hellogѸ˥֥     η     η     ǿ     helhub (The HEL Hub)     ڡ     ɽ    

hellogѸ˥֥ / 2018-03

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

2018-03-31 Sat

#3260. űѸˤɸಽ [oe][standardisation][orthography][lexicology]

űѸˤĤɸಽ (standardisation) ݤ˼礿ȤʤΤϡ(1) űѸ "Early West Saxon" 뤤 "Alfredian Old English" ˡ(2) űѸ "Late West Saxon", "Ælfrician Old English" 뤤 "Standard Old English" ˡ(3) "Winchester vocabulary" 3Τۤˤ⡤"Mercian literary language" ʤɤɸಽȤܤΤȤǰ꤫⤷ʤ
θűѸΡɸפϡ#2745. Haugen θɸಽ4ʳ (2) ([2016-11-01-1]) #3209. ɸಽ7Ĥ¦̡ ([2018-02-08-1]) ǾҲ𤷤 Haugen Milroy and Milroy ɸಽŪʴ˾Ȥ餷ƤߤСޤǸŪʰ̣ǤΡɸפˤʤȤϤ㤨 Late West Saxon űѸɸʾʤȤˡˤơˤǤȤªŪˤʤäƤ뤬 Haugen Τ Selection ʳФ٤˲᤮Codification, Elaboration, Acceptance Ȥ¦̤ˤĤƤϤۤܲؤäƤʤ̩ˤΤǤСɸפʤɤǤϤʤȤȤˤʤ롥Late West Saxon ˤĤƤϡˡǤϤʤष޷ˤɸʲˤۤŬڤǤϤʤȤո⤢ (Kornexl 231)
ѸΤήΤʤɸಽͤǤϡϤűѸξоݤȤƲƤΤ褤㤨СűѸ Early West Saxon ȸűѸ Late West Saxon ˤĤƤϡ줾ˡθŪɸಽ뤳ȤǤ뤬ξԤδ֤ˤɬ̻ŪϢ³ϤʤȤƤϽפǤ (Kornexl 230) ޤѸȯãɸ⡤θűѸɸΤȤϢ³ʤĤޤꡤѸɸಽϡ˾塤ΩƲ٤Ƥ롥
ä˴ؤűѸɸಽλȤƤϡ"Winchester vocabulary" 󤲤롥10--11 "Winchester group/circle" ̾դ줿ɤ Winchester ˽äƽ񤤤ʸϤΤʤˡꤵ줿Ȥܤθäǧ롥γɤΤʤǺǤŵŪԤ Ælfric ǤꡤΥƥȤˤƤ "Winchester vocabulary" κΨ98.3%ˤȤɸŪäεɤˤΤˤĤƤϵ뤬ƥƥȤθűѸκݤȤ夷Τ¿ȤȤƤ롥äợǤϳΰϤˤɸಽλȤȤˤʤ

Kornexl, Lucia. "Standardization." Chapter 12 of The History of English. Vol. 2. Ed. Laurel J. Brinton and Alexander Bergs. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2017. 220--35.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-01-07-1] [2020-04-22-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-30 Fri

#3259. 17˺줿ư̾췲褹 (2) [synonym][loan_word][borrowing][renaissance][inkhorn_term][emode][lexicology][word_formation][suffix][affixation][neologism][derivation][statistics]

ε ([2018-03-29-1]) ³ԡ Bauer ư̾ΥꥹȤǤϡ-ment -ure ¸ߤΩäƤ17̾ˤɤΤ褦ʼΤΤꡤ줾줬Ĥ̾äƤΤˤĤƤ⡤Bauer (185) OED ˴ŤפȤäƤ롥̤ϰʲ̤ꡥ

SuffixNumber
-y2
-ery8
-ancy10
-ency10
-ence18
-ion20
-ance49
-al56
-ure96
-ation190
-ment258


ȥå׿Ⱦ򥫥СƤ뤳Ȥ顤٤ι⤤ŵŪʡ뤳ȤϳΤˤ狼롥ŵŪȤȤǡ꤬褹뤳ȤˤϤʤʤŵŪޤ᤿ʣƱδΤ³ȤȡƼºݤˤΤ褦¤줵ʻѤ줿ȤäǤ롥
εǿ줿褦ˡBauer Ϥ򿷸Υˡ˴ؤʣ˵Ƥ뤬ȴϢơŪФŪؤμפ¸ߤΤȤĥŸƤ롥

. . . there is a constant application of unproductive morphology in order to solve problems provided by productive morphology, so that the language is continually having new words added to it which are not the forms which would be the predicted ones, as well as a number of predicted forms. That is, the processes of history add irregularities (which are available to turn into regularities if enough of them are coined). History, rather than simplifying matters (or rather than merely simplifying matters), reflects a process of building in extra complications.


ѼԤοؤ׵ϡɬŪͿƤʤȤη̤Ǥʤۤɤʣ̯ʤΤǡŪμʤѤơԵ§ФȤ⤢Τ⤷ʤ˸ؼԤϡѼԤΡΤ褦ʣ̯¤쿴ˤɤޤΤǤϤ뤬ƥ󥰤ʥơޤǤ롥

Bauer, Laurie. "Competition in English Word Formation." Chapter 8 of The Handbook of the History of English. Ed. Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. 177--98.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-29 Thu

#3258. 17˺줿ư̾췲褹 (1) [synonym][lexical_blocking][loan_word][borrowing][renaissance][inkhorn_term][emode][lexicology][word_formation][suffix][affixation][neologism][derivation][cognate]

ѹͥ󥹴17ˤϡƥ䥮ꥷ濴Ȥ줫̤θäѤ줿ηаޤˤĤƤϡޤǡ#478. ѸΤ褦˼ڤƤϼΤƤ줿ƥ ([2010-08-18-1])#114. ѸμѸεȳ ([2009-08-19-1])#1226. Ѹˤäǯʬۡ ([2012-09-04-1]) ʤɤε͡ʳ٤夲ƤλˤϡФСƱפۤʤäȼäȤݤ줿㤨СǤ1586ǯ discovery Ѹä˲äƤȤˡ17ˤʤäƱ discoverance discoverment ⸽졤û֤ȤϤ硦¸ΤǤʴϢơ#3157. ʤ splendid Ʊ ([2017-12-18-1]) ⻲ȡˡ
ʲϡBauer (186) OED 17˽Фư̾ȤǤ롥

abutmentabuttal 
bequeathalbequeathment 
bewitcherybewitchment 
commitmentcommittalcommittance
composalcompositure 
comprisalcomprisementcomprisure
concumbenceconcumbency 
condolementcondolence 
conducenceconducency 
contrivalcontrivance 
depositationdepositure 
deprivaldeprivement 
desistancedesistency 
discoverancediscoverment 
disfigurationdisfigurement 
disprovaldisprovement 
disquietaldisquietment 
dissentationdissentment 
disseverationdisseverment 
encompassmentencompassure 
engraftmentengrafture 
exhaustmentexhausture 
exposalexposementexposure
expugnanceexpugnancy 
expulsationexpulsure 
extendmentextendure 
impartmentimparture 
imposalimposementimposure
insistenceinsisture 
interposalinterposure 
pretendencepretendment 
promotementpromoval 
proposalproposure 
redamancyredamation 
renewalrenewance 
reposancereposure 
reservalreservancy 
resistalresistment 
retrievalretrievement 
returnalreturnment 
securancesecurement 
subdualsubduement 
supportmentsupporture 
surchargementsurchargure 


θΤʤˤϡߤǤɸŪʤΤ⤢СǤѸȤʤäƤΤ⤢롥û֤ѤʤäΤ⤢С줿Τ⤢롥17˺줿Ʊ̾ȶ礷Τ⤢СǤʤΤ⤢롥λθ塤˻ޤǤˡ2Ÿ3Ÿ¸Ƥä⤢СǤʤ⤢롥Τ lexical_blocking θˤǤΤ⤢СǤʤΤ⤢롥ĤޤꡤȤˤĤư̲Ƹ뤳ȤϤޤʤΤǤ롥
17˸¤ʤȤϤȤ櫓ˡߤ˰̣㤨ʤ̾줬ʣ졤硦¸Ȥ¤ϲʪΤƥ䥮ꥷ줫Τ褦˸Ѥ̤Ȥ⤤뤷餫Ф̾Ѥ̵ˤ̾͡¤줷Ƥä̤Ȥ⤤롥Bauer (197) ϼҲŪʴ顤Τ褦˼Ƥ롥

Individual ad hoc decisions on relevant forms may or may not be picked up widely in the community. . . . [I]t is clear from the history which the OED presents that the need of the individual for a particular word is not always matched by the need of the community for the same word, with the result that multiple coinages are possible.


ˤ衤Ū𤬡Ѹư̾η֤˾ʤȺ⤿餷³Ƥ뤳Ȥϻ¤Ǥ롥塤Ƥ椯ȤƤ⡤餯ˤϿȤĹ֤뤳Ȥ

Bauer, Laurie. "Competition in English Word Formation." Chapter 8 of The Handbook of the History of English. Ed. Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. 177--98.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-28 Wed

#3257. ʸˡŪ¿Ʊ۵ͤβˤĤ [polysemy][homonymic_clash][functionalism]

Ʊ۵ (homonymy)¿ (polysemy)Ʊ۵ (homonymic_clash) δطˤĤơ#286. homonymy, homophony, homography, polysemy ([2010-02-07-1])#815. polysemic clash? ([2011-07-21-1])#1801. homonymy polysemy ζ ([2014-04-02-1])#2823. homonymy polysemy ζ (2) ([2017-01-18-1]) ʤɤεǸƤȤ櫓Ʊ۵ͤ򤷤褦ȤüԤθưѲװǤȤĥˤĤơŪΩ줫ȿϾʤʤȤ˿줿㤨С#714. ѲˤƱ۵ɤɾ뤫 ([2011-04-11-1])#717. Ʊ۵˴ؤ ([2011-04-14-1])#835. ǽŪʸѲѤؤȽ ([2011-08-10-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
Ʊ۵ͤβˤʤΤϡۤȤɤξ硤ñ٥롤ȤƸ٥Ǥ롥ǽǤȤ٥ǹͤƤߤȡƱ۵ͤˤĤƿʸǤ褦˻פ롥㤨СѸǷ -s ϡ̾ʣɸΤߤʤ餺̾ʶˤνͭʤɸ뤷ư3ñɸ롥ΰ̣ -s Ϥʸˡǽˤ¿ŪƱ۵ŪȤäƤ褯̣ǾͤäƤȤ櫓򤷤褦Ȥ뷹ä˸ʤ褦˻פ롥Hopper and Traugott ε˼򷹤褦

. . . grammatical items are characteristically polysemous, and so avoidance of homonymic clash would not be expected to have any systematic effect on the development of grammatical markers, especially in their later stages. This is particularly true of inflections. We need only think of the English -s inflections: nominal plural, third-person-singular verbal marker; or the -d inflections: past tense, past participle. Indeed, it is difficult to predict what grammatical properties will or will not be distinguished in any one language. Although English contrasts he, she, it, Chinese does not. Although OE contrasted past singular and past plural forms of the verb (e.g., he rad 'he rode,', hie ridon 'they rode'), PDE does not except in the verb be, where we find she was/they were. (Hopper and Traugott 103)


ǽǤˤƸȤϰۤʤᥫ˥बѤƤꡤƱ۵ͤФȿۤʤäƤΤȵ뤳ȤϡҤäȤǤ뤫⤷ʤΤ褦ʴƸѲװȤƤƱ۵ͤβȽŪ˹ͻƤߤΤ⤪⤷ʸˡŪ¿Ʊ۵Ȥϱ

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2003.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-27 Tue

#3256. ήʸˡΰ [grammaticalisation][drift][unidirectionality][language_change][inflection][synthesis_to_analysis][teleology]

ˤˤή (drift) ȡʸˡ (grammaticalisation) ĥѲΰ (unidirectionality) ϸߤ˴طοǰΤ褦˻פ롥ξԤδطˤĤơ#685. ʤѲˤ drift Τ (1) ([2011-03-13-1])#1971. ʸˡˤӸݤ ([2014-09-19-1]) Ǥ⿨Ƥ Hopper and Traugott ε̤ƤͤƤߤ
Sapir ǽήȸƤȤǰƬˤäΤϡѸˤޤξüӱŪɽȯãΤȤä礫ʬϤءפȤήΤȤǤ (cf. synthesis_to_analysis) θԤϡ෿Ūʰ̣絬ϤʸѲȤƤȤ館ĤޤꡤʸˡΤȤƤɤƻڤȤƤǤ롥
ʸˡʸ̮ǤФѤȤϡˤŪѲˤĤƸ뤳ȤϤʤʸˡ¤ɤȤƻڤˤĤƤγǰѸǤꡤפˤäȶɽŪʰ̣礤ǻȤȤȤ

Drift has to do with regularization of construction types within a language . . ., unidirectionality with changes affecting particular types of construction. (Hopper and Traugott 100)


ήȰϡŪɽŪ絬ϤϤʸפε§˴ؤΤġιʸפѲ˴ؤΤȤ顤ߤ˰ۤʤΤȤƤȤ館Τ褵ְפȤѸ줬ѤȤˤϡѸȤƤǤϤʤƤʸˡȤѲνѸȤѤȤȤռƤʤȡ㤤ǽΤդǤ롥

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2003.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-26 Mon

#3255. The World Color Survey [bct][link][typology]

#2103. Basic Color Terms ([2015-01-29-1])#3153. Ѹˤˤ̸ܿȯŸ ([2017-12-14-1])#3154. Ѹ˾塤̸줬äƤͳ ([2017-12-15-1]) ǾҲ𤷤褦ˡ̸ܿ (Basic Color Term) ˴ؤ븦ϡBerlin and Kay λɷŪͤȯɽưʹߡȯŸƤ̸츦Ǥ The World Color Survey ΥȤϡϢʸǡؤΥޤΥ󥯤ĥƤ롥
̸츦ϡƤ Berlin and Kay ηǤ˴ؤ2Ĥβ򸡾ڤŪǹԤʤƤ2ĤβȤϰʲΤΤǤʾ嵭HPˡ

(1) the existence of universal constraints on cross-language color naming, and
(2) the existence of a partially fixed evolutionary progression according to which languages gain color terms over time.


(1) Ͽ̸˴ؤ붦Ū餫ˤ(2) ̻ŪȯŸν뤳ȤǤ롥෿оȸؤˤ⿼ط롥ܤݤˡˤĤƤϡStatistical tests of cross-language color naming Ƥ롥

Color Grid

Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. Basic Color Terms. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P, 1969.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-25 Sun

#3254. ٤⤿餹̤̾¸ [frequency][grammaticalisation][auxiliary_verb][suppletion][zipfs_law]

ܤϡ٤ǤФۤɷ֤긺äƽ̾ȤȤϤ褯ΤƤ롥ܤϹ٤ǤФۤɡʷ֤˼ä뤳ȤʤŤ֤ݻ䤹Ȥ⤷Ƥ롥⤿餹줾θ̤ϡ"Reduction Effect" ʽ̡̾ˡ"Conservation Effect" ¸̡ˤȸƤФƤ (Hopper and Traugott 127--28)
̤̾ϡʸˡ (grammaticalisation) ȴϢɽŪϡ#64. ˡưʤ³ȡ ([2009-07-01-1]) Ǽ褦ʿˡư췲Ǥ롥used to [ju:stə], have to [hæftə], have got to [hævgɑtə], (be) supposed to [spoʊstə], (be) going to [gɑnə] ʤɤβꥸʥβ餹긺äƽ̾ƤΤǧ롥θ̤ϡ#1101. Zipf's law ([2012-05-02-1]) #1102. Zipf's law ȸοա ([2012-05-03-1]) Ǽ夲 Zipf's law Ȥط (cf. zipfs_law) ٤ȲĹˤشطΤʤ٤ʸˡδ֤ˤͽۤۤɤδطϤʤ롤#2176. ʸˡ̣Ѳ١ ([2015-04-12-1]) ǾҲ𤷤褦Ω⤢뤳ȤդäƤˡ̤̾ΰȤƤϡ#1091. ;١ѡ ([2012-04-22-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿
¸̤ϡŪˤϵˤԵ§θ֡Ȥ櫓佼ˡ (suppletion) η֤餳˻¸Ƥ뤳ȤǧǤ롥;̾Ѳ be ưγѤʤɡĶٸˤƤϸŤ֤褯ݻ졤Ūˤͽ¬Բǽʷ֤򼨤ˤĤƤϡ#43. ʤ go β went ˤʤ뤫 ([2009-06-10-1])#1482. ʤ go β went ˤʤ뤫 (2) ([2013-05-18-1])#2090. 佼ˡ餱ο;̾ηϡ ([2015-01-16-1])#2600. űѸ be ưζޡ ([2016-06-09-1])#694. ٸԵ§ʣ ([2011-03-22-1]) 򻲾ȡ¸̤Ϸ֤Τߤʤ餺ʤɤ츽ݤˤ⸫ΤǡˤĤư̤ˤ뤳Ȥ

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2003.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-05-17-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-24 Sat

#3253. θ경ʸˡλ㤫ݤ [word_order][grammaticalisation]

Meillet θ경ʸˡ (grammaticalisation) λȤߤʤȤϡ#1972. Meillet ʸˡ([2014-09-20-1]) ǿ줿̾ʸˡȤϸŪʰ̣äŪʸʶˤʸˡŪʵǽӤӤ褦ˤʤѲؤŪʸȤΤʸˡȸ硤ϤʤˤƤȸΤHopper and Traugott ϡMeillet 1912ǯεǰ٤ʸ˸ڤĤġˤĤƲ⤷Ƥ (23)

At the end of the article he opens up the possibility that the domain of grammaticalization might be extended to the word order of sentences (1912: 147--8). In Latin, he notes, the role of word order was "expressive," not grammatical. (By "expressive," Meillet means something like "semantic" or "pragmatic.") The sentence 'Peter slays Paul' could be rendered Petrus Paulum caedit, Paulum Petrus caedit, caedit Paulum Petrus, and so on. In modern French and English, which lack case morphemes, word order has primarily a grammatical value. The change has marks of grammaticalization: (i) it involves change from expressive to grammatical meaning; (ii) it creates new grammatical tools for the language, rather than merely modifying already existent ones. The grammatical fixing of word order, then, is a phenomenon "of the same order" as the grammaticalization of individual words: "The expressive value of word order which we see in Latin was replaced by a grammatical value. The phenomenon is of the same order as the 'grammaticalization' of this or that word; instead of a single word, used with others in a group and taking on the character of a 'morpheme' by the effect of usage, we have rather a way of grouping words" (1912: 148).


(i) ˼Ƥ褦ˡŪŪʰ̣ôäƤ䤬ʸˡŪˤʤäȲǤȤ館ơθ경ʸˡȸƤǤ뤳Ȥ狼롥ޤ(ii) ˤ褦ˡ줬ʡʸˡŪƻפΤȤĥ⡤ʤۤɤǤ롥
Hopper and Traugott ϡθ경ʸˡ̴طˤ뤳ȤǧĤĤ⡤켫ΤʸˡλȤߤʤΤǤʤȹͤƤ롥ͳ1ĤϡѲɬ (unidirectionality) ǧʤȤ (60) ޤѲ¾ʸˡݤϤäƤȤѲʸˡ˲̤ŪˤĤƤ⡤Hopper and Traugott ϿŤΩäƤ (61) ơѲʸˡȤƻФΤϹƤȤ󥹤Ǥ롥

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2003.
Meillet, Antoine. "L'évolution des formes grammaticales." Scientia 12 (1912). Rpt. in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion, 1958. 130--48.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-23 Fri

#3252. ܽʬˡ (NDC) 10Ǥ3ʬɽ [taxonomy][italic][linguistics][mindmap]

#3248. ܽʬˡ (NDC) 10ǡ ([2018-03-19-1]) Ǥ2ʬɽҲ𤷤ϸʳءˤ˴ؤ80ܤβ̶ʬ3ʬɽˤҲ𤷤3ʬǤ3ֹ椬ѤƤ뤬ʲΥޥɥޥåפǤϡ800 ס830 Ѹס890 ¾νפξܺ٤򼨤Ƥ롥ܸ졤ե󥹸ʤɤϡѸȲ̶ʬۤƱʤΤǾάPDFSVGǤɤ

Detailed NDC10 in Mindmap

ǰʤֱѸˡפȤ륺Х3οϤʤΤ˺ʬ830.2פʤʬޤˡֱѸˡסˤСűѸϡ830.23סѸϡ830.24סѸϡ830.25פȤʤäƤ롥Τꤪ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-22 Thu

#3251. <chi> ϡ֥פ֥פ֥פ֥ҡפ [digraph][h][phoneme][arbitrariness][alphabet][grammatology][grapheme][graphemics][spelling][consonant][diacritical_mark][sobokunagimon]

ꥢοɸ֥磻 CHIANTI ʥƥˤߤĤġꥢ <chi> = /ki/ ˻פڤ<ch> Ȥ2Ż (digraph) ˴ؤơ衼åѤνϤƤ⡤ŵŪб벻ϤޤޤǤ롥첻 <i> դ <chi> ˤĤƹͤƤߤ褦פʸɽСѸǤ chill, chin Τ褦 /ʧi/ե󥹸Ǥ Chine, chique Τ褦 /ʃi/ꥢǤ chianti, chimera Τ褦 /ki/ɥĸǤ China, Chinin Τ褦 /çi/ Ǥ롥Ʊ <ch> Ȥ2ŻȤäƤʤ顤б벻ХХʤΤϤäʤ
򤯤ˤϡʸ (arbitrariness) ȡƸβηϤȤˤΩˤĤ򤹤ɬפ롥ޤʸ顥ե٥åȤˤȤȡ<a> Ȥʸ /a/ ȤȷӤĤϤȹͤΤϡĹȽˤΤˤºݤˤξԤδ֤ɬŪʴطϤʤбطե٥åȤѤ¿θǸΤϡΥե٥åηϤѤˤäơѸ˸줿ηդδطѤˤʤ̤ʻ𤬤ʤꤤطѤΤݤȤȤ⤢ΤʸȲȤδط塹Ѥ뤳Ȥ¿餫̤ʻ𤬤СȤСб벻ʬθˤ¸ߤʤΤǤʸȤ줺;äƤޤ硽<a> Ѥˤ뤳ȤǤ뤷ޤäۤʤ¾βˤƤȤäƤǤ롥ȤС춦ƱΤ <a> = /t/ ȷꤷƱդСθˤƤϤǤ褤ΤǤ롥ʸϸŪʤΤǤ뤫顤ʬդС¾ͤ˴Ĥڹ礤ϤʤΤǤ롥<ch> ñǤϤʤ2ŻǤȤüϤ뤬2ʸη1ĤʸȤߤʤСʸƸϻ˱ƹʤ褦ѤƤ褤θ¸ߤɤʻҲ˳ƤƤ褤üʤȤ򤤤첻˳ƤƤ⡤̵˳ƤƤ褤Ĥޤꡤ<ch(i)> ɤߤϡޤäŪɬŪ˷ޤäƤ櫓ǤϤʤ򤹤뤳ȤοǤ롥
ˡƸβηϤȤˤΩˤĤơޤǤʤȤƱθǤʤ줾ȼβηϤäƤ롥Ѹˤ /f, l, θ, ð, v/ ʤɤβǤ뤬ܸˤϤʤȤä褦ˡ줴ȤͭβǥåȤΤǤ롥ƸβηϤȯŸˤ⡤§ȤΩŪǤ롥μѤʤɤäǤ⡤αƶϸŪäơۤʤˤϰۤʤ벻ǥåȤꡤǥåȴ֤Ǹߤб褦ȤƤäƤΤ顤줤·ȤȤ˾ʤϤǤ롥ɽʸ륢ե٥åȤϸ§ȤƲǤ̤Τ顤ǥåȴ֤ǤޤбʤΤʸåȴ֤ˤб褦ȤȤǡϤɬ⤭줤ˤ·ʤϤǤ롥
ǵ󤲤衼åѤμפʸϡˤηаޤȤ˥ޥ󡦥ե٥åȤƤϤȤʤƥˤ <ch> Ȥ2ŻѤƤ뤳ȤΤäƤޤ§ȤƤΩȤĤĤ⡤ߤθܤǸƤΤ¤Ǥ롥ǡ2Ż <ch> Ѥ褦ȤǥΤϡθ⼫ƤΤ<ch> ɤβˤƤˤĤƤϡƸ˰ѤͤƤǡƸǤ <c> ŵŪɽ蘆벻ȶŪ̻Ū˴طο̤βбʸȤ <ch> 򤢤ƤȤˤȤ櫓ĤޤꡤѸǤ /ʧi/ե󥹸Ǥ /ʃi/ꥢǤ /ki/ɥĸǤ /çi/ Ǥ롥Ƥξ硤ƸˤˤơȤȤ /k/ ɽ魯Τ <ch> ѤƤ롥
ޤȤСθ⡤Ū <ch> Ȥ2ŻȤ³뤳ȤˤĤƤ϶̤ƤƸŪ˰ۤʤ벻ѲƤˡ<ch> ɽ蘆벻ϡߤ˰ۤʤäƤΤǤ롥
Ѹˤ <ch> = /ʧ/ ˴ؤˤĤƤϡʲε⻲ȡ

#1893. إܥ󼰥޻ <sh>, <ch>, <j> ϤɤΤ餤Ѹ ([2014-07-03-1])
#2367. űѸ <c> Ѹ <k> ء ([2015-10-20-1])
#2393. <Crist> <Christ> ([2015-11-15-1])
#2423. digraph (1) ([2015-12-15-1])

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-21 Wed

#3250. ν̱²֥ΤӤ [language_planning][linguistic_right][sociolinguistics][altaic][map][russian]

ǤϥסΤ4ܤޤꡤ³Ÿ뤳ȤޤƤ롥228俷ʹī8̤ˡ¿̱²ΤӤפȤФεǺܤƤס100ʾ̱²򱿱ĤˤֹȤΰפȡּҲķפĴƤ뤬μĥŪȿǤȤơȡ̱²ζ̤θȤƤΥʤˤǤФƤ롥΢֤ƤС̱²θڻ뤹Ǥ롥
ʹǼ夲ƤΤϡ⥹800ۤɡ뻳̮Υܥ륬ή˰֤륿륹¹ˤ륿 (TaTar, Tartar) Ǥ롥ϡ륿²륯ɤ°ǡ衤ϰ˺դƤʡ#1548. 륿² ([2013-07-23-1]) 򻲾ȡˡŪˤϡ󥴥ή७ץ㥯ϥθȤʤä󡦥ϥ15--16˱ɤԤΥˤ濴˥ʸֺ餤ͤΩ줫鸫С1237--1480ǯޤǡ֥ΤӤפΤȤDzʻۤθ1552ǯ˥뤬ƤϤȤȤˤʤ롥Ϣˤϥ뼫¹Ȥ¸ߤߤϥϢˮ°̱²¹1ĤȤ¸ߤ롥륹¹θߤο͸388ͤǡΤäͤ53%ͤ40%ʥΤȤƤ⥿ͤϥͤ˼¿̱²Ǥˡ¹Ǥϥȥ줬ѸȤʤäƤ롥

Map of Tatarstan

̳عǤϡɬܤȤƤ뤬ǯɤæɬΰϤ򤫤ƤƤȤȿȯݸԤ佻̱¿ɤΥڻϥͤºĤƤ񤷤Ƥ롥춵꤬ҲȤʤäƤǤ롥
ˤĤƤϡEthnologue Ͽ⻲ȡ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-20 Tue

#3249. The Falkland Islands [variety][world_englishes][history][map][rhotic][lesser-know_varieties]

ɸ the Falkland Islands ʥեɽ; Falklands Ȥ) ȤС1982ǯΥեʶ褬۵롥ξ塤Φ480ۤβ⤫֤νϥꥹο̱ϤŪͭĥ륢를󤬤ǯ˷ŪߤȤȯʶǤ롥ꥹϥå㡼ΤȤǥ를ȹ䤷ǡä를󷳤ݤꥹ̱ռ򤯤줿ΤȤ¦⳵ͥꥹٻλफΤ褦ʻݤ᤺θɬ⥤ꥹˤȤä˧ʤξɤ˿ɴͤλԤФä

Map of the Falkland Islands

եɽˤƤߤ褦ˤ West Falkland East Falkland 2Ĥμ礿礬롥˥ꥹϽ̱2100ͤۤɽǤ롥1690ǯꥹĹ John Strong ˾ΦȤεϿĤäƤ롥̾ϡ Strong Ĺ Viscount Falkland ˤʤ̾դΤȤ1765ǯ˺ǽεサϤߤΤ de Bougainville Ψ줿ե󥹿ͤǤꡤꥹ͵サϤηߤϤ줫1ǯ٤줿1767ǯˤϥڥ󤬥ե󥹵サϤθŪ˥ꥹͤɤʧäꥹͤ櫓ǤϤʤä1811ǯ٤ϥڥサϤűह뤳ȤȤʤä
θ塤1816ǯ˥ڥ󤫤Ω̤를󤬡1820ǯ˥եɽͭʥ를ǤϽ Las Islas Malvinas ȸƤǤ롥ϡˬ줿 Saint-Malo пȤΥ֥ȥ͵դˤʤǥե󥹸 Les îles Malouines ̾դ줿ΤΥڥ̾Ǥˡ1831ǯ˥ꥫηϤ East Falkland Υ를サϤ򹶷⤷1833ǯˤϥꥹƥ를ͤɤʧä1841ǯꥹϥեɽĤǤ̿1885ǯޤǤ2Ĥ1800ͤۤɤΥꥹͼҲ夲ơ1892ǯ˥ꥹ̱ϤȤʤä
ʹߡԤǤ East Falkland Port Stanley Ǥϡȥꥢ˥塼ɤαѸȤ֤̤äѸѼ郎ȯãƤߤ˿ܿäȤϻפʤӴϫƯԤȥꥢ˥塼ɡեɽΤƤȤ¤ꡤη̤ȤƸߤαѸѼ˻ƤʬȤȤ⤷ʤޤWest Falkland θġ¼äѼϡĤνпϤǤ륤ꥹȷӤĤȤʤեɽѼǤ non-prevocalic r ˴ؤƤ non-rhotic Ǥ롥
ʾ塤Trudgill and Hannah (123--24) McArthur (397) εҤ˰͵򤷤ƽ񤤤CIA: The World Factbook ˤ Falkland Islands Ethnologue ˤ Falkland Islands ⻲ȡ

McArthur, Tom, ed. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: OUP, 1992.
Trudgill, Peter and Jean Hannah. International English: A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. 5th ed. London: Hodder Education, 2008.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-04-22-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-19 Mon

#3248. ܽʬˡ (NDC) 10 [taxonomy][italic][thesaurus][semantics][htoed]

Ω޽Ǥϡʿ29ǯ4ܽʬˡ (NDC) ο10ǤŬѤƤΰ򻲾ȡˡ10Ǥʬ2017ǯ1ǡˤ (PDF)  *
9Ǥ10ǤؤŪѹϤۤȤɤʤѸǤ롥10Ǥιɽ2ʬɽ˴ŤʲΥޥɥޥåפäƤߤPDFSVGɤˡ

NDC10 in Mindmap

δؿäˡ80 פˤ뤬9Ǥ龯ѤäΤϡ84 ɥĸפäΤ84 ɥĸ졥¾ΥޥפȤʤäȤǤ롥Ʊͤˡ85 ե󥹸ס86 ڥס87 ꥢפ⤽줾85 ե󥹸졥ץХ󥹸ס86 ڥ졥ݥȥס87 ꥢ졥¾Υޥ󥹽פܾ̾Ƚ줿90 ʸءפбʬˤƱͤγȽܤƤ롥󡤤Τ褦ʳȽʬϻϤХ꤬ʤɤޤɽ뤫ϡ޽ʬθŪȤ⤪ǷŪнˡϤʤ
ܽʬˡϿ޽˴ؤʬˡ (taxonomy) 1ĤɴʻŵŪʬˡȤ⤤롥ʬˡȤС̣켭ŵ (thesaurus) ԻˤƤ̣ʬϺǤ񤷤νʬϿݤȤ̤βƤȤ狼롥
ѸˤȤδطǤСܳŪŪ켭ŵ HTOED ʬɽ򡤡#3159. HTOED ([2017-12-20-1]) ͳǻȤ줿

Referrer (Inside): [2018-03-23-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-18 Sun

#3247. ֺ¡֥ڥ󥰤ǤɤѸˡפ5color colour --- ꥫΥڥ󥰡 [slide][ame][ame_bre][webster][spelling][spelling_pronunciation_gap][orthography][hel_education][link][asacul]

ī㡼󥿡ɶιֺ֥ڥ󥰤ǤɤѸˡ5ˤ5򡤺317ڡˤ˳ޤǽȤʤ뺣ϡcolor colour --- ꥫΥڥ󥰡פꤷơڥ󥰤αƺ濴ޤֺ¤Ѥ饤ɻɤ
ϰʲ3ĤǤ

ڥ󥰤αƺ¿ȤϤޥʡ
Υ֥Υڥ󥰲פ¿ʬ˰񿴤椨
ڥ󥰤ΡפϸŪȤˡҲŪʸϤΤǤϤʤ

ʲ饤ɤΥڡȤ˥󥯤ĥäƤޤƥ饤ɤϡ֥ؤΥ󥯽ȤƤȤޤ

1. ֺ¡إڥ󥰤ǤɤѸˡ5color colour --- ꥫΥڥ
2.
3. (1) ڥ󥰤αƺ
4. ꥫΥڥ󥰤ħ
5. -<ize> -<ise>
6. ¾
7. (2) Υ֥Υڥ󥰲
8. Υ֥
9. ֥Ͽ
10. colour ο color γβ
11. ʤ֥Υڥ󥰲פΤ
12. (3) ڥ󥰤ΡפȤϡ
13. ޤȤ
14. ֺܹ¤򿶤֤ä
15. ʸ

ޤǹֺ½λʤΤǡ5Υ饤ɤؤΥ󥯤ʲˤޤȤĥäƤޤ

1󡡱ѸΥڥ󥰤Ե§
2󡡱ѸΥե٥åɽ --- űѸΥڥ
3515̤ through--- ѸΥڥ
4doubt <b>--- ѸΥڥ
5color colour --- ꥫΥڥ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-17 Sat

#3246. ¥ɤ̩ [sociolinguistics][terminology][context][style]

ɸϡߤǤҲؤˤƤޤ˽вѸ졦ǰǤ롥¥ (restricted code) (elaborated code) ϡΩ2Ĥθѷ֤ɽ魯¥ɤϡŪʤäñʸˡ¤Ѥʸ̮¸ι⤤ոǤ롥̩ɤϡ˭٤ʸä줿ʸˡ¤Ѥʸ̮¸㤤ոǤ롥üǤϤ뤬ҶѤ륤եޥäդȡͤѤեޥʽ񤭸դΩ򥤥᡼Ф褤
Ѹ줬ӤӤΤϡѸƳԤǤ륤ꥹμҲؼ Basil Bernstein ۤʤ볬λҶθո̤ΤˤѤǤ롥ήλҶξɤȤ뤬ϫƯԳλҶ¥ɤȤʤȤäơ줬Ƴθ콬ʤΤ뤤ΤΤʤΤȤ夬ꡤȯŸߤǤȤϴطʤȤƤΤΡѸΥѥȤ϶ޤʤߤǤ롥
Crystal Ѹ콸ꡤ"restricted" "elaborated" ߤƤ

restricted (adj.) A term used by British sociologist Basil Bernstein (1924--2000) to refer to one of two varieties (or codes) of language use, introduced as part of a general theory of the nature of social systems and social roles, the other being elaborated. Restricted code was thought to be used in relatively informal situations, stressing the speaker's membership of a group, was very reliant on context for its meaningfulness (e.g. there would be several shared expectations and assumptions between the speakers), and lacked stylistic range. Linguistically, it was highly predictable, with a relatively high proportion of such features as pronouns, tag questions, and use of gestures and intonation to convey meaning. Elaborated code, by contrast, was thought to lack these features. The correlation of restricted code with certain types of social-class background, and its role in educational settings (e.g. whether children used to this code will succeed in schools where elaborated code is the norm --- and what should be done in such cases), brought this theory considerable publicity and controversy, and the distinction has since been reinterpreted in various ways.


elaborated (adj.) A term used by the sociologist Basil Bernstein (1924--2000) to refer to one of two varieties (or codes) of language use, introduced as part of a general theory of the nature of social systems and social rules, the other being restricted. Elaborated code was said to be used in relatively formal, educated situations; not to be reliant for its meaningfulness on extralinguistic context (such as gestures or shared beliefs); and to permit speakers to be individually creative in their expression, and to use a range of linguistic alternatives. It was said to be characterized linguistically by a relatively high proportion of such features as subordinate clauses, adjectives, the pronoun I and passives. Restricted code, by contrast, was said to lack these features. The correlation of elaborated code with certain types of social-class background, and its role in educational settings (e.g. whether children used to a restricted code will succeed in schools where elaborated code is the norm --- and what should be done in such cases), brought this theory considerable publicity and controversy, and the distinction has since been reinterpreted in various ways.


Ѹ˾塤¥ɤ˴ϢƼ夲ϡ#3043. ѸμΨ ([2017-08-26-1]) Ǹ褦ʼΨξɤζ̤ǰƬˡ񤭸դȤǥȼˤƸƤƤߤȤ⤷⤷ʤ

Crystal, David, ed. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. 295--96.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-16 Fri

#3245. idiolect [terminology][idiolect][history_of_linguistics][saussure]

Ʊ°Ŀͤδ֤Ǥ⡤٤ߤȯʸˡäʤɤǸĿŪʺ졤Ʊո򤹤ͤͤȤʤλ¤˴դߤơidiolect ָĿ͡ʸ˸פȤΤͤ뤳ȤǤ롥Ѹؼŵ "idiolect" ιˤϼΤ褦ˤ롥

Bloc (1948) ѤѸǡ1ĿͤΤ1ˤȯäΤؤȯʸˡäΤˤ錄ꡤĿŪʤޤǴޤࡥ
ָĿ͸פγǰȯŸϥꥫι¤ؤιͤȶդƤ롥ʤι¤餫ˤ뤿ˤϻǤŪˤ٤ȹͤۤʤäƱΰۤʤäλκƱ򸷤˲ᡤǤŪʻȤƸĿ͸ˤɤĤޤ츦ϡɤΤߤŪʸĿ͸ȯȤ򤨤ʤΤǤȤ礭ʻ٤ȤʤäƤ롥ά
ƱϰŪ뤤ϼҲŪ°Ŀʹ֤θĿ͸κۤθϸʬˤäƤǤ롥ηϤǤϺۤǤ⾯ʤʸˡηϤ˼ηϤǤϺǤ㤷ϢϢ졤Ĥޤ֤Ȥʡפ̤ˤ礭Ŀͺ롥


ؼԤ󥰤ȤҲ˶̤ι¤Τɤʤ⡤idiolect ȤˤƸĿŪ˹Ԥ夤ƤޤäȤϡLabov Τ "Saussurean Paradox" ؤƤʡ#2202. langue parole ([2015-05-08-1]) ⻲ȡˡ
ޤѤκǸǸĿʹ֤ idiolect κۤȤʤäƤ뤬1ͤüԤ idiolect ͤƤ⡤ϤŪʤΤȤ䤬롥ȤСĿͤɸɸʤʣѼ硤ʤ linguistic repertoire äƤˤϡüԤʣ idiolects äƤ뤳ȤˤʤꡤϼҲŪʰۼ򼨤Ƥˤۤʤʤrepertoire ĤҤȤĤ򲾤 style ȸƤǤȤС style ؤ idiolect ȤߤʤϤ
ˤŪ idiolectפޤؤκȤΤɬפȤեȹͤƤΤ褵

⿮ ʸͺ ƽؿѸؼŵ١ҡ1987ǯ
Block, B. "A Set of Postulates for Phonetic Analysis." Language 24 (1948): 3--46.

Referrer (Inside): [2018-04-04-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-15 Thu

#3244. 2 HiSoPra* DZѸˤˤɸಽˤĤäޤ [academic_conference][standardisation][hisopra][mindmap]

#3222. 2 HiSoPra* DZѸˤˤɸಽˤĤäޤ ([2018-02-21-1]) ǰ⤷ޤ줿ƱΤʤDZѸɸಽ (standardisation) ˤˤĤƾäޤ֥ɤη ̸ˤоȤƸƤΡפꤹ륷ݥΰĤȤơѸˤΩ줫󶡤ޤΤ褦ʾߤƤäؽιϤᡤγŤ˷Ȥäư̤˴դޤ
ݥλȤơʲΤ褦ʥޥɥޥåפޤܤդλ (PDF: 582KB) ɤ

Standardisation in HEL for HiSoPra*

ݥǤȤ3ˤɸಽβоȤޤ̤ơɸಽפȤƱ٥ǤȤƤɬƱɶǵǤ櫓ǤʤȤ˴ޤߤ˥ƤʤȤФȡɤƤΤȵȼΤ̤ä褦˻פޤƸȤޤäƸ첣Ūʵ򤹤뤳ȤǡʤȤϰۤʤ뿷ʻɷ뤳ȤǤޤƬ餫ʤС
Ѹɸಽ˴ؤϡܥ֥Ǥ standardisation νǽ񤤤ƤޤΤǡ⤴

Referrer (Inside): [2022-07-21-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-14 Wed

#3243. Caxton ֻɸಽˤɤΤ褦˹׸ [caxton][orthography][spelling][standardisation][chancery_standard][printing]

ɸȴϢϡ#1385. Caxton ֻɸಽ˹׸ʤäȹͤ뺬 ([2013-02-10-1]) ǼꤢϡFisher "Caxton and Chancery English" ꤹ뾮η (129) Ѥơ

Caxton's place in the history of the development of standard written English must be regarded as that of a transmitter rather than an innovator. He should be thanked for supporting the foundation of a written standard by employing 86 percent of the time the favorite forms of Chancery Standard, but he is also responsible for perpetuating the variations and archaisms of Chancery Standard to which much of the irregularity and irrationality of Modern English spelling must be attributed. Some of these variations have been ironed out by printers, lexicographers, and grammarians in succeeding centuries, but modern written Standard English continues to bear the imprint of Caxton's heterogeneous practice.


Chancery Standard Caxton ֻʤ١86%⡪˻ƤŦƤ롥ξǡֻɸಽФ Caxton Ūϡޤdz׿ԤǤϤʤڼԤΤǤȷŤƤ롥դΤϡCaxton Chancery Standard ֻޤƤʤɤݻȤǤ롥ơɤ줬ޤǤٰѤƤΤǤ롥Caxton Chancery Standard Ūʽ񤭸ɸؤȤĤʤͤȤơѸ˾̤Ȥ
Caxton뤤ϰѤֻɸಽؤι׸ˤĤƤϡʲε⻲Ȥ줿

#297. ѤƳϱѸɸಽʤݤ ([2010-02-18-1])
#871. Ѥȯˤֻθ경˷ӤĤʤäͳ ([2011-09-15-1])
#1312. Ѥȯˤֻθ경˷ӤĤʤäͳ (2) ([2012-11-29-1])
#1384. ֻɸಽ˹׸Τ17ؼԤȶա ([2013-02-09-1])

Fisher, John H. "Caxton and Chancery English." Chapter 8 of The Emergence of Standard English. John H. Fisher. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1996. 121--44.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-03-29-1] [2022-07-19-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-13 Tue

#3242. 󥫥īαѸ첽Τ⤯ߤ Chancery Standard (2) [standardisation][politics][monarch][chancery_standard][lancastrian][chaucer][lydgate][hoccleve][language_planning]

[2018-02-24-1]ε˰³Ƥꡥε#3241. 1422ǯɥ¤ȹαѸ첽 ([2018-03-12-1]) ǰѤ Fisher ϡ󥫥ī15ȤƱѸι첽 Chancery Standard γΩڤ˴ͿǽˤĤơѶŪʵŸƤ롥Τ˥󥫥īβȤڵϤʤHoccleve Lydgate ˤ⤽λݤľŪʸڤϤʤʬϤľ𶷾ڵϤ Fisher 롥ξ𶷾ڵȤϡ褽 Chancery Standard ĹƤߥ󥰤˴ؤΤǤ롥

Hoccleve, no more than Lydgate, ever articulated for the Lancastrian rulers a policy of encouraging the development of English as a national language or of citing Chaucer as the exemplar for such a policy. But we have the documentary and literary evidence of what happened. The linkage of praise for Prince Henry as a model ruler concerned about the use of English and for master Chaucer as the "firste fyndere of our faire langage"; the sudden appearance of manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales, Troylus and Criseyde, and other English writings composed earlier but never before published; the conversion to English of the Signet clerks of Henry V, the Chancery clerks, and eventually the guild clerks; and the burgeoning of composition in English and the patronage of literature in English by the Lancastrian court circle are all concurrent historical events. The only question is whether their concurrence was coincidental or deliberate. (34)


ä Chaucer νʤμܤƤΤ14ǤϤʤ15äƤȤ̣Chaucer 1400ǯפθˤ褦䤯ܤƤȤΤ϶ʤΤ뤤ϡֽƱѸǰʺʤ񤤤ȡפ夲뤳ȤˤäơгŪ˥󥰥ɤؼ褦ȤŪʤ⤯ߤη̤ȤƤνǤǤϤʤäʴϢơHoccleve ˤ Chaucer ɾ ("firste fyndere of our faire langage") ˤĤơ#298. Chaucer Ѹ˾˲̤Ȥϡ (2) ([2010-02-19-1]) 򻲾ȡ
Fisher ϡΤ褦ʸϸźդƤ뤳ȤҤ٤Ĥļ䶯Ƥ롥

All linguistic changes of this sort for which we have documentation---in Norway, India, Canada, Finland, Israel, or elsewhere---have been the result of planning and official policy. There is no reason to suppose that the situation was different in England.


Fisher, John H. "A Language Policy for Lancastrian England." Chapter 2 of The Emergence of Standard English. John H. Fisher. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1996. 16--35.

Referrer (Inside): [2024-06-20-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-12 Mon

#3241. 1422ǯɥ¤ȹαѸ첽 [chancery_standard][reestablishment_of_english][language_shift][monarch][standardisation][politics][lancastrian]

#131. Ѹ ([2009-09-05-1])#2562. Mugglestone ԡˤαѸǯɽ ([2016-05-02-1])#3214. 1410ǯ夫30ǯˤƤ Chancery English ˨ ([2018-02-13-1]) ǿ줿̤ꡤ1422ǯ˥ɥ¤ȹ (Brewers' Guild of London) ĻϿȷʸˤƥ줫Ѹؤڤؤη꼫ΤϥƥǵϿƤ뤬ݤϰʲΤ褦ʤΤäFisher (22--23) ¹Chambers and Daunt αѤ롥

Whereas our mother-tongue, to wit the English tongue, hath in modern days begun to be honorably enlarged and adorned, for that our most excellent lord, King Henry V, hath in his letters missive and divers affairs touching his own person, more willingly chosen to declare the secrets of his will, for the better understanding of his people, hath with a diligent mind procured the common idiom (setting aside others) to be commended by the exercise of writing; and there are many of our craft of Brewers who have the knowledge of writing and reading in the said english idiom, but in others, to wit, the Latin and French, before these times used, they do not in any wise understand. For which causes with many others, it being considered how that the greater part of the Lords and trusty Commons have begun to make their matters to be noted down in our mother tongue, so we also in our craft, following in some manner their steps, have decreed to commit to memory the needful things which concern us [in English]. (Chambers and Daunt 139)


Henry V ˸ڤƤ뤳Ȥ¬̤ꡤκǤˡȥåץǽ񤭸դαѸ첽ϩȤƤ餷ޤ񲦤Τɨ Chancery ˤơ "Chancery Standard" ̾դ뤳ȤˤʤɸѸν񤭸դ˨Τ褦ʤΤиƤȻפ롥񤭸դαѸ첽äơˤȽ̱ȤɤΤ褦ʴطˤäΤ϶̣ˤ1422ǯϡ15ȾαѸ˾žˤƾħŪʰ̣ǯȤϢơ#3225. 󥫥īαѸ첽Τ⤯ߤ Chancery Standard ([2018-02-24-1]) ⻲ȡ

Fisher, John H. "A Language Policy for Lancastrian England." Chapter 2 of The Emergence of Standard English. John H. Fisher. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1996. 16--35.
Chambers, R. W. and Marjorie Daunt, eds. A Book of London English. Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford UP, 1931.

Referrer (Inside): [2024-06-20-1] [2018-03-13-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-11 Sun

#3240. Singapore English ˤ used to ʲˤʤ use to ʸߡ [singapore_english][auxiliary_verb][corpus][ice]

#735. ʤư used to ˸߷ʤ ([2011-05-02-1]) εǡ?Τäפ̣ used to Ȥνư줬ʤ顤ʤ֡ʸߡ?뽬פۤɤ̣븽ߤνư use to ʤΤˤĤƹͤǤϡuse to ϼºݤΤȤŪˤʸڤΤߤޤǤѤȤʤäȽҤ٤
Milroy and Milroy (89) ˼Τ褦ʸڤ򸫤Ĥؤȴ

One syntactic feature which is very characteristic of Singaporean English and appears to be gaining currency, even in written varieties, is the expression use to as a mark of habitual aspect. Thus, all Europeans use to go there is glossed as 'Europeans commonly go there'.


ȤȤǡ#518. Singapore English ΥɤС ([2010-09-27-1]) Ѥ Singapore English Υѥ (ICE-SIN) Ĵ٤Ƥߤ顤2ΤߤǤϤ뤬طʸĤä1ĤϡSinglish λѤˤĤʣüԤƤƤʸ̮Ǥ롥ɤΤ褦ʾ̤ Singlish Ѥ뤫ȤΤʤǡü B ֡Singlish äΤ̤ȤȾ꤬ȻפפȽҤ٤Ƥ롥

C: There are many informal situations in the home where Singlish is used. You see I feel very much that this discussion is kind of passe really is uh we're we're being a bit old-fashioned here in discussing discussing Singlish in the first place
B: No I think there's a time and place where I use to speak
D: There is a time and place precisely


⤦1Ĥʸϡ"Fortunately for me, nice and satisfied clients use to write me complimentary letters." Ǥ롥ʸ̮ߡɽ魯ΤǤ뤳ȤϳǧѤߤǤꡤ used to ȯֻѤȤƤ use to ǤϤʤ
ʤƱѥǤϡΤȤʤ used to ¿ҥåȤ롥

Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 4th ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-10 Sat

#3239. Ѹ˴ؤʿ [complaint_tradition][prescriptivism][prescriptive_grammar][dryden][swift][language_myth][stigma]

ѸˤϡʹߤϢʤ³ "the complaint tradition" ʿˤꡤ"the complaint literature" ʿʸˤѤƤ㤨С#301. ѤȤѸθˡ Top 10 ([2010-02-22-1]) ǼतΡ֤ʱѸϼʤפȤӤΤȤǤ롥ŵŪ˿ʹʤɤ˴󤻤Ƥ
ϡɸѸ줬ۤܳΩǡϼŪĬ褦ˤʤäƤŤλ̤롥̾ͤǤСJohn Dryden (1631--1700) 䡤 Jonathan Swift (1667--1745) κǽôȤcf. #3220. 󥰥ɻ˾αѸ쥢ǥߡɤ Dryden αѸ˾ɾ ([2018-02-19-1])#1947. Swift clipping Ƚ([2014-08-26-1]
Milroy and Milroy ˤСˤ2ĤΥפȤξԤϽŤʤ⤢뤬ŪۤʤäƤꡤŪˤʪȹͤɬפ롥ޤ Type 1 顥

Type 1 complaints, which are implicitly legalistic and which are concerned with correctness, attack 'mis-use' of specific parts of the phonology, grammar, vocabulary of English (and in the case of written English 'errors' of spelling, punctuation, etc.). . . . The correctness tradition (Type 1) is wholly dedicated to the maintenance of the norms of Standard English in preference to other varieties: sometimes writers in this tradition attempt to justify the usages they favour and condemn those they dislike by appeals to logic, etymology and so forth. Very often, however, they make no attempt whatever to explain why one usage is correct and another incorrect: they simply take it for granted that the proscribed form is obviously unacceptable and illegitimate; in short, they believe in a transcendental norm of correct English. / . . . . Type 1 complaints (on correctness) may be directed against 'errors' in either spoken or written language, and they frequently do not make a very clear distinction between the two. (30--31)


Type 1 ϡǤŵŪʥפǤꡤȤñƤʿǤ롥ָȽפȤäƤ褤ΥפɸѸݻ (maintenance) 뵡ǽôäƤȤŦ⤪⤷
˵󤲤 Type 2 Type 1 ۤΤƤʤϤ Swift ˤޤ̤롥

Type 2 complaints, which we may call 'moralistic', recommend clarity in writing and attack what appear to be abuses of language that may mislead and confuse the public. . . . / Type 2 complaints do not devote themselves to stigmatising specific errors in grammar, phonology, and so on. They accept the fact of standardisation in the written channel, and they are concerned with clarity, effectiveness, morality and honesty in the public use of the standard language. Sometimes elements of Type 1 can enter into Type 2 complaints, in that the writers may sometimes condemn non-standard usage in the belief that it is careless or in some way reprehensible; yet the two types of complaints can in general be sharply distinguished. The most important modern author in this second tradition is George Orwell . . . (30)


Type 1 "the correctness tradition" ȸƤ֤ʤСType 2 "the moralistic tradition" ȸƤǤ褤Ѥˤ褦ˡGeorge Orwell (1903--50) Ǥ̾ʼ羧ԤǤ롥Type 2 ɽǯưȤƤϡ1979ǯ˻Ϥ줿 "Plain English Campaign" 롥ŪʾˤïˤǤʬʸո򿴤٤ȼĥȿǤꡤʱѸǽ񤫤줿ʸ "Crystal Mark" դưԤʤäƤۤǯʱѸФƾޤ£äƤ롥

Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 4th ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-09 Fri

#3238. [language_shift][language_death][bilingualism][diglossia][terminology][sociolinguistics][irish][terminology]

ܥ֥Ǥϡ (language_shift) ٤夲ƤϸäͤƤߤ褦Trudgill Crystal Ѹ콸ˤС줾켡Τ褦ˤ롥

language shift The opposite of language maintenance. The process whereby a community (often a linguistic minority) gradually abandons its original language and, via a (sometimes lengthy) stage of bilingualism, shifts to another language. For example, between the seventeenth and twentieth centuries, Ireland shifted from being almost entirely Irish-speaking to being almost entirely English-speaking. Shift most often takes place gradually, and domain by domain, with the original language being retained longest in informal family-type contexts. The ultimate end-point of language shift is language death. The process of language shift may be accompanied by certain interesting linguistic developments such as reduction and simplification. (Trudgill)


language shift A term used in sociolinguistics to refer to the gradual or sudden move from the use of one language to another, either by an individual or by a group. It is particularly found among second- and third-generation immigrants, who often lose their attachment to their ancestral language, faced with the pressure to communicate in the language of the host country. Language shift may also be actively encouraged by the government policy of the host country. (Crystal)


ؤϸĿͤ佸Ĥ뤳Ȥ⤢뤬奢ɤǼƤȤꡤ򤫤ơ٤äȿʤळȤ¿ϢơؤϤФ bilingualism ʳͳȤ⤢뤬Ȥˤ줬ٲ diglossia ξ֤߽Ф⤢뤳Ȥ˿Ƥ
ޤؤϰ̱δ֤䤹Ȥ⿨Ƥ뤬ާƸС͡ưȤ˸ؤϵ䤹ȤȤʡ#3065. ԻԲ¡ء ([2017-09-17-1]
ɤŪ˵äʤ뤤Ϻ³Ƥ˸ؤˤĤƤϡ#2798. ̦رѸȤ򡡥ɤκ١ȽŹ2016ǯ ([2016-12-24-1])#1715. Ireland ˤѸˡ ([2014-01-06-1])#2803. ɸüԿ͸Ȼϰ ([2016-12-29-1])#2804. ɤˤߤΤͤ츽ݡ ([2016-12-30-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Trudgill, Peter. A Glossary of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Crystal, David, ed. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. 295--96.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-08 Thu

#3237. ɸಽ [terminology][standardisation][historiography]

줬Ūɸಽɸಽ򷫤֤ݤɸಽ (standardisation cycle) ȸƤ֡#3207. ɸѸȸɸಽ˴ؤ뤤ĤνѸ ([2018-02-06-1]) ǾҲ𤷤ѸѤСʶƱΡˤ focused diffuse ξˤԤä褿ꤹȤȤˤʤ롥
Swann et al. μҲؼŵˤȡΤ褦ˤ롥

standardisation cycle According to Greenberg (1986) and Ferguson (1988), a regular historical process by which an originally relatively uniform language splits into several dialects; then at a later stage a common, uniform standard is established on the basis of these dialects. Finally, this variety will again split into regional and social varieties and the cycle will start again.


ΤˡδѸˤ򿶤֤ȡȿѰۤ졤focused diffuse δ֤Ԥ褷ƤȤǧ뤳ȤǤ롥#3231. ɸ˼­򤪤 Blake αѸ˻ʬ ([2018-03-02-1]) 7ʬά˥ղȡΤ褦ˤʤΤǤϤʤ

Standardisation Cycle of English

1000ǯˤëϡѸ˾ǽɸ Late West Saxon γΩؤΩȤϤäƤⴰʤ "focused" ξ֤ˤãƤ餺٤ѰۤƤˤɸǤ롥θ塤ƤѸ "diffuse" ʾ֤ز󵢤뤬15äȸɸˤĤʤĬήϤޤäƤ롥αѸ˾2ܤɸಽϡ1ܤ "focused" ٤ۤ "fixed" Ȥ٤ΤǤ뤳ȤդǸʹߡѸ줬ʬȻƤΤ¤Ǥꡤ⥰դΤǤСΤ褦ˤʤ뤫⤷ʤȤСfocused diffuse ؤΥ뤬ƤӻưƤ褦˸Ƥ롥

Swann, Joan, Ana Deumert, Theresa Lillis, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds. A Dictionary of Sociolinguistics. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2004.
Greenberg, J. H. "Were There Egyptian Koines?" The Fergusonian Impact. Vol. 1. Ed. A. Fishman, A. Tabouret-Kellter, M. Clyne, B. Krishnamurti and M. Abdulaziz. Berlin and New York: Academic P, 1986.
Ferguson, C. A. "Standardization as a Form of Language Spread." Language Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications, and Case Studies. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 1987. Ed. P. Lowenberg. Washington, DC: Georgetown UP, 1988.
Blake, N. F. A History of the English Language. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.

Referrer (Inside): [2018-11-20-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-07 Wed

#3236. 饤ɤǤ륤ꥹʸشϢάǯɽ [literature][timeline][history]

ǯɽ꡼ (timeline) ΰĤȤơ#3226. ꥹʸشϢάǯɽ ([2018-02-25-1]) ˥饤ɤǤǯɽ˺ľʲޤ򥯥åˡ饤ɤǤǯɽȤƤϡ#2358. 饤ɤǤѸǯɽ ([2015-10-11-1])#2871. űѸΥ饤ǯɽ ([2017-03-07-1])#3164. 饤ɤǤѸǯɽ (2) ([2017-12-25-1])#3205. 饤ɤǤѸǯɽ (3) ([2018-02-04-1]) ⻲ȡ

HELIT Timeline by Kawasaki

ɧإꥹʸػ١ҡ1986ǯ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-06 Tue

#3235. ɸ쥤ǥɸಽǥ [linguistic_ideology][standardisation][language_myth][terminology]

ɸ쥤ǥ (standard language ideology) ȤϡSwann et al. μҲؼŵˤȰʲ̤Ǥ롥

standard language ideology A concept introduced to sociolinguistics by James Milroy and Lesley Milroy (1999) in order to describe the prescriptive attitudes that accompany the emergence of standard languages. Standard Language Ideologies (SLIs) are characterised by a metalinguistically articulated and culturally dominant belief that there is only one correct way of speaking (i.e. the standard language). The SLI leads to a general intolerance towards linguistic variation, and non-standard varieties in particular are regarded as 'undesirable' and 'deviant'.


ǻȤƤ Milroy and Milroy ˡ4ǡ2012ǯˤäƤߤȡp. 19 ˴Ϣ뵭Ҥ롥

. . . it seems appropriate to speak more abstractly of standardisation as an ideology, and a standard language as an idea in the mind rather than a reality --- a set of abstract norms to which actual usage conform to a greater or lesser extent.


ɸȤΤʪǤ뤳Ȥϡ#3232. ۲줿ŪѼȤƤɸ ([2018-03-03-1]) Ǥ Milroy and Milroy ̤ƳǧΤ褦Ѽ郎¸ߤȿ뤳Ȥϡ1ĤΥǥǤȤȤ줬ɸ쥤ǥפǤ롥
˿ʤƤСɸಽ (standardisation) ȤΤΤȤƤβȤ⡤ѻԤƬˤ륤ǥˤʤȤ٤ϡɸಽǥפȸƤǤ褤
֡ˤˤɸಽηȯŸפȤ褦ʥơޤ򰷤ˤϡΥơޤΩΤ1Ĥθ쥤ǥɤäƤդ٤⤳ޤDZѸɸಽˤѤʵȤɵᤷƤɸಽݤˤϡˤ륤ǥ˼ŪǤʤФʤʤȿʤƤ롥

Swann, Joan, Ana Deumert, Theresa Lillis, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds. A Dictionary of Sociolinguistics. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2004.
Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 4th ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-05 Mon

2018-03-04 Sun

#3233. Ѹ켫ͳȱѸв19 [standardisation][romanticism][history_of_linguistics][prescriptivism][historiography][wordsworth][coleridge]

#3231. ɸ˼­򤪤 Blake αѸ˻ʬ ([2018-03-02-1]) εǼꤢBlake ˤѸ˶ʬ61798ǯ?1914ǯˤˤĤƹͤ롥ޥε1˶ޤ줿λϡɸѸǰƬˤѸˤδϡѼŪ¿ռ줿Ȥ롥19Ťȡ18ħä줷ϼ꤫餢ٲ褦ˤʤꡤˤƼȯŪʸոºŤ졤ɸѼ郎ľѸ켫ͳѸвλۤȯȤäƤ褤𤲤ϵ줬ħŪˡWordsworth and Coleridge ˤ Lyrical Ballads (1798) νǤäBlake (13) ۩

This collection of poetry [= the Lyrical Ballads] attacked the idea of a prescriptive language for poetry and raised the concept that it should deal with 'the real language of men'. It was inspired in part by the French Revolution of 1789, which had called into question the very bases of the old order and its assumptions of regulation and conformity. This attitude gradually spilled over into language as well, for there seemed to be a profound attack on the nature of authority and the assumption that those at the top could dictate what was right and acceptable to the rest of society. While such attitudes did not change overnight, we can accept that there was a new spirit abroad which provides us with a convenient boundary in 1798.


1798ǯ˻Ϥޤꡤ1ȯ1914ǯޤǤλϡĹ19ɽƤ褤Blake ˤСλϡŪˤߤ (1) ¿ɸѼºš(2) ŪζδȤ2ħŤȤ줾ʬѤ褦

Firstly, the previous age had been concerned with regulating language and discovering the principles which underlined a language on the assumption that all languages followed the same structure. The nineteenth century was interested in the diversity of languages and varieties of language. The growth of the empire promoted interest in a whole range of languages other than the classical languages which had hitherto been the model for all linguistic structure. And scholars in England began to record the various regional dialects found in the United Kingdom. Whereas before these dialects may have been considered provincial and little more than barbarous, their use in poetry and the novel and the collections and studies based on these forms gradually meant that they were seen as real means of communication, even if they were not as socially acceptable as the standard. The respect for non-standard varieties increased, though this was a gradual process which even today has not made these dialects socially acceptable. One problem that such varieties faced, and still face, is that they do not usually exist in a regulated written form and thus may be regarded as inferior.


Secondly, the nineteenth century saw an enormous growth in the historical study of language. Many of the changes in English and its ancestors which will be outlined in the book were discovered in the nineteenth century. The development of the concept of a family tree for languages and the recognition that English was a Germanic language which belonged to the Proto-Indo-European family of languages (also known simply as Indo-European) were among the advances made at this time. Not unnaturally this put English and the classical languages into a different perspective. Their nature was not different from that of other languages, and English dialects could be regarded as closely related to standard English in origin and development; they had simply not been chosen to form the standard.


ǤСɸѸ򡤤ƱѸ줽ΤΤвª߽Ф줿ȤˤäŪʻ줿櫓ǤϤʤޤŪʻ¤ΩĤ褦ˤʤäȤȤǤ롥Ūʻϡ21κǤ⽽ʬƤΤ

Blake, N. F. A History of the English Language. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-03 Sat

#3232. ۲줿ŪѼȤƤɸ [standardisation][linguistic_ideology][sociolinguistics]

ɸѸˤ˾ƤʸδƬǡMilroy (11) ˤޤɸȤΤˤĤƽҤ٤Ƥ롥

It has been observed (Coulmas 1992: 175) that 'traditionally most languages have been studied and described as if they were standard languages'. This is largely true of historical descriptions of English, and I am concerned in this paper with the effects of the ideology of standardisation (Milroy and Milroy 1991: 22--3) on scholars who have worked on the history of English. It seems to me that these effects have been so powerful in the past that the picture of language history that has been handed down to us is a partly false picture --- one in which the history of the language as a whole is very largely the story of the development of modern Standard English and not of its manifold varieties. This tendency has been so strong that traditional histories of English can themselves be seen as constituting part of the standard ideology --- that part of the ideology that confers legitimacy and historical depth on a language, or --- more precisely --- on what is held at some particular time to be the most important variety of a language.
   In the present account, the standard language will not be treated as a definable variety of a language on a par with other varieties. The standard is not seen as part of the speech community in precisely the same sense that vernaculars can be said to exist in communities. Following Haugen (1966), standardisation is viewed as a process that is in some sense always in progress.


ɸȤŪ¸ʪǤϤʤưŪήΤΤ褦ʤΤǤ롥ɸಽȤưŪʲŪʤΤؤȥޥåԥ󥰤ͶŪʸѼ˶ᤤȤȤɸ˸¤餺Ѽ郎եǤȤϤcf. #1373. variety Ȥϲ ([2013-01-29-1])#415. All linguistic varieties are fictions ([2010-06-16-1])#2116. ֱѸפεۣ ([2015-02-11-1])#2265. ѼȤϸѲηϩꤷեǤ ([2015-07-10-1])ˡɸϡɸ뤹륤ǥ˻٤ơŪʥե󡽡եΥե󡽡ˤʤ䤹ʪǤΤ⤷ʤ#1396. "Standard English" Ȥϲ ([2013-02-21-1]) Ȥˤ⡤ŤɽϤʤФʤʤΤ

Milroy, Jim. "Historical Description and the Ideology of the Standard Language." The Development of Standard English, 1300--1800. Ed. Laura Wright. Cambridge: CUP, 2000. 11--28.
Coulmas, F. Language and Economy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 1991.
Haugen, Einar. "Dialect, Language, Nation." American Anthropologist. 68 (1966): 922--35.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-05-26-1] [2018-03-06-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-02 Fri

#3231. ɸ˼­򤪤 Blake αѸ˻ʬ [standardisation][periodisation][historiography][chancery_standard][prescriptive_grammar][prescriptivism][romanticism]

Blake αѸ˽ϡѸɸಽ (standardisation) ɸѸηȤ˾碌ͥ줿Ѹ˳Ǥ롥Ȥ櫓ܤ٤ϡΤΤȤ礭ۤʤѸˤλʬˡ (periodisation) Ǥ롥ѸˤθˤˤơޤǤ͡ʻʬƤƤBlake ΤϰӤɸ˼­򤪤ҲŪʴƤǤꡤܤФ褦ʿ (Blake, Chapter 1) 7ʬƤ롥ʲˡȤȤ˵

(1) եå粦λ (?9Ⱦ)ɸŪѼ郎¸ߤ͡Ѽ郎ΩƤ
(2) 9Ⱦ?1250ǯȥν񤭸ɸबƶϤä
(3) 1250ǯ?1400ǯɸȤǰʤ塨ɸΤ˶ޤ줿 "the Interregnum"
(4) 1400ǯ?1660ǯɸν񤭸աʤȤ櫓ֻȸäΥ٥ˤơˤΩƤ
(5) 1660ǯ?1798ǯɸλ
(6) 1798ǯ?1914ǯѼŪ¿ռ줿
(7) 1914ǯ?ѸʬԳΤħŤ

(1) եå粦λ (?9Ⱦ) ϡѸ줬ѸȤ1Ĥñ̤ȤƸƤȤ⡤ѸνѼ郎¤٤뽸ΤȸƤǤ롥äơ1ĤɸȤȯۤ¸ߤʤ
(2) եå粦λʹߡȤ櫓10--11ˤƥȥűѸν񤭸դɸȤƤϰ̤1066ǯΥΥޥϳΤ˱ѸμҲŪϰ̤򤪤Ȥ᤿ȥɸϱѸҶǺ١³1250ǯޤDZƶϤĤʤȤ⡤ϤƱѸ񤳤Ȥ񤭼ꤿ¸ߤƤѸ˾塤ɸ줬ΩȤƽפǤ롥
(3) Ƥɸ줬ƶϤ򼺤ʤɸ줬ޤǤζ̴ (the Interregnum) Ѽ郎Ω1Ĥɸ줬ʤ塥
(4) Ѹ˾2ܤν񤭸դɸ줬졤夷Ƥ塥15Ⱦ Chancery Standard ΡʤΰˤǤȹͤ롥ޤȤȯۤϵǤ롥
(5) 뵬ϼλ塥ʸˡ¿蘆졤ɸܻؤ줿塥ڤǯϡ (Restoration) 1660ǯȡޥȤʤ Wordsworth and Coleridge ˤ Lyrical Ballads Ǥ줿1798ǯħŪǯǤϤ뤬Τ˴֤˶ޤ줿ϡסס«פȤäɤ礦Ǥ롥
(6) Lyrical Ballads 1 (1914) ޤǤλ塥Ĥ餢ټͳˤʤꡤѼؤδؿޤꡤɸвƸ褦ˤʤä塥夫εϼޤƤΤ¡
(7) 1狼鸽ߤޤǤλ塥Ѹ줬ʤʬԤƩʾ"fragmentation and uncertainty" (Blake 15) ħŤ塥

ŪʡָűѸסѸסֶѸפζʬ򤵤ȾۤƤϤ褤

Blake, N. F. A History of the English Language. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2018-03-01 Thu

#3230. indict θ츻Ūֻ [etymological_respelling][spelling][pronunciation][silent_letter][spelling_pronunciation_gap][doublet]

츻Ūֻ (etymological_respelling) ɽ1ĤȤ̾⤤ñȯ /ɪnˈdaɪt/ Ǥ롥ֻȤƤ <c> Τȯʤۻ (silent_letter) ޤǤ롥Ƕᡤ꤬ Merriam-Webster Ȥñ쥳ʡ Why Do We Skip The "C" in "Indict"? ȤƼꤢ줿ʲˡѤƤ

Why do we pronounce indict /in-DYTE/? Other legal terms in English that share the Latin root dicere ("to say") are pronounced as they are spelled: edict, interdict, verdict.

Indict means "to formally decide that someone should be put on trial for a crime." It comes from the Latin word that means "to proclaim."

We pronounce this word /in-DYTE/ because its original spelling in English was endite, a spelling that was used for 300 years before scholars decided to make it look more like its Latin root word, indictare. Our pronunciation still reflects the original English spelling.

The other words ending in -dict were either borrowed directly from Latin or the English pronunciation shifted when they were respelled to reflect a closer relationship to Latin.


ƥϤ <c> 줿Τȯɿ路ʤä indict ФֻȯŪ˰פ -dict Ȥ edict, interdict, verdict 󤲤Ƥ롥ºݤˤ -dict ˸¤餺깭 ct 򼨤ˤĤƸ츻ŪֻȤƤ <c> ǧ졤ֻˤäȯ /kt/ б̤ȤʤäƤ롥Ȥơconduct (ME conduit), distracted (ME distrait), perfect (ME parfit), subject (ME suget), victual (ME citaile) ʤɤ󤲤Ƥ<t> <ct> ϡ츻ŪֻŵŪʥѥ1ĤäȤcf. #1944. 츻Ūֻ෿ ([2014-08-23-1]
1դƤΤϡԸդǤϤ뤬֡ʻʸˤ롨񤯡פȤ̣ indite/endite Ȥ¸ߤ뤳ȤǤ롥indict indite ϡä2Ÿ (doublet) ȤȤˤʤ롥

[ | ѥڡ ]

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow