
"The Bush administration has launched a 'significant escalation' of COVERT operations in Iran, sending U.S. commandos to spy on the country's..."
Ok. Let's freeze it right there. Now I may not be the sharpest monk in the drawer, and I am all for freedom of the press and all but does anyone else think that this is story http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/06/29/us.iran/index.html is a little bit too informative? Isn't the whole point of "covert operations" meant to be, well covert? And if one were to reveal such a mission wouldn't that defeat the purpose of the operation?
I'm so glad that CNN wasn't around for the Revolutionary War. We probably would have received a news bulletin about Gen. Washington secretly crossing the Deleware on Christmas Eve to suprise the British.
In other news, CNN will now be handing out T-Shirts to identify members of the Secret Relocation Service.



