Events on the Day I Submitted the Notice of Appeal
Introduction
The other day, I posted an article titled “The Main Text of the First Trial Judgment and My Response After Receiving the Written Judgment.”
On March 7, 2025, I went out to submit my notice of appeal to the Tokyo District Court.
Once again, I experienced unusual phenomena—such as abnormal tinnitus, sudden urges to defecate or urinate, and suspicious behavior—both during the trip from my home to the courthouse and within the courthouse itself.
This article documents the details of that day, based on entries from my personal journal.
「目次」：Table of Contents
Click 「すべて表示」： “Show all” to expand the full table of contents.
Tinnitus attack & other Tortures Before Leaving Home (Relatively Mild)
The illustration below (Figure 1) visualizes the content of my journal regarding my sleep and pre-departure conditions on the day I submitted the notice of appeal.
Being woken up in the middle of the night or early morning is a daily occurrence, and this day was no exception.
The torture I endured before leaving home on this day appeared to be on the milder side compared to what I usually experience.
During the Outing / Inside the Courthouse
Tinnitus Attack
The illustration below (Figure 2) visualizes the content of my journal regarding the time I was out to submit the notice of appeal to the Tokyo District Court.
On the way to the court, I stopped at Tokyo Central Post Office to purchase a revenue stamp (¥21,000) as the appeal fee.
Afterward, while walking through the underground passage toward Tokyo Station on the Marunouchi Line, I experienced a strong “keening” sound in my left ear that continued for a relatively long time.
Possibility of Confusion Regarding the Underground Tinnitus Attack
In a previous post titled “Events on the Day of the Second Oral Argument at the Tokyo District Court,” I described a similar tinnitus attack while walking from JR Tokyo Station to Tokyo Station on the Marunouchi Line.
<Insert Figure 3>
However, my journal entry for the second oral argument day contains no mention of tinnitus in that section of the journey.
Therefore, it’s possible that my memory of the “strong tinnitus in the left ear” may actually refer to the day I submitted the notice of appeal, and that the events became conflated in my mind.
That said, the journal entry for the appeal submission day states, “a strong keening sound for a relatively long time,” whereas the post about the second oral argument describes it as “a relentless tinnitus attack,” suggesting a difference in impression.
Also, since the walking distance from the post office to Tokyo Station on the Marunouchi Line is quite short, it wouldn’t be surprising if the attack experienced on the day of submission was a second occurrence.
Inside the courthouse, I continued to experience a strong tinnitus attack for a considerable duration.
Abnormal Urges to Defecate / Urinate & Suspicious Objects in the Restroom
Around the time I arrived at Kasumigaseki Station, I felt an urge to defecate and urinate, so I went to the restroom on the first floor of the courthouse.
Of the two stalls available, one was in use, and the other contained suspicious objects—what looked like plastic packaging and an empty transparent tube that may have been used for medication—discarded in the toilet.
These may have been left by the person who had just used the stall or by someone in the adjacent stall, but they also gave the impression of having been placed intentionally.
Feeling uneasy, I left the restroom without using it. Shortly afterward, I passed a security guard who looked visibly agitated.
It is possible that security staff have been provided with information that misidentifies me as a suspicious person.
I suppressed the urge to use the toilet and first proceeded to the 14th floor to complete the appeal filing at the case reception desk.
Then I went to the 9th floor payment office to pay the postal fee (¥6,000) for the court to mail my documents. Before that, I used the 9th floor restroom.
By that time, the urge to defecate had subsided, and only a small amount of urine was discharged.
I have suspected for several years now that even such urges and bodily functions may be subject to some degree of external control.
Unusual Sound Environment and Human Behavior at the Court’s Case Reception Desk
At the case reception desk on the 14th floor, the female staff member was courteous, but it took a considerable amount of time to complete the process.
While I was waiting, despite no other visitors being present, several women came to the counter multiple times. In addition, I heard what seemed to be the prolonged sound of a copier running behind a partition to the right. Occasionally, a phone ringtone would also sound. The whole environment felt out of the ordinary.
The staff member explained the following:
The appeal brief must be submitted within 50 days from the following day.
For about 30 days after the ruling, the case records remain at the district court, so the brief should be submitted to the relevant department of the Tokyo District Court.
Since the department in charge at the High Court has not yet been determined, I should check with the district court before submission.
I was also asked whether I intended to submit the appeal brief within 30 days, to which I replied, “It’s not possible.”
Afterword
Analysis
As shown in Figures 2, 4, and 5, just going out to submit the notice of appeal resulted in over 2,000 characters of journal entries.
I also encountered suspicious individuals both on the way and inside the courthouse, but the details are too extensive to include here, so I will omit them.
Of course, I cannot definitively say that every person I perceived as suspicious was a collaborator of the human experimentation network or had been instructed without knowing the full circumstances—but I believe that likelihood is extremely high.
Additionally, I understand that phone ringtones and copier sounds can occur under normal circumstances.
However, considering my previous experiences—such as
“Events at electronics stores and 100-yen shops,” (Japanese only)
“Suspicious responses from the Legal Consultation Center and certain lawyers,” and
the “Rustling Sound Incident at the Tokyo District Court”
— I hope readers will understand that my suspicions are not simply the result of paranoia.
Reflection
The events of this day may appear similar to what I often experience during outings, but the fact that such phenomena occurred even inside a courthouse has deepened my sense of despair, especially in a situation where I can no longer rely on the police or the media.
I had intended to review the court records after they were transferred to the Tokyo High Court following the submission of my notice of appeal.
Accordingly, on April 17, 2025—over 40 days after the submission—I visited the records inspection room at the Tokyo High Court.
However, even during that visit, abnormal events occurred, which I have already briefly reported elsewhere.
Coming Up Next
In the next post, I plan to report on the events of the day I submitted the appeal brief.
Update (July 15, 2025):
I first posted about the circumstances from April 24 to 26, a few days before I submitted the written statement of reasons for appeal on April 28, 2025.
