INSTRUCT ME
-
UKVI News and Updates- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: students
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: workers
- Guidance: Single protection interview: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: Information booklet for asylum applications
- Prove your English language abilities with a secure English language test (SELT)
- Guidance: Pakistan: country policy and information notes
- Migration transparency data
- Form: Information for your immigration bail reporting appointment
- Guidance: Document checks and charges for carriers
- Guidance: Sponsor a seasonal worker
- Global Corporate Law
- Key Features of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- What is the test for a ‘one man company’?
- LIBOR: The Final Nail in the Coffin?
- Banking and Misconduct: A Critique of the Cure of Culture
- Court of Appeal Opens the Door to LIBOR and Benchmark Misrepresentation Claims
- Habib Bank Expelled From New York
- Supreme Court: Equity’s Darling and Guidance on Enforceability of Trusts where the Institution is Unknown
- Conduct Costs on the Rise (2012-2016): No End in Sight
- Supreme Court Clarifies the Law on Security and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards
- FSMA and Third Party Rights: Victory for FCA in Supreme Court
- Immigration News
- Shabana Mahmood hints she could water down controversial care worker visa plans
- Shabana Mahmood says Labour party wants to create ‘fairness in our immigration system’ – UK politics live
- Three people dead, including a child, in attempt to cross Channel to UK
- UK to open new refugee resettlement routes for Afghan women and Palestinians
- Facing up to the threat that Reform poses to our democracy | Letters
- UK politics live: Pat McFadden tells Labour activists they should not defend benefits system ‘status quo’ because it ‘writes off’ claimants
- ‘We’ve done everything by the book’: EU citizens left in limbo after UK government strips post-Brexit residency status
- Angela Rayner stands by attack on care worker visa reforms ahead of Labour conference
- Ukrainians in UK fear homelessness over host scheme funding cuts
- Londoners get £3bn a year subsidy because structure of council tax biased against north, says thinktank – UK politics live
-
-
Category Archives: Rwanda
Upper Tribunal refuses costs because proceedings only existed “in the realm of politics and not in the realm of law”
IX, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Judicial Review; costs) [2025] UKUT 154 (IAC) (23 April 2025) The Upper Tribunal (Swift J, UTJ Smith) has reiterated that the general rule (Civil procedure Rules … Continue reading
Posted in Asylum, Costs, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, MEDP, Refugee Convention, Removals, Rwanda
Tagged Asylum, Case Law, CPR, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Tribunals
Leave a comment
Obligation of civil servants under the Civil Service Code not breached by defunct ministerial Rwanda removal decisions
FDA, R (On the Application Of) v Minister for the Cabinet Office & Anor [2024] EWHC 1729 (Admin) (05 July 2024) Rwanda removals were the Conservative party’s vanity project which cost the UK taxpayer £700 million. Everything was wrong with … Continue reading
Posted in Africa, Asylum, Civil Service Code, ECHR, High Court, International Law, Judicial Review, Politics, Refugee Convention, Rwanda
Tagged Asylum, Civil Servants, ECHR, FDA, Rule 34, Rwanda, Rwanda Policy
Leave a comment
Rwanda removals
Last November in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v SSHD [2023] UKSC 42 the Supreme Court held that the government’s Rwanda policy is unlawful and unanimously dismissed the SSHD’s appeal. The new policy aimed to “stop the boats” and the SSHD … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice, Article 3, Article 8, Asylum, Refugee Convention, Removals, Rwanda, UKSC
Tagged Asylum, Case Law, ECHR, Rwanda Policy, UK Supreme Court
Leave a comment
SSHD’s Rwanda policy appeal dismissed by Supreme Court
R (on the application of AAA (Syria) & Ors) v SSHD [2023] UKSC 42 (15 November 2023) In this judgment, unanimously dismissing the SSHD’s appeal, the Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the Rwanda policy is … Continue reading
Policy of removing asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawful
AAA v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rwanda) [2022] EWHC 3230 (Admin) (19 December 2022) The High Court has held that the SSHD’s policy of removing asylum seekers to Rwanda to have their asylum claims determined there rather … Continue reading
Posted in Africa, Article 3, Asylum, ECHR, Immigration Rules, Israel, Judicial Review, MEDP, Parliament, Refugee Convention, Removals, Rwanda
Tagged Asylum, ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, MEDP, Rwanda, UK Supreme Court, UNHCR
Leave a comment
