Events on the Day of Filing the Answer

Introduction

On May 9, 2025, I posted an article titled "Facing an Eviction Lawsuit in Court – 2nd Edition."

In that article, I provided a more detailed account of the content from the initial post, "Facing an Eviction Lawsuit in Court," and reported the events leading up to the first oral argument in the appeal trial scheduled for June 18 next month.

This eviction lawsuit is closely related to the incidents I have been reporting as "unimaginable human rights violations."

From the filing of the answer to the interactions in the Record Viewing Room of the Tokyo High Court, several suspicious incidents occurred within the court premises as well.

I understand that incidents occurring inside the courtroom are difficult to substantiate with objective evidence due to the closed environment.

Moreover, posting such suspicious incidents on SNS may potentially worsen the court's impression of me.
Nevertheless, I have decided to document these incidents.

Today, I will record what happened when I visited the Tokyo District Court on Thursday, October 17, 2024, to file the answer.

Thursday, October 17, 2024 (Day of Filing the Answer)

At the Tokyo District Court 1st Floor

I visited the Tokyo District Court to file the answer.
General visitors are required to hand over their belongings to security officers, have them scanned through the X-ray baggage inspection machine, and pass through the metal detector gate simultaneously.

At the main building of the Tokyo District Court, the civil divisions are numbered from Civil Division 1 to Civil Division 51.

To find out which floor the clerk’s office of the assigned division was located, I wandered around the first floor for a while.
I noticed a table where it seemed one could look up information, but it was crowded with people who appeared suspicious, operating computers.

In the end, I asked the information desk for guidance and confirmed the location.

At the Assigned Civil Division

After going up to the assigned floor, I saw a sign at the entrance indicating that the assigned division was to the "left" after entering.

However, when I followed the instructions and proceeded to the left, it turned out to be a different civil division.

When I asked a female staff member nearby, she informed me that the assigned division was actually on the right side.

Upon arriving in front of the assigned division, a young female staff member stood up and approached me.

I handed over the "Notice of the First Oral Argument Date and the Order to Submit the Answer," which was placed in a clear file folder.
This was to confirm that I was the defendant and to have her refer to the case number.

Inside the back cover of the clear file folder, I had inserted a spare answer document with the statement, "I will submit my rebuttal later. I will not attend the first oral argument," in case the answer was not accepted.

The female staff member confirmed the case number and other details and responded, "Yes, I've received it."

Therefore, I took back the clear file folder, removed the spare answer document, and then handed over the "Notice and Order to Submit the Answer" again.

Next, I placed three copies of the answer on the counter and said, "I brought the answer documents."
However, the female staff member simply said, "Yes," and did not move.

Then, a different female staff member sitting next to her said, "Since he took the time to bring it, why don't you take a look?"

Following her prompting, a male clerk sitting opposite the first female staff member stood up and said, "I am in charge," and took the answer documents, saying, "Two copies will suffice."

I had heard that in some cases, answers may not be accepted if the defendant is unrepresented by a lawyer, so I mentioned this to the clerk.

The clerk then started checking the answer documents on the spot.

One of the evidence documents was stapled on the right side, so I used the stapler I had brought to re-staple it on the left side.

Ultimately, the answer documents were successfully accepted.

While I was inside the court, the tinnitus attack continued, and especially during the verification of the answer, I felt intense heat.
A drop of sweat formed on my forehead, but it did not run down.
I remember wiping that sweat with a handkerchief as I was leaving the clerk's office.

After Filing the Answer – Until Leaving the Court

On the way back, in the elevator, I mistakenly thought that there was an exit on the basement floor (B1) and pressed the B1 button.
Two men who got on at a middle floor gave me a somewhat suspicious impression.

When I got off at B1, I could not find an exit, so I asked a nearby female staff member, "There is no exit from the basement, right?"
She replied, "No, you cannot exit from here."
Moreover, the two men who got on at the middle floor also got off at B1 and then disappeared somewhere.

After that, I went back to the first floor and left the court.

Impressions

The following is a portion of the diary entry recorded during the time I went out to submit the answer.

This post is based on the content of the above diary entry.

I feel that I am being treated as an unwelcome defendant, based on the reversed signage for the assigned civil division and the behavior of the first woman who assisted me.

However, I had not informed anyone that I would be visiting the court on that day.
In other words, I do not know exactly when, but it seemed as though someone knew in advance that I would be visiting the court.

It is possible that the information desk staff had communicated this, but considering that the direction signs for the assigned division were reversed, it felt as though this had been prearranged.
When I visited the court next time, the direction signs had been corrected.

The male clerk initially seemed suspicious of me, but after verifying the answer documents, he treated me normally, which gave me some relief.

Inside the court, I felt excessively warm.
It might have been because I rushed from the subway station, but it felt as though the heating was overly intense.

I am convinced that those conducting the human experiments can control my body temperature sensations, so it is possible that similar attacks were carried out within the court as well.

The reason I mentioned getting off at B1 is because it is related to an incident that occurred later when I visited the court again.
It may not be significant, but I am noting it just in case.

A week after this day, during the first oral argument, something even more surprising occurred.
I plan to post about it soon.