hellogѸ˥֥     η     η     ǿ     helhub (The HEL Hub)     ڡ     ɽ    

hellogѸ˥֥ / 2016-06

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

2016-06-30 Thu

#2621. ɥĸαѸؤܳŪ׸19 [loan_word][borrowing][statistics][german]

#2164. ѸˤǤޤΩʤɥĸ줫μѡ ([2015-03-31-1]) ǿ줿褦ˡɥĸαѸؤθŪƶϰƳʤ°桦 (20) ϼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥

ɥĸ줬1824ǯ˻ޤǡѹͤˡۤȤɤޤäȤäƤ褤餤ܤߤʤäΤ⡤ä٤ȤǤ롥ɥĸ줫μѸ16餢ˤϤ뤬ե󥹸졤졤󥸥ʥʤɤμѸ٤ȡĤ˾ʤΤǤ롥20äƤǤ⡤ѹͤΥɥĸ˴ؤμ­٤ʳãƤʤ


ʤ1824ǯȤϡThomas Carlyle (1795--1881) Göthe Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship ǤǯǤ롥
OED3 ˤѸ򸦵椷 Durkin (362) ˤȡ19ˤϥɥļѸΩäƤʤä19Ⱦ˰쵤˿ĥȤ19ȾˤϤԡã20ȾȾ塤20ȾˤƲФȤʤ˻롥  *
ɥļѸΤȤѸ줬¿줬̤ΩʤͳDurkin (361) Pfeffer and Cannon Ը򻲾Ȥʤ顤ɥĸѤȻˤĤƼΤ褦󤷤Ƥ롥

Pfeffer and Cannon provide a broad analysis of their data into subject areas; those with the highest numbers of items are (in descending order) mineralogy, chemistry, biology, geology, botany; only after these do we find two areas not belonging to the natural sciences: politics and music. The remaining areas that have more than a hundred items each (including semantic borrowings) are medicine, biochemistry, philosophy, psychology, the military, zoology, food, physics, and linguistics. Nearly all of these semantic areas reflect the importance of German as a language of culture and knowledge, especially in the latter part of the nineteenth century and early twentieth century.


Ѹϥޥ (Germanic) θǤꡤɥĸ (German) ȡַ״طˤȤϸ뤬˸褦ξŪˡʶḽ˻äƤܿε񤬰ճ˳äˡֱƶ״ط϶ϾǤ롥ޤˡֱѸϥɥĸαƶƤפȸͤ뤬Ϸطȱƶط㤨Ƥ뤫뤤 Germanic German Ʊ뤷Ƥ뤫ˤ˴ŤƤ롥θˤĤƤϡ#369. ˤƶ ([2010-05-01-1])#1136. ۤʤδ֤줬 ([2012-06-06-1])#1930. ȱƶθ줿ɥ衼åѸ²δطޡ ([2014-08-09-1]) 򻲾ȡ

° ̭ ͡ΤäƤѸˡ١ҡ2014ǯ
Durkin, Philip. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: OUP, 2014.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-29 Wed

#2620. 󥰥īηϿ [family_tree][oe][monarch][history][anglo-saxon]

#2547. 奤󥰥ɷǯΰ ([2016-04-17-1]) ǵ󤲤顤󥰥īʸűѸˤηϿޡEgbert William I (the Conqueror) ޤǤηޤ򻲾Ѥ˷ǤƤ

            Egbert (829--39) [King of Wessex (802--39)]
              
              
          Ethelwulf (839--56)
              
              
    
                                                                      
                                                                      
Ethelbald (856--60)   Ethelbert (860--66)   Ethelred I (866--71)   Alfred the Great (871--99)
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                   Edward the Elder (899--924)
                                                                            
                                                                            
                      
                                                                        
                                                                                                            
                  Athelstan (924--40)   Edmund I the Elder (945--46)   Edred (946--55)                            ???HOUSE OF DENMARK???
                                                                                                              
                                              
                  Edwy (955--59)        Edgar (959--75)                                                        Sweyn Forkbeard (1013--14)
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                          
                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                  
           Edward the Martyr (975--79)   Ethelred II the Unready (979--1013, 1014--16)  Emma (--1052)   Canute (1016--35)
                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                    Hardicanute (1040--42)    
                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                              
                                     Edmund II Ironside (1016. 4--11)      Edward the Confessor (1042--66)             Harold I Harefoot (1035--40)
                                                
                                                
                                                                                              
                                       Edward Atheling (--1057)               ???HOUSE OF NORMANDY ???                  ???HOUSE OF GODWIN ???
                                                                                              
                                                
                                                
                                     Edgar Atheling (1066. 10--12)          William the Conqueror (1066--87)          Harold II (1066. 1--10)

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-28 Tue

#2619. űѸѲ2ưޤ˸ -i- ѸǤξü [inflection][verb][oe][eme][conjugation][morphology][owl_and_nightingale][speed_of_change][schedule_of_language_change][3sp][3pp]

űѸμѲ2°ưǤϡɽΤĤβս "medial -i-" (#2112. ʤ3ñ -s ĤΤ ([2015-02-07-1]) θűѸ lufian ζɽ򻲾) -i- Ѹʹߤ˼ƤüΥߥ󥰤䥹ԡɤƥȤʤɤˤäưۤʤäƤʬۤΰȤƤϡݼŪǤ -i- ٤ޤݤ졤׿ŪǤ᤯˼줿
űѸμѲ2Ǥľˡ3;ñߤζ޸ -i- Ժߤ - Ȥʤ뤬б3;ΡʣǤ -i- -iaþ Ȥʤ롥äơѸʹߤ -i- ξüʤȡ޸ˤä3;Τñʣ̤뤳ȤǤʤʤä
üʹԤƤѸβϴˤϡκ⤢äΤǤϤʤȵ롥㤨СThe Owl and the Nightingale ll. 229--32 򸫤Ƥߤ褦Cartlidge Ǥˡ

Vor eurich þing þat schuniet riȝt,
Hit luueþ þuster & hatiet liȝt;
& eurich þing þat is lof misdede,
Hit luueþ þuster to his dede.


֤ǵưϤűѸμѲ2ͳ褷3;ñμäƤ롥äơ -i- ʤϤschuniet hatiet Ǥ -i- Ƥ롥ʤ嵭 C ܤǤη֤ȿǤƤ뤬J ܤǤб֤Ϥ줾 schonyeþ, luuyeþ, hateþ, luueþ ȤʤäƤꡤ-i- ʬۤǤޤޤǤ롥
schuniet ˤĤƤϡԻ eurich þing ̣ʣȤƲᤵ줿뤤 alle þing ʤɤοʣäΤǤϤʤȤǽŦƤCartlidge (Owl 113) Ǥϡ"it seems more sensible to regard these lines as an example of the Middle English breakdown of distinctions made between different forms of Old English Class 2 weak verbs" Ȥθ򤬼Ƥ롥
Cartlidge ̤ʸǡΥƥȤˤ -i- ˤĤƽҤ٤ƤΤǡβսѤƤ

In both C and J, the infinitives of verbs descended from Old English Class 2 weak verbs in -ian always retain an -i- (either -i, -y, -ye, -ie, -ien or -yen). However, for the third person plural of the indicative, J writes -yeþ five times, as against nine cases of - or -þ; while C writes -ieþ or -iet seven times, as against seven cases of -, -ed, or -et. In the present participle, both C and J have medial -i- twice beside eleven non-conservative forms. The retention of -i in some endings also occurs in many later medieval texts, at least in the south, and its significance may be as much regional as diachronic. (Cartlidge, "Date" 238)


ˤϡ-i- ξüηˤäưۤʤäƤФǤʤɽΥåȤˤäƤ⥿ߥ󥰤䥹ԡɤۤʤäƤǽƤꡤѲΥ塼 (schedule_of_language_change) δ鶽̣

Cartlidge, Neil, ed. The Owl and the Nightingale. Exeter: U of Exeter P, 2001.
Cartlidge, Neil. "The Date of The Owl and the Nightingale." Medium Aevum 65 (1996): 230--47.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-27 Mon

#2618. ʸ⤿ʤοϡ (2) [world_languages][writing][statistics][language_planning][language_myth][medium]

#1277. ʸ⤿ʤοϡ ([2012-10-25-1]) ǡμפ뤳Ȥ񤷤˿줿ϡ̱²ɴʻŵ٤ˡ̵ʸפȤ򸫤ĤΤǡƤ󤷤
̵ʸ (unwritten language) Ȥϡ֤ʸ˽񤫤뤳ȤʤȤȤǤϤʤԤʤɤˤäƽ񤫤뤳ȤȤƤҲ夷Ƥ餺줬̿䵭ϿΤȤƵǽƤʤפǤ롥̵ʸοˤĤƤϡܹ񤤤Ƥ (186) ΤʤȤϸʤ褦ǡEthnologue ˤθοפ򻲾Ȥʤ顤ȡʸ줿ϡˤ餯%ʤΤǤϤʤºŪΤۤȤɤʸ̵ʸʤΤǤפȽҤ٤Ƥ롥
εǤ⿨줿̵ʸüԤʸΤʤȤɬ⤤ʤȤդǶʸƤǽϤ뤫ºݤˡ¿ο͡Τ褦ʾˤƤ롥դ˸Сǡʤ뤤ǡ˶ȤΤϡʤΤǤ롥
ȥꥢ̵ʸä̱²ʸ̵ʸȤݸ褦Ȥ뱿ưʤɡΤĤϰǾݻλߤʤƤϤ롥Τ褦ʸ (language_planning) ϤޤŪȤϤ¿θ줬ϰζʸ줫ΰϤ亹̤ˤ餵ƤΤ֤
(187) ϡ̵ʸ˴ؤο (language_myth) ˸ڤĤġ̵ʸҲˤߤƬ礭ŦƤ롥

ʸʤɽ̡ˤʤΤǤϤʤȹͤ⤢뤬ϤषդǤ뤳Ȥ¿ʸʤ餳ɽ˰ηͿߥ˥ΤʤΤˤ褦ȤռƯʤ䥢եꥫθ̱äȤꡤޤ2,0003,000⤢ΤͤƤߤ褦㤨иȤΤϡҲαΤ򥳥ѥȤɽΤǤ뤬ˤϱƧжѤȤޤޤʷƳƤ롥
άʸϡޤޤʤΤʸѤ뤳Ȥ롥㤨С̾̾ϽεϿΤȤƵǽ뤳Ȥ¿ϰǤߤ롥㤨СեꥫʤɤǤϡ򼰡פȤ̾ϡ²ӤƤȤޤ줿Ҷפ襤äȤλҶƻפƤʤ˵ޤΤ֤˹鷺ƻǻҶȤäǤ롥̾ϸĿͤ¾θĿͤȶ̤ǤʤƱ̿̾ԡʤϼȤƻҶοơˤˤȤäƽפʽ򡤻Ҷ̾˵ϿƤΤǤ롥ޤٿͤФơ񤯤褦˥åҶ̾Τ¿
Τ褦ˡ̵ʸ줽̵ʸҲˤƤϡʸʤ餳˭ʸʸݤȯãƤΤǤ롥ʸ䤬礭ʤФʤۤɡʸݤषƤȤϺ桹ܤˤƤȤǤ롥


Ϣơ#1685. ƬΤĵϤȰҿ ([2013-12-07-1]) 򻲾ȡ

м̵ʸס̱²ɴʻŵ١Ω̱²ʪۡԡˡǡ2014ǯ186--87ǡ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-26 Sun

#2617. "colloquial" Ȥ쥸 [register][medium][componential_analysis][prototype]

"colloquial" Ȥ쥸 (register) ˤĤƹͤƤ롥ȤƤϡָ(), äդΡäΡΤΡĥʤפۤɤͿ졤ϢȤƤ "conversational", "spoken", "vulgar", "slangy", "informal" ʤɤ󤲤롥Ū "literary" ȤѸ줬ꤵƤ뤳Ȥ¿̵ʿͤθոɽƻǤϤʤषΤͤäǻȤդȤްդĤγؽԱѱѼ񤫤Ѥ褦

(of words and language) used in conversation but not in formal speech or writing (OALD8)
language or words that are colloquial are used mainly in informal conversations rather than in writing or formal speech (LDOCE5)
(of words and expressions) informal and more suitable for use in speech than in writing (CALD3)
Colloquial words and phrases are informal and are used mainly in conversation (COBUILD)
used in informal conversation rather than in writing or formal language (MED2)


ɽȤƤ a colloquial expression, the colloquial style, a colloquial knowledge of Japanese, colloquial speech ʤɤͤˤʤ롥
嵭顤"colloquial" ŵŪˡ (mode of discourse) ȤƤäաʲˤ° (style (tenor) of discourse) ȤƤϷĥʤΤ°Ȥ (cf. #839. register ([2011-08-14-1])) "colloquial" ϸ§ȤʳŪƻ (gradable adjective) Ǥꡤɽ "colloquial" Ǥ뤫ݤŪ˷ꤹ뤳Ȥ񤷤Τäդ񤭸դȤΤ°ϥǥǤϤ뤬񤭸դؤ "colloquial" ɽ뤳ȤԲǽǤϤʤ (ex. The passage is written in a colloquial way.) ޤˤĤƤϷĥٹ礤ϥʥǤ뤫顤"colloquial" "uncolloquial" ζϤȤ꺤Ǥ롥ɭ"colloquial" ΰ̣ΤΤȥȤ2°Ȥ߹碌ˤäʬʬ (componential_analysis) ŪȤϡץȥ (prototype) ȤΤդ路褦˻פ롥
ץȥפȤƤβ᤬Ǥ뤳Ȥϡ#611. Murray θ ([2010-12-29-1])#1958. Hughes θ ([2014-09-06-1]) Ǽʡ֥쥸פɤؤƤ褵ˤˤäƤ⼨롥˵󤲤Ƥ "colloquial" ۤ "dialectal", "literary", "formal" ʤɤΥ쥸Ѹΰ̣⡤٤ƥץȥŪˤȤ館ƤΤ褵

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-25 Sat

#2616. Ūʰ̣礤복ǰ᥿ե [metaphor][cognitive_linguistics][sapir-whorf_hypothesis][rhetoric][conceptual_metaphor]

#2593. 졤׹͡¡ʸĤʤΤȤƤΥ᥿ե ([2016-06-02-1]) Ǽ褦ˡǧθŪʸˤСǰ᥿ե (conceptual_metaphor) ϻ׹ͤ˱ƶڤܤǤʤưδפȤʤ롥ʤǰ᥿եϡ͡ιư¥ưϤȤʤꤦȤǡŪѤ뤳ȤȤȤ
Lakoff and Johnson θŵŪ Metaphors We Live By κǽϤκǽˡ"Politics" ꤹʸϤ֤ƤΤϼŪǤ롥ǤϤФСֿʹå褦ʡ (dehumanizing) ᥿եѤ졤ˤäƼºݤˡֿʹ (human degradation) ޤƤȡԤϻŦ롥ƱκǸ2ȴФ

   Political and economic ideologies are framed in metaphorical terms. Like all other metaphors, political and economic metaphors can hide aspects of reality. But in the area of politics and economics, metaphors matter more, because they constrain our lives. A metaphor in a political or economic system, by virtue of what it hides, can lead to human degradation.
   Consider just one example: LABOR IS A RESOURCE. Most contemporary economic theories, whether capitalist or socialist, treat labor as a natural resource or commodity, on a par with raw materials, and speak in the same terms of its cost and supply. What is hidden by the metaphor is the nature of the labor. No distinction is made between meaningful labor and dehumanizing labor. For all of the labor statistics, there is none on meaningful labor. When we accept the LABOR IS A RESOURCE metaphor and assume that the cost of resources defined in this way should be kept down, then cheap labor becomes a good thing, on a par with cheap oil. The exploitation of human beings through this metaphor is most obvious in countries that boast of "a virtually inexhaustible supply of cheap labor"---a neutral-sounding economic statement that hides the reality of human degradation. But virtually all major industrialized nations, whether capitalist or socialist, use the same metaphor in their economic theories and policies. The blind acceptance of the metaphor can hide degrading realities, whether meaningless blue-collar and white-collar industrial jobs in "advanced" societies or virtual slavery around the world.


"LABOUR IS A RESOURCE" Ȥǰ᥿եˤɤäפ꿻äҲɤäפ꿻ääƤĿͤȤơεˤȿʤФǤ롥ǡȿʤ褦ȷդǡ˼ºݤȿʤ뤳ȤǤȤȤϡγǰ᥿եˤäơʹ֤λ׹ͤư˹«櫓ǤϤʤȤȤˤʤ롥ǰ᥿եȻ׹͡ưδط˴ؤϡԥᥦդβ (sapir-whorf_hypothesis) Ȥ¿

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P, 1980.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-05-26-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-24 Fri

#2615. Ѹä [lexicology][loan_word][borrowing][statistics][link]

ѸäŪ (cosmopolitan) Ǥ롥350ʾθ줫äѤƤˤߤʤѤ³Ƥ롥ѸäȤˤˤĤơʲܥ֥ (http://user.keio.ac.jp/~rhotta/hellog/) δϢ뵭˥󥯤ĥäѸûˤ˴Ϣ󥯽ȤƤɤ

1ǤߤѸ
1.1äεϤ礭 (#45)
1.2äμ˭٤ (##756,309,202,429,845,1202,110,201,384)
2üѤȤϡ
2.1ʤäѤΤ (##46,1794)
2.2Ѥ5W1Hġɤǡï顤ɤΤ褦ˡʤڤꤿΤ (#37)
3ѸθüѤ (#1526)
3.1Φ (--449)
3.1.1ƥ (#1437)
3.2űѸ (449--1100)
3.2.1ȸ (##1216,2443)
3.2.2ƥ (#32)
3.2.3ťΥɸ (##340,818)
3.3Ѹ (1100--1500)
3.3.1ե󥹸 (##117,1210)
3.3.2ƥ (#120)
3.4Ѹ (1500--1700)
3.4.1ƥ (##114,478)
3.4.2ꥷ (#516)
3.4.3ޥ󥹽 (#2385)
3.5Ѹ (1700--1900) ȸѸ (1900--)
3.5.1ν (##874,2165)
4αѸäˤߤˤΰ仺
4.1ե󥹸ȥƥ줫μѸ (#2162)
4.2ưʪɽ魯ñ (##331,754)
4.3ä3ع¤ (##334,1296,335)
4.4Ѹθäζ (##1526,296,1630,1067)
5ߤ̤αѸ
5.1Ѱʳοθ (##873,875)
5.2äϻǤФ (##625,631,876,889)


[ ʸ ]

Hughes, G. A History of English Words. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
Durkin, Philip. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: OUP, 2014.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-23 Thu

#2614. 岻ˤд첻2ɤ [phonetics][vowel][sonority][stress][variation]

Ѹˤơ岻˸д첻ɽȤ /ə/ /ɪ/ 2ब롥ܼʣιǤȤƸ뤳Ȥ¿ơʬۤˤϤ褽Ф꤬ΤΡξԤδ֤ɤ򼨤⾯ʤʤ㤨 except θƬ첻ˤ /ə/ /ɪ/ Τ⸽뤳ȤǤԤξˤ accept ƱȤʤ롥illusion θƬ첻ˤĤƤƱͤǤꡤ/ə/ ȯ allusion ƱȤʤ롥ѸѼˤäƤ⤳ɤʬۤηϰۤʤ롥
ɤεϡSamuels ˤѸ줫ѸˤƤλˤäȤűѸˤ岻첻ϸ¤ѸǤ /ə/ ؤۣ첻θ夵˼岽ƴĶ˱ /ɪ/ ؤѲ礬äʤʤǤּ岽פȤʹ (sonority) δߤ岽ǤꡤĴŪˤС־夲 (raising) 롥⤤첻ˤʤСʹ٤ꡤ첻ȤƤϼ夯ʤȲǤ뤫ˡ
/ə/ /ɪ/ ɤϡߤ֤夤פǤ뤳Ȥ˵Ȥ/ə/ ϶ĥٹ礤ȤǤ /ɪ/ 夯 /ɪ/ ʹ٤Ǥ /ə/ 夤ȹͤ뤫Ĥޤꡤߤ˼岽礦طȤȤˤʤ롥Τʤˤ첻ˤϾ˼岽뷹ȤСʤ /ə/ /ɪ/ ΤDZʱɤ줬֤Ȥˤʤ
嵭ˤĤ Samuels (44--45) ľʹ

In ME, where the vowels of the OE endings had been centralised to /ə/, we find widespread new raising to /ɪ/, especially in inflexions ending in dental or alveolar consonants (-is, -ith, -yn, -id, -ind(e)). Since then, there has been constant distribution of the vowels of syllables newly unstressed to one or other member of the opposition /ɪ?ə/, depending partly on the inherited quality of the vowels and partly on that of the neighbouring segments: /ɪ/ is the commoner reflex of the vowels of ME -es, -ed, -est, -edge, -less, -ness, de-, re-, em-, ex-, whereas /ə/ represents the vowels of nearly all other unstressed syllables (the more important are -ance, -and, -dom, -ence, -ent, -land, -man, -oun, -our, -ous, a-, con-, com-, cor-, sub-, as well as syllabic /-l, -m, -n, -r/ and their reflexes wherever relevant). But there are exceptions to the expected distribution that are due to conditioning: the raising of /ə/ to /ɪ/ before /(d)ȝ, s/ as in cottage, damage, orange, furnace, and by vowel-harmony in women (also sometimes in chicken, kitchen, linen); and the same applies to other exceptions recorded in the past.
   Thus the pattern of development in EMnE was that new cases of /ə/ were continually arising from unstressed back vowels, but meanwhile certain cases of /ə/ with raised variants from conditioning were redistributed to /ɪ/. In present English, centralisation to /ə/ is again on the increase as dialects with higher proportions of /ɪ/ gain in prominence.


Samuels, M. L. Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English. London: CUP, 1972.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-22 Wed

#2613. ؤˤ벻ħΰ֤Ť (4) [phonaesthesia][sound_symbolism][word_formation][semantic_change][etymology][blend]

ɸ4 (cf. [2012-10-17-1], [2015-05-28-1])[2016-06-14-1]) Samuels ϡphonaesthesia Ȥݤ켫ȡѲ1ȤƽפǤǤϤʤ̼θѲβˤͿȹͤƤ롥ʲΤ褦ˡ֤̣ؤδͿƿˤ׸ȽҤ٤Ƥ (Samuels 48)

   (a) a word changes in form because its existing meaning suggests the inclusion of a phonaestheme, or the substitution of a different one;
   (b) a word changes in meaning because its existing form fits the new meaning better, i.e. its form thereby gains in motivation;
   (c) a new word arises from a combination of both (a) and (b).


(a) ζȤ Samuels ε󤲤ƤΤdrag, fag, flag, lag, nag, sag Τ褦 phonaestheme -ag /-ag/ ĸ췲Ǥ롥Τʤ flag, lag, sag ˤĤƤϡΤƤ츻Ϥ /g/ ǤϤʤ /k/ äƤ롥˾Τ줫ʳ /k/ /g/ ִ줿Ȥ򼨺뤬ϲѲη̤ǤϤʤ phonaestheme -ag αƶˤΤ̣Ǥ (analogy) ȤäƤ褤פǤ礭Ǥ꾮 phonaestheme Ȥñ̤εˤðۤǤ롥ۤˡդɽ魯Τ˻ҲŤͤ "expressive gemination" ⡤(a) Υפ˶ᤤ
(b) ȤƤϡcl- br- ĤĤθΰ̣ phonaestheme ΤĴްաʤ줾 "clinging, coagulation" "vehemence" ۤɡˤ˶ŤĤѲƤäҲ𤵤Ƥ (Samuels 55--56)

 earlier meaninglater meaning
CLOGfasten wood to (1398)encumber by adhesion (1526)
CLASPfasten (1386), enfold (1447)grip by hand, clasp (1583)
BRAZENof brass (OE)impudent (1573)
BRISTLEstand up stiff (1480)become indignant (1549)
BROILburn (1375)get angry (1561)


(c) ȤƤϡflurry θ츻ιͻ (Samuels 62) ñϡ餯 hurry Ȥ줬ΤȤʤäƤꡤƬҲ h phonaestheme fl- ˤ֤줿Τȿ仡Ƥ롥ȤȡϹ̣Ǻ (blend) ΰȹͤ졤smog, brunch, trudge ʤɤˤߤ뤳ȤǤ롥
嵭ΤʤˤϡФи츻ԾܤȤΤޤޤƤ뤬phonaesthesia ̣ѲθȤǧ뤳Ȥˤꡤ츻꤬褵륱ʤʤΤǤϤʤ
Ǥ礭Ǥ꾮ñ̤ȤƤ phonaestheme ȤͤˤϴؿäƤ롥ǯ9˸Ƭȯɽ "From Paragogic Segments to a Stylistic Morpheme: A Functional Shift of Final /st/ in Function Words Such As Betwixt and Amongst (cf. #2325. ICOME9 ˻äƵŤسĬήʤɡ ([2015-09-08-1])) 䡤"Betwixt and Between: The Ebb and Flow of Their Historical Variants" ꤹĴ betwixt amongst /-st/ ޤ phonaestheme ǤϤʤȹͤƤ롥

Samuels, M. L. Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English. London: CUP, 1972.
Hotta, Ryuichi. "Betwixt and Between: The Ebb and Flow of Their Historical Variants." Journal of the Faculty of Letters: Language, Literature and Culture 114 (2014): 17--36.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-21 Tue

#2612. 14˥ե󥹸ǤϤʤѸǽ񤳤Ȥ櫓 [reestablishment_of_english][lme][french]

Ѹ˽񤭸դƥ줫ѸڤؤäƤäаޤطʤˤĤơε#2611. 17˽񤭸դDZѸ줬ʤƥ줬षƤäͳ ([2016-06-20-1]) #1407. Ѹ3Ĥ ([2013-03-04-1])#2580. Ѹιռʳ ([2016-05-20-1]) εˤڤؤλˤϡޤѸǽ񤯤Ȥؤε줬줿Τ褯褦ʾ̤ä14ʸؤθˤƤ⸫줿14ξȤʤäƤΤϡƥ줫ڤؤȤϡषե󥹸줫ڤؤǤ롥
ξǤľŪ˼Τϡ14ΤĤΥƥȤˤߤ롤ѸѤݤθڤǤ롥Baugh and Cable (138--40) ꡤ3ĤΥƥȤΰѤ󤲤褦1ܤϡ1300ǯΥ󥰥ǽ񤫤줿ⶵǤ롥

Forthi wil I of my povert
Schau sum thing that Ik haf in hert,
On Ingelis tong that alle may
Understand quat I wil say;
For laued men havis mar mister
Godes word for to her
Than klerkes that thair mirour lokes,
And sees hou thai sal lif on bokes.
And bathe klerk and laued man
Englis understand kan,
That was born in Ingeland,
And lang haves ben thar in wonand,
Bot al men can noht, I-wis,
Understand Latin and Frankis.
Forthi me think almous it isse
To wirke sum god thing on Inglisse,
That mai ken lered and laued bathe.


Ԥϡ󥰥ɤǤϥե󥹸ƥ򤷤ʤԤϤ뤬Ѹ򤷤ʤԤϤʤȽҤ٤ơѸǽ񤯤ȤƤ롥ˡWilliam of Nassyngton Speculum Vitae or Mirror of Life (c. 1325) 1ᡥ

In English tonge I schal ȝow telle,
ȝif ȝe wyth me so longe wil dwelle.
No Latyn wil I speke no waste,
But English, þat men vse mast,
Þat can eche man vnderstande,
Þat is born in Ingelande;
For þat langage is most chewyd,
Os wel among lered os lewyd.
Latyn, as I trowe, can nane
But þo, þat haueth it in scole tane,
And somme can Frensche and no Latyn,
Þat vsed han cowrt and dwellen þerein,
And somme can of Latyn a party,
Þat can of Frensche but febly;
And somme vnderstonde wel Englysch,
Þat can noþer Latyn nor Frankys.
Boþe lered and lewed, olde and ȝonge,
Alle vnderstonden english tonge.


Ǹˡ餯14Ƭ˽񤫤줿ޥ Arthur and Merlin 1ᡥ

Riȝt is, þat Inglische Inglische vnderstond,
Þat was born in Inglond;
Freynsche vse þis gentilman,
Ac euerich Inglische can.
Mani noble ich haue yseiȝe
Þat no Freynsche couþe seye.


κޤǤˤϡ¿ε²Ǥ˥ե󥹸ǽϤ򼺤äƤȤȤ狼롥14ˤϡѸϳ鷺󥰥ɤγ򤹤ȤǧƤΤǤ롥

Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable. A History of the English Language. 6th ed. London: Routledge, 2013.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-20 Mon

#2611. 17˽񤭸դDZѸ줬ʤƥ줬षƤäͳ [latin][emode][renaissance]

#1407. Ѹ3Ĥ ([2013-03-04-1]) #2580. Ѹιռʳ ([2016-05-20-1]) εǻŦ褦ˡ16ȾޤǤϡԤܤ񤯤Τ˱ѸѤ뤳Ȥ˴ؤ¿쾯ʤ apologetic ä줬˶ŤȱѸФ뼫褦ˤʤꡤ17ˤϼۤܲ褦ˤߤ롥
ȤϤĹˤȰҿΤƥ줬񤭸դ餹˶व뤳ȤϤʤäƥϡ䶵طθҤȤƳΤϰ̤ݻƤؽѤθȤƥ衼åѤιݸǤ⤢ä͸αʸˡǤƥǽ񤫤ƤۤɤǤ롥ԤϡΤ褦ʬˤƤ̾˻ĤȻפСޤƥǽ񤯤Τդ路ȴƤΤǤ롥ѸȤ16--17Ԥƥǽ񤤤򤤤Ĥ󤲤Ƥߤ褦 (Görlach 39)

Literature: T. More, Utopia 1515ff.; Milton, early Latin poems
History: Boetius, Chronicles; W. Camden, Britannia
Sciences: W. Gilbert, De magnete . . . (1600); W. Harvey, Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus (Frankfurt, 1628); I. Newton, Principia (1689)
Philosophy: F. Bacon, De augmentis scientiarum (1623); T. Hobbes, De cive (1642)
Grammars, etc.: T. Smith, De recta et emendata linguae anglicae scriptione (1542, printed 1568); A. Gil, Logonomia Anglica (1619/21); J. Wallis, Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae (1685, English version 1687)


Τ褦ˡ줿ƥ줿ѸζϿˤ錄ä³ѸѤ17δ֤¤ƤꡤNewton Locke θOpticks (1704), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690) ʤɡˤ˸褦ˡѤܤޤǤˤϤۤܥƥषȤäƤ褤¾Υ衼åѽǤϤä٤äȤ⤢ˡ17ΥƥͳˤĤơGörlach (39) 4󤲤Ƥ롥

1 The grammar schools increasingly adopted English-medium education; the use of Latin declined sharply as soon as it began to be learnt only for reading texts (Latin classics, etc.).
2 Bacon and the 'New Science' looked more critically at classical and humanist concepts and their rhetorical forms; their demand for plain language strengthened the vernacular.
3 The influence of Puritanism increased, and Puritans tended to equate Latin with Roman Catholicism.
4 The upheavals of the Civil War disrupted the old traditions of the schools.


ҿȤƤΥƥοϰīͼˤϤʤλ֤פƱ褦ˡ줿Ѹΰҿˤ⡤٤δ֤ɬפäΤǤ롥

Görlach, Manfred. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: CUP, 1991.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-19 Sun

#2610. ƥ󥢥ꥫϱѸѼ [world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][demography][substratum_theory][aave]

ǯѸѼؤδؿ⤯ܥ֥Ǥ world_englishes new_englishes ȤΤȤǡ ͡Ѽ˿ƤϡBayley ˤ "Latino Varieties of English" ꤹʸʤȤϾҲ𵭻ˤ˽äơꥫˤƥ󥢥ꥫϰ̱Ȥλ¹ѤѸѼ "Latino English" ˤĤơñ˽Ҥ٤褦
ǿפǤϤʤ2004ǯλǡƹΥƥ󥢥ꥫϿ͸40,424,000ͤۤɤǤꡤˤΤ14%롥βȾϲǥڥѤ³ƤȤǤѸΤߤä͸ľ20ǯۤɤδ֤¤ƤƤȤBayley (522) ˰ѤƤ Brodie et al. 2002ǯפˤС̱1ˤͤǤϼȤƥڥΤߤä礬72%ǰݤƤ뤬2Ǥ47%Ѹ졦ڥΥХ󥬥ǤꡤˤۤƱȤƱѸäȤ3ʹߤˤʤȡ1Ⱦž78%ȤƱѸѤȤ롥Ĥޤꡤƥ󥢥ꥫϥꥫͤ2ʹߤȤƱѸ褦ˤʤäƤꡤäѼαѸ줬 "Latino English(es)" ȸƤФΤǤ롥ѼϡڥȤͤѸǼ interlanguage Ȥϰۤʤ뤳Ȥդ
Latino English ˤʣѼ郎̤뤬Bayley ˤС̤ηŪϤۤɿʤǤʤȤ̡2Ĥμ礿ѼǤ "Chicano English" "Puerto Rican English" ȤƤ롥Chicano English ϡȤƥե˥ barrio ʥƥ󥢥ꥫϵサˤʹѼǤ롥Puerto Rican English ϼȤ New York City ޤ쳤ߤʹ롥Ѽ⡤ǯƥ󥢥ꥫϿ͸ꥫdz礷Ƥ뤿ᡤ嵭ϰʳǤʹ褦ˤʤäƤƤ롥㤨СChicago, Georgia, North Carolina ʤɤǤϡƥ󥢥ꥫϿ͸äǤ롥
ѼθŪħȤƤϡظȤƤΥڥθ̤ͿƤȹͤΤ뤬ƥ󥢥ꥫϱѸѼʿŪħ⸫졤ظ줫αƶɾϿŤˤʤʤФʤʤषPuerto Rican English ǤϡŪ be ˡϢ (copula) ηǡ3ñ -s ηǡ˴ؤơAAVE αƶȸƤ롥
塤¿¿ͤʥƥ󥢥ꥫϿ͸礷ưܿεƤͽۤ뤬ƥ󥢥ꥫϱѸѼγơϤɤΤ褦ȯŸ򤿤ɤ뤳ȤˤʤΤġХХȯãΤ뤤1Ĥ "pan-Latino English" ȸƤ٤褦Ѽ郎ȯã뤳ȤˤʤΤư򸫼ꤿ
ϢȤơ#256. ƹ Hispanification ([2010-01-08-1])#1657. ꥫαѸѸ첽ư ([2013-11-09-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Bayley, Robert. "Latino Varieties of English." Chapter 51 of A Companion to the History of the English Language. Ed. Haruko Momma and Michael Matto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 521--30.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-18 Sat

#2609. αѸ˽ [hel][history_of_linguistics][historiography][bibliography][periodisation]

ε#2608. 19ʹߤʬȤƤαѸˤȯŸʳ ([2016-06-17-1]) Ǽ夲褦ˡѸ˵Ҥ19˻Ϥޤ롥̻ˤϤ褽ȥꥢī蘆褦ˤʤꡤ1ĤʬȤƤκۤӤӤƤCable (11) ˤȡȥꥢī濴Ȥ˽Ǥ줿αѸ˽ʬŪʤΤޤˤμ礿ΤȤơΤΤ󤲤롥

Bosworth, J. The Origin of the Germanic ans Scandinavian Languages and Nations. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green. 1848 [1836].
Latham, R. G. The English Language. 5th ed. London: Taylor, Walton, and Maberly. 1862 [1841].
Marsh, G. P. Lectures on the English Language. Rev. ed. New York: Scribner's, 1885 [1862].
Mätzner, E. Englische Grammatik. 3 vols. 3rd ed. Berlin: Weidmann, 1880--85 [1860--65].
Koch, K. F. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. 4 vols. Weimar: H. Böhlau, 1863--69.
Lounsbury, T. R. A History of the English language. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, 1894 [1879].
Emerson, O. F. The History of the English Language. New York: Macmillan, 1894.
Bradley, H. The Making of English. Rev. ed. Ed. B. Evans and S. Potter. New York: Walker, 1967 [1904].
Jespersen, O. Growth and Structure of the English Language. 10th ed. London: Harcourt, 1982 [1905].
Wyld, H. C. The Historical Study of the Mother Tongue. London: Murray, 1906.
Jespersen, O. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: Allen & Unwin, 1909
Smith, L. P. The English Language. London: Williams and Norgate, 1912.
Wyld, H. C. A Short History of English. 3rd ed. London: Murray, 1927 [1914].
Baugh, A. C. A History of the English Language. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1957 [1935]. (Co-authored with Thomas Cable (1978--2002). 3rd--5th eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.)

Cable (11) ˤСߤαѸ˵ҤϢʤǽΤȤ櫓פ Latham Lounsbury Ǥ롥Ȥ˸Ԥ1879ǯ˽ǤƤ顤θ Smith (1912) ˻ޤǤΥǥȤʤäȤäƤ褤դ٤ϡLounsbury ǤϡѸ˵ҤγϤޤߤǤȤѸꤵƤꡤ"Old English" 뤤 "Anglo-Saxon" ϤषΦΥޥˤΰʤȹͤƤǤ롥15ǯ Emerson (1894) ϡ"Old English" Ѹ˵ҤΰȤư֤Ť򼨤Ƥ롥
20ʤǤȡ˵󤲤ΤΤۤˤ¿αѸ˽ȸƤ֤٤Ǥ줿21äƤ⤽ϿꤨƤʤɤޤޤȯƤ롥ΤȤϡѸˤȤʬŸ˾뤤赤ΤΰǤ뤳Ȥ򼨤ΤǤ롥Cable (15) ۩

A casual observer might imagine that 200 years of modern scholarship on 1,300 years of the recorded language would have covered the story adequately and that only incremental revisions remain. Yet the subject continues to expand in fructifying ways, and interacting developments contribute to the vitality of the field: the recognition that cultural biases often narrowed the scope of earlier inquiry; the incorporation of global varieties of English; the continuing changes in the language from year to year; and the use of computer technology in reinterpreting aspects of the English language from its origins to the present.


ѸˤϤ˳ؽ椹ͤΤʬǤ롥Ϣơʲε⻲ȡ#24. ʤѸˤؤ֤ ([2009-05-22-1])#1199. ʤѸˤؤ֤ (2) ([2012-08-08-1])#1200. ʤѸˤؤ֤ (3) ([2012-08-09-1])#1367. ʤѸˤؤ֤ (4) ([2013-01-23-1])

Cable, Thomas. "History of the History of the English Language: How Has the Subject Been Studied." Chapter 2 of A Companion to the History of the English Language. Ed. Haruko Momma and Michael Matto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 11--17.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-17 Fri

#2608. 19ʹߤʬȤƤαѸˤȯŸʳ [hel][hel_education][history_of_linguistics][historiography][methodology]

ϡѸ (history of the English language) Ȥʬ19衤ؤ䤽μդγΰȯŸȤȤˤɤΤ褦ȯŸƤƺɤΤ褦ȯŸ³ƤꡤɤΤ褦ظäƹԤΤȤ᥿ˤĤƹͤȤΤϡMomma and Matto ˤԤޤ줿αѸ˼ƳǤ롥
1920Ƭˤϸؤδؿ鲻֤Ūȯã̩õ뤳ȤäӸؤȸƤФŪΰ褬ͥ줿̤򤢤ؤϤ˿䤷ʤ᤿Ǥ롥ѸˤΤ褦ʸ̸ˤɬŪˤ˾ꡤǵҤ٤ϡѸβ֤ʤɤФƤѲפǤ뤳Ȥ뤵ƤߤȤαѸΡ̻ˡ (internal history) Ǥ롥Matto and Momma (7) ˤȡ

. . . the study of language in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was almost exclusively philological. Sound shifts, developments in vocabulary, and syntactic changes were of primary interest, while historical events were at best secondary.


20ʤǤȡӸؤȤϰۤʤ빽¤Ūʸθ졤ŪηϤؤδؿѤ餺³ΤΡǸηŪǤҲ䤽ˤȤä쳰δĶˤäƤ˾դΤȤäռƤơѸ˵ҤˤȼҲĶδطռȿǤϤ᤿"emphasis on the social function of language" (Matto and Momma 8) ȤǤ롥ǡѸˤˡֳ̻ˡ (external history) ȤܳŪդääƤΤǤ롥
Ѹˤˤ̻ˤȳ̻ˤߴطŻ뤹뵭Ҥ٤λȤʤäƤη˾ǡ20Ⱦ顤ѸˤȤʬȯŸ3ʳȤ⤤뿷ʻ夬ϤޤäƤ롥ϡɸѸȤפ1Ѽǯ嵭ȤαѸ˵ҤæơɸŪѼޤ᤿ "Englishes" ˤ礷褦ȻߤʳǤ롥ǤϤʤ¿¿ͤʱѸѼˤܻؤʱѸˤؤĩǤ롥Matto and Momma (8) ϡθɸѸؤ³ռűѸ졤Ѹ졤Ѹ3ʬȤȯۤϡѸ˵ҤˤȤäƤϡޤľŪȴƤ롥

[The tripartite history of Old, Middle, and Modern English] is linear, tracing a straight-line trajectory for a well-defined, unitary language, thus denying a full history to the offshoots, the non-standard dialects, the conservative backwaters, or the avant-garde neologisms of a given historical period. But even if we grant that the "standard" language has until recently had enough momentum to pull along most variants in its wake, such a single straight-line trajectory is insufficient to capture the current global spread and multidimensional changes in the world's Englishes. It may be time to consider the "Old--Middle--Modern" triptych as complete, and to seek new models for representing English in the world today as well as for the processes that led to it.


Τ褦ʿŪʱѸ˵ҤưפãǤϤϤʤȤȤϡԼԤ褯򤷤Ƥ褦ϸߤ̤αѸˤΤ٤ѤǤꡤ٤ʳMatto and Momma (8--9) ۩

We cannot offer here a unified image that captures all aspects of the history of English; the result would of necessity be a schematic chimera of chronological lines, branching trees, holistic circles, interactive networks, and evolutionary processes. Such a chimera cannot be easily imagined . . . .


嵭ΡʬȤƤαѸˤȯŸʳפˤĤưϤʤơȯŸʳˤƶ̤Ƥ뤬ƤʤȤ1Ĥ롥ϡѸ˵ҤҲŪ¦̤ĸȤݤ˵ҤǤʾ塤㤨ХꥹȤ˹ˤȤäƱѸȤϲʸ߱ѸŪѤƤˤȤäƱѸȤϲˤȤäƸȤϲȤȤ̵ǤϤʤȤ¤Ǥ롥Ѹ˵ҤȤϡˡΤ褦䤤ФƵҼԤĤ뵡ȹͤƤ롥

Matto, Michael and Haruko Momma. "History, English, Language: Studying HEL Today." Chapter 1 of A Companion to the History of the English Language. Ed. Haruko Momma and Michael Matto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 3--10.

Referrer (Inside): [2016-06-18-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-16 Thu

#2607. ֳϰΥ쥪μΧ [creole][caribbean][sociolinguistics][variety]

ֳϰαѸˤĤơ#1679. The West Indies αѸ ([2013-12-01-1]) ϤȤ caribbean γƵˤƤֳϰȰˤäƤ⡤Ѹ䥯쥪 (creole) μҲŪϰ̤ϸġϤǰۤʤäƤꡤưפ˳礹뤳Ȥ񤷤ϤˤɸŪʱѸѼȤߤʤ (acrolect) ȡŪˤǤ֤äƤѸ١Υ쥪Ѽ (basilect) Ȥδ֤ˡ¿ŪѼ (mesolects) ǧ졤 post-creole continuum ѻ륱Ǥϡbasilect ˶ᤤѼμҲŪʰ֤ŤʤҲŪʼΧ (autonomy) ԰ǤʴϢơ#385. Guyanese Creole Ϣ³Ρ ([2010-05-17-1])#1522. autonomy heteronomy ([2013-06-27-1])#1523. Abstand language Ausbau language ([2013-06-28-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
ǯ¿ϰ basilect ѼμΧȤǧ褦ˤʤäƤƤȸ뤬ǧĤοˤĤƤϰˤäƲٺ롥㤨СBelize, Guyana, Jamaica Τ褦ʼҲǤϡacrolect basilect γ֤꤬ʬ礭ȴƤꡤԥ쥪Ѽ "Ausbau language" ȤƤ autonomy ʸ䤹ǡthe Bahamas, Barbados, Trinidad ʤɤǤϥ쥪Ѽ "intermediate creole varieties" (Winford 417) ȸƤФۤɡϤɸŪѼȤεΥŪᤤˡ heteronomy Ŧ䤹Winford (418--19) ꡤ"The Autonomy of Creole Varieties" ꤹѤ褦

In the Anglophone Caribbean, the question of the autonomy of the creole vernaculars has long been fraught with controversy, concerning both their linguistic structure and their socio-political status as national vernaculars. DeCamp (1971) was among the first to point to the problem of defining the boundaries of the language varieties in such situations, where there is a continuous spectrum of speech varieties ranging from the creole to the standard. Caribbean linguists, however, have argued that there are sound linguistic grounds for treating the more "radical" creole varieties as autonomous. A large part of the debate over the socio-political status of the creoles has focused on situations such as those in Belize, Guyana, and Jamaica, where the creole is quite distant from the standard. There is a growing trend, among both the public and the political establishment, to view the creoles in these communities as languages distinct from English. For instance, Beckford-Wassink (1999: 66) found that 90 percent of informants in a language attitude survey regarded Jamaican Creole as a distinct language, basing their judgments primarily on lexicon and accent.
   In intermediate creole situations such as in the Bahamas, Barbados, and Trinidad, there is a greater tendency to see the creole vernaculars as deviant dialects of English rather than separate varieties. Even here, though, there is a trend toward tolerating the use of these varieties for purposes of teaching the standard. So far, however, support for this comes primarily from linguists or other academics, and is not generally matched by popular opinion.


Τ褦ϰ褴ȤβٺϡŪˤϸŪǤꡤҲŪǤ⤢뤬̻Ūˤϥ쥪Ѽ郎졤ɸѼȤŪʰּ忴Ƥаޤΰ㤤¸˸ŪǤ롥

Winford, Donald. "English in the Caribbean." Chapter 41 of A Companion to the History of the English Language. Ed. Haruko Momma and Michael Matto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 413--22.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-15 Wed

#2606. Ѳν۴ĥե [gvs][grimms_law][phonetics][functionalism][vowel][language_change][causation][phonemicisation]

첻 (gvs) 䥰ˡ§ (grimms_law) ɽ벻ν۴ĥե (circular shift, chain shift) ˤ͡Ū򤬤롥Samuels ϡ첻ܤϡϵŪ ("mechanical") ѲȤƻϤޤäʳǵǽŪ ("functional") ʺѤƯƲηϤȤƤΥХ󥹤줿ϢβǤȤߤƤ롥ŪѲȤϡŪˤС㡦첻ˤĤƤϡĴ줿ʶĥˤΰ۲򤵤줿ȤȤǤꡤ첻ˤĤƤϡ줿дˤ2첻Ūʰ۲򤵤줿ȤȤǤ롥ơ첻ϡϤΤ褦˵Ū۲򤪤餯ΩƺΤäʳˤʤäơηϤΰݻ褦Ȥ뵡ǽŪʰϤ˲ƺǽŪʬۤ᤿Ȥͤ

Circular shifts of vowels are thus detailed examples of homeostatic regulation. The earliest changes are mechanical . . . ; the later changes are functional, and are brought about by the favouring of those variants that will redress the imbalance caused by the mechanical changes. In this respect circular shift differs considerably from merger and split. Merger is redressed by split only in the most general and approximate fashion, since the original functional yields are not preserved; but in circular shift, the combination of functional and mechanical factors ensures that adequate distinctions are maintained. To that extent at least, the phonological system possesses some degree of autonomy. (Samuels 42)


Samuels εαǤ롥۴ĥեȤǽŪΩ줫鲻Ǥʬȵۼ (split and merger) βȤɤΤ褦˰ۤʤäƤ뤫Ŧʤ顤Ԥ벻ηϤμΧǫƤ롥Τ褦 Samuels Ω줬ǽŪФäƤȤθˤʤӤ䤹ΤäϤޤǵŪװǤ Samuels ƤõƤϢơ#2585. ѲưΤϷǽ ([2016-05-25-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Samuels, M. L. Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English. London: CUP, 1972.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-14 Tue

#2605. ؤˤ벻ħΰ֤Ť (3) [phonaesthesia][sound_symbolism][arbitrariness][homonymy]

#1269. ؤˤ벻ħΰ֤Ť ([2012-10-17-1])#2222. ؤˤ벻ħΰ֤Ť (2) ([2015-05-28-1]) ˰³Ƥꡥ (phonaesthesia) 䥪Υޥȥ (onomatopoeia) ޤ಻ħ (sound_symbolism) ФƤϡ¿θؼԡȤ櫓ѸؼԤؿ󤻤Ƥ
ˤĤƤȽ⾯ʤʤä phonaesthsia ˤĤƤ褯ʹȽϡޤƤϤޤ㤬ȻפСƱ餤㳰¿ȤȤ㤨СѸ첻Τɽ魯Ȥϡlittle ˤƤϤޤ뤬big ˤƤϤޤʤ#2222. ؤˤ벻ħΰ֤Ť (2) ([2015-05-28-1]) ǰѤ Ullmann ϡỌ̇̄ޤƤϤޤˤϡΩɤ phonaesthesia ȤʤꡤǤʤˤ phonaesthesia θ̤ʤȡȡȥΤ褦ʤȤҤ٤Ƥ뤬줬¤ʤΤǤϤʤȻפѸθѲŪ Samuels ⤳ˤĤͤUllmann ΤΤƤϤ뤬̻Ūʴޤ᤿˰Ƨ߹ŸƤ롥

The answer to such objections is that the validity of a phonaestheme is, in the first instance, contextual only: if it 'fits' the meaning of the word in which it occurs, the more its own meaning is strengthened; but if the phoneme or phonemes in question do not fit the meaning, then their occurrence in that context is of the common arbitrary type, and no question of correlation arises. (Samuels 46)


ˤƲỌ̇̄Υեåȴʸ̮˸ȡ phonaestheme Ȥ٤Τޤ롥Υեåȴθ1ĤǤʤۤθˤ⤿ޤ޴ȡեåȴϸߤ˶礤ˤ̣ĸؼ鼡ؤȵڤƤΤ褦ʸ줬ۤɡphonaesthesia θ̤礭ʤꡤ¸ߴ⶯ʤ롥ϡphonaesthesia ȯĹȻȤ̻ŪʽʳεҤˤۤʤʤ³ Samuels ϡphonaestheme homonymy Ȥ̣ݤˤĤƻŦƤ롥

Furthermore, just as a phonaestheme may or may not be significant, depending on its context, so it may have two or more separate values which are again contextually determined. It may often be possible to treat them as one, e.g. Firth classed all exponents of /sl-/ together as 'pejorative'; but, firstly, this entails a great loss of specificity, and secondly, it is clear from the historical evidence that we are dealing with two patterns that have in the main developed independently from separate roots containing the meanings 'strike' and 'sleep' in Germanic. It is therefore preferable to reckon in such cases with homonymous phonaesthemes; if connections subsequently develop that suggest their unity, this is no more than may happen with normal homonymy of free morphemes, as in the historically separate words ear (for hearing) and ear (of corn). (Samuels 46)


Ūˤǧ phonaesthemes phonaesthesia ϡΤ褦ʸ̮ζȯãη̤ȤǧƤΤǤäơˤβǺƤ췲Ǥ괶ФʤΤǤ롥Ȥꡤȿ㤬˻ŦΤˤդ路ۤŪʤĸݤǤϤʤ
ʤΰѤ̾ε󤬤äƤ Firth ϡphonaestheme ȤѸȯƼԤǤ (Firth, J. R. Speech (London, 1930) and The Tongues of Men (London, 1937), both reprinted in one volume, London, 1964. p. 184.)

Samuels, M. L. Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English. London: CUP, 1972.

Referrer (Inside): [2017-05-15-1] [2016-06-22-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-13 Mon

#2604. 13Υե󥹸ʸŪŪϰ [reestablishment_of_english][french][history][literature]

13Υ󥰥ɤϡJohn ˤ Normandy Ӽ˻Ϥޤꡤդˤ Henry III Provisions of Oxford #2561. The Proclamation of Henry III ([2016-05-01-1])פʤɤǧᤵ졤θαѸŤ褦ʻ郎꼡 (see #2567. 13Υ󥰥ɿͤȱѸηӤĤ ([2016-05-07-1]))
礭ήȤƤϱѸؤɤڤäƤΤΡήȤƤϡѸ椷ƥե󥹸줬ä׻뤵Ȥή⤢äHenry III ե󥹵²ѤȤˤǤΥե󥹸Ѥ󥰥ɤΤߤʤ餺ŪˤߤƤ13Υե󥹸ϰ̤⤫äȤ⤢ä18ˤ衼å˥ե󥹸ήԤ줿13ե󥹸ϥ衼åѤʸŪʹݸȤĺζˤߤˤäΤǤ롥
㤨СAdenet le Roi ˤϥɥĤΤ뵮²Ҷ˥ե󥹸ζդĤƤȤθڤʰʲBaugh and Cable 129 ѡˡ

Avoit une coustume ens el tiois pays
Que tout li grant seignor, li conte et li marchis
Avoient entour aus gent françoise tousdis
Pour aprendre françoise lor filles et lor fis;
Li rois et la roïne et Berte o le cler vis
Sorent près d'aussi bien la françois de Paris
Com se il fussent né au bourc à Saint Denis. (Berte aus Grans Piés, 148ff.)


ޤDante λվǤ Brunetto Latini ɴʻŵ Li Tresor (c. 1265) ե󥹸路ϥե󥹸줬Ǥ̥ŪǤꡤǤ褯Ѥ뤫ȤƤ롥⤦1ͤΥꥢ Martino da Canale ⡤٥ͥˤե󥹸ȤˡƱͤͳ󤲤Ƥ롥褦ʥȤϡΥ륦䥹ڥ󤫤顤ƥ륵ǧ褦ƱݤʸθڤϡȤ15ϤޤǤߤ줿Ȥ (Baugh and Cable 129)
Ǥϡ󥰥ɵڤӥ衼åΤˤ롤13Υե󥹸ι⤤Ūϰ̤ϲˤΤäΤBaugh and Cable (129) ϡΤ褦ʣװŦƤ롥

The prestige of French civilization, a heritage to some extent from the glorious tradition of Charlemagne, carried abroad by the greatest of medieval literatures, by the fame of the University of Paris, and perhaps to some extent by the enterprise of the Normans themselves, would have constituted in itself a strong reason for the continued use of French among polite circles in England.


Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable. A History of the English Language. 6th ed. London: Routledge, 2013.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-02-09-1] [2017-02-25-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-12 Sun

#2603. פꡤƤ [sociolinguistics][terminology][linguistic_ideology]

#1537. פˤޤĤ3Ĥ ([2013-07-12-1])#1926. ܸܿ͡üԡ ([2014-08-05-1]) ǡפȤѸΤ
(mother tongue) ȥͥƥ֡ԡ (native speaker) 11ʬӤĤȤ󤬤ꡤؤǤ뤵Ƥ¤Ϥ1ĤΥǥˤʤޥ (180--81) ε˼򷹤褦

ȥͥƥ֡ԡӤĤ뤳ȤϡޤޤʷȽƤϤǰ¤¨Ƥʤ۲줿Ĥιͤ˴ŤƤ뤫Ǥ롥①ȤϡѤǤꡤΤʶĥƥǤꡤ②ͤϰĤθˤΤߥͥƥ֡ԡˤʤ뤳ȤǽǤȤΤǤ롥
ۤϡˡ͡˹ڤѸ줬ƥ졤ꥷ졤إ֥饤ȤäŪʽ񤭸դ顤ϸͭäդ˰ܹԤͥ󥹤Υ衼åѤˤƸΤȤָʸ̮ˤơΥ᡼Ƹ줿ȤǤ롥ե󥹳̿ο̳ڤعˤ붵ʤȤơŪƷؤѤĤ̵ռΤ˳ȹͤƤäǽϡտŪǡռŪʳؽȤʤäΤǽϤǤΤؤФʤФʤʤȤ餫̷Ϥߤʤ顤ǽϤüԤˤãʤȤ¾ռ줿Τϡ̱ȤǤ19Ǥä
ϸ졤°ռڡ̱֤֥ǥ쥤ǥ礵줿Ǥ롥ع餬ڤȼɥĤůؼ J. G. إ󾧤Ϲ̱ˤǤȤͤ¿ι񤬻ƱإϡҶؤ֤ΤϡмʬλȤߤѤȤǤƤ롥إλۤή³ޥŪʻۤϡȸΩƤ뤳ȤޤĤǤʤ̤Ǥʤ뤤ϤǤˤƥǤȿòΥʥʥꥺϸ̸¾ŪʤΤȤƤȤ館뷹򶯤᤿塤ΥǥܤǤ夷¿Υ衼åѽƱ͡ܤ̱ñŪʤΤȤƻٻ
λϤޤ˥衼åѤǹȤΤ˻Ȥ줿¾ŪΥǥǰΤȤϰäġĤޤ¿줬̤ǤϤθؼԤˤäȽŪæۤ줿ΤԻ׵ĤʤȤǤϤʤ饤ɤθؼ D. P. ѥåʥåϡͤϼºݤäȤǤʤƤ⡤˵°ռ򴶤ǽʰ¾Ǥ줬ǻȤƤǤ뤫˷餺֤褯ǤȤ٤ȻŦ
¿Ҳοʹ֤ˤȤäơ¤餮ļʬ򤭤ɽǤɬĤǤɬפϤʤ¿ҲǤϡ¿¿ͤʥѥ¸ߤ롥ϼ˿ȤˤĤפȤإñΰŻ뤹륤ǥФĤޤϤʾθ쥷ƥब¸ߤҲǤϡǽϤȥͥƥ֡ԡñˤह֥ǥʤ뤳Ȥˤʤ롥


ǥޥƤΤϡפȤŪʳǰǤꡤѸǤȤȤüԤˤäơҲˤäơפ˹줿̣ϰۤʤäƤꡤι줿̣Ȥ1Ĥθ쥤ǥˤۤʤʤȥͥƥ֡ԡɬ11δطǤϤʤΤ
⡤ѸȤơޤˤĤƤγؽŪʸˤơפ֥ͥƥ֡ԡפȤɽ¿ѤƤ뤬ظˤϡޤ뤳ȤΤʤƽ󤬱Ƥǽ˵ŤƤɬפ롥

ޥեꥢ󡡡ס̱²ɴʻŵ١Ω̱²ʪۡԡˡǡ2014ǯ180--81ǡ

Referrer (Inside): [2016-12-30-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-11 Sat

#2602. Baugh and Cable αѸˤ --- Chapters 9 to 11 [hel_education][terminology]

#2588. Baugh and Cable αѸˤ --- Chapters 1 to 4 ([2016-05-28-1])#2594. Baugh and Cable αѸˤ --- Chapters 5 to 8 ([2016-06-03-1]) ³ǽԤȤ9--11Ϥ󼨤롥

[ Chapter 9: The Appeal to Authority, 1650--1800 ]

1. Explain why the following people are important in historical discussions of the English language:
   John Dryden
   Jonathan Swift
   Samuel Johnson
   Joseph Priestley
   Robert Lowth
   Lindley Murray
   John Wilkins
   James Harris
   Thomas Sheridan
   George Campbell
2. How were the intellectual tendencies of the eighteenth century reflected in attitudes toward the English language?
3. What did eighteenth-century writers mean by ascertainment of the English language? What means did they have in mind?
4. What kinds of "corruptions" in the English language did Swift object to? Do you find them objectionable? Can you think of similar objections made by commentators today?
5. What had been accomplished in Italy and France during the seventeenth century to serve as an inspiration for those in England who were concerned with the English language?
6. Who were among the supporters of an English Academy? When did the movement reach its culmination?
7. Why did an English Academy fail to materialize? What served as substitutes for an academy in England?
8. What did Johnson hope for his Dictionary to accomplish?
9. What were the aims of the eighteenth-century prescriptive grammarians?
10. How would you characterize the difference in attitude between Robert Lowth's Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762) and Joseph Priestley's Rudiments of English Grammar (1761)? Which was more influential?
11. How did prescriptive grammarians such as Lowth arrive at their rules?
12. What were some of the weaknesses of the early grammarians?
13. Which foreign language contributed the most words to English during the eighteenth century?
14. In tracing the growth of progressive verb forms since the eighteenth century, what earlier patterns are especially important?
15. Give an example of the progressive passive. From what period can we date its development?

[ Chapter 10: The Nineteenth Century and After ]

1. Explain why the following people are important in historical discussions of the English Language:
   Sir James A. H. Murray
   Henry Bradley
   Sir William A. Craigie
   C. T. Onions
2. Define the following terms and for each provide examples of words or meanings that have entered the English language since 1800:
   Borrowing
   Self-explaining compound
   Compound formed from Greek or Latin elements
   Prefix
   Suffix
   Coinage
   Common word from proper name
   Old word with new meaning
   Extension of meaning
   Narrowing of meaning
   Degeneration of meaning
   Regeneration of meaning
   Slang
   Verb-adverb combination
3. What distinction has been drawn between cultural levels and functional varieties of English? Do you find the distinction valid?
4. What are the principal regional dialects of English in the British Isles? What are some of the characteristics of these dialects?
5. What are the main national and areal varieties of English that have developed in countries that were once part of the British Empire?
6. Summarize the main efforts at spelling reform in England and the United States during the past century. Do you think that movement for spelling reform will succeed in the future?
7. How long did it take to produce the Oxford English Dictionary? By what name was it originally known?
8. What changes have occurred in English grammatical forms and conventions during the past two centuries?

[ Chapter 11: The English Language in America ]

1. Explain why the following people are important in historical discussions of the English language:
   Noah Webster
   Benjamin Franklin
   James Russell Lowell
   H. L. Mencken
   Hans Kurath
   Leonard Bloomfield
   Noam Chomsky
   William Labov
2. Define, identify, or explain briefly:
   Old Northwest Territory
   An American Dictionary of the English Language (1828)
   The American Spelling Book
   "Flat a"
   African American Vernacular English
   Pidgin
   Creole
   Gullah
   Americanism
   Linguistic Atlas of the United States and Canada
   Phoneme
   Allophone
   Generative grammar
3. What three great periods of European immigration can be distinguished in the peopling of the United States?
4. What groups settled the Middle Atlantic States? How do the origins of these settlers contrast with the origins of the settlers in New England and the South Atlantic states?
5. What accounts for the high degree of uniformity of American English?
6. Is American English more or less conservative than British English? In trying to answer the question, what geographical divisions must one recognize in both the United States and Britain? Does the answer that applies to pronunciation apply also to vocabulary?
7. What considerations moved Noah Webster to advocate distinctly American form of English?
8. In what features of American pronunciation is it possible to find Webster's influence?
9. What are the most noticeable differences in pronunciation between British and American English?
10. What three main dialects in American English have been distinguished by dialectologists associated with the Linguistic Atlas of the United States and Canada? What three dialects had traditionally been distinguished?
11. According to Baugh and Cable, what eight American dialects are prominent enough to warrant individual characterization?
12. What is the Creole hypothesis regarding African American Vernacular English?
13. To what may one attribute certain similarities between the speech of New England and that of the South?
14. To what may one attribute the preservation of r in American English?
15. To what extent are attitudes which were expressed in the nineteenth-century "controversy over Americanisms" still alive today? How pervasive now is the "purist attitude"?
16. What are the main historical dictionaries of American English?


Cable, Thomas. A Companion to History of the English Language. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2002.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-07-28-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-10 Fri

#2601. ʤ If I WERE a bird ʤΤ [be][verb][subjunctive][preterite][conjugation][inflection][oe][sobokunagimon]

ʸˡΡֲˡפˤƤϡ if ΤʤưβѤΤ§Ǥ롥βȤϡŪˤľˡβƱΤΤѤФ褤1Ĥ㳰롥ɸΤ褦˼줬1;ñξ硤뤤3;ñξˤϡľˡ was ѤȤˡˡǤ were ѤʤФʤʤʸѸθˤƤ was Ѥ뤳Ȥ⤢뤬ʸˡǤ were §ǤˡϤʤ
äȤñΤǤС줬űѸˤ³ˡ13;ñζ޷äǤʸΡֲˡפΤűѸǤϡ³ˡ (subjunctive) ȸƤ֡ˡ
ε#2600. űѸ be ưζޡ ([2016-06-09-1]) ǷǤűѸ bēon ζɽǡSubjunctive Preterite 򸫤ƤߤȡñǤϿ;Τˤ餺 wǣre ѤƤ롥ĤޤꡤűѸ ġif ic wǣre . . . ʤɤȸäƤ餳ѸǤ if I were . . . ʤΤǤ롥
ѸǤϡۤȤɤξ硤ˡη֤ȤơҤΤ褦ľˡη֤򤽤ΤޤѤФ褤ˡä˰ռƲˡζ޷ɽľˡȶ̤ƳФɬפʤŪˤľˡʲˤȲˡʲˤϵǽŪˤŪˤΤ˶̤٤ۤʤηϤǤꡤơư˴ؤˡ˱ۤʤ޷ȶɽѰդƤȤˤΤʤǶ޸οʿŪ䤬Ѥbe ưʳΤ٤Ƥư˴ؤ³ˡľˡƱȤʤäͣ줫ĤƤηŪʶ̤ݻӤƤΤ be äȤȤǤ롥¸μ礿ͳϡbe ޤ˹٤Ǥ뤳Ȥ
ɸΡ֤ʤ If I WERE a bird ʤΤפȤ䤤ϡѸζŪʴϼѤʵȤ롥Ѹˤδ䤤ΩľΤǤС֤ʤˤ be ưʳΤ٤Ƥưˤ³ˡľˡƱȤʤäΤפ٤Ǥ롥

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-09 Thu

#2600. űѸ be ưζ [suppletion][be][verb][conjugation][inflection][oe][paradigm][indo-european][etymology]

ѸǺǤʣʶޤ򼨤ưȤСbe ưǤ롥ޤ˿षƤ븽ѸˤäơޤʣݤäƤͣưޤ٤⤹ơԵ§ʤΥѥबĤäƤޤäΤ
űѸˤƤ⡤ζޤοθȤƤ⡤be ưζޤϤϤʣäʲˡűѸ bēon ȸѸ be ζɽǤ褦 (Hogg and Fulk 309)

OE

餫˰ۤʤ캬ͳ褹η֤ޤäơɽƤ뤳Ȥ狼롥Сbe ưζɽ佼ˡ (suppletion) κǤǤ롥be ϡӸŪˤ "athematic verb" ȸƤФư1ĤǤꡤΤʤǤǤʣˤ򤿤ɤäƤHogg and Fulk (309--10) ˤСűѸ bēon ν֤Ϥ餯4Ĥθ캬̤롥
1ܤϡPIE *Hes- ͳ褹ΤǡűѸ첻뤤 s ǻϤޤ֤ȿǤƤs ǻϤޤΤϡ *Hs- ͳ褹롨 cf. ƥ sumˡ
2ܤϡPIE *bhew(H)- ͳ褷űѸǤ b ǻϤޤ֤ȿǤcf. ƥ fuī 'I have been'ˡűѸǤϡηϽŪ뤤̤δްդȼȤ¿ä
3ܤϡPIE *wes- ̤ꡤűѸʤƸѸ˻ޤǡˤǤϤäѤη֤ȤѤ롥϶Ѳ5ưǤꡤ߷äƤűѸޤǤ˲˸ꤵ줿
4ܤϡűѸľˡ2;ñ eart ٤Ȥ PIE *er- ꤵƤcf. ƥ orior 'I rise' Ʊ캬ˡ
be ưΥѥϡűѸ褢٤ϴάƤΤΡʤĹˤΤʤݤ줿ʣϷߤǤ롥

Hogg, Richard M. and R. D. Fulk. A Grammar of Old English. Vol. 2. Morphology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-08 Wed

#2599. ̾ Rose 鯤ʤϡ [onomastics][personal_name][etymology][metathesis]

RoseRosa Ȥ̾鯤̣ΤȻפ뤫⤷ʤThe Wordsworth Dictionary of Firms Names (200) ˤȸ horse ȷӤĤƤǽ⤤褦

Rose (f)
From the name of the flower. Common long before flower names came into popular use in the 19th century. Probably from Germanic names, based on words meaning 'horse', an important feature of the life of Germanic tribes. However, the English flower name is a more attractive association for most people.
Variant form: Rosa


ḽζŪʴФȤƤϡ̾ϴְ㤤ʤ֤ rose ȷӤĤƤ뤬θ츻ϥޥϤϤɽ魯ñ졤űѸǤȤ hros ˤȤ#60. ž ( metathesis ) ([2009-06-27-1]) Ǽ夲褦ˡűѸ hros ϸ˲ž (metathesis) ˤ hors(e) ȷѤޥ̱²ˤȤäƽפưʪ̾μ򶡵뤷ȤȤϡˤꤽǤ롥θ¤ Rose ϡˤθ츻˺졤֤ rose Ȥǧ褦ˤʤä֤ rose Τϡ˸츻õΤ񤷤褦Ǥ˥ƥ rosa ȤѤƤꡤ줬űѸ rōse ޤᡤޥؤѤ줿
鯤ȤϢۤϡŪʸˤ뤳ȤϸޤǤʤΰѤˤ⤢Ȥꡤ19˲֤̤̾˿̾ȤѤ褦ˤʤäаޤȤδϢⵤαƤ¾Ȥ19 Daisy) ˤС19ˤϰ̤̾̾ȤѤĬäˤĤƤϡ#813. Ѹο̾ˡ ([2011-07-19-1]) ⻲ȡ

Macleod, Isabail and Terry Freedman. The Wordsworth Dictionary of Firms Names. Ware: Wordsworth Editions, 1995.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-07 Tue

#2598. ťΥɸαƶϤŤõ븦ˤαդ٤Ѹ쥳ѥ [old_norse][loan_word][me_dialect][representativeness][geography][lexical_diffusion][lexicology][methodology][laeme][corpus]

#1917. numb ([2014-07-27-1]) εǡѸˤ nimen ȸťΥɸѸ taken ζˤĤĴ Rynell θ˿줿̤˸ťΥɸѸ줬Ѹ椤ˤƱѸ˿ƩƤäݤˤϡδϰδθ롥ΤȤʤ顤οƩˤϤ٤λ֤ΤǡΤۤƩٹ礤ϸȤʤޤťΥɸαƶ the Danelaw ȸƤФ륤󥰥ˤƺǤ⶯Ǥꡤ󥰥ؤϡξ׷⤬֤ޤʤŤƤäȹͤΤǤ롥
Τ褦˸ťΥɸθŪƶζˤĤƤϡϰδ֤̩ܤߴطꡤʬۤΤǤȤ롥ºݤˡ#818. 󥰥ɤ˻ĤťΥɸ̾ ([2011-07-24-1]) #1937. Ϣ -son ˤΤϸťΥɸͳ ([2014-08-16-1]) ˼ʬۿޤϡΤʬۤ򼨤űѸȸťΥɸѸ줬礹륱Ǥϡ̤˾嵭ʬۤǧ뤳Ȥ¿褦Rynell (359) ۩"The Scn words so far dealt with have this in common that they prevail in the East Midlands, the North, and the North West Midlands, or in one or two of these districts, while their native synonyms hold the field in the South West Midlands and the South."
ϰ츫ۤñǤϤʤȤˤαդɬפ롥Rynell (359--60) Ͼʸ³ơΤ褦â񤭤դäƤ롥

This is obviously not tantamount to saying that the native words are wanting in the former parts of the country and, inversely, that the Scn words are all absent from the latter. Instead, the native words are by no means infrequent in the East Midlands, the North, and the North West Midlands, or at least in parts of these districts, and not a few Scn loan-words turn up in the South West Midlands and the South, particularly near the East Midland border in Essex, once the southernmost country of the Danelaw. Moreover, some Scn words seem to have been more generally accepted down there at a surprisingly early stage, in some cases even at the expense of their native equivalents.


äդ٤ϡ¸ѸƥȤʬۤФäƤǤ롥򤫤СѸ쥳ѥϰ˴ؤɽ (representativeness) 礤ƤȤRynell (358) ˤС

A survey of the entire material above collected, which suffers from the weakness that the texts from the North and the North (and Central) West Midlands are all comparatively late and those from the South West Midlands nearly all early, while the East Midland and Southern texts, particularly the former, represent various periods, shows that in a number of cases the Scn words do prevail in the East Midlands, the North, and the North (and sometimes Central) West Midlands and the South, exclusive of Chaucer's London . . . .


ťΥɸθŪƶϡѸᤤǡ٤ˤǴѻ롤ȤȤϳȤƽҤ٤뤳ȤϤǤΤΡ줬Ѹ쥳ѥλʬۤȸ˰פƤ¤ƨƤϤʤʤĤޤꡤ嵭γŪʬۤϡޤ޸¸ƥȤλ֡ŪʬۤʿԤƤ뤿ˡȤˤ˶ĴƤ뤫⤷ʤΤ䤹Τޤޤ䤹ʤꡤˤΤ줿ޤޤˤ빽¤Ū꤬ˤ롥
ϡťΥɸθŪƶˤȤɤޤ餺Ѹ̡ŤѲ̤ѻݤˤͿǤ (see #941. ѸθѲϤʤ̤ŤΤ ([2011-11-24-1])#1843. conservative radicalism ([2014-05-14-1]))
ϢơѸ쥳ѥ A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English (LAEME) ɽˤĤơ#1262. The LAEME Corpus ɽ (1) ([2012-10-10-1])#1263. The LAEME Corpus ɽ (2) ([2012-10-11-1]) ⻲ȡ

Rynell, Alarik. The Rivalry of Scandinavian and Native Synonyms in Middle English Especially taken and nimen. Lund: Håkan Ohlssons, 1948.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-06 Mon

#2597. Book of Common Prayer (1549) [bible][history][literature][book_of_common_prayer][idiom]

ֵסʱѹ񶵲ҤθǧʸˤȤΤ The Book of Common Prayer νǤϡ1549ǯԻ줿׼Ԥˤƥ󥿥٥꡼綵 Thomas Crammer (1489--1556) 濴Ȥμ綵ԻǤΤǤꡤŪϡ񤭸դˤƤäդˤƤȤߤʤѸεʸ뤳Ȥä̾Τ The Booke of the Common Prayer and administracion of the Sacramentes, and other Rites and Ceremonies after the Use of the Churche of England Ǥ롥
εϡQueen Mary Oliver Cromwell ˤưλơߤޤϢʤѤ³Ƥ롥̤߰ѤƤΤϽǤ1塤1661--62ǯ˲줿ΤǤ뤬Ǥʬ褯ȤɤƤȤǡϢ³롥ε5᤯η֤Ƥˡ͸դʸ⾯ʤʤäˤ褯ΤƤΤϷ뺧Ǥʸ¾ξ¿Crystal (36) ꡤʲˤĤ󤲤Ƥߤ褦

[ 뺧ط ]

all my worldly goods
as long as ye both shall live
for better or worse
for richer for poorer
in sickness and in health
let no man put asunder
now speak, or else hereafter forever hold his peace
thereto I plight thee my troth
till death us do part
to have and to hold
to love and to cherish
wedded wife/husband
with this ring I thee wed

[ ¾ ]

all perils and dangers of this night
ashes to ashes
battle, murder and sudden death
bounden duty
dust to dust
earth to earth
give peace in our time
good lord, deliver us
peace be to this house
read, mark, learn and inwardly digest
the sins of the fathers
the world, the flesh and the devil


˴Ϣơ#745. 뺧 wedlock ([2011-05-12-1])#1803. Lord's Prayer ([2014-04-04-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿ޤ񤫤ξȤƤϡ#1439. ͳ褹ɽ ([2013-04-05-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Crystal, David. Evolving English: One Language, Many Voices. London: The British Library, 2010.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-05 Sun

#2596. ־޸ȤСפ [japanese][world_englishes][pidgin][creole][creoloid][code-switching][bilingualism][sociolinguistics][contact][lesser-know_varieties]

#2559. ޸αѸ ([2016-04-29-1]) ǡĤƾ޸äƤѸѼҲ𤷤ϰθˤϡ180ǯۤɤĹϤʤΤΡʣǤ롥 (134--35) ˤС޸ǻѤƤ͡ʸѼΤ־޸ȤСפȸƤ֤Ȥˤȡ־޸ȤСפŪϰʲΤ褦ꤹ뤳ȤǤ롥
19ˤϤ餯־޸ԥѸפäƤꡤ줬ȤƤΡ־޸९쥪ѸפؤȯŸ19ˤϡܸä͡餬¤ưΡ֥ܸ͡פ줿ơ20Ⱦ޸αѸܸ줬򤸤äԤθ (matrix language) Ȥ־޸פ줿Ȥ
Τ褦ɬʸŪ΢դƤΤǤϤʤŪʾڵ˴Ť˼ҲŪʴ¬ΥʥꥪǤ롥㤨С1ʳȤƤΡ־޸ԥѸפԤʤƤȤĥˤĤƤϡ (134--35) ϼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥

ޤϡѸظȤ־޸ԥѸפȤΤǤ롥19ˤ餯äƤǤȻפ뤳ȤФǤ뤬ºߤȤڵϤʤȤΤϡξ餹Сԥ󤬶̤Υߥ˥ʤȤƻȤƤȽǤΤϺǤǤϤ뤬ʸˡηϤξܺ٤Ǥ뤫Ǥ롥줬ߤ̤ʤ͡Ʊ˽ߡߥ˥ƥƤȤʬäƤΤǡ̤Υߥ˥ʤȤƥȯȹͤΤԼǤϤʤ̸ά͡


Ʊͤˡ־޸९쥪ѸפȯˤĤƤܺ٤ʬäƤʤξƤԥѸǥߥ˥äƤ¿äȤڵ򤬤뤿ᡤλҶ९쥪 (creoloid) ȹͤ뤳ȤϡʤĤȤľܤξڵ򤬤櫓ǤϤʤ
嵭ŪǺǸʳ־޸פˤĤƤ⡤򤯤٤꤬¿ĤƤ롥㤨СʤܸѼȱѸѼ郎2ʻ (bilingualism) 䥳ɥå (code-switching) ˤȤɤޤ餺¤ƺȤʤ˻äΤơʤκݤܸѼΤۤθȤʤäΤȤ˼ҲŪˤĤơ (148--55) ٤ͻԤʤäƤ뤬ˤϤʤ븦椬ɬפΤ褦Ǥ롥
(155) ϡʣʸ뤲Ƥ޸ξָΰפȰŪˤʤ館Ƥ롥

޸˼ҲؼԤˤȤäƤϸˤǤ롥Ǥ椨ˡ줾λˤƼҲŪװͤߤ뤳ȤŪñǤ롥μҲŪװȤϡ㤨Сäͤͤ餤ǡïȲۤƤ򤷤褷ƤïȴؤäƤʤɤװǤ롥
޸Τ褦Ϥ褯ȸƤФ롥Τ˳ŪΩƤ뤷Τ餽Ǥäꡤοʹ֤ߤ˵ڤܤƶθܿٹ礤ǻ
ϡڡˤΤ褦ʰŪʸҲǿɴǯ褦ѲϾ޸Τ褦ʸǤϿǯ٤ǵ롥ϸѲΡְפǤ롥


󥰡˥롡¾ܿ˼Ҳء޸ξס˼Ҳ١ʹ ԡë ̦ ջҡˡˡ罤ۡ2015ǯ134--55ǡ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-04 Sat

#2595. Ѹ̾ˤߤ̾Ρּѡפλ [latin][etymology][borrowing][loan_word][loan_translation][mythology][calendar]

Ѹ̾ϡ褯ΤƤ褦ˡ۷ϤμפŷΤ뤤Ͽþ夽ȷӤĤ줿̾ȿǤƤ롥⡤ƥñȿǤǤꡤ̣ǡּѡפȤäƤ褤μѤλ3ĤΥѥ󤬤ߤ롥
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday ˤĤƤϡơʣ1ǤȤơ޿ Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus б륲ޥ̾ͿƤ롥ϡ޿äο򥲥ޥäοηŪ˺ؤȤǡ"loan rendition" ȸƤ֤Τդ路Wednesday ˤĤƤϡ#1261. Wednesday ȯֻ츻 ([2012-10-09-1]) 򻲾ȡ
Sunday, Monday 1ǤˤĤƤϡ줾ۤȷȤŷΤ̾ƥ줫ѸΤȹͤ롥ؤȤϡǥ٥ "loan translation" ȤߤʤȤ
Ǹ Saturday 1Ǥϡ޿ä Saturnus Ȥƥñη֤򤽤Τޤ1ǤؼѤƤΤǡ1ǤΤߤ˸ꤹСȤ̾μ ("loan") ǤʣΤȤƹͤˤϡ1Ǥѡ2ǤʤΤ "loanblend" Ȥʤ롨see #901. ʬ ([2011-10-15-1]
Ѹ̾ˡ嵭Τ褦ˡּѡפΤĤΥѥ󤬤ߤ뤳ȤˤĤơDurkin (106) Τ褦˾Ҳ𤷤ƤΤǡѤƤ

The modern English names of six of the days of the week reflect Old English or (probably) earlier loan renditions of classical or post-classical Latin names; the seventh, Saturday, shows a borrowed first element. In the cases of Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday there is substitution of the names of roughly equivalent pagan Germanic deities for the Roman ones, with the names of Tiw, Woden, Thunder or Thor, and Frig substituted for Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, and Venus respectively; in the cases of Monday and Sunday the vernacular names of the celestial bodies Moon and Sun are substituted for the Latin ones. The first element of Saturday (found in Old English in the form types Sæternesdæġ, Sæterndæġ, Sætresdæġ, and Sæterdæġ) uniquely shows borrowing of the Latin name of the Roman deity, in this case Saturn.


Durkin, Philip. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: OUP, 2014.

Referrer (Inside): [2018-11-02-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-03 Fri

#2594. Baugh and Cable αѸˤ --- Chapters 5 to 8 [hel_education][terminology]

#2588. Baugh and Cable αѸˤ --- Chapters 1 to 4 ([2016-05-28-1]) ³ơ5--8Ϥ󼨤롥Baugh and Cable Τˤɤ

[ Chapter 5: The Norman Conquest and the Subjection of English, 1066--1200 ]

1. Explain why the following people are important in historical discussions of the English language:
   Æthelred
   Edward the Confessor
   Godwin
   Harold
   William, duke of Normandy
   Henry I
   Henry II
2. How would the English language probably have been different if the Norman Conquest had never occurred?
3. From what settlers does Normandy derive its name? When did they come to France?
4. Why did William consider that he had claim on the English throne?
5. What was the decisive battle between the Normans and the English? How did the Normans win it?
6. When was William crowned king of England? How long did it take him to complete his conquest of England and gain complete recognition? In what parts of the country did he face rebellions?
7. What happened to Englishmen in positions of church and state under William's rule?
8. For how long after the Norman Conquest did French remain the principal language of the upper classes in England?
9. How did William divide his lands at his death?
10. What was the extent of the lands ruled by Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine?
11. What was generally the attitude of the French kings and upper classes to the English language?
12. What does the literature written under the patronage of the English court indicate about French culture and language in England during this period?
13. How complete was the fusion or the French and English peoples in England?
14. In general, which parts of the population spoke English, and which French?
15. To what extent did the upper classes learn English? What can one infer concerning Henry II's knowledge of English?
16. How far down in the social scale was knowledge of French at all general?

[ Chapter 6: The Reestablishment of English, 1200--1500 ]

1. Explain why the following are important in historical discussions of the English language:
   King John
   Philip, king of France
   Henry III
   The Hundred Years' War
   The Black Death
   The Peasants' Revolt
   Statute of Pleading
   Layamon
   Geoffrey Chaucer
   John Wycliffe
2. In what year did England lose Normandy? What events brought about the loss?
3. What effect did the loss of Normandy have upon the nobility of France and England and consequently upon the English language?
4. Despite the loss of Normandy, what circumstances encouraged the French to continue coming to England during the long reign of Henry III (1216--1272)?
5. The arrival of foreigners during Henry III's reign undoubtedly delayed the spread of English among the upper classes. In what ways did these events actually benefit the English language?
6. What was the status of French throughout Europe in the thirteenth century?
7. What explains the fact that the borrowing of French words begins to assume large proportions during the second half of the thirteenth century, as the importance of the French language in England is declining?
8. What general conclusions can one draw about the position of English at the end of the thirteenth century?
9. What can one conclude about the use of French in the church and the universities by the fourteenth century?
10. What kind of French was spoken in England, and how was it regarded?
11. In what way did the Hundred Years' War probably contribute to the decline of French in England?
12. According to Baugh and Cable, the Black Death reduced the numbers of the lower classes disproportionately and yet indirectly increased the importance of the language that they spoke. Why was this so?
13. What specifically can one say about changing conditions for the middle class in England during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries? What effect did these changes have upon the English language?
14. In what year was Parliament first opened with a speech in English?
15. What statute marks the official recognition of the English language in England?
16. When did English begin to be used in the schools?
17. What was the status of the French language in England by the end of the fifteenth century?
18. About when did English become generally adopted for the records of towns and the central government?
19. What does English literature between 1150 and 1350 tell us about the changing fortunes of the English language?
20. What do the literary accomplishments of the period between 1350 and 1400 imply about the status of English?

[ Chapter 7: Middle English ]

1. Define:
   Leveling
   Analogy
   Anglo-Norman
   Central French
   Hybrid forms
   Latin influence of the Third Period
   Aureate diction
   Standard English
2. What phonetic changes brought about the leveling of inflectional endings in Middle English?
3. What accounts for the -e in Modern English stone, the Old English form of which was stān in the nominative and accusative singular?
4. Generally what happened to inflectional endings of nouns in Middle English?
5. What two methods of indicating the plural of nouns remained common in early Middle English?
6. Which form of the adjective became the form for all cases by the close of the Middle English period?
7. What happened to the demonstratives , sēo, þæt and þēs, þēos, þis in Middle English?
8. Why were the losses not so great in the personal pronouns? What distinction did the personal pronouns lose?
9. What is the origin of the th- forms of the personal pronoun in the third person plural?
10. What were the principal changes in the verb during the Middle English period?
11. Name five strong verbs that were becoming weak during the thirteenth century.
12. Name five strong post participles that have remained in use after the verb became weak.
13. How many of the Old English strong verbs remain in the language today?
14. What effect did the decay of inflections have upon grammatical gender in Middle English?
15. To what extent did the Norman Conquest affect the grammar of English?
16. In the borrowing of French words into English, how is the period before 1250 distinguished from the period after?
17. Into what general classes do borrowings of French vocabulary fall?
18. What accounts for the difference in pronunciation between words introduced into English after the Norman Conquest and the corresponding words in Modem French?
19. Why are the French words borrowed during the fifteenth century of a bookish quality?
20. What is the period of the greatest borrowing of French words? Altogether about how many French words were adopted during the Middle English period?
21. What principle is illustrated by the pairs ox/beef, sheep/mutton, swine/pork, and calf/veal?
22. What generally happened to the Old English prefixes and suffixes in Middle English?
23. Despite the changes in the English language brought about by the Norman Conquest, in what ways was the language still English?
24. What was the main source of Latin borrowings during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries?
25. In which Middle English writers is aureate diction most evident?
26. What tendency may be observed in the following sets of synonyms: rise--mount--ascend, ask--question--interrogate, goodness--virtue--probity?
27. What kind of contact did the English have with speakers of Flemish, Dutch, and Low German during the late Middle Ages?
28. What are the five principal dialects of Middle English?
29. Which dialect of Middle English became the basis for Standard English? What causes contributed to the establishment of this dialect?
30. Why did the speech of London have special importance during the late Middle Ages?

[ Chapter 8: The Renaissance, 1500--1650 ]

1. Explain why the following people are important in historical discussions of the English language:
   Richard Mulcaster
   John Hart
   William Bullokar
   Sir John Cheke
   Thomas Wilson
   Sir Thomas Elyot
   Sir Thomas More
   Edmund Spenser
   Robert Cawdrey
   Nathaniel Bailey
2. Define:
   Inkhorn terms
   Oversea language
   Chaucerisms
   Latin influence of the Fourth Period
   Great Vowel Shift
   His-genitive
   Group possessive
   Orthography
3. What new forces began to affect the English language in the Modern English period? Why may it be said that these forces were both radical and conservative?
4. What problems did the modern European languages face in the sixteenth century?
5. Why did English have to be defended as language of scholarship? How did the scholarly recognition of English come about?
6. Who were among the defenders of borrowing foreign words?
7. What was the general attitude toward inkhorn terms by the end of Elizabeth's reign?
8. What were some of the ways in which Latin words changed their form as they entered the English language?
9. Why were some words in Renaissance English rejected while others survived?
10. What classes of strange words did sixteenth-century purists object to?
11. When was the first English dictionary published? What was the main purpose of English dictionaries throughout the seventeenth century?
12. From the discussions in Baugh and Cable §177 and below, summarize the principal features in which Shakespeare's pronunciation differs from your own.
13. Why is vowel length important in discussing sound changes in the history of the English language?
14. Why is the Great Vowel Shift responsible for the anomalous use of the vowel symbols in English spelling?
15. How does the spelling of unstressed syllables in English fail to represent accurately the pronunciation?
16. What nouns with the old weak plural in -n can be found in Shakespeare?
17. Why do Modern English nouns have an apostrophe in the possessive?
18. When did the group possessive become common in England?
19. How did Shakespeare's usage in adjectives differ from current usage?
20. What distinctions, at different periods, were made by the forms thou, thy, thee? When did the forms fall out of general use?
21. How consistently were the nominative ye and the objective you distinguished during the Renaissance?
22. What is the origin of the form its?
23. When did who begin to be used as relative pronoun? What are the sources of the form?
24. What forms for the the third person singular of the verb does one find in Shakespeare? What happened to these forms during the seventeenth century?
25. How would cultivated speakers of Elizabethan times have regarded Shakespeare's use of the double negative in "Thou hast spoken no word all this time---nor understood none neither"?


Cable, Thomas. A Companion to History of the English Language. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2002.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-07-28-1] [2016-06-11-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-02 Thu

#2593. 졤׹͡¡ʸĤʤΤȤƤΥ᥿ե [metaphor][cognitive_linguistics][sapir-whorf_hypothesis][rhetoric][conceptual_metaphor]

Lakoff and Johnson ϡ᥿ե (metaphor) ñ˸εȤƤǤϤʤʹ֤ǧ׹͡ưδܤˤäƸ¤İˡͿƤΤȤȤƤȤ館Ƥ롥ŵȸƤ֤٤ Metaphors We Live By ǤϰӤƤμݤǼĥʤƤ뤬ΤʤǤȤ櫓ĥ϶սȤơ"New Meaning" ꤹϤʲʸϤ򤢤褦 (145--46)

   Many of our activities (arguing, solving problems, budgeting time, etc.) are metaphorical in nature. The metaphorical concepts that characterize those activities structure our present reality. New metaphors have the power to create a new reality. This can begin to happen when we start to comprehend our experience in terms of a metaphor, and it becomes a deeper reality when we begin to act in terms of it. If a new metaphor enters the conceptual system that we base our actions on, it will alter that conceptual system and the perceptions and actions that the system gives rise to. Much of cultural change arises from the introduction of new metaphorical concepts and the loss of old ones. For example, the Westernization of cultures throughout the world is partly a matter of introducing the TIME IS MONEY metaphor into those cultures.
   The idea that metaphors can create realities goes against most traditional views of metaphor. The reason is that metaphor has traditionally been viewed as a matter of mere language rather than primarily as a means of structuring our conceptual system and the kinds of everyday activities we perform. It is reasonable enough to assume that words alone don't change reality. But changes in our conceptual system do change what is real for us and affect how we perceive the world and act upon those perceptions.
   The idea that metaphor is just a matter of language and can at best only describe reality stems from the view that what is real is wholly external to, and independent of, how human beings conceptualize the world---as if the study of reality were just the study of the physical world. Such a view of reality---so-called objective reality---leaves out human aspects of reality, in particular the real perceptions, conceptualizations, motivations, and actions that constitute most of what we experience. But the human aspects of reality are most of what matters to us, and these vary from culture to culture, since different cultures have different conceptual systems. Cultures also exist within physical environments, some of them radically different---jungles, deserts, islands, tundra, mountains, cities, etc. In each case there is a physical environment that we interact with, more or less successfully. The conceptual systems of various cultures partly depend on the physical environments they have developed in.
   Each culture must provide a more or less successful way of dealing with its environment, both adapting to it and changing it. Moreover, each culture must define a social reality within which people have roles that make sense to them and in terms of which they can function socially. Not surprisingly, the social reality defined by a culture affects its conception of physical reality. What is real for an individual as a member of a culture is a product both of his social reality and of the way in which that shapes his experience of the physical world. Since much of our social reality is understood in metaphorical terms, and since our conception of the physical world is partly metaphorical, metaphor plays a very significant role in determining what is real for us.


ΰˤϡܽǷ֤Ƥĥ褯󤵤Ƥ롥ǰ᥿եϡǧΡưλŤΤȤơĿͤˡƼҲ˿ĥäƤꡤ켫ȤϸĿͤҲηиŪפξΩƤ롥ɽϤΤ褦ФʴäξȯΤǤꡤ̣ǤŪȤ餤롥᥿եȤϡεǤϤʤषδפΤ˴פȤʤ뤯餤ǧβοȤޤƤΤǤ롥
Lakoff and Johnson ˤȤäƤϡ򸦵椷褦ȻפΤǤСʹ֤ǧβΤΤϤʤФʤʤȤȤ󤬡ǧθؤνȯȤ롥

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P, 1980.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-05-26-1] [2016-06-25-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2016-06-01 Wed

#2592. Lindley Murray, English Grammar [prescriptive_grammar][history_of_linguistics][lowth][priestley]

1918ȾФεϱʸˡΥ٥ȥ顼#2583. Robert Lowth, Short Introduction to English Grammar ([2016-05-23-1]) Ҳ𤷤ϡ1918ȾˤäðۤαʸˡȤȤԤҲ𤹤롥
Lindley Murray (1745--1826) ϡPennsylvania Υ̤εȤޤ줿Ƥ¶ȲȤǤꡤפѤ褦˸ƤˡΧƻ˿ʤߡNew York ۸ΤȤʤä̤ʤɿŪDzʻŻ֤꤫۸ΤȤᡤ30ȾˤϤǤ˰ʤƤ򹯾ͳ⤢1784ǯˤϥꥹ York ˶ᤤ Holgate ž֤ơᤤʳ鱣Ϥ᤿ޤ޶˥νع졤ζդ˱Ѹ콤ؤʤɤ򶵤뵡äȤˡ褤ʸˡζʽ񤬤ʤΤǽ񤤤ƤȺꤵ줿ϼ뵤ϤʤäǤڤ줺ˡ1ǯ餺ǽ񤭾夲줬18˶äƽǤƤεʸˡ軻Ȥ٤ English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of learners; With an Appendix, containing Rules and Observations for Promoting Perspicuity in Speaking and Writing (1795) Ǥ롥äơʸˡϡϼ侦䵤Ȥ̵طޤ줿λʪǤ롥
Murray ϡʸˤƤˤƸǤꡤʸˡ (work) ȤϸƤФãˤʸˡԻ (compilation) ȸƤȤԤȤ Harris, Johnson, Lowth, Priestley, Beattie, Sheridan, Walker, Coote 󤲤Ƥ뤬Ȥ Lowth ߤˤƤ뤳ȤϵʤεʤɤޤơLowth ȾषȤäƤ褤餤Ǥ롥ȤƳȤȤϤʤ֤ݼŪŪɼԤռǺӤδϳΤǤꡤ̤ȤơȴѤΥХ󥹤μ줿軻ȸƤ֤ˤդ路ʸˡ˻ž夬ä
English Grammar ϽǤƱȯŪԤ򼨤1850ǯޤǤ150줿Ȥꥹ⥢ꥫǤΤۤԤ褯衼åѤܤǤǤ줿19ȾˤƤϱʸˡ̾ȤƷפθγعʸˡθȤʤä
ʾ塤Crystal (53) Ӻڡڸԡ(248--49) 򻲾Ȥ

ʸ嵭2016/06/06(Mon)Ƭ2١19פȽ񤭤ޤ18פθǤŦäк꤬Ȥޤ

Crystal, David. Evolving English: One Language, Many Voices. London: The British Library, 2010.
ãڸ ԡرѸؿ̾ŵ١ҡ1995ǯ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

ǽ: 2026-06-26 03:46

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow