Legal

Karnataka High Court ruled the arrest of 3 Gameskraft directors in a PMLA case illegal, stressing that the arrests must be based on fresh material and necessity.

The consumer body found that despite making full preparations for the 2012 Hajj pilgrimage, the travel company allegedly told the complainant at the last moment that his visa had not been issued.

The allegation of complainant was that he purchased membership for 10 years holiday from Country Club India, but when he requested to avail services for around five complimentary holiday weeks, company failed to provide hotels.

The Haryana consumer body was hearing a complaint filed by a 27-year-old shopper who purchased a pair of Red Tape shoes in 2023 and was separately charged Rs 10 for a carry bag.

The messaging app has challenged the interim blocking order, stating that it is violative of Article 14.

The bench also said “the learned judges be advised not to recuse in the matter irrespective of the situations that may be created by anyone”.

The Kolkata consumer commission held Hero Electric liable for failing to replace a defective battery under warranty, directing battery replacement and awarding Rs 10,000 compensation plus Rs 10,000 litigation costs.

The Timothy Initiative routed foreign funds to India using US bank debit cards, withdrawing cash through ATMs across Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, and Assam, in violation of the FEMA and the FCRA, according to the Enforcement Directorate

The complainant stated that he paid an advance of Rs 59,000 through cheque, which was encashed by the venue operators.

The Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed a plea from a woman who complained that a restaurant refused to let her mother-in-law eat home-cooked food on its premises.

The consumer body was hearing a complaint filed by a man and his family against MakeMyTrip India Private Limited and Go Airlines (India) Limited, popularly known as Go First.

The consumer body was hearing the complaint filed by a man who lost his wife in 2020 and was facing issues in getting the insurance amount despite having a family policy. 

The Kangra Consumer Court refund order grants relief to a homeowner after a contractor allegedly abandoned tile-laying work and left defective construction.

The consumer commission in Chandigarh said the policyholder, who was trying to surrender the policy, cannot be made to suffer for the insurer’s administrative negligence.

The Karnataka High Court rejected the appellant’s explanations for the three-month delay in filing the police complaint and the mismatch in the alleged accident's location.

The consumer body directed Karur Vysya Bank to pay compensation exceeding Rs 3 lakh, besides refunding the disputed amount and Rs 7,500 towards mental agony and litigation expenses.

The HDFC Bank had frozen the money after the senior citizen complained that he was duped of Rs 2 lakh by scammers who posed as police officers and claimed that his son was in their

According to the complaint, the man had booked a room at Yatari Palace, a hotel listed on OYO’s platform, for a stay between January 17 and 18, 2023.

Sansui stated that the TV was purchased by the complainant from Nandilath G Mart after properly inspecting the product.

A Kerala Water Authority bill dispute has ended with the consumer commission setting aside a Rs 79,808 demand and directing compensation and meter replacement.

Pavel Durov, founder of ​Telegram, has said that by temporarily banning Telegram, Indian authorities have “punished” over ⁠150 million ordinary ​users in India.

The complainant alleged that the bank froze Rs 9,000 in his account in September 2025 without prior notice or explanation.

The consumer commission was hearing a complaint filed by Raxaul resident, against Nissan Motor India and others over alleged failure to honour warranty commitments and repair his vehicle.

The Kolkata consumer commission ordered Godrej to refund Rs 55,718, along with compensation and costs, to a senior citizen, ruling that the almirah had a manufacturing defect, despite the company's design claims.

The consumer body observed that despite receiving five opportunities to lead evidence, the airline failed to do so. Consequently, its evidence was closed by an order dated April 8, 2026.