Regrets? I’ve got a few.

I have very mixed feelings on this Brexit day today!

I hate nationalism. I have always have been an internationalist, and always will be. But I am no fan of the very limited and conditional internationalism that has been on offer through the European Union.

bweyale_bar_three1 copyYes, I feel European, much more than I feel English or British, but I also have deep attachments to places outside of Europe, such as Canada where I have many cousins and some shared family histories, and Uganda where I enjoyed life-changing visits through work with an educational NGO in 2001, 2006 and 2010, and got a glimpse into how the world might look from inside a country in sub-Saharan Africa.

As someone with an immigrant family background (my dad and all my grandparents were immigrants), and as a lifelong anti-racist, I have felt perfectly at home with the crossing of meaningless borders in Europe. It has felt natural.  But I know that this  much-vaunted “free-movement” in Europe has been mostly for the benefit of White Europeans. I am starkly aware that this is not everyone’s experience. The Europe that many others have encountered is “Fortress Europe”: a set of deeply oppressive and murderous barriers, that have been designed to mainly keep out Brown and Black people seeking to enter Europe to work and to live.

And whatever claims have been made about the EU “keeping peace within Europe” – what I see all around Europe is the absence of social peace, and, in its place, the violence, the intimidation, the tensions that have accompanied the rise of populist-right racist and semi-fascist movements in many EU countries – such as Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Sweden .

But wasn’t Brexit itself, though,  a project of our own populist right and further right forces here? Yes and no. Certainly not wholly so. There were a plethora of reasons for different people choosing to vote “Leave”, many of which had nothing to do with nationalism or racism.

I was intellectually tempted by the Lexit position in the Referendum, but I ended up voting Remain – a reluctant Remain voter, ultimately convinced that the Right had much more to gain than the Left from Brexit.

The Referendum question that was put in 2016 was an intensely stupid one. It was framed by the racists, revanchists and ultra-nationalists of UKIP. It was implemented by the Tories in order to settle their own internal arguments. The Labour Party, who knew that this was not, and could not be, the crucial divide in society, was always going to be the collateral damage.

In my view, in the 2017 election campaign, Labour got it right in a very difficult situation.labour-manifesto-jeremy-corbyn-2017 Its manifesto stated that it would respect the majority Leave vote (albeit a small majority) but fight to defend workers rights, environmental rights, and consumer rights in any deal that was finally made to Leave the EU, and to maintain a close, mutually beneficial trading relationship with Europe.

In 2019, under pressure from blinkered or cynical ultra-Remainers in the Party, and the manipulative People’s Vote campaign, which, whatever it said on the tin, was being used as a weapon to compromise and weaken Corbyn, Labour came to a new position. This was to negotiate a credible Leave deal that had the protections it sought, and then test that against Remain in a Second Referendum. The Party agreed to implement the result, whichever side won,  within six months. But this was not enough to convince increasingly alienated Labour voters in the vast majority of leave-voting constituencies who had already waited three years for the result of the First Referendum to be implemented.

Many voters there stayed away or switched sides despite everything they had to gain materially from a Labour government that was brimming with positive ideas and radical plans, and despite everything they have to lose from a hard-right Tory government that had carried out 10 years of continuous and painful austerity policies but was now making cynical, half-hearted promises.

I am sad that we are leaving the EU, but I am a million times more sad that we haven’t got a Left-Labour Government led by Jeremy Corbyn – a true egalitarian and internationalist who has always been on the side of the oppressed.

But today, as we leave the EU, I am looking forwards, and I’m looking outwards. My commitments to anti-racism, to internationalism are as strong as they have always been.

No borders. No nations. One world. One love. One struggle.

One Polish Jewish socialist’s journey through the Holocaust

This is from my speech at the Holocaust Memorial Day event, held this afternoon jointly by Hackney and Islington branches of Stand Up to Racism. The central feature of this event was a very moving film called Terezin: Refuge in Music, which tells the story of Alice Herz-Sommer and Coco Schumann, two extraordinary musicians from very different musician worlds, both of whom survived Terezín/Theresienstadt. It also reveals what really happened there between 1941-45 behind the Nazi’s propaganda facade

Ghettoes, concentration camps, death camps: these were all different phenomena within a system of oppression, brutality, slavery, and industrial murder, in Nazi occupied areas of Europe

Every life lost was of equal value whether they were Jews, Roma and Sinti Gypsies, Russian Prisoners of War, Jehovah’s Witnesses, socialist, communists, trade unionists, Gays, disabled people or others. Many died from starvation and diseases in the brutal conditions in which they were kept, whether behind ghetto walls or in concentration camps.

Two peoples were marked out for complete extermination in an industrial process calmly and professionally designed by educated and skilled architects and engineers in offices in Germany, for a series of death camps in Poland: Around 6 million Jews and at least half a million Gypsies were murdered.

But even in the very worst circumstances during these times though there was resistance. That resistance took many forms cultural, spiritual, psychological, physical.

The film focuses, through interviews with survivors, on a particular kind of cultural resistance, in a location that was a hybrid of ghetto and concentration camp: a small town within a one-time military fortress.

ThereisenstadtIt was called Theresienstadt and was located in Czechoslovakia, about 40 miles from Prague. It was liberated by the Red Army in May 1945 – the last of all the camps to be liberated. In the period of the Holocaust, 33,000 of those incarcerated there died, mainly from disease and malnutrition, and yet the Red Cross visited and went away apparently satisfied that prisoners were being treated well.

The Nazis had a more permissive regime there, than at other camps, that fooled them. As it was meant to. Meanwhile, some 88,000 Jews were deported to death camps from Theresienstadt. Less than 4% of them survived the war.

I personally knew one of the survivors who was liberated from Theresienstadt having been there a relatively short time. His name was Perec Zylberberg.

My friend Perec was a Polish Jewish socialist who arrived in Theresienstadt at the end of April 1945, just days before its liberation and a couple of weeks before his 21st birthday. He had been travelling in inhuman conditions on a packed transport with hundreds of other Nazi prisoners over a few weeks. Many died en-route.

Perec was suffering from typhoid when he got to Theresienstadt, but his nightmarish experiences of suffering under the Nazis had begun shortly after the Nazis invaded Poland in September 1939.

Perec grew up in a working class socialist family in the city of Lodz in Poland. He had an older brother and younger sister.  His father was a textile worker and prominent activist in the Bund – a radical internationalist-minded movement of socialist Jews, especially active in trade union and political campaigns, and increasingly in anti-fascist work with the ever more threatening situation in Poland in the late 1930s. Poland already had a deeply antisemitic, very right wing government before the Nazis invaded.

In Lodz the first Nazi order to create a ghetto was made in December 1939. Over the subsequent months through processes of stigmatisation and discrimination, the Jewish community was separated from the non-Jewish population and ghettoized. A large community of ethnic Germans in Lodz were were relocated to replace longstanding Polish communities near the boundaries of the ghetto – which was completely sealed off – making solidarity efforts very difficult.

The responses of local Poles varied – some tried to help the Jews, despite the difficulties of doing so, others deliberately collaborated with the Nazi occupiers, but the majority just acquiesced and did not take a stand, did not take risks, to help the Jews who were being targeted.

One of our purposes today in educating people about that history must be to ensure that people are atuned to what is happening to others, and do not remain bystanders but become upstanders when they witness oppression and mistreatment, whoever the targets may be.

Inside the ghetto, a few political activists had clandestine radios. Perec did not, but his role was helping to distribute news from those that did about the progress of the war, through clandestine bulletins.

There were around 250,000 Jews in the Lodz ghetto and around 5,000 Roma.

At the end of 1943, deportations to the death camps began from ghetto. People were not told where they were being deported to or why. Perec was one of hundreds of young Jewish men rounded up but taken to the prison in the ghetto in December 1943. He was told he would soon be part of a slave labour group that was being formed for work outside the ghetto, but spent two to three months in the prison before being moved with others to a camp at a place called Warta near the city of Czenstochowa.

In January 1945, without any warning, they were hurriedly transported from Warta to a huge and notorious concentration camp called Buchenwald, which was near Weimar in Germany, Buchenwald had been set up in 1937. Its first detainees had been political prisoners before the war ­– communist anti-fascist resisters. Perec had already heard of Buchenwald before the war. In a memoir he wrote in the 1990s, he said this about Buchenwald:

“It became known the world over immediately after it was establishedâ€Ķ synonymous

buchenwald11

Prisoners in Buchenwald

with torture, inhumanity and bestiality. All of those designations were constantly confirmed by stories that came out of the German underground. We used to shudder at the very thought of that horrible placeâ€Ķ It became a scare word everywhere.”

Camp prisoners were given numbers, sewn on uniforms and tattooed on their arms. Perec wrote: “ I was transformed into 113208, I was just a number. It was a vast campâ€Ķ Barracks devoid of anything save the three-tiered bunks. Dark, cold and frightening.”

The constant flow of new prisoners also brought more news from outside. Perec learned there why he and many others had been hurriedly transported to Buchenwald. A day after they had been evacuated from Warta, the Nazis had fled as that camp was liberated by the Russians. He had missed out on being rescued and freed by 24 hours.

Buchenwald had prisoners from all over Europe. Perec had grown up in a movement that stressed belief in humanity and international solidarity, and despite the terrible circumstances at Buchenwald, he was pleased to meet Italian and Spanish anti-fascists.

It was a brutal and punishing regime there working 6.5 days a week for 12 hours a day on the most meagre rations.

Because we tend to focus on the mass murder during the Holocaust, there is insufficient attention to the system of slavery, and how that fits into the long history of slavery in the world, which includes the millions who suffered through the transatlantic slave trade, through Nazi slavery, and the estimated 30 million people in the world today trapped in conditions that are labelled contemporary slavery. Putting Nazi slavery in that context ought to encourage us to build solidarity and campaigning links between communities that have suffered, and still suffer, from slavery and its effects.

In April, Perec and many Buchenwald prisoners who had survived their slavery, were transported again, arriving at the end of April/beginning of May in Theresienstadt, suffering from typhoid. He didn’t know the precise date that he arrived there.  We know from records recovered after the war that between 20 and 30 April 1945 there were 12,555 new registrations there.  One survivor, called Aliseh Shek, who managed to keep a diary at the camp, noted on 20th April that 1,800 people from the camps arrived in twenty-five wagons, “stinking, infested cattle wagons, inside, stinking infested people, half alive, half dead or corpses.” Perec found himself in the camp hospital.

theres liberation

Theresienstadt prisoners shortly after liberation

With Germany losing the war rapidly, and the Soviet Union’s Red Army getting closer, the Nazis prepared to abandon the camp in early May. First the Red Cross and then the Red Army took over the administration of the camp. Other allied soldiers arrived too. Their task was to look after the survivors, help them recover and help them find somewhere to go to start to rebuild their lives.

Perec remembers that summer of 1945 and various schemes being put forward to offer a new future to survivors. In his memoir he recalled a lot of activity by Zionist emissaries to persuade Jewish survivors to go to Palestine but he wrote:

“I was never enamoured of the idea of a Jewish state. It seemed unreal and carried the threat of Arab-Jewish confrontation. I thought this was an attempt to avoid fighting for your human rights wherever you lived.”

He heard rumours of a scheme to bring unaccompanied young refugees to UK, drawn up by the British government and a Jewish refugee committee in Britain, but candidates had to be 15 or under.

Perec had some relatives who had got to Britain before the war. He was 21 but physically small and after five years in the ghetto and slave labour camps living on the most meagre food, could pass for being younger. He registered for the scheme and put his age as 15.

He came to Britain in 1945. They were divided into groups and his group was at first taken to Windermere in the Lake District. Eventually he  settled in London‘s East End, where there was a large working class Jewish community. Over the next year he was able to establish that his sister had survived. She is known to people who were active in the Anti-Nazi League – her name is Esther Brunstein.

Perec made contact with other Bundist survivors, socialists and Labour Party figures, one of whom was Fenner Brockway, a great socialist, anti-imperialist, anti-colonialist and fighter for equality, who was also well connected at the Home Office. Brockway interceded with the Home Office to help Esther get a permit to come to Britain as a domestic worker.

bundists_london

Perec Zylberberg (front row, left), with other Bundists in London. His sister Esther is 3rd from left, front row

Perec lived in London until late 1950s then emigrated to Montreal in Canada  He stayed active there with the remnants of the Bund. He remained a socialist, anti-racist and anti-fascist till he died in 2007. In the 1980s I got to know his sister Esther very well and Perec used to come over to visit Esther for a few weeks every year or two. I used to meet them both. I often played chess and talked Bundist politics with Perec.

Today and tomorrow, politicians of all stripes in Britain will be saying meaningful words at Holocaust remembrance events. Those words will ring especially hollow from the mouths of the 350+ Tory politicians who, this week, callously voted down an amendment to guarantee the right of family reunion to a few thousand unaccompanied child refugees.

Just in December there were grounds for optimism of a major turnaround on refugee policy.  There was the  prospect of defeating the Tory government. Labour, led by Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and John McDonnell was committed to closing down the shameful detention centres, and to welcoming instead of oppressing refugees.

But Instead of bucking the trend, Britain chose the hard right Conservatives, and has fallen into line politically with the populist right wing forces that have been growing and dominating in Poland, Hungary, USA, Brazil, India and Israel.  Far-right movements remain strong in France, Spain, Italy , Sweden, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine

Old racisms and newer racisms co-exist and flourish in these countries with anti-Roma prejudice, antisemitism , Islamophobia, anti-Black racism, all finding free expression. For all the media attention alleging antisemitism against the Labour Party (and there have been some real cases), we know the real story that antisemitism is strongest in its natural home – the right and far-right of the political spectrum. But  anti-racists and antifascists do need to reflect very seriously on the new realities

Of course the openly fascist Far-Right forces will be emboldened – and we need to impede and confront them where we can, but those same forces can get much of what they want from the men and women in suits in the heart of the Conservative government. We will need to shift the balance of our activities much more into confronting government and state racism.

And we should note that the Johnson Government is not just wedded to racism but to authoritarianism too. Many talk about similarities between Johnson and Trump, but as much as Johnson looks west to America for his inspiration, he is looking east to Poland and Hungary where racism and authoritarianism are combining.

It is also clear in both Poland and Hungary that the populist right governments mobilise support among working class voters on sexism, homophobia, and promotion of the Christian family, as well as on old and new racism. These must be our arenas of struggle too.

And the place where we will have to do our work will shift from set-piece confrontations on the streets with far right thugs, to patient work to build as much solidarity from the ground up as we can inside our communities across the many divisions that our government will try to foster.

The fundamental lessons we must draw from the Holocaust are about being upstanders not bystanders; being bold in support of others as well as ourselves; resisting every attempt to shut down civil rights, human rights; and building, communicating and spreading a vision of the kind of world of freedom and progress and diversity that we can create that is the polar opposite of everything the Nazis sought.

Vindictiveness and faux outrage

Here are some names: James Cleverly, Michael Gove, Jeremy Hunt, Rishi Sunak, Iain Duncan Smith… they have all been almost wetting themselves with excitement at the prospect of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) reporting soon with a verdict that the Labour Party is “institutionally racist” (the EHRC having been egged on by the gaggle of very right wing Tories and Islamophobes that hypocritically call themselves the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” and the fanatically anti-Corbyn Jewish Labour Movement).

If anyone is in any doubt about which party has called out and campaigned most strongly against institutional racism over many, many years, that is the Labour Party.
The vote that took place in Parliament this week was a fine illustration of what the Tories really believe, and just how selective is their faux-outrage about “Labour Party racism”.

Those names above were among the 348 (almost all Tories plus the occasional DUP member) who voted down the Dubs Amendment to the Brexit Withdrawal Bill which sought to guarantee the right of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with family living in the UK. The amendment was tabled by Jeremy Corbyn in absolute accordance with his lifelong support for refugee rights and total opposition to racism.

One of Boris Johnson’s very first acts as Prime Minister was to seek to remove this commitment that even the heartless director of the Hostile Environment policy, Theresa May, had accepted under duress.

But now with their majority secure – a result partly achieved through false Tory propaganda, shamefully echoed daily by mainstream news outlets, that identified the Tories as supposed defenders of Jews – they can revert back to the most blatant reactionary attitudes towards vulnerable minorities.

Corbyn-and-Dubs

87 year old campaigner Alf Dubs with Jeremy Corbyn at the launch of Labour’s Race and Faith manifesto during the 2019 Election campaign

This was the Tories showing their absolute contempt for the Czechoslovakian-born Jewish parliamentarian Lord Dubs, who has directly related his campaigning on this issue to the sanctuary he found as a 6-year-old child refugee through the Kindertransport.

The vote this week was as clear a display of the petty, vindictive, inhumane, anti-refugee racism of the Tory party as you will find – as well as their hypocrisy. Sickening and disgusting.