01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
űѸθȾ8Ⱦаʹߡϥ˿å줿ϰϡ˥ǡͤˡΧŬѤϤȤ̣ Danelaw ȸƤФ뤳Ȥˤʤ롥ϰˤϡťΥɸǤޤ̾¿ĤäƤ롥ˤĤƤϺε#5331. ťΥɸͳ̾2ñ°ʷ ([2023-11-30-1]) Ǥ夲ۤˤ#818. ɤ˻ĤťΥɸ̾ ([2011-07-24-1]) #1938. Ϣ -by ˤ̾ϸťΥɸΤΤ ([2014-08-17-1]) ʤɤˤƤ
ϡDanelaw Ȥʤˡ襱ȿͤǤϤǤꡤ˥ͤ褷ƽ夤ϤǤ롥äơǤ¿ϤȸѸ̾դƤϤޤǤθˤäƤΤǤꡤǤťΥɸǤѤƿ̾ͿȤϤۤ¿ʤäϤˤ⤫餺ťΥɸǤޤ̾ʤ餺ĤäƤȤȤϡ(1) ¸̾ťΥɸǤ֤뤤 (2) ޤ̾դƤʤäϤ˸ťΥɸ̾ͿȤȤˤʤ롥
δ顤Clark (484--85) ̣ŦͿƤ롥Danelaw ̾˴ؤ¤ꡤ˭ϤˤϸűѸ̾Ϳ졤ϤϤˤϸťΥɸ̾ͿƤ뷹ȤΤ
The distribution in England of Scandinavian, Scandinavianised and hybrid place-names coincides almost exactly with the Danelaw as specified in Alfred's treaty with Guthrum . . . . This implies such names to stem mainly from the late ninth-century settlements, rather than from the wider Cnutian hegemony. Throughout the area, however, Scandinavian names co-exist, in varying proportions, with purely English ones. So, in attempts to clarify the picture and its bearing on settlement history, sites to which the various types of name are applied have been graded according to their likely attractiveness to subsistence formers. Those adjudged most promising bear either purely English names or else the sort of hybrid ones in which a Scand. specific, often a personal name, qualifies an OE generic; a finding consonant with the view that often the latter sort of name represents partial Scandinavianisation of a pre-Viking OE one. Sites bearing purely Scand. names, especially ones based on the generic -bý, mostly look less promising; and the villages concerned have often indeed prospered less than ones with names in the two previous categories. The main river-valleys are dominated by OE names, whereas Scand. forms appear mainly along the tributaries. These name-patterns are taken to imply two modes of settlement: one by which pre-existing English villages acquired Viking overlords, whose names some at least of those that had changed hands thenceforth bore; and another by which Viking settlers adopted lands previously uncultivated. As yet, it remains unclear what chronological relationship is to be postulated between the two processes.
ήϤϥեѸ̾ήϤϱѸ졦ťΥɸΥϥ֥å̾ήϤϥեťΥɸ̾
ˤۤɤ줤ʬۤƤΤɤϻˤʬʤ⤷
Clark, Cecily. "Onomastics." The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 1. Ed. Richard M. Hogg. Cambridge: CUP, 1992. 452--89.
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06
Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow