Just over a month ago I linked to the Statement of Solidarity with Palestine that I had written. Since then, 139 people have signed it. Far more than I had thought would ever come across it. I'm grateful to all the signatories. And since almost everyone is a stranger I don't know, I thought I should provide some kind of update as to what I intend to do with the statement.
Not much, really.
I will keep the form to sign the statement open for the foreseeable future--as long as Israel is bombing children, I imagine it serves a purpose of just being a space to register protest.
I do not plan to link it to the OTW, though anyone else is welcome to do so. The statement denounces and repudiates the OTW, which is not a demand for anything concrete that the OTW could do, and the OTW doesn't give a shit about what fans say unless either
a) Important People in their specific sphere of reference call them out (Henry Jenkins, Courtney Milan, these are the kinds of levers that have produced public-facing responses)
b) The Important volunteers face a magnitude of sustained discomfort (pasting entire novels in tags absolutely worked to change the tag limits)
c) OTW members and volunteers who gain social and professional capital from their participation in the org (like Francesca Coppa, Rebecca Tushnet, Mel Stanfill, etc) receive criticism for their support of it
I will note that the OTW Board has chosen to explicitly lie to its constituants - in response to a Zionist commenter demanding protection from comments containing what they framed as 'terrorist phrases', OTW Board Member Kathryn Soderholm said:
(This is the Board member who previously said, according to leaked screenshots from an internal OTW slack channel, that anyone using the phrase From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free "is at least implying 'all of that [land] belongs to our side, kick out the other guys'.")
An organisation that tells its users to contact their elected representatives, and comments on international legistation, is clearly capable of political activity.
As a US incorporated 501(c)(3) organisation, the only restriction on political activity that the Internal Revenue Service demands in order for it to keep its tax-exempt status is that it "cannot âparticipate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements) any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.â.
A 501(c)(3) organisation CAN take positions on public policy issues as long as it does not reference a specific political candidate.
A public statement denouncing a genocide is not a banned political activity.
A public statement supporting fans threatened with a genocide is not a banned political activity.
A public statement denouncing the military support of a genocide by the nation the organisation is a legal entity of is not a banned political activity.
A public statement stating the values an organisation wishes to govern itself by and hold its volunteers to is not a banned political activity.
(Of course, the crack legal committee that lied about how they "did not ignore [Denise's] advice in 2022" can certainly not be trusted to give the OTW Board accurate legal advice, but it is debatable as to whether Board Member Kathryn Soderholm made her statement with any legal opinion informing it.)
The OTW has now unilaterally enforced a comment moderation policy on its newsposts stating: "We encourage comments responding to our post content. Off-topic comments will be hidden by the moderators". They have chosen to enforce this sweeping comment policy in response to users posting comments like "Free Palestine" in their News Posts. I have chat transcripts dating to 2020 where Board Members and Chairs have stated their commitment to wanting as light-handed a comment moderation policy as possible; including permitting statements like "racism is imaginary" as long as those comments were not directed at a specific user. So the choice to react with this measure of extreme restriction to this specific kind of off-topic comment is telling of the way in which the OTW will always, ultimately, appropriate the tools and theories of marginalised resistance to oppression, to uphold its committment to protecting white fragility.
And because the OTW does not deserve any further attention beyond enduring contempt of it, here are some links with resources about Palestine and the ongoing genocide, that are posted by fanworkers. The kind of fanworkers whose physical safety or mental comfort is dismissed by the complicit silence of the larger Global North white fanworker 'community'.
fairuzfan: Palestine resources Masterpost
palipunk: Palestine Masterlist"
apollos-olives: Posts tagged 'Palestine'
ibtisams: Posts tagged 'Palestine'
el-shab-hussein: Posts tagged 'Palestine'
tamarrud: Posts tagged 'text: Palestine'
90-ghost: Posts tagged 'Gaza'
sar-soor: Posts tagged Ųب쨷ŲŲ
irhabiya: Posts tagged 'Palestine'
fallahifag
bloglikeanegyptian
feluka: Posts tagged 'Palestine'
Not much, really.
I will keep the form to sign the statement open for the foreseeable future--as long as Israel is bombing children, I imagine it serves a purpose of just being a space to register protest.
I do not plan to link it to the OTW, though anyone else is welcome to do so. The statement denounces and repudiates the OTW, which is not a demand for anything concrete that the OTW could do, and the OTW doesn't give a shit about what fans say unless either
a) Important People in their specific sphere of reference call them out (Henry Jenkins, Courtney Milan, these are the kinds of levers that have produced public-facing responses)
b) The Important volunteers face a magnitude of sustained discomfort (pasting entire novels in tags absolutely worked to change the tag limits)
c) OTW members and volunteers who gain social and professional capital from their participation in the org (like Francesca Coppa, Rebecca Tushnet, Mel Stanfill, etc) receive criticism for their support of it
I will note that the OTW Board has chosen to explicitly lie to its constituants - in response to a Zionist commenter demanding protection from comments containing what they framed as 'terrorist phrases', OTW Board Member Kathryn Soderholm said:
While we want to protect our users and volunteers from harassment, as a U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit, it is critical for the OTW to refrain from making public statements on political matters beyond our purview, as this could put our tax-exempt nonprofit status at risk. Therefore, the OTW will not comment on the merits of different perspectives in this conflict or otherwise get involved in global political issues not related to fandom.
(This is the Board member who previously said, according to leaked screenshots from an internal OTW slack channel, that anyone using the phrase From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free "is at least implying 'all of that [land] belongs to our side, kick out the other guys'.")
An organisation that tells its users to contact their elected representatives, and comments on international legistation, is clearly capable of political activity.
As a US incorporated 501(c)(3) organisation, the only restriction on political activity that the Internal Revenue Service demands in order for it to keep its tax-exempt status is that it "cannot âparticipate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements) any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.â.
A 501(c)(3) organisation CAN take positions on public policy issues as long as it does not reference a specific political candidate.
A public statement denouncing a genocide is not a banned political activity.
A public statement supporting fans threatened with a genocide is not a banned political activity.
A public statement denouncing the military support of a genocide by the nation the organisation is a legal entity of is not a banned political activity.
A public statement stating the values an organisation wishes to govern itself by and hold its volunteers to is not a banned political activity.
(Of course, the crack legal committee that lied about how they "did not ignore [Denise's] advice in 2022" can certainly not be trusted to give the OTW Board accurate legal advice, but it is debatable as to whether Board Member Kathryn Soderholm made her statement with any legal opinion informing it.)
The OTW has now unilaterally enforced a comment moderation policy on its newsposts stating: "We encourage comments responding to our post content. Off-topic comments will be hidden by the moderators". They have chosen to enforce this sweeping comment policy in response to users posting comments like "Free Palestine" in their News Posts. I have chat transcripts dating to 2020 where Board Members and Chairs have stated their commitment to wanting as light-handed a comment moderation policy as possible; including permitting statements like "racism is imaginary" as long as those comments were not directed at a specific user. So the choice to react with this measure of extreme restriction to this specific kind of off-topic comment is telling of the way in which the OTW will always, ultimately, appropriate the tools and theories of marginalised resistance to oppression, to uphold its committment to protecting white fragility.
And because the OTW does not deserve any further attention beyond enduring contempt of it, here are some links with resources about Palestine and the ongoing genocide, that are posted by fanworkers. The kind of fanworkers whose physical safety or mental comfort is dismissed by the complicit silence of the larger Global North white fanworker 'community'.
Tags: