fred_mouse: pencil drawing of mouse sitting on its butt reading a large blue book (book)
Not so much a review as a dot point list of reactions
  • Unreliable narrator is unrealible
  • Frustratingly telegraphed twist, I was kind of thinking in the right direction*, but missing some key ideas
  • science fiction with psychologists. I approve. Particularly at the harder, mathy end of psych.
  • supposed to be a tear jerker. Other than one scene in which the protagonist farewells someone, I didn't get that depth of emotion
  • I suspect this is because I already know a lot about vivisection. And what animal labs were like in the 90s (I did my first honours project in a locked lab. Which had helpful notices about what to do in the case of bomb threats, or other activities potentially dangerous for scientists or lab animals)
  • I think I was supposed to have more sympathy for the protagonist's slightly off-kilter interactions with other humans, and her desire to keep her family secret(s). Or have the voyeuristic othering 'there but for the grace' kind of reaction to her. But hey, psychologist parent, weird home life, missing siblings, significant loss of family at at five, slightly off-kilter interactions with other humans. Hard to other someone who feels a lot like me.
  • I kind of understand the narrative motivation that led to the ending. But it fizzled for me.
  • The fizzled ending, and the fact that I had to reread the first forty-odd pages again because I had absolutely no idea what I'd read a few days previously, means that I don't rate the book as highly as many people have.

Worth a read. Fiction about science, and families, and the stories we tell ourselves. 4/5



spoiler-ish footnote )
fred_mouse: Wooden mouse shape with leather ears and dots for eyes, wrapped in a piece of green blanket (blanket)
In reading Abraham Merritt's The Moon Pool I have come across reference to coronium and nebulium as possibly being the elements that are causing one or more of the seemingly supernatural events that have occurred. I had not previously been aware of either of these elements, and I wondered what kind of scientific veracity there might be. So, to wikipedia, which tells me that coronium (a.k.a/ newtonium) was identified as a possible element from looking at the coronal spectrum of the sun during a total solar eclipse in 1869, while nebulium was identified as a possible element from the spectrum of the Cat's Eye Nebula in 1864.

In both cases, it turned out that the unusual/unexpected lines on the frequency spectrum* were nothing particularly new. Coronium was identified as a highly ionised iron (Fe13+) in the 1930s, while nebulium was identified as 'doubly ionised oxygen at extremely low density'(1) in the 1920s.

Thus, at the publication of The Moon Pool in 1919, these must have seemed pretty safe bets for unidentifiable elements, given that their theoretical existence had been shown, but no evidence of them yet seen.


* I suspect there is a proper term that I'm not using here, but both spectrograph and spectrogram appear to refer to things other than that which I am attempting to discuss.
(1) the linked wikipedia article credits this to Bowen, I. S. (1927). "The Origin of the Nebulium Spectrum". Nature. 120 (3022): 473. Bibcode:1927Natur.120..473B. doi:10.1038/120473a0

Profile

fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)
fred_mouse

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   12 34
5 67891011
121314151617 18
1920212223 24 25
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags