Day two of the 'not quite a conference' is done. Morning session (double length) of beginner's python went well; I did a lot of 'and what does this look like if I try and break it' (mostly successful) and 'does it work like R if I do this' (about 50% of the time)
Afternoon sessions on Qualitrics and Bioinformatics. The former has given me Ideas that I don't have a project to attach them to; the latter at least gave me a better understanding of conda, and I discovered the existence of mamba, which is apparently like conda, but faster. Please don't ask what they are, because I just barely understand how to use them in some very specific situations, let alone what they classify as. Conclusion: I don't want to go any closer to bioinformatics, but I'm going to join a thingy anyway.
Yesterday was a bit less full on. Intro session had a significant amount of time allocated to tech support (can we all get on wifi? well, no. I'm one of the very small number who can't, and it is probably because my security settings are on 'paranoid'), and general hanging around. Second morning session was on privacy, security, and ethics -- if I remember I'll type that one up, but probably on the other blog. I was somewhat surprised at the naïveté of the presenter about how helpful IT (department? some other word) should be in terms of providing secure environments (me: hah. we have been waiting a year to get IS to give us an solution on that one).
After lunch was Cloudstor, which I knew nothing about before hand, and now have a cursory knowledge of. Not useable knowledge, because I'm in government, and it is aarnet (mostly universities). But there were three options, co-worker was going to one, and the third was not useful to either of us, so I don't mind that I went. And I got talking with a psych PhD student, and possibly info dumped some really useful info at them. Not the only time across the two days that my psych knowledge has been valuable.
Yesterday afternoon finished up with a 'poster' session -- posters were just very simple 'what is my research, what is my research toolbox, what am I looking to learn, plus some pretty images related to my research or my toolbox', meant to be thrown together in under an hour. I'm pretty pleased with how mine turned out. Got chatting with a few people, only got small-towned once that I remember (co-worker from last job is PhD student in same lab as the person I was talking to; lab PI is someone I'm a co-author with, but don't think I've ever met them).
Got talking with someone lamenting the lack of actual statisticians out there -- they have three 'bioinformatics' people with not enough stats knowledge. I did not give in to temptation to say 'send me the next job advert', but am going to go sticky beak at the organisation and see whether I would want to work there.