反原発論：フェイク映画・フクシマ50
放射性神風-フクシマ50：福島のメルトダウンから日本を救った Radioactive Kamikaze Fukushima 50 Movie Trailer & Interview -reaction
1. 動画のタイトル" 放射性神風-フクシマ50：福島のメルトダウンから日本を救った" には大いに問題があります。サムネールに”実話に基づきます”とありますが、この映画は、率直に言ってしまうなら、原発マフィア・原子力村（原発推進の御用新聞・読売＆産経が出資)のプロパガンダ・フィクション（フェイク）映画です！The title of this YouTube movie, "[Radioactive Kamikaze] Fukushima 50: Saving Japan from the Fukushima Meltdown" is highly problematic. The thumbnail says "based on facts," but this film is, to be frank, a propaganda fiction film by the nuclear mafia (funded by the pro-nuclear newspapers, Yomiuri and Sankei)!
2. この映画は、2022年に暗殺された安倍晋三元首相の御用ライターであった門田隆将の『死の淵を見た男 吉田昌郎と福島第一原発』を原作としていますが、この本は事実誤認に基づき、事故当時首相であった民主党の菅直人に責任を押し付けスケープゴートにするような政治的な悪意を持った”ノンフィクション”を装った”フィクション”です。The film is based on the book "The Man Who Saw the Edge of Death: Masao Yoshida and the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant" by Ryusho Kadota, a writer for the former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who was assassinated in 2022. The book is a "fiction" disguised as "non-fiction" based on factual misunderstanding and with political malice to make a scapegoat of Naoto Kan of the Democratic Party of Japan, who was Prime Minister at the time of the accident.
3. 因みに、故安倍元首相は安倍第1次内閣当時、国会答弁でこう答えていました。FYI: Mr. Abe responded to this question at the time of the first Abe cabinet in a Diet session.
日本共産党・吉井英勝議員「海外（スウェーデン）では二重のバックアップ電源を喪失した事故もあるが日本は大丈夫なのか」Mr. Hidekatsu Yoshii, a member of the Japanese Communist Party, asked, "There have been accidents overseas (in Sweden) where double backup power sources were lost, but is Japan safe?
安倍晋三「海外とは原発の構造が違う。日本の原発で同様の事態が発生するとは考えられない」Shinzo Abe: “The structure of nuclear power plants is different from those overseas. It is inconceivable that a similar situation could occur at nuclear power plants in Japan.”
吉井議員「冷却系が完全に沈黙した場合の復旧シナリオは考えてあるのか」Senator Yoshii: “Have you thought of a recovery scenario in case the cooling system completely stops working?”
安倍晋三「そうならないよう万全の態勢を整えている」Shinzo Abe: “We are taking all possible measures to prevent that from happening.”
4. さて、例えば、映画では「菅直人総理が現地へ行くことになったのでベントが遅れ、被害が拡大した」というストーリーに仕立てていますが、何種類も出た事故調査委員会の報告書で否定されており、東電側に不備があった事実が抜け落ちています。Now, for example, the movie makes up a story that "the venting was delayed because Prime Minister Kan Naoto had to go to the site, and the damage increased," but this is denied in several accident investigation committee reports that have been issued, and the fact that there were deficiencies on the part of TEPCO is missing. Wikihttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_50_(%E6%98%A0%E7%94%BB)
5.."官邸が海水注入を渋っている”というのも事実に反します。むしろ事実は、It is also untrue that the Prime Minister's Office is reluctant to inject seawater. Rather, the facts are‥
1) 菅首相は海水注入を早急にやれと言っていた。Prime Minister Kan wanted the seawater injection to be done as soon as possible.
2) 原子力安全委員会長・班目春樹 (実に無能だった）が、科学者がよく責任回避するやり方で、“海水を注入すると化学反応を起こす可能性がある”と述べたが...Haruki Madarame, Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Committee (a truly incompetent person), said, in a way that scientists often avoid responsibility for, "Injecting seawater may cause a chemical reaction...
3) これを聴いていた東電の武黒一郎フェローが勝手に忖度して吉田所長に「官邸が海水注入に反対している」と伝えた。TEPCO Fellow Ichiro Takeguro, who was listening to this, took the liberty of telling Director Yoshida that the Prime Minister's Office was opposed to seawater injection.
4) 吉田は一応聞くふりをして、海水を注入し続けたのだが…Yoshida pretended to listen and continued to inject seawater...
5) しかし、実は海水は炉に届いておらず、もうその前に既にメルトダウンしていた。But in fact, the seawater did not reach the reactor, and it had already melted down before that.
【福島第一】「10年目の真実」…じつは「吉田所長の“英断”海水注入」は、ほぼ“抜け道”に漏れていた Fukushima Daiichi: "The Truth 10 Years Later"... "Director Yoshida's 'Wise Decision' to Inject Seawater" Was Almost Leaked Through a "Loophole
6. ですから実際には、吉田所長の”英断"も”フクシマ50"のがんばりも米国政府の要請によりなされた茶番・原子炉上空からの自衛隊ヘリによる降水も、当時東京都知事だった石原慎太郎の決断による東京消防庁隊員による放水も結局、全部”無駄なあがき”であり、メルトダウンを防ぐことはできなかったのです。So, in reality, Director Yoshida's "wise decision," the efforts of the "Fukushima 50," the farce of the Self-Defense Forces helicopters dropping water over the reactor at the request of the US government, and the decision by Shintaro Ishihara, then Governor of Tokyo, to have the Tokyo Fire Department crews release water over the reactor, were all "futile efforts" that failed to prevent the meltdown.
7.ところで3:41 の記者会見は”フクシマ50"のメンバーではなく、東京消防庁から派遣された消防隊員たちなので誤解がないように.。Please ensure that the press conference at 3:41 was not given by members of "Fukushima 50" but by firefighters dispatched by the Tokyo Fire Department.
確かに、僕も当時この会見には感動して涙が出ましたし、彼らを”放射性神風特攻隊”と見なしたくなるのもわかります。Certainly, I was also moved to tears at the press conference, and I understand why you might want to consider them "radioactive kamikaze suicide pilots".
8. しかし、東電の社員である”フクシマ50"の作業員らの決死の行動がまるで戦時中の特攻隊を彷彿させるように英雄視することで、事故の原因に“大自然の猛威”以上の重大要素があるのでは？という問題から目を反らすように描かれています。However, by treating the desperate actions of the "Fukushima 50" workers, who were TEPCO employees, as heroic, as if they were wartime suicide pilots, it seems as if the cause of the accident is more important than "the fury of nature." The story is designed to turn our attention away from the question of whether the cause of the accident was something more serious than "the fury of nature."
9.ですから、彼ら東電社員たちは決して記者会見には出て来ません。東電にとってまずい事実が色々と露呈してしまうからです。Therefore, these TEPCO employees never appear at the press conferences. This is because it would expose numerous facts that are unfavorable to TEPCO.
10. 例えば、防衛省幹部に対して「（原発管理の知識の全くない）自衛隊に原子炉の管理をすべて任せる」と勝俣恒久東電社長が依頼したか否かのNHKの取材を勝俣氏は拒否しました。For example, Mr. Katsumata refused to be interviewed by NHK about whether or not TEPCO President Katsumata asked a Defense Ministry official that he would "entrust the Self-Defense Forces (which does not know nuclear power plant management) with the management of all nuclear reactors."
追記：東電旧経営陣4人、原発事故で13兆円賠償命令 最高額か
株主代表訴訟で東京地裁判決 2022年7月13日
This is Four Former TEPCO Executives Ordered to Pay 13 Trillion Yen in Compensation for Nuclear Power Plant Accident, the Highest Amount Ever
Tokyo District Court Decision in Shareholder Lawsuit July 13, 2022
11.『科学ジャーナリストの添田孝史は、東電本店の技術者たちは2008年に福島第一でも津波対策は不可避と結論づけていたにもかかわらず、幹部は対策を2016年まで先送りすると決めたが、その意思決定の中心にいたのは当時東電本店の原子力設備管理部長を務めていた吉田所長だった。Science journalist Takashi Soeda writes that although engineers at TEPCO's head office concluded in 2008 that tsunami countermeasures were inevitable at Fukushima Daiichi, the executives decided to postpone them until 2016, and the man at the center of the decision-making process was TEPCO's General Manager Yoshida, who was then the head of the nuclear facilities management department at the company's head office.
各種報告書でも推察できるように実際は「想定外の大津波」ではなく、日本原電や東北電力と同じ程度に津波対応を進めていれば避けられた事故だったにもかかわらず、作中ではまるで人間の想定を超えた事態だったと描かれており、東電の責任から目を背け、事故の本当の姿を現場の美談で隠してしまったと批判している。』As can be inferred from the various reports, the tsunami was not actually an "unexpectedly large tsunami," and the accident could have been avoided if the tsunami response had been carried out to the same extent as that of JAEPCO and Tohoku Electric Power Company. The film is turning a blind eye to TEPCO's responsibility and covering up the truth of the accident with the beauty of the scene.⇒Wiki
12. 最後に、インターネットの掲示板5chで見つけた、この映画に対する辛辣だが視野の広い適切なコメントをご紹介します。Finally, I would like to share with you an appropriate comment I found on the Internet message board 5ch, which is scathing but broad-minded about the film.
何故に美化する必要があるのか？
脚色し過ぎ。
東電、政府、原発で潤っていた福島の住人
全てが悪いのに。
こんなヒーローを作りたいだけのク●映画を評価する映画関係者の気が知れんね
Why do they need to beautify it?
It is too much of an adaptation.
TEPCO, the government, the people of Fukushima who were enriched by the nuclear power plant.
All of them are to blame.
I don't know what kind of people in the film industry would appreciate such a s*itty film that just wants to make heroes.
⇒反原発論：反原発の三段論法
⇒反原発論：安心してください、処理水ですよ。
⇒反原発論：ドンチャン騒ぎには耐えられない！
