Events on the Day of the Second Oral Argument at the Tokyo District Court

Introduction

On May 9, 2025, I published an article titled “I Actually Stood in Court for the Eviction Lawsuit – 2nd Edition.”

This eviction lawsuit is closely related to the human rights violations I have been continuously protesting as "unimaginable infringements."

From the submission of the answer to the interactions at the Tokyo High Court's record viewing room, there have been numerous suspicious incidents within the court.

I understand that events occurring within the courtroom are behind closed doors and lack objective evidence.

I also recognize that sharing such content on social media may influence the court's perception.

Nevertheless, I believe it is important to keep a personal record, which is why I decided to post this article.

This article documents the second oral argument held on Thursday, December 5, 2024, at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 633 of the Tokyo District Court, along with the events before and after the session.

Developments Between the First and Second Oral Arguments

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

I received a call from the clerk in charge at the Tokyo District Court, informing me that the plaintiff would be sending me a preparatory document.

I also inquired about the unusual noise that occurred in the courtroom. The clerk responded that it was a sound caused by the air conditioning system, which is well-known and not uncommon at the Tokyo District Court.

Friday, November 29, 2024

I received the plaintiff's preparatory document (1) from the plaintiff's attorney.

Monday, December 2, 2024

I sent a receipt acknowledgment for preparatory document (1) to the plaintiff's attorney. On the day of the second oral argument, I handed it directly to the judge.

Wednesday, December ４, 2024

The day before the hearing, I received a call from Kandenko, a utility company, informing me that there would be a temporary power outage around 1:00 PM on December 6 due to underground cabling work.

When I mentioned that I would be out during that time, they added that preparatory work might begin around noon.

Events Before Leaving Home and During Transit

Thursday, December 5, 2024

Early in the morning, I checked the train operation information and found delays on the Chiyoda and Marunouchi lines. Therefore, I left early around 11:30 AM.

Just before leaving, I heard a loud drilling noise near the wall of my residence. Looking out the window, I saw a Kandenko work vehicle's crane approaching the building. The power outage had not yet occurred.

By the time I left, the delays might have eased, but to be cautious, I chose a route from Kashiwa-no-ha Campus Station via the Tsukuba Express to Kita-Senju, then transferred to the JR line to Tokyo Station, and from there took the Marunouchi Line to Kasumigaseki.

Since Tokyo Station is not far from Kasumigaseki, minor delays wouldn't be a problem, and walking was an option if necessary.

I hadn't gotten off at Tokyo Station in a while. The walk from JR Tokyo Station to the Marunouchi Line station is quite long.

The noise of the crowd was overwhelming, and I regretted my choice, as it could be a significant source of stress for me.

Additionally, I experienced intense tinnitus attacks along the way.

After being subjected to psychological destruction tactics using sound and light in March 2018, I frequently experienced such attacks when going out for several months, but it has become rare recently.

The tinnitus on this day was so intense that it drowned out the noise of the crowd. The severe sound was only on my left ear side, while the right ear experienced tinnitus attacks similar to those during recent outings.

Events Inside the Court

In the Waiting Room

As before, I sat on the right side near the entrance of the 6th-floor waiting room. Shortly after, a man in a suit sat on the opposite side. After a while, he left the room while talking on the phone and entered the courtroom directly ahead (likely Courtroom 634).

I also noticed that the ticking sound of the clock hands was unusually loud.

Since I hadn't noticed this during the previous visit, it's possible that someone had replaced the clock.

From Entering the Courtroom to the Start of the Argument

I headed to the courtroom a bit early and saw someone seated on the plaintiff's side and a person who appeared to be the judge.

Initially, I thought the previous case was still ongoing and tried to sit in the gallery, but I realized it was the same person I had seen during the first session and moved to the defendant's seat. The judge was also approaching the gallery area to call me.

The judge on this day wore silver-framed glasses, appeared older than the previous one, and had an atmosphere reminiscent of an associate professor from my university days.

Content and Atmosphere of the Oral Argument

• The current lease agreement is without a fixed term.

• There is no possibility of settlement.

• The contract submitted by the plaintiff lacks renewal conditions, potentially violating Article 30 of the Land Lease and House Lease Act.

• The living conditions are such that normal life is impossible.

• Reasons for referring to Kashiwa City as a "torture human experimentation city," among others.

While I was explaining, one of the plaintiff's attorneys crossed his legs, turned his chair to face another attorney, said "Oh~," and held a pen in his mouth, displaying an attitude that didn't seem serious.

This reminded me of a scene mentioned in an online program, stating that such behavior is common in district courts.

After the Argument Until Leaving the Courtroom

After the trial, three of the plaintiff's attorneys approached me, and one of them told me to submit the preparatory document to the court. They appeared confident.

Subsequently, the clerk approached, explained the submission procedure, and answered my questions politely.

When we were alone in the courtroom, the clerk pointed to the ceiling and asked, "Is it this sound?" At that moment, I heard a faint "pattering" sound from the ceiling and replied, "Yes, that's it."

However, when I explained that the sound was louder and seemed to move back and forth across the ceiling twice, the clerk didn't seem to recall hearing such a sound and appeared not to understand.

Incidentally, during the trial on this day, I believe I heard a faint continuous "pattering" sound shortly after the session began.

This sound also felt artificial, but unlike the first oral argument, it didn't seem to move across the ceiling but rather occurred in a narrow area above my head.

Until Leaving the Courthouse

In the elevator on the way back, a woman who appeared to be a staff member was already inside. I thought the elevator was going down, but it stopped on the 13th floor, where the clerk's office is located.

The button for the 14th floor was also pressed, so I got off there temporarily. No one boarded the elevator from the 13th floor, and there were no people in the hallway.

It's possible that the woman intended to get off on the 14th floor but mistakenly pressed the 13th-floor button. However, given the odd feeling I had about her, I also considered the possibility that someone asked her to press it or that someone else had pressed it beforehand.

When I got off the elevator on the 1st floor, I passed by a man who looked straight at my face and made eye contact without saying anything. He was in a suit, not wearing judicial robes, but I instinctively felt he was the clerk in charge and gave a slight nod.

Events on the Way Home

After leaving the courthouse, I experienced drowsiness-like attacks, such as heavy eyelids and a dull head.

Based on both my diary and my memory, I had already begun experiencing such symptoms after leaving my apartment.

However, I clearly remember that the attack after leaving my apartment was significantly stronger than the one after leaving the courthouse.

Around the time I got off at Kashiwanoha-campus Station, I began to experience continuous fatigue attacks, along with a mild headache that lasted for a while.

Afterword

During this oral argument, I continued to experience tinnitus attacks, although they were weaker than during the first session.

I have already explained that the tinnitus attacks are not caused by illness but are artificially induced perceptions.

Perceiving tinnitus sounds that drown out the loud noise of the crowd in the underground passage of Tokyo Station further proves that it's not tinnitus caused by hearing loss.

This time as well, I recorded as many minor events as possible.

The trial is ongoing, but considering the possibility of being obstructed from attending future appellate hearings, I intend to continue keeping records.

Here is the journal entry for the time period when I went out for the second oral argument.

I posted 「Events Surrounding the Submission of the Defendant's Written Statement」 on Tuesday, June 3, 2025.