Category Archives: Deception

Court of Appeal dismisses challenge to citizenship deprivation by dishonest Albanian who told “a lie on every page”  

Onuzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1337 (21 October 2025) This appeal turned on the question of the circumstances in which a naturalised British citizen may be deprived of his citizenship on the ground … Continue reading →

Posted in Albania, Asylum, British Citizenship, Court of Appeal, Deception, Deprivation of Citizenship, Dishonesty, False Statements and Misrepresentations, ILR, Kosovo, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal: Ciceri and Chimi should not be followed

Chaudhry v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 16 (17 January 2025) In this case, the Court of Appeal imparted guidance on the approach to be adopted on an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal from a … Continue reading →

Posted in British Citizenship, British Nationality Act 1981, Court of Appeal, Deception, Deprivation of Citizenship, Dishonesty, Human Rights Act, Naturalisation, UKSC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal: Deprivation decision judged consistent with Nationality Instructions on practising deceit

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Daci [2025] EWCA Civ 18 (17 January 2025) In this case, Underhill, Dingemans and Edis LJJ held that the Upper Tribunal had erred in finding that the appellant SSHD’s decision to deprive … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 8, British Citizenship, Court of Appeal, Deception, Deprivation of Citizenship, ECHR, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Nationality, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

False representations made in pending application don’t ‘simply disappear’ by varying it to an ILR application

Al-Azad v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWCA Civ 407 (25 April 2024) The Court of Appeal has rejected the argument that the SSHD should not have refused Mr MN Wohhab Al-Azad’s application for indefinite leave to … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Bangladesh, Court of Appeal, Deception, Entrepreneurs, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, Long Residence, Paragraph 322(5), Proportionality, Section 3C Leave, Tier 1, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal quashes Upper Tribunal’s article 8 decision in deception case

Kaur v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 1353 (17 November 2023) In this case, the Court of Appeal remitted to the Upper Tribunal an Indian national’s claim based on the right to respect for family … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Deception, ECHR, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, India, Judges, Proportionality, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Winning for JO: An Afghani ADR case 

Obtaining entry clearance for an Adult Dependant Relative (ADR) is a difficult task these days. The rules are stringent and applications are routinely refused and appeals take ages to get heard. But in credible cases it is possible to secure … Continue reading →

Posted in ADR, Afghanistan, Appendix FM, Article 8, Court of Appeal, Deception, ECHR, ECOs, Immigration Rules, Pakistan, Proportionality, Public Interest, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

UK government’s inaction allows fraudulent Albanian to keep British citizenship

Laci (Albania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 769 (20 May 2021) In these proceedings, the Court of Appeal held that the FTT had not erred in finding that there were exceptional circumstances to justify … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Asylum, Citizenship and Nationality, Court of Appeal, Deception, Deprivation of Citizenship, False Statements, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Home Office sticks to its guns on paragraph 322(5)

In Balajigari [2019] EWCA Civ 673 (discussed here), the Court of Appeal held that the use of paragraph 322(5) of the Immigration Rules in the cases of highly skilled Tier 1 (General) migrants (T1GMs) was “legally flawed” because SSHD decision-makers … Continue reading →

Posted in Appendix FM, Appendix V, Court of Appeal, Deception, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Paragraph 322(5), PBS, Settlement, Tier 1 | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal takes a strict stance on adducing new evidence to the Upper Tribunal

Kabir v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 1162 (09 July 2019) On the topic of fresh evidence (in the context of deception, false documents, bank statements) the Court of Appeal has held that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Bangladesh, Bank Accounts, Banks, Court of Appeal, Deception, Entrepreneurs, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, PBS, Tier 1 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seven Year Rule: Child-Centred Decision By Supreme Court

KO (Nigeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2018] UKSC 53 (24 October 2018) The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed these appeals. But thankfully Lord Carnwath’s meticulous judgment clarified wide-ranging misconceptions in the courts below regarding … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Children, Court of Appeal, Deception, ECHR, Families, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Public Interest, Removals, s 55 BCIA, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Deceptive Criminal from Sierra Leone Triumphs on Citizens’ Directive in Court of Appeal

R (Decker) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1752 (03 November 2017) These judicial review proceedings relate to the refusal of a residence card and the right approach to the validity of deportation … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Asylum, Citizens Directive, Deception, Deportation, Detention, Entry Clearance, European Union, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Judicial Review, OFMs, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment