One step forward two steps back?

One of the most hypocritical and nasty tirades against Jeremy Corbyn in the right-wing

images

Rabbi Sacks

Jewish section of the war against Labour, that started in 2015, was made by the former Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, who in August 2018 compared Jeremy Corbyn to Enoch Powell. I say “hypocritical” because, just a few months earlier, Rabbi Sacks listed Douglas Murray’s book, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam as one of his four favourite books of 2017; a book that included an apologia for and re-interpretation of Enoch Powell’s horrifying “Rivers of Blood” speech, a speech that incited violence towards immigrants.

Screen Shot 2018-08-29 at 11.22.15

Douglas Murray

In Rabbi Sacks’s rave review of Murray’s book, he wrote: “Murray weaves a tale of uncontrolled immigration, failed multiculturalism, systemic self-doubt, cultural suicide and disingenuous political leadership.” He called it: “Accurate, insightful and devastating.” In more liberal circles, the Eton and Oxford-educated Murray has been roundly condemned as a dangerous Islamophobe. The writer Pankaj Mishra described this book in The New York Times as, “a handy digest of far-right clichés”. Not surprisingly, Murray’s book has been enthusiastically promoted on Facebook by none other than Hungary’s antisemitic, Populist Right premier, Victor Orban

Rushing to defend Rabbi Sacks after his attack on Corbyn were the Board of Deputies and the Jewish Chronicle, whose editor, the execrable Stephen Pollard, is one more gushing fan of Douglas Murray.

But times move on. Yesterday, the Board of Deputies announced it was holding a meeting on 17th March at Portcullis House, asking: “How should the Jewish community respond to the Far Right?”, with speakers including prominent MPs and commentators and a representative of the Community Security Trust which monitors the rise in antisemitism.

Good. And not before time. In its publicity the Board rightly highlights the Far-Right terror attack at Hanau last week (in which most victims were Muslims and also included a Roma immigrant to Germany from Poland).

Even without the outrage in Hanau, it may have also come to the Board of Deputies’ notice that the Johnson government they were so keen to get in power instead of the alternative – a Corbyn-led Labour government – has, in the short time since the General Election, taken measures to deny unaccompanied child refugees the right to be reunited with family members in Britain;  deported people to Jamaica, who came to Britain as children, but have spent some time in prison; produced a blueprint for a more racist and unjust immigration system; and welcomed as a government adviser Andrew Sabisky – a eugenicist – who was forced to resign, but only under pressure from anti-racist protesters.

Meanwhile a backbench Tory MP, Dehenna Davidson, is in trouble for being pictured

Orban-Salvini-800x450

Orban and Salvini

recently with members of the far-right ‘Democratic Football Lads’ Alliance’ (DFLA), and the Tory MP for Shrewsbury, Daniel Kawczynski, spoke at a conference earlier this month alongside the anti-migrant, anti-refugee Italian politician, Matteo Salvini, antisemitic Hungarian leader Viktor Orbán, and Marion Marechal le Pen of the far-right National Rally party (formerly the French National Front).

Given the belated, but welcome, switch of focus by the Board of Deputies to the threat from the Right, I wonder, then, how they will respond to the invitation by “Jewish Book Week” to Douglas Murray to speak on 3rd March about his 2019 book: The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity, where he will be introduced by the (Jewish) right wing Islamophobe, Melanie Phillips? This is the same Melanie Phillips who was roundly condemned by figures across and beyond the Jewish community for her column in the Jewish Chronicle last December urging  people not to “fall for bogus claims of ‘Islamophobia'”. The Editor of the ailing Jewish Chronicle (its sales are plummeting, and it has just had to make a big out-of-court settlement to an elderly Labour Party activist in Liverpool for telling lies about her) was strongly criticised for publishing this piece by Philips.

Jewish Book Week’s website helpfully lists its “supporters”. Among them you will find the Community Security Trust and the Board of Deputies. Let’s see what they say and do about the presence of Murray and Philips at this festival, in this increasingly febrile atmosphere of right-wing racism.

Let’s rid ourselves of the culture of fear

One of the most important documents to come from the Labour Party in recent years was the Chakrabarti Report, which provides the basis for a rational approach to disciplinary issues in a party, which, unlike the Tories, people join because they are motivated by social justice.

The Report was praised by some for its clarity and principles, while being rubbished by those within the party wishing to freely use accusations and expulsions to settle political scores.

It was also panned by bodies outside the party who certainly have not had the interests of the Party at heart in their interactions with Labour. They were panicked because the approach Chakrabarti proposed provides a basis for distinguishing real from baseless complaints. It also proposed a transparent process based on natural justice, and, most importantly, it placed educational responses to instances of apparent bigotry, above draconian disciplinary processes.

There are cases where, at the end of a thorough process, expulsion may be necessary. But unless we are dealing with completely unreasonable people who cannot understand how something they have said or written is wrong and harmful – and in most cases I don’t believe those accused fall into this category (I know some of them) – then we have to regard cases of expulsion as failures of our movement.

We should always aspire to correct any reactionary views expressed through creative and serious educational approaches, and keep expulsions to a minimum.

I have the greatest respect for Jennie Formby who has been subjected to unbearable pressures, and has attempted to answer her critics, but I am at a complete loss to understand why Labour Party expulsions have mushroomed recently, and why committed members who have worked incredibly hard for Labour Party goals, and for social justice campaigns, locally and globally, who have not showed themselves to hold bigoted views, are suddenly being disciplined, suspended and expelled in the least transparent ways. (I was at the National Gallery this afternoon and found myself opposite a painting that made me think of the frenzied and poisonous atmosphere that seems to have overtaken the Party’s response to allegations against previously loyal and appreciated party members!)

IMG_E1596The General Election saw millions of previous Labour voters engage in the most terrible act of self-harm, in the face of the most pernicious propaganda of demonisation against our anti-racist and anti-austerity party – a party that seriously threatened to challenge the causes of the real divide in society. It is tragic that we are now witnessing that being compounded in the way the Party is dealing with accusations, many of which I believe may ultimately be proven to have been vexatious.

But the (self) harm would have already been done.

One result has been a new exodus from the party of committed socialists, anti-racists and anti-imperialists, who are in fear of being unfairly fingered for unjust disciplinary measures, and who feel themselves gagged when it comes to exposing the shenanigans of certain individuals and bodies opposed to Labour, or of speaking up about the daily repression and humiliation of Palestinians by the Israeli military and the blatantly racist and unjust policies of the Israeli government.

I have done my best to try to persuade people to stay, and not risk allowing the Right to take Labour over again, but that is the danger.

Whoever wins the Labour leadership and Deputy Leadership – and I will personally be backing Rebecca Long-Bailey and Richard Burgon – it is absolutely crucial that they rebuild a culture of free speech and mutual respect, in place of the culture of fear we are experiencing now that can only empower and embolden bullies.

Let’s not do the work of the Tories, or anyone else, who wants to roll back the really important policy shifts adopted by Labour in the last five years. We had a world to win, and though it will take longer, we still do!

Enabling critical voices to be heard

My speech to the Palestine Solidarity rally against Trump’s “Deal of the Century” hled at Conway hall on 11 February 2020, alongside several Palestinian speakers, MPs, trade unionists, and other campaigners

I bring solidarity on behalf of the Jewish Socialists’ Group, and as a member of Jewish Voice for Labour and Jews for Justice for Palestinians. We are part of a growing force among Jews here, but also in Trump’s America, absolutely committed to justice, equality, dignity and freedom for Palestinians. We know that Trump’s plan can only increase the discrimination and repression, that Palestinians experience and resist daily.

I became politically active around 1976. My first two involvements were with anti-fascism here in London and with the Anti-Apartheid movement seeking justice for Blacks in South Africa. These commitments flowed naturally from my knowledge of what Jews experienced at the hands of the most powerful ethno-nationalist forces.

For many years even many Jews who regularly criticised Israel’s government and military, resisted calling Israel an Apartheid state. I don’t particularly like politics by analogy to be honest, but when the Israeli Government passed its Nation State Law in 2018, all pretense was abandoned. This is Apartheid. Israeli-jews who contested that law on the streets, together with Palestinians, increasingly defined their struggle not just as opposition to Occupation but opposition to Apartheid.

Netanyahu and OrbanThat law was passed during a state visit to Israel by a politician Netanyahu regarded as a friend. But this was no friend of the Jews. It was Victor Orban the Hungarian premier, elected in an openly antisemitic campaign that cast George Soros as arch-Jewish-villain and conspirator against the Christian Hungarian nation.

Netanyahu has a few other friends – Modi, Bolsonaro, Salvini, Johnson and Trump: all united in their opposition to democracy and human rights, and their commitment to ultra-nationalism. He is struggling, though, to sustain these friendships and the loyalty of diaspora Jews. Our communities are beginning to fracture along stress lines, hence the pressure on trusted local bodies to be more authoritarian in suppressing dissent. Board of Deputies, Campaign Against Antisemitism, evangelists for the IHRA… you know who I am talking about.

Israel’s government may be impervious to criticism from those it regards as outsiders, but it is ultra-sensivitive to those they see as insiders. Their own blinkered actions have, ironically, made support for Palestinian justice among Jews more possible.

We have to make those stress lines completely visible, and give Jewish critics, whether of particular policies, the Occupation, or Zionism, more confidence to speak out. We have to amplify the voices of Palestinians describing daily experiences of many kinds of repression but also the voices of Israeli army refuseniks, human rights groups such as B’Tselem, the street campaigners such as Omdim Beyachad, who organise joint Jewish –Palestinian protests. We should maximise opportunities for critical Jews to mobilise together with Palestinians, in solidarity with Palestinian demands for justice.

I want to finish with a quote from Emanuel Scherer, who was active in the Jewish Workers’ Bund – a movement founded in 1897 in the same year as Herzl founded Zionism, but with completely opposite values. Scherer said: “Rights and justice for Jews everywhere, without wrongs and injustice to other people anywhere.”

Without wrongs and injustice  to other people anywhere.