hellogѸ˥֥     ChangeLog ǿ    

writing_system - hellogѸ˥֥

ǽ: 2026-07-15 01:27

2023-05-12 Fri

#5128. 17ʸؤδؿϥƥΰҿοब [writing_system][alphabet][latin][prestige][emode][history_of_linguistics][orthoepy][orthography][pictogram]

ڥ󥰤αѸˤ路 Horobin ˤȡ17αѸҲˤϽΥޥ󡦥ե٥åȤǤϤʤ̤ʸͰƤ褦ȤưƤ
16--17ˤ (orthoepy) ȯãȼäˡ (orthography) ؤδؿޤäǾ뤵줿Τϥޥ󡦥ե٥åȤԴäռΤȤǡʤŪʸηϤϺ뤳ȤˤʤäȤɬȤɬä17ʸιͰƤưˤϤ⤦1ġƱͭװäΤǤϤʤȤĹ餯衼åѼҲ׸ȤǧƤƥοǤ롥Ťסָפ줫ȤˡסʸפϺ褦ˤʤäȤΤϡήȤƤ⤷Horobin (25) Ѥ롥

Attempts have also been made to devise alphabets to overcome the difficulties caused by this mismatch between figura and potestas. In the seventeenth century, a number of scholars attempted to create a universal writing system which could be understood by everyone, irrespective of their native language. This determination was motivated in part by a dissatisfaction with the Latin alphabet, which was felt to be unfit for purpose because of its lack of sufficient letters and because of the differing ways it was employed by the various European languages. The seventeenth century also witnessed the loss of Latin as a universal language of scholarship, as scholars increasingly began to write in their native tongues. The result was the creation of linguistic barriers, hindering the dissemination of ideas. This could be overcome by the creation of a universal writing system in which characters represented concepts rather than sounds, thereby enabling scholars to read works composed in any language. This search for a universal writing system was prompted in part by the mistaken belief that the Egyptian system of hieroglyphics was designed to represent the true essence and meaning of an object, rather than the name used to refer to it. Some proponents of a universal system were inspired by the Chinese system of writing, although this was criticized by others on account of the large number of characters required and for the lack of correspondence between the shapes of the characters and the concepts they represent.


21θߡʸȤƤγʸԥȥ (pictogram) βǽܤ󤻤Ƥ롥ˤ׸Ȥ٤Ѹ줬17ΥƥΤ褦˿षƤ櫓ǤɬʤΤΡʸȤƤΥԥȥϺؤδؿޤäƤȤΤ϶̣17ȸξϤɤΤ褦оȤǤ
Ϣơ#2244. ԥȥβǽ ([2015-06-19-1])#422. ʸμ ([2010-06-23-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Horobin, Simon. Does Spelling Matter? Oxford: OUP, 2013.
󡦥ۥӥˡ δˡإڥ󥰤αѸˡ١˼2017ǯ

Referrer (Inside): [2024-10-29-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2022-04-13 Wed

#4734. ǥҲϱѸνηϤɤѤ뤫 [writing_system][spelling][orthography][sociolinguistics][standardisation]

ѸνηϤˡּҲءפƤߤɤʤCoulmas ʸϡΤ褦ʻߤǤ롥
ǥ䥳ߥ˥ȯãƤȼưѥѲˤꡤᤤ衤Ѹν񤭸դϤɤΤ褦ѲƤΤïˤȤäƤ̤ΤΰǤϤ뤬Coulmas (271-72) 򤤤Ĥ󤲤Ƥ롥

The admittance of spell checkers and electronic dictionaries in ever-lower grades at school could alter public attitudes toward the importance of spelling.
By virtue of easy access to materials in other languages and automatic translation software, language contact in the written mode has acquired a new dimension.
Non-native written English text is made public on an unprecedented scale.
Communities of vernacular writing are more easily formed. To what extent is this potential actually exploited?
More people partake in word play (Leetspeak, Lolcat) and Internet memes like Doge.
Non-standard and loaded spellings (e.g., imagiNation, a book title prior to Scotland's independence referendum) and cacography (wot? magick, marshall law) can gain currency in ways unimaginable only a generation ago (by 'going viral'). The exposure of the reading public to text on the Internet that has not gone through the traditional filters has grown exponentially. Will this have an effect on what is considered Standard English?
The authority the written word was traditionally accorded could be undermined and the grip of norm-preserving institutions (i.e., school, government printing offices, newspapers, dictionaries) on the language could weaken as a result.
New forms of writing practices evolve as the new media take hold in society. The handwritten CV is already anachronistic, while it is becoming more common for employers to screen job applicants' social media pages. At the same time, digital literacy is becoming ever more important for any employment and full participation in society.

Coulmas ε󤲤Ƥ⤫Ӿ夬äƤΤϡΥǥ֤ˤƤޤޤ¿ɸŪʱѸɽӸ򤦤ȤˤꡤɸŪʽ񵭤ΰæʹԤΤǤϤʤȤ̤¾Ϥ뤷ɸफΰæ񹳤ϳؤⲿ餫ηǺѤ˰㤤ʤ٥ߤʤɤǵˤդ路Ȥߤ

Coulmas, Florian. "Sociolinguistics and the English Writing System." The Routledge Handbook of the English Writing System. Ed. Vivian Cook and Des Ryan. London: Routledge, 2016. 261--74.

[ | ѥڡ ]

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow