User talk:WXchaser

This user has alternative accounts named

Elliott Crowell, Julie Crowell, Minecraft11226.

Question from Kankunda mariam on Instituto Cultural Tampico (12:49, 14 September 2026)

Hello can i see public --Kankunda mariam (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello Kankunda mariam! I'm not sure how to answer. can you make it clearer on what you want to ask? thanks. WXchaser (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Ainigushenzouanxiang on Spotted eagle ray (08:28, 15 September 2026)

Note: Ainigushenzouanxiang's mentor Matrix is away.

Hello! I can't find any information that is out of date. The tag was posted in June 2013, and I'm not sure if anybody had fixed it. If you do find any out-of-date information, please inform me about it. Thank you! --Ainigushenzouanxiang (talk) 08:28, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Ainigushenzouanxiang on List of mammals of Brazil (08:46, 15 September 2026)

Note: Ainigushenzouanxiang's mentor Matrix is away.

Hello! I can't find any out-of-date, unsourced, or unreliably sourced information. The tags were both posted last year, and I'm not sure if anyone fixed those problems since then. Also, it's very hard to find those kinds of problems in a list like this that contains a lot of items. Please inform me about them if you do find any unfixed problem. Thank you so much! --Ainigushenzouanxiang (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't know what is or is not up to date, but it's a long article with relatively few sources and there's still a large amount of content with no citations at all. However, you aren't obligated to complete any of these tasks if you don't understand what the problem is or how to address it. Newcomer tasks are entirely optional and you can skip any that you'd like. They're also poorly designed, so there definitely are some cases where it might suggest something that doesn't actually need to be fixed. If everything looks fine to you don't worry about it. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 10:28, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1913 Omaha, Nebraska tornado has been accepted

1913 Omaha, Nebraska tornado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

thanks! WXchaser (talk) 19:41, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Róż when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:00, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I am not in "trouble" correct? WXchaser (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

That really isn't how wikipedia works, but no. This is just a heads up that made a mistake. Use it as a learning opportunity! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:09, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Adams Island (Nunavut) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:47, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Heyo. Regarding your recent edits to CONAGUA when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

2007 Enterprise, Alabama tornado

Hello, I've moved this article to the draft namespace as the article did not have enough independent sources to establish notability as a weather event with a standalone page. The article is now located at Draft:2007 Enterprise, Alabama tornado. You are encouraged to work on the article here, and when you decide it's ready, you can move it back to mainspace at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Happy editing! Departure– (talk) 01:56, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Bergdi (01:52, 17 September 2026)

Note: Bergdi's mentor Scaledish is away.

Hi WXchaser, how are you? I'm your temporarily assigned newbie:) sorry for bothering you but a small issue occurred and I thought maybe you could help. I've been trying to login from my laptop(I'm logged in on my android phone wiki-app at the moment) but forgot my password and when I try to click on Forget my login details button it says my ip address is blocked to prevent false edits-or something in that line. Now I haven't been even trying to edit an article and so far didn't make any information-wise contribution. I'm trying to find a solution on the help page of Wikipedia specifically for this situation where it sends you to open another temporary account to be able to discuss this issue with the whomever is at charge but I don't even know why is this happening. I haven't even written anything ok Wikipedia or even interacted with anyone the only time I did was when I made a donation. I'd appreciate if you could please shed some light on this issue. Kind regards:) --Bergdi (talk) 01:52, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

You'll want to read the page at Wikipedia:Autoblock and follow the instructions there. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 02:47, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

(Editing from a temporary account to circumvent blocks is called WP:LOUTSOCKing, and will not work with IP blocks in any case. Please follow the approved procedures for an admin to review the block.) ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 02:49, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

@ChompyTheGogoat, I had the same issue. I think it was because I had removed my email so I couldn't get a recovery code. WXchaser (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Autoblocks shouldn't have anything to do with that AFAIK. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 16:51, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from KolawoleHilary (16:38, 18 September 2026)

Please how may I do my verification on TikTok ?? --KolawoleHilary (talk) 16:38, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Please keep questions related to Wikipedia WXchaser (^{Say what?}) 18:44, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Odongo nelson on Number of the beast (20:26, 20 September 2026)

musician --Odongo nelson (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello, @Odongo nelson! Do you have a Wikipedia related question? guninvalid (talk) 00:38, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Floretion (September 23)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

For directly citing the information of who conjectured this concept we shouldn't use a userpage on another wiki but another secondary source or even the person's own website if available, we're more likely to ensure the information we're getting is true. Also reference 3 seems self-published.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Floretion to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why'd you decline my draft? (talk, contribs)🔥 13:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Enterprise-al-ef4-rare-photos-2007-v0-04k86ptp27xd1.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enterprise-al-ef4-rare-photos-2007-v0-04k86ptp27xd1.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from YunYuY on Wikipedia:Text of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (11:37, 25 September 2026)

g --YunYuY (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

? guninvalid (talk) 09:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from KolawoleHilary (09:43, 26 September 2026)

How can I copy my Wikipedia link ? --KolawoleHilary (talk) 09:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

The link to your user is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KolawoleHilary. Does that help? (talk page stalker) guninvalid (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Christopheryoung5809 (01:47, 27 September 2026)

Hi WXchaser,

I noticed that you are my assigned mentor and wondered whether you might be willing to offer some general feedback on my revised draft, [Roy Herbert Dobell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roy_Herbert_Dobell), which I resubmitted on September 18th after an earlier decline over notability. I have revised the draft with WP:CREATIVE in mind, following the original reviewer’s confirmation that it was an appropriate guideline to consider.

Dobell is my great-grandfather, and I have disclosed that connection on the draft’s talk page. I would particularly appreciate your perspective on whether the revised draft and its sources address the earlier concern.

There is no urgency or expectation of a full review; any guidance you could offer when convenient would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks, Christopher --Christopheryoung5809 (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Question from Redsopod (20:58, 27 September 2026)

I have just done a 'major' rewrite and edit of the page The Seventh Bullet. Would you mind checking if I have done a good job or have unwittingly broken a core rule? Also can I have the article go up from stub to start?

Thanks- Redsopod. --Redsopod (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

"Add sources later" really isn't how things work around here. You need to have the sources before you start writing, and you can only include what they say. Any unsourced (or poorly sourced) content may be removed at any time. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 22:40, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

We also can't use YouTube as a source in most cases, nor primary sources (the movie itself). ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 22:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

This is really helpful, thank you! Redsopod (talk) 16:03, 28 September 2026 (UTC)