User talk:CNMall41

Baltimore Consolidated Ry. Co. Draft Denial

Hello,

You denied my draft page yesterday, citing poor sources. I understand the issue, but could you help me out and highlight specifically which sources are most problematic?

Many thanks,

questorio. Questorio (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

@Questorio:, I may not be the best person to ask as it was originally declined by DoubleGrazing for the sourcing. I declined as you only changed one of the sources. My comment did ask you to review WP:CORPDEPTH and list the WP:THREE sources you feel meet that criteria. If you are able to do so I will take a look and re-evaluate the decline. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

@Questorio: I declined your draft for lack of evidence of notability. Per the WP:NCORP notability guideline, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple (3+) secondary sources that are reliable and independent. At the time of reviewing, the draft cited five sources, at least two of which were not secondary, and one provided only a single passing mention. Even the remaining two sources were solid (which is difficult to ascertain, as they are offline), they wouldn't be quite enough to satisfy NCORP. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:35, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for making my draft List of people from Sioux Falls an article. MisterE727 (talk) 20:42, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for creating it. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:05, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

Why you to revert TeleRadyo Serbisyo Balita into draft in Wikipedia article, this is your last change and final time. ~2026-48646-39 (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Naveen Tewari

Do you think Naveen S Tewari is notable? I saw that you deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Sachchidanand Tewari. ~2026-48838-27 (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Its the same subject, but IP messages on heavily edits UPE topics gives me the impression that there is motivation beyond making the encyclopedia a better place. You are welcome to nominate the page for deletion on your own if you wish. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:40, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Moelis & Company updates

Hi CNMall41, thank you for your help on the Moelis & Company article. I took a little break from editing, so I was only able to implement your approved changes now, but I think they really improve the article. There were a couple other small things like employee count and the number of offices that I noticed needed updating, and I would be grateful if you could take a look at my request here: Talk:Moelis & Company#Offices and employee count updates. I am happy to implement the changes with approval again. Thanks so much MLiberty30 (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

I left a comment on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

User:Robwakeman/sandbox

This was not meant to be submitted for review. Please leave as is until it's completed. Robwakeman (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

@Robwakeman you submitted it again for review but since you state you did not mean for it to be submitted, I will withdraw it for you . S0091 (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Robwakeman (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Reconsideration of Draft:Richard Hughes IV

Hello @CNMall41,

Following your May 1 review, I have expanded the draft’s sourcing and would appreciate reconsideration of the notability assessment.

In addition to the previously cited GW Hatchet reporting, the revision includes:

• Nell Smith’s “State too slow to vaccinate children for HPV, some say,” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, February 17, 2007, pages 1B and 7B. It discusses his advocacy on the Arkansas State Board of Health concerning HPV vaccination requirements and health officials’ response.
• The Washington Blade’s July 10, 2023 report, “Lawsuit against Affordable Care Act targets PrEP.” It identifies his role as lead attorney for 25 organizations’ amicus filing and discusses the argument.
• The GW Hatchet’s January 12 and March 19, 2026 reports specifically address his role in the vaccine policy litigation.

Would you assess whether this combined coverage of his legal and policy work addresses the earlier concern about sources that merely quote or mention him?

The earlier AfC notices and reviewer comments were also removed when I replaced the page text. Could you help restore those and advise on the next step toward resubmission?

Thank you very much. Philphilson4 (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

@Philphilson4:, I restored the comments on the draft. I will take some time to review a little bit later. In the meantime, do you have any connection to the subject? Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much @CNMall41. I appreciate the restoration and review. And thanks for flagging the policies. My only connection to the subject is as a distant professional acquaintance and follower of his career in vaccine policy. I can confirm that I have received no compensation for this contribution. I welcome an assessment of whether the sources establish notability. Philphilson4 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you but that does not address the COI to be fair. After reading the COI and PAID guidelines, does anything in there apply to you? --CNMall41 (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Got it and apologies - yes, confirming that nothing in the COI or PAID guidelines applies to me. Philphilson4 (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Looking closer, I still do not feel he meets notability. While he appears to do a lot of work in his field, he would not meet WP:NACADEMIC so he would need to meet WP:GNG. Sources do not talk about him in-depth so that would fall short. As far as the draft, there are issues that would need addressed assuming he did meet notability guidelines. For instance, having a list of all his commentary would be promotional. You are welcome to ask SafariScribe who was the other reviewer on the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:De Beers on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 00:31, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

August 2026 AfC backlog drive award

		Brownie
		This is awarded to CNMall41 for accumulating more than 21.5 points during the August 2026 AfC backlog drive. Thank you for sharing your time, knowledge and dedication; together, we reviewed over 12,700 drafts during the drive and brought the 3+ month backlog down to just a single week, which we couldn't have done it without you. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for your opinion on Sacnilk reassessment

Hi CNMall41, as you’re involved in Indian cinema/box-office-related editing, you may be familiar with some of the sourcing issues around these figures.

It took me quite a lot of time to gather the information and put together this reassessment of Sacnilk.com. Your opinion would be really, really helpful, so I’d appreciate it if you could take a look when you get a chance: Reassessment of Sacnilk.com.

Thanks! Tonyy Starkk (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Request to review Polsinelli lack of sources

Hello @CNMall41, I was wondering if you could review the tag of no sources on this page. I have recently added a lot of citations and cleaned up the copy. Let me know what you think.

Thanks for your time Ggevaart1 (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

@Ggevaart1:, I would recommend undoing your edits and going to the talk page per WP:COI. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

AfC resubmission note

I have revised the draft in response to the previous review.

The article now includes additional independent secondary sources providing substantial coverage of QuickNode itself, including Forbes, Fortune, Business Insider, and the Miami Herald. These sources discuss the company's business model, blockchain infrastructure, marketplace, major applications, customers, growth, and development over multiple years.

I have also streamlined the article to remove unsupported or promotional claims and reduced reliance on primary company sources. Matosyan Marta (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

It does not seem as if you are listening to the advice given by editors. Please slow down, read the guidelines in the links provided, and only then make an attempt at rewriting. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1973 establishments in Algeria

A tag has been placed on Category:1973 establishments in Algeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)