hellogѸ˥֥     η     η     ǿ     helhub (The HEL Hub)     ڡ     ɽ    

hellogѸ˥֥ / 2021-08

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

2021-08-31 Tue

#4509. "angloversals" --- ѸˤߤŪʡ׸ [world_englishes][typology][variety][terminology]

ε#4507. World Englishes ෿ؤ2ĤΥץ ([2021-08-29-1]) "angloversals" ȤѸ˿줿Ѹ world_englishes νѼϤȡŪŪطϴǤˤؤ餺ۤʤѼ֤ǻ褦ʸħǧ뤳Ȥ롥⹭̣ǤϡֱѸפǤΤ顤̹बĤ뤳ȼΤϤۤԻ׵ĤǤϤʤȻפ뤫⤷ʤɸѸǤǧʤħŪʴطʽѼ֤˹ǧȤȤǤСˤϲȴʤͳΤǤϤʤȵΤǤ롥äħ򡤲 "Angloversals" ȸƤǤȤȤ餷"universals" ⤸äƤƾߥ꡼ǥ󥰤̾Τ̩ʰ̣ǤΡספȤ¿Ѽ˸ַפȤ򤷤Ƥ٤Ǥ뤳ȤϡǰΤ˻ŦƤ
ơѸäΤ Mair Ǥ롥褦ѸȤơChambers κä "vernacular universals" ȤΤ⤢롥դѸаޤˤĤơSiemund and Davydova (135) 򻲾Ȥ褦

Another line of research departs from the observation that World Englishes (or varieties of English) frequently exhibit identical, or at least similar, non-standard morpho-syntactic phenomena, with common ancestors of these phenomena being difficult to reconstruct in the historical dialects of the British Isles. Such observation have led to the coinage of the label 'angloversals' (Mair 2003). Another notion used with a similar extension is 'vernacular universals' (Chambers 2001, 2003, 2004).
   Chambers defines vernacular universals as 'a small number of phonological and grammatical processes [that] recur in vernaculars wherever they are spoken' and views them as inherent features of unmonitored speech coming about as a result of the workings of the human language faculty (Chambers 2004: 128--29).


Ǥϡ"angloversals" ȤơŪˤϤɤΤ褦ʸħȤƵ󤲤ƤΤSiemund and Davydova (135--36) ꡤĤ󤲤Ƥߤ褦

Ե§ưοʿ
̵ɸñ
ư԰
¿
Ϣ (copula) ξά
ñ̾ʣɸηǡ
yes/no ʸˤ֤ηǡ
̤Ȥ I ǤϤʤ me Ѥ뷹
줬ƻƱȤʤ븽
ɽ魯Τ never ư֤븽
괧β

ϡ̤L2Ѹˤ褯ħƱǤȸäƤ⡤ۤɳƤʤ̸ŪѸνѼˤƸƤΡ줬 "angloversals" ʤΤ

Siemund, Peter and Julia Davydova. "World Englishes and the Study of Typology and Universals." Chapter 7 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 123--46.
Mair, Christian. "Kreolismen and verbales Identitätsmanagement im geschriebenen jamaikanischen Englisch." Zwischen Ausgrenzung und Hybridisierung. Ed. E. Vogel, A. Napp and W. Lutterer. Würzburg: Ergon, 2003.
Chambers, J. K. "Vernacular Universals." ICLaVE 1: Proceedings of the First International Confrerence on Language Variation in Europe. Ed. J. M. Fontana, L. McNally, M. T. Turell, and E. Vallduvi. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2001.
Chambers, J. K. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Implications. Oxford, UK/Malden, US: Blackwell.
Chambers, J. K. "Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals." Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Ed. B. Kortmann. Berlin/New York: Gruyter, 2004.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-09-28-1] [2022-05-12-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-30 Mon

#4508. World Englishes Υѥ̤ [world_englishes][variety][corpus][multilingualism][methodology][ice]

Ϣ World Englishes ˴ؤ夲Ƥ롥ŪʬǤȤϤʬǤΥѥѤˤϾʤȤǯۤɤμӤ롥ϡ1960ǯʹߡˤƽѤƤȤƱѼ˾Ƥ100줫ʤ륳ѥ "The Brown family of corpora" äȤäƤ褤 (cf. #428. The Brown family of corpora Ѿա ([2010-06-29-1]))
"Brown family" ϡʤ緿ץȤˤ⥤󥹥ԥ졼Ϳ#517. ICE 󶡤7ϰѼ拾ѥ ([2010-09-26-1]) ǾҲ𤷤 International Corpus of English Ǥ롥1990ǯ Sydney Greenbaum ײȯɽư衤ꥹѸȥꥫѸϤ󡤸ߤޤǤ˥ʥѸ졤쥢եꥫѸ졤Ѹ졤ɱѸ졤ɱѸ졤ޥѸ졤˥塼ɱѸ졤ʥꥢѸ졤եԥѸ졤󥬥ݡѸ졤󥫱Ѹʤ͡ʱѸѼ100쵬ϤΥѥԻƤʰΤΤϥɲǽˡߤӲǽʷǥǥ󤵤ƤꡤICECUP ȤեȥѰդƤ롥ܥ֥ ice ε⻲ȡ
³ơ2013ǯˤʬˤǯκ̤Ǥ GloWbE (= Corpus of Global Web-Based English) 饤줿#4169. GloWbE --- Corpus of Global Web-Based English ([2020-09-25-1]) ǾҲ𤷤̤ꡤ20񤫤αѸѼ礷19줫ʤѸѼ拾ѥǤ롥ߡΥѥѸ˴ؤ븦Ǥ褯ѤƤ롥
Τ褦 World Englishes 륳ѥԻȻѤ¥ʤƤ塤̤ǤϤɤΤ褦ŸͽۤMair (118--19) ϺŸʤ뤤ϴ˾ˤȤ3󤲤Ƥ롥

(1) ѼˤνʳΥѥԻԤ
(2) Ѽμ֤ˤĤƥ־ΥǡѤ뤳ȤޤޤͭѤȤʤäƤ
(3) Ѽ¿ˤĤƥޥ󥬥ʾǻѤƤΤ֤Ǥʾ塤αѸΥΥ󥬥롦ѥȤȤߤǤϤʤѸޤޥ󥬥롦ѥȤĤԻƤ٤Ǥ

Ȥ櫓 (3) ϡŪʡֱѸءפؤǤΤ褦ʼԤˤȤäƤϡå󥰤ʡܤڤ褦̤Ǥ⤢롥World Englishes ϡǤ˱ѸؤȤϤ߽Ф"sociolinguistics of globalisation" (Mair 119) Ȥ٤ɸؤƧ߽ФƤ뤳Ȥ򼨺롥ơֱѸˡפθ⡤Ѹθʾ塤ưϢươޤޤ줿ΤˤʤäƤΤ

Mair, Christian. "World Englishes and Corpora." Chapter 6 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 103--22.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-10-19-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-29 Sun

#4507. World Englishes ෿ؤ2ĤΥץ [world_englishes][variety][typology][linguistic_ideology][ecolinguistics][methodology]

ε#4506. World Englishes Ū3 ([2021-08-28-1]) ǿ줿褦ˡѸ (world_englishes) θϥѥʤɤѤƵ®ȯŸƤƤ롥Fong (88) ˤ복򻲾ȤȡĬήȤƤϡѸ¿෿ (typology) ˤ礭2Ĥ褦
(1) 1Ĥ͡ʱѸ˶̤ "angloversals" õǤ롥ENL ESL αѸѼ٤Ƥ⡤ӤƼѤƤ뤫Τ褦˸Ѥħǧ롥 "angloversals" ȾΤѸѼζõߤʤƤַѾפȤ̻Ū¦̤Ϥ뤬η̤ȤƤŻ뤹붦ŪʻȤäƤ褤
(2) ⤦1Ĥϡɤ餫ȤȱѸνѼ֤Ƕ̤¦̤㤹¦̤뤳ȤǧᡤʤΤ褦ʶΤ˼ҲŪʥƥȤ˴ŤŤ褦ȤǤ롥羧Ԥ Mufwene (2001) θ򻲾ȤСѸŪȯŸܿħҲкŪʴĶַָϡפҴʤΤǤȤȤˤʤ롥
Fong ϡѸ츦ؤФȤơΤ褦2Ĥη褬뤳Ȥ򥵥äȾҲ𤷤Ƥ뤬쥤ǥŪˤϡ2Ĥ˰ۤʤ٥륯ȥäƤΤȻפ롥Ԥ⼫餬ɤλΩĤ򼫳ФƤɬפ褦˻פ롥

Fong, Vivienne. "World Englishes and Syntactic and Semantic Theory." Chapter 5 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 84--102.
Mufwene, S. S. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP, 2001.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-10-19-1] [2021-08-31-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-28 Sat

#4506. World Englishes Ū3 [world_englishes][variety][medium][register]

Mair (116) ˤȡѸ (world_englishes) θԤ褽դƤ礿ȥɤ3ĤȤ

1. Accent divides, whereas grammar unites (with the lexicon being somewhere in between)
2. There is divergence in speech, but convergence in writing.
3. Variation is suppressed in public and formal discourse, but pervasive in informal settings.


Τ褦˸ȡľŪˤ⤽̤ʤΤȻפ졤äϤʤǻŦƤѸηϡѸ쥳ѥʤɤˤҴŪǼ¾ŪʸˤäƤ褽΢դȤפǤ롥绨ĤˤСäդŵŪʥեޥʱѸѤˤƤϡѼ֤礭ʰ㤤ߤ뤬񤭸դŵŪʥեޥʱѸѤǤϡɸؤλظߤȤȤ
3ϡ츫褽褦ʤȤҤ٤Ƥ褦ˤפ뤫⤷ʤΤ˸ߤ˽ŤʤʬΤ¤Ǥ롥ơϸ§Ȥưۤʤ뼴­ΩäλŦȤʤäƤ뤳Ȥդ1ܤϡȯʸˡʸäˤȤ˴ؤѥ᡼˴ŤƤ롥2ܤäդ񤭸դȤΤ˴ط롥3ܤϡҲŪʥåƥ󥰡üŪˤХեޥ뤫եޥ뤫ȤѤطʤܤƤ롥
äդȤСƤեޥǤꡤʤȯκۤ˴ؿեޥäդλѤϳؽѹֱʤɤ̤˴ѻ뤷Ǥȯ٤ŪΩʤʤʸˡäͿƤΤǤ롥ޤ񤭸դȤХեޥȤʤ뤳Ȥ¿åȤäΥץȤΤ褦ɬ⤽ǤϤʤ񤭸դλѤϤǤ⤢뤷ȯѰۤȿǤɸŪʥڥ󥰻Ѥߤ롥
3ĤΥѥ᡼ϡߤ˽Ťʤ뤬ŪˤΩΤȤ򤷤ƤΤŬڤǤ롥ˤĤƤϡ#230. äȤФȽ񤭤ȤФΩŪ ([2009-12-13-1])#2301. äդȽ񤭸դĤʤڥȥ ([2015-08-15-1])#839. register ([2011-08-14-1]) ʤɤ򻲾Ȥ줿

Mair, Christian. "World Englishes and Corpora." Chapter 6 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 103--22.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-10-19-1] [2021-08-29-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-27 Fri

#4505. פȤƤΥƥȱѸȤǡƱDzۤʤ뤫 [future_of_english][latin][lingua_franca][history][world_englishes][diglossia]

ε#4504. ƥ褷ȱѸιԤ ([2021-08-26-1]) ˰³פȤƤξԤɤäƤˤ٤뤳ȤˤѸ̤ꤦȤǤȤˤĤơ
ƥȱѸᤰ˼ҲŪʾˤĤơפĤޤޤ˥֥쥹ȤƤߤ

Ρ

äդȤƤ͡ʡʤФиߤ̤ʤ˸Ѽʬ񤭸դȤƤ1ĤɸŪѼˤ褽«Ƥ
ŪɸѼ norm-producing ̤ʶȤˤƥޥ󥹽ϳơϤĤ˻äƱƹȤΡ֡ѸפŪȤʤĤĤ
ƥ¿ΤҤ᤯衼åѤˤäƥ󥬡ե󥫤ȤƵǽѸ¾ΤҤ᤯ˤäƥ󥬡ե󥫤ȤƵǽƤ롥

Ρ

ƥϻǤѲʤѸϸθǤѲ³
ƥεϤŪŪѸεϤϲŪήưŪ
ƥϽ񤭸դäդγ֤꤬礭ԤŪѤͤϤʤʥŪˡѸˤĤƤϡɸѸüԤ˴ؤ¤ǤϤ뤬񤭸դäդγ֤ŪԤ˶ᤤѼŪѤͤ⤤Ū
ƥŪ˥衼åѤΤߤĤƤѸʤäƤ
ƥˤʹüԤʤäѸˤüԤ
ƥϳؽѡ濴Ȥ¤줿ʸŪ٤ι⤤ʬˤƼȤƽ񤭸դȤѤ줿ѸʬˤƤΤˤƤ⹭Ѥ
ƥεϤ᤿ΤϻѼԿ͸ΰǤҲŪ˹⤤ؤο͡ѸεϤ᤿Τ⡤18򻲾Ȥ¤ꡤѼԿ͸ΰǤҲŪ˹⤤ؤο͡ǤꡤǤϻƤȤ뤬21αѸεϤäƤΤϤ餯ĤƤȰۤʤΤǤϤʤ̤αѸѼԤŪ˵˴ͿƤΤǤϡ

ۤʤΤǡΤȤʤϤäȵ󤲤뤳ȤǤ롥㤨СؤäƤüԿ͸ʤɤӤС23ۤʤ̹򤯤ФˤϹ٤Ūʻ׹ͤɬפǡñˤϥǥ⤫Фʤ󡤤Ǥ礦
Ѹ̤ͤǡѸˤϤۤΩʤȻפäƤޤʹ֤θ̤ͤǡѸˤΩĤȻפäѸˤθ³Ƥޤ

Referrer (Inside): [2021-11-04-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-26 Thu

#4504. ƥ褷ȱѸιԤ [future_of_english][latin][lingua_franca][history][world_englishes]

Ĥƥ衼åѤǤϥ󥬡ե (lingua_franca) Ȥƥƥ줬Ĺ餯ɲڤؤä䤬ƳϤ͡ʥޥ󥹽ʬƤ˿ह˻ä˾λ¤ϡѸ̤ͤɬȤݥȤǤ롥Ѹϸǥ󥬡ե󥫤ô˻äǽѸѼ (World Englishes) ؤʬƤΤ¤⤢ꡤῴϤݻǤΤȵ롥ԤϥƥƱ­פ򤿤ɤ뤳Ȥϴְ㤤ʤȤͽۤΩơ̤ԤϥƥȱѸǤŪۤʤñˤӤǤʤȤߤ롥
ξӤ˴Ť򤹤硤ʤ顤Ū¤ΤˤĤǤȤפǤ롥Ȥ櫓ƥ˴ؤơ礭ʸ򤬹ޤäƤΤǤϤʤƥ줬ޥ󥹽ʬɽ硤ȤƤΤϡƥ줬ˤϰäȤȤǤ롥Ȥäդ˴ؤ¤ꡤƥϥޥ󥹽ʬϤѤƤΤǤꡤ̣Ǥϡ֥ޥ󥹽ؤʬפϾ˵äƤȤˤʤ롥ƥ줬ǤȤΤϡޤǽ񤭸դ˴ؤʤΤǤ롥McArthur (9--10) ϡ"The Latin fallacy" Ȥ1ǤθФդ¥Ƥ롥

Between a thousand and two thousand years ago the language of the Romans was certainly central in the development of the entities we now call 'the Romance languages'. In some important sense, Latin drifted among the Lusitani into 'Portuguese', among the Dacians into 'Romanian', among the Gauls and Franks into 'French', and so on. It is certainly seductive, therefore, to wonder whether American English might become simply 'American', and be, as Burchfield has suggested, an entirely distinct language in a century's time from British English.
   There is only one problem. The language used as a communicative bond among the citizens of the Roman Empire was not the Latin recorded in the scrolls and codices of the time. The masses used 'popular' (or 'vulgar') Latin, and were apparently extremely diverse in their use of it, intermingled with a wide range of other vernaculars. The Romance languages derive, not from the gracious tongue of such literati as Cicero and Virgil, but from the multifarious usages of a population most of whom were illiterati.
   'Classical' Latin had quite a different history from the people's Latin. It did not break up at all, but as a language standardized by manuscript evolved in a fairly stately fashion into the ecclesiastical and technical medium of the Middle Ages, sometimes known as 'Neo-Latin'. As Walter Ong has pointed out in Orality and Literacy (1982), this 'Learned Latin' survived as a monolith through sheer necessity, because Europe was 'a morass of hundreds of languages and dialects, most of them never written to this day'. Learned Latin derived its power and authority from not being an ordinary language. 'Devoid of baby talk' and 'a first language to none of its users', it was 'pronounced across Europe in often mutually unintelligible ways but always written the same way' (my italics).
   The Latin analogy as a basis for predicting one possible future for English is not therefore very useful, if the assumption is that once upon a time Latin was a mighty monolith that cracked because people did not take proper care of it. That is fallacious. Interestingly enough, however, a Latin analogy might serve us quite well if we develop the idea of a people's Latin that was never at any time particularly homogeneous, together with a text-bound learned Latin that became and remained something of a monolith because European society needed it that way.


ѤκǸˤ⤢̤ꡤΡ֥ƥ˴ؤɵפ˴٤ʤ褦դǡƥƥ褷ȱѸιԤӤƤߤȤξ괬˼ҲŪˤϤϤ궦褦˻פ롥Ѹ̤ͽۤ褦ȤݤԳǤ1Ĥϡ󥬡ե󥫤ȤƤαѸɤ줯餤Ƥ뤫Ǥ롥ߵ᤬¸ߤƤ¤ꡤʤȤ񤭸դˤƤϡƥ줬ä褦ˡ̸ŪݻƤΤǤϤʤ

McArthur, Tom. "The English Languages?" English Today 11 (1987): 9--11.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-11-04-1] [2021-08-27-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-25 Wed

#4503. ȤŤ줿ľ [simile][rhetoric][metaphor][proverb][alliteration]

Ѹˤϡ#4415. as mad as a hatter --- ŪݸŪľȤθͷӡ ([2021-05-29-1]) ǾҲ𤷤褦ʡݸŪľ (proverbial simile) 䶯Ūľ (intensifying simile) ȸƤФľȤ󤢤ޤ¿ϡ#943. Ƭˤ ([2011-11-26-1]) ǤŦ̤ꡤƬ (alliteration) ƧϤΤ褤ɽǤ
Ϥޤ˻ȤŤƤ "stock phrase" Ǥ뤳Ȥ¤ǡѰդ˻ȤʤȤåƥĥ줫ͤޤ Partridge Ϥ "battered similes" ǤŪˤߤʤֻȤ˺ƹͤפƤӤƤۤɤǤPartridge (303--05) 󤷤Ƥߤޤ礦

aspen leaf, shake (or tremble) like an
bad shilling (or penny), turn up (or come back) like a
bear with a sore head, like a
black as coal - or pitch - or the Pit, as blush like a schoolgirl, to
bold (or brave) as a lion, as
bright as a new pin, as [obsolescent]
brown as a berry, as
bull in a china shop, (behave) like a
cat on hot bricks, like a; e.g. jump about caught like a rat in a trap
cheap as dirt, as
Cheshire cat, grin like a
clean as a whistle, as
clear as crystal (or the day or the sun), as; jocularly, as clear as mud
clever as a cart- (or waggon-) load of monkeys, as
cold as charity, as
collapse like a pack of cards
cool as a cucumber, as
crawl like a snail
cross as a bear with a sore head (or as two sticks), as
dark as night, as
dead as a door-nail, as
deaf as a post (or as an adder), as
different as chalk from cheese, as
drink like a fish, to
drop like a cart-load of bricks, to
drowned like a rat
drunk as a lord, as
dry as a bone (or as dust), as
dull as ditch-water, as
Dutch uncle, talk (to someone) like a
dying like flies
easy as kiss (or as kissing) your hand, as; also as easy as falling off a log
fight like Kilkenny cats
fit as a fiddle, as
flash, like a
flat as a pancake, as
free as a bird, as; as free as the air
fresh as a daisy (or as paint), as
good as a play, as; i.e. very amusing
good as good, as; i.e. very well behaved
good in parts, like the curate's egg
green as grass, as
hang on like grim death
happy (or jolly) as a sandboy (or as the day is long), as
hard as a brick (or as iron or, fig., as nails), as
hate like poison, to
have nine lives like a cat, to
heavy as lead, as
honest as the day, as
hot as hell, as
hungry as a hunter, as
innocent as a babe unborn (or as a new-born babe), as
keen as mustard, as
lamb to the slaughter, like a
large as life (jocularly: large as life and twice as natural), as
light as a feather (or as air), as
like as two peas, as
like water off a duck's back
live like fighting cocks
look like a dying duck in a thunderstorm
look like grim death
lost soul, like a
mad as a March hare (or as a hatter), as
meek as a lamb, as
memory like a sieve a
merry as a grig, as [obsolescent]
mill pond, the sea [is] like a
nervous as a cat, as
obstinate as a mule, as
old as Methuselah (or as the hills), as
plain as a pikestaff (or the nose on your face), as
pleased as a dog with two tails (or as Punch), as
poor as a church mouse, as
pretty as a picture, as
pure as the driven snow, as
quick as a flash (or as lightning), as
quiet as a mouse (or mice), as
read (a person) like a book, to (be able to)
red as a rose (or as a turkey-cock), as
rich as Croesus, as
right as a trivet (or as rain), as
roar like a bull
run like a hare
safe as houses (or as the Bank of England), as
sharp as a razor (or as a needle), as
sigh like a furnace, to
silent as the grave, as
sleep like a top, to
slippery as an eel, as
slow as a snail (or as a wet week)
sob as though one's heart would break, to
sober as a judge, as
soft as butter, as
sound as a bell, as
speak like a book, to
spring up like mushrooms overnight
steady as a rock, as
still as a poker (or as a ramrod), as
straight as a die, as
strong as a horse, as
swear like a trooper
sweet as a nut (or as sugar), as
take to [something] like (or as) a duck to water
thick as leaves in Vallombrosa as [Ex. Milton's 'Thick as autumnal leaves that strow the brooks In Vallombrosa']
thick as thieves, as
thin as a lath (or as a rake), as
ton of bricks, (e.g. come down or fall) like a
tough as leather, as
true as steel, as
two-year-old, like a
ugly as sin, as
warm as toast, as
weak as water, as
white as a sheet (or as snow), as
wise as Solomon, as

Partridge, Eric. Usage and Abusage. 3rd ed. Rev. Janet Whitcut. London: Penguin Books, 1999.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-24 Tue

#4502. αѸѼˡ --- Goerlach "Hub-and-Spokes" ǥ [model_of_englishes][world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][sociolinguistics]

ε#4501. αѸѼˡ --- McArthur "Hub-and-Spokes" ǥ ([2021-08-23-1]) ˰³Ʊ "Hub-and-Spokes" ǥǤϤ뤬 Görlach 1988ǯ1990ǯȯɽС򼨤Ǥ McArthur 1991ǯʸ (p. 20) ǿ޼ƤΤ򼨤

Goerlach's Circle of World English

McArthur ΥǥȯۤѤʤ٤ŤƱߤƤΤħǤ롥¦鳰¦˸äơ"International English", "regional/national standards", "subregional ENL---ESL semi-standards", "dialects, ethnic E (creoles), semi-/non-standards" ȹäƤΤ˳¦ "pidgins (creoles), mixes, related languages" ΰ褬ߤƤ롥
褦 McArthur Υǥ˸줿Ƚϡ褽 Görlach ǥˤƤϤޤ롥㤨СƱߤκդ Tamil E Butler E ¤Ǥ뤬Τ褦ϰѼȼҲѼʤ˴Ťԥˤ󤵤ΤŬڤʤΤޤŪʴޤƤ餺Ūʥǥ˽ߤƤ뤭餤⤢롤
ѸѼ޼ (model_of_englishes) ƤȤ館褦Ȥߤ¿ɡĹûꡤʣʸ¤򤭤줤ȤΤϻζȤǤ롥

Görlach, M. Studies in the History of the English Language. Heidelberg: Winter, 1990.
McArthur, Tom. "Models of English." English Today 32 (1991): 12--21.

Referrer (Inside): [2021-10-19-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-23 Mon

#4501. αѸѼˡ --- McArthur "Hub-and-Spokes" ǥ [model_of_englishes][world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][sociolinguistics]

ѸѼˡȤŪ᤯󵯤줿ǥ1Ĥ "Hub-and-Spokes" ǥ뤬롥͡ʱѸѼ狼鹽ƱߤοޤؤΥϥ֤ȥݡ˸ΩƤХǥΥǥˤ⤤ĤΥС󤬤뤬McArthur 1987ǯʸ ("The English Languages?", 11) 󼨤ΤƤߤ1991ǯʸ ("Models of English", 19) ˺ƷǤƤޤƸ롥

McArthur's Circle of World English

ΥǥˤĤơMcArthur ("The English Languages?", 11) ϼΤ褦˲⤷Ƥ롥

The purpose of the model is to highlight the broad three-part spectrum that ranges from the 'innumerable' popular Englishes through the various national and regional standards to the remarkably homogeneous but negotiable 'common core' of World Standard English.


McArthur ȤҤ٤Ƥ褦ˡΥǥϤޤǤȤƤ줿ΤǤꡤ͡뤳Ȥͽۤ롥ºݡǤȽŪʥȤä뤳ȤǤ롥ġѼʬϤ̤ǹΤBBC English Norn Ʊ֤ƤΤϤΤǤϤʤޤ Australian English Tok Pisin ꡥܼŪ䤤Ȥơ⤽˿Ƥ "World Standard English" ȤΤϸ¤¸ߤΤ
οޤΤȤ World English ƤȤˤĤƤϡMcArthur ("The English Language", 10) ϡֵŪʻ¡פǤɾƤ롥

Within such a model, we can talk about a more or less 'monolithic' core, a text-linked World Standard negotiated among a variety of more or less established national standards. Beyond the minority area of the interlinked standards, however, are the innumerable non-standard forms --- the majority now as in Roman times, with all sorts of reasons for being unintelligible to each other. There is nothing new in this, and it is a state of affairs that is unlikely to change in the short or even the medium term. In the distinctness of Scots from Black English Vernacular, Cockney from Krio, and Texian from Taglish, we have all the age-old criteria for talking about mutually unintelligible languages. Nonetheless, all such largely oral forms share in the totality of World English, and can be shown to share in it, however bafflingly different they may be. This is a paradox, but it is also a fact.


McArthur, Tom. "The English Languages?" English Today 11 (1987): 9--11.
McArthur, Tom. "Models of English." English Today 32 (1991): 12--21.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-22 Sun

#4500. ʸηϤ̤θ줫ڤȤ˵뤳6 [grapheme][graphology][alphabet][writing][diacritical_mark][ligature][digraph][runic][borrowing][y]

餬ʸηϤ߽ФǤʤ¤ꡤθ⤹Ǥ¾ǻȤƤʸѤ뤳ȤˤäʸαѤϤ᤿ϤǤ롥ȼѸθʤ¿쾯ʤۤʤħʤȤ櫓ˤäƤ櫓ǤꡤʸαѤˤäƤѸǤαѤ100%Τޤ޻ۤ櫓ǤϤʤ֤ʸηϤѤȤˤϡ餫Ѳ뤳Ȥ򤱤ʤϡ6˥޻Ѹ˼Ѥ줿ȤꡤƱ˴ܸ˼Ѥ줿ȤǤ롥
Görlach (35) ϡʸηϤμѤ˺ݤƲꤦ뤫6վ񤭤ǵ󤲤Ƥ롥ɽʸǤ륢ե٥åȤμѤǰƬ֤Ƥβվ񤭤Ȼפ뤬ʲ˰Ѥ

   Since no two languages have the same phonemic inventory, any transfer of an alphabet creates problems. The following solutions, especially to render 'new' phonemes, appear to be the most common:

1. New uses for unnecessary letters (Greek vowels).
2. Combinations (E. <th>) and fusions (Gk <>, OE <æ>, Fr <œ>, Ge <ß>).
3. Mixture of different alphabets (Runic additions in OE; <ȝ>: <g> in ME).
4. Freely invented new symbols (Gk <, , , >).
5. Modification of existing letters (Lat <G>, OE <ð>, Polish <ł>).
6. Use of diacritics (dieresis in Ge Bär, Fr Noël; tilde in Sp mañana; cedilla in Fr ça; various accents and so on).


ʤۤɡ¸ʸˡѤȤȤ⤢СʸФȤȤ⤢Ȥ褦͡ʥѥ󤬤ꤽ¿ϳΤ˸֤ǤʸηϤμѤ˺ݤƵ뤳Ȥ¿⤷ʤǤʤƤ⼫ȯŪ˵ܤ⤢ΤǤϤʤ
㤨о嵭1ˤĤƤϡƱǤäƤ̻Ū˵뤳Ȥ롥űѸ <y> /y/ ˤĤơѸˤƱǤ߿ȼäơƱʸǤϤ̣ǡספȤʤä櫓ѸˤϻҲ /j/ ɽ魯褦ˤʤä֤ˤä /i/ ΰ֤ȤǤϡܿľŪ˴ؤäƤʤ褦˻פ (cf. #3069. Ϣ9֤ʤ try tried Ȥʤꡤdie dying ȤʤΤס ([2017-09-21-1]))

Görlach, Manfred. The Linguistic History of English. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-21 Sat

#4499. ˤ Shakespeare ȯꤹ뤫 [shakespeare][pronunciation][reconstruction][spelling][rhyme][pun]

#4482. Shakespeare ȯ񡩡 ([2021-08-04-1]) 褦ˡShakespeare ȯפȤȤ˲̣Ƥ뤫˵ĤɬפϤ뤬Ū Shakespeare Υꥸʥȯʤ뤤ϺƷ (reconstruction)ˤ褦ȻߤȤˡˤʤ4ढ롥ֻ (spelling)ӱ (rhyme)ϸ (pun)ƱκȤΥȤǤ롥Crystal (xx) ʬ䤹ȤȤˡ4Ĥʷ˾Ҳ𤷤ƤΤǡ˰Ѥ롥

- In RJ 1.4.66, when Mercutio describes Queen Mab as having a whip with 'a lash of film', the Folio and Quarto spellings of philome indicate a bisyllabic pronunciation, 'fillum' (as in modern Irish English).
- MND 3.2.118, Puck's couplet indicates a pronunciation of one that no longer exists in English: 'Then will two at once woo one / That must needs be sport alone'.
- In LLL 5.2.574, there is a pun in the line 'Your lion, that holds his pole-axe sitting on a close-stool, will be given to Ajax' which can only work if we recognize . . . that Ajax could also be pronounced 'a jakes' (jakes = 'privy').
- In Ben Johnson's English Grammar (1616), the letter 'o' is described as follows: 'In the short time more flat, and akin to u; as ... brother, love, prove', indicating that, for him at least, prove was pronounced like love, not the other way round.


ĸκƷʤɤǤƱͤμʤγơˤĤȤʤٹ礤Ū˰ۤʤ롥ֻɸಽƤʤλˤϡֻѰۤϤʤפʾڵˤʤ뤷ӱؤοŪ˹⤤ȤäƤ褤ϸϼ¦μѤƤǽäȤжɤ߹ǤޤäƤǽꡤŤɾʤФʤʤShakespeare ˤäƤϤ٤ƤϸȤ⤢ΤˡƱκȤˤȯ˴ؤ᥿ȤˤĤƤ⡤Τ˻ͤˤϤʤ뤬ĿŪȯʤȿǤΤˤʤ⤷ʤƱȯ뤤 Shakespeare ȯŬѤǤ뤫ɤӿŤȽǤɬפ롥
ʣμʤˤƱؤߤ˶礦褦ǤСȤƤοޤ뤳ȤϤޤǤʤŲοϡʣʥѥΤ褦Ϣơ#437. ˤƸŲꤹ뤫 ([2010-07-08-1])#758. ˤƸŲꤹ뤫 (2) ([2011-05-25-1])#4015. ˤѸȯꤹ뤫 ([2020-04-24-1]) ⻲ȡ

Crystal, David. The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: OUP, 2016.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-11-14-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-20 Fri

#4498. ѸȺŬ [ot][phonology][world_englishes][pidgin][contact][sociolinguistics]

ҲŪʸ̮ǵ뤳Ȥ¿Ѹ (world_englishes) ȡȤƤκŬ (Optimality Theory; ot) 2ĤȤ߹碌ƹͤƤߤ뤳ȤʤɡޤǤʤäUffmann ޤˤΤ褦ͤ󼨤Ƥ롥
"World Englishes and Phonological Theory" Ȥ򸫤Ȥˤϡ͡ʱѸѼβ٤ơŬˤŪ褦ȤΤȻפäɤ⤽櫓ǤϤʤ褦ˤɸȤƤϤΤ褦ʤȤͤƤΤ⤷ʤͤǤϡ Vernacular Liberian English (cf. #1697. Liberia ι ([2013-12-19-1])) ȤL2ѸѼβħL1ʤΥ󥭥󥰡ˤۤ줿Ȥͳ褹ȤΤˡŬѤƤ롥
ɷŪʸäܿ (contact) ȤƼҲŪȡηϤ˴ؤŪȤŬΥ󥭥󥰤𤷤ƷӤĤȤФ褤ʸξԤηӤĤɬ䤫󼨤줿櫓ǤϤʤޤǺβȤƼˤȤɤޤäƤϤ롥Ǥ⡤̤ȤƤͭ˾Uffmann (79--80) ϼΤ褦˸̤Ƥ롥

   We also still do not have a clear idea of how the social factors in language contact interface with the formal properties of a grammar. With respect to creoles, Uffmann . . . suggests that there are three main processes at work whose relative weighting will depend on the exact nature of the contact situation: (a) transfer of substrate rankings, (b) levelling across substrates, which will be levelling to the unmarked (unless the marked option is shared by a majority of speakers), that is, choosing the ranking from the pool of grammars in which markedness constraints are ranked highest, and (c) acquisition of the superstrate grammar, as reranking via constraint demotion . . . . How does this proposal transfer to other contact varieties?
   In this context, a particularly interesting model to look at could be the Dynamic Model of postcolonial Englishes proposed in Schneider (2007; this volume). It is interesting not only because it is the best developed framework to date to account for all postcolonial varieties, from settler varieties, via nativized varieties, to pidgins and creoles. Its special relevance lies in the fact that it links sociolinguistic and socio-historical conditions to identify construction and to linguistic effects. Why and how then do specific contact settings yield specific linguistic outcomes? How could this proposal tie in with Uffmann's model of constraint transfer, levelling to the unmarked and reranking (as acquisition)? This chapter cannot answer these questions. It can only serve as a call for more serious research in this field. Linking World Englishes to phonological theory and applying the models of phonological theorizing to varieties of English from around the world can be an exciting endeavour, and it is to be hoped that it can enrich our understanding of both the processes that lead to the emergence of new Englishes and of the fundamental principles that underlie phonological computation and processing.


ǤϡܿҲŪѥ᡼ζ١ظαƶŪ¸ߡȤäؤüüޤǤʤ򡤺ŬΥ󥭥󥰤Ȥ1Ĥ֤˼̤ƤȤ롥
ŬˤĤƤϡ#3848. 󥭥󥰤 "Optimality Theory" ([2019-11-09-1])#3867. Optimality Theory --- äʹΥˡθ줿 ([2019-11-28-1])#1581. Optimality Theory Ρϡס ([2013-08-25-1])#3910. Ŭ (Optimality Theory) Υ󥭥ɽɤ ([2020-01-10-1]) 򻲾ȡ
ΰѤǻȤƤ Schneider "Dynamic Model" ˤĤƤϡε#4497. ݥȥ˥ѸѼ˴ؤ Schneider Dynamic Model ([2021-08-19-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Uffmann, Christian. "World Englishes and Phonological Theory." Chapter 4 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 63--83.
Schneider, Edgar W. "Models of English in the World." Chapter 3 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 35--57.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-19 Thu

#4497. Schneider ݥȥ˥ѸѼ˴ؤ "Dynamic Model" [model_of_englishes][world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][sociolinguistics][contact][accommodation][variation][dynamic_model]

#4492. αѸѼˡ --- Gupta 5ס ([2021-08-14-1]) #4493. αѸѼˡ --- Mesthrie and Bhatt 12ס ([2021-08-15-1]) ѸѼˤĤ2ĤθҲ𤷤¾ˤ͡ʥǥ뤬ꡤmodel_of_englishes Ǽ夲ƤǯäȤŪʥǥȤСSchneider ݥȥ˥ѸѼ˴ؤ "Dynamic Model" 2001ǯ夲Ƥǥǡ乭ĤĤ롥ΥǥιҤ򼨤ΤˡSchneider (47) ΰʲʸϤѤ롥

Essentially, the Dynamic Model claims that it is possible to identify a single, underlying, fundamentally uniform evolutionary process which can be observed, with modifications and adjustments to local circumstances, in the evolution of all postcolonial forms of English. The postulate of some sort of a uniformity behind all these processes may seem surprising and counterintuitive at first sight, given that the regions and historical contexts under investigation are immensely diverse, spread out across several centuries and also continents (and thus encompassing also a wide range of different input languages and language contact situations). It rests on the central idea that in a colonization process there are always two groups of people involved, the colonizers and the colonized, and the social dynamics between these two parties has tended to follow a similar trajectory in different countries, determined by fundamental human needs and modes of behaviour. Broadly, this can be characterized by a development from dominance and segregation towards mutual approximation and gradual, if reluctant, integration, followed by corresponding linguistic consequences.


ΥǥˤäƤϡطʤˤ뤤ĤǤˤĤ򤷤Ƥɬפ롥Schneider (47--51) ꡤɤվ񤭤ȴФƤߤ褦

Ρ4ĤΡˡ˼Ҳؤ

1. Language contact theory
2. A "Feature pool" of linguistic choices
3. Accommodation
4. Identity

Ρ2ĤΥߥ˥̮

1. The "Settlers' strand"
2. The "Indigenous strand"

Ρ4ĤΡˡ˼ҲŪȸŪȯŸδط˴ؤǡ

1. The political history of a country
2. Identity re-writings of the groups involved
3. Sociolinguistic conditions of language contact
4. Linguistic developments and structural changes in the varieties concerned

Ρ5ĤŵŪʳ

1. Foundation
2. Exonormative stablization
3. Nativization
4. Endonormative stabilization
5. Differentiation

Schneider ΥǥŪŪǤꡤλ׹ˡ Keller θʤȤ롥塤ɤΤ褦˵ŸƤڤߤǤ롥

Schneider, Edgar W. "Models of English in the World." Chapter 3 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 35--57.
Keller, Rudi. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. Brigitte Nerlich. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-18 Wed

#4496. two laps to go ֻĤ2פ to go [sobokunagimon][infinitive][bnc]

Φ嶥ʤɤǡֻĤ2פȤΤ˱ѸǤ two laps to go ʤɤȸΤʹȤȤǡto go ˡˤĤƼ䤬ä֡Υ¾̤ʤɤˤĤơֻĤפȤư̤ѤŪʥե졼ɤΤ褦ͳʤΤ
OED go, v. Ĵ٤Ƥߤȡ 9c βˤˡ󤲤Ƥ󤲤Ƥǽ3ʸȤȤˡʲ˰Ѥ롥

c. intransitive. In the infinitive, used as a postpositive clause. Of a period of time: to be left, remain; to be required to elapse. Hence of a quantity of something: to remain to be dealt with.
     Earliest in the context of marine racing.
      Formally coincident with some uses of sense 2a(b): cf. quot. 1905 at that sense.


1881 'Rockwood' Stories Sc. Sports 91 Fifteen seconds to go, and it is all anxiety. Five seconds gone, and yet she is not there.
1892 J. G. Blaine Let. 26 Feb. in Fur-seal Arbitration: App. Case U.S. before Tribunal I. 354 Our consul at Victoria, telegraphs to-day that there are---Forty-six schooners cleared to date. Six or seven more to go.
1909 H. Sutcliffe Priscilla of Good Intent xvi. 241 There were five minutes to go before the signal for the start.


㤬19ȾȤȤʤΤǡ褷ƸŤɽǤϤʤ嶥ݡĤʸ̮ޤ줿ɽȹͤƤ褵ǡΥεŤǤϤʤäȤˤʤ롥
go ֹԤפȤưϡűѸ֡ʤ֡Υ̤˿ʤࡤФ롤Ƨˤ롤СפۤɤθѤƤ㤨СѸǤ "One of my favorite things to do was ice-skate on the beautiful St. Lawrence river... I'd go for miles and miles." ʤɤȤ롥ˡ go ֡Υ̤ɽ魯ɽθ˷ƻˡȤ֤졤ֻĤפδɽ뤳ȤˤʤäΤ
ʤߤˡBNCweb "_CRD (more)? _NN* to go" ȸƤߤ422㤬󤬤äƤñ̤̾ minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years ʤɤλ֤ɽ魯Τ¿feet, yards, miles ʤɤεΥɽ魯Ρޤ laps, holes, fenses, games ʤɥݡĶϢۤΤ⻶롥

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-17 Tue

#4495. δñѸ in English٤Ϣ6֤ʤƻӵˤ -er more Ρ [notice][sobokunagimon][rensai][comparison][adjective][adverb][suffix][periphrasis][link]

NHK饸ֺ¡δñѸ in Englishפ9ΥƥȤȯȤʤޤϢܤƤֱѸΥܥʵפ6Ȥʤޤϡ֤ʤƻӵˤ -er more ΡפǤ

δñѸ in English2021ǯ9



Ѥʵ֤ȤäƤ褤Ǥ͡ûƻʤ -erĹƻʤ more Ȥ褦˳ФƤ¿ȻפޤäûĹȤΤǤ§Ȥ1Ǥ -ermore Ǥ褤Ȥơ2ϤɤʤΤʹȤʤʤ񤷤Ǥ͡Ʊ2Ǥ early, happy -er Ǥafraid, famous more ޤϢܵǤϡդʣʻޤơʤ٤פŪ򤭤Ƥߤޤɤɤ
֤ȤȤǡܥ֥Ǥ͡ʷǼ夲ƤޤϢܵŪƤޤޤޤɤ

#4234. ʤӵˤ -er ĤΤ more ĤΤȤΤǤ --- hellog 饸ǡ ([2020-11-29-1])
#3617. -er/-est more/most --- ӵ顦Ǿκ ([2019-03-23-1])
#4442. 2ηƻӵ -er more ([2021-06-25-1])
#3032. ӤȶӤζάˡ ([2017-08-15-1])
#2346. more, most ѤӤȯã ([2015-09-29-1])
#403. ή˵դäƤӵˡ ([2010-06-04-1])
#2347. Ӥȯãˤե󥹸졤ƥαƶˤĤơ ([2015-09-30-1])
#3349. ѸˤƻӤζ޷ vs ηװ ([2018-06-28-1])
#3619. Lowth Ф2ӵȲǾ ([2019-03-25-1])
#3618. Johnson ˤӵ顦Ǿκε§ ([2019-03-24-1])
#3615. Ѹ2ӵ顦ǾԸˤʤ ([2019-03-21-1])
#456. Ӥ -er, -est ϶ޤݤ ([2010-07-27-1])

Referrer (Inside): [2022-07-22-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-16 Mon

#4494. "South Seas Jargon" --- ʿκ [world_englishes][variety][pidgin][tok_pisin]

ε#4493. αѸѼˡ --- Mesthrie and Bhatt 12ס ([2021-08-15-1]) ǾҲ𤷤ʬ (k) Jargon Englishes 1Ȥơ19 "South Seas Jargon" 󤲤Ƥ롥ʿκפȲ᤹٤ѸѼ̤ΤΡˤǡ¾θƤ̾⤢褦ˤĤ McArthur λŵĴ٤Ƥߤ

PACIFIC JARGON ENGLISH, also South Seas English, South Seas Jargon, Jargon. A trade jargon used by 19c traders and whalers in the Pacific Ocean, the ancestor of Melanesian Pidgin English. The whalers first hunted in the eastern Pacific but by 1820 were calling regularly at ports in Melanesia and took on crew members from among the local population. The sailors communicated in Jargon, which began to stabilize on plantations throughout the Pacific area after 1860, wherever Islanders worked as indentured labourers.


19ΥͥǡΤϸǰ׾ͤߤΥߥ˥Τ˻ѤƤǤꡤʿϰΥץơǹ夹뤳Ȥˤʤԥ "Melanesian Pidgin English" εȤʤäѼǤ롥Ǥϡȯã "Melanesian Pidgin English" ȤϤʤΤƱ McArthur λŵꡥ

MELANESIAN PIDGIN ENGLISH, also Melanesian Pidgin. The name commonly given to three varieties of Pidgin spoken in the Melanesian states of Papua New Guinea (Tok Pisin), Solomon Islands (Pijin), and Vanuatu (Bislama). Although there is a degree of mutual intelligibility among them, the term is used by linguists to recognize a common historical development and is not recognized by speakers of these languages. The development of Melanesian Pidgin English has been significantly different in the three countries. This is due to differences in the substrate languages, the presence of European languages other than English, and differences in colonial policy. In Papua New Guinea, there was a period of German administration (1884--1914) before the British and Australians took over. The people of Vanuatu were in constant contact with the French government and planters during a century of colonial rule (1880--1980). However, Solomon Islanders have not been in contact with any European language other than English.


"Melanesian Pidgin English" 켫Τ⡤Ū˾ܤߤʣѼνΤȤ٤ΤȤƤϸߤˤ褯Ƥ뤷ƶط⤢ä褦Ǥ롥ѥץ˥塼˥ Tok Pisin, Solomon Pijin, Х̥Ĥ Bislama ߴطˤĤƤϡ#1688. Tok Pisin ([2013-12-10-1])#1689. ʿϰΥԥȥ쥪θá ([2013-12-11-1]) 򻲾Ȥ줿
Υͥι񡹤ǤϳƥԥѸ줬 lingua_franca ȤƹѤƤ뤬ˤϤ150--200ǯۤɤʤȤȤˤʤ롥#1536. ǤʤعǤλѤػߤƤ Bislama ([2013-07-11-1]) ⤪⤷

McArthur, Tom, ed. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: OUP, 1992.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-15 Sun

#4493. αѸѼˡ --- Mesthrie and Bhatt 12 [model_of_englishes][world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][pidgin][creole][esl][efl][enl]

ε#4492. αѸѼˡ --- Gupta 5ס ([2021-08-14-1]) ˰³αѸѼˡˤĤơ World Englishes ȤХܤ路 Mesthrie and Bhatt (3--10) ˤ12פؤʬҲ𤷤Ʊ͡Schneider (44) ͳƼ

(a) Metropolitan standards (i.e. the "respected mother state's" norm as opposed to colonial offspring, i.e. in our case British English and American English as national reference forms).
(b) Colonial standards (the standard forms of the former "dominions," i.e. Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, South African English, etc.).
(c) Regional dialects (of Britain and North America, less so elsewhere in settler colonies).
(d) Social dialects (by class, ethnicity, etc.; including, e.g. Broad, General and Cultivated varieties in Australia, African American Vernacular English, and others).
(e) Pidgin Englishes (originally rudimentary intermediate forms in contact, and nobody's native tongue; possibly elaborated in complexity, e.g. West African Pidgin Englishes).
(f) Creole Englishes (fully developed but highly structured, hence of questionable relatedness to the lexifier English; e.g. Jamaican Creole).
(g) English as a Second Language (ESL) (postcolonial countries where English plays a key role in government and education; e.g. Kenya, Sri Lanka).
(h) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) (English used for external and international purposes; e.g. China, Europe, Brazil).
(i) Immigrant Englishes (developed by migrants to an English-dominant country; e.g. Chicano English in the United States)).
(j) Language-shift Englishes (resulting from the replacement of an ancestral language by English; possibly, like Hiberno English, becoming a social dialect in the end).
(k) Jargon Englishes (unstable pre-pidgins without norms and with great individual variation, e.g. South Seas Jargon in the nineteenth century)
(l) Hybrid Englishes (mixed codes, prestigious among urban youths; e.g. "Hinglish" mixing Hindi and English).


Ѹʻѡˤˡϰ̡ǽ4ĤΥѥ᡼Ȥ߹碌ʬȤ롥ºݤ¸ߤʤˤȤѸѼ夷Ƥ봶롥ϳ餵ʬȤ櫓ǤϤʤʬǤϡʣΥƥ꡼ˤޤäƽ°Ƥޤ褦ʱѸѼ⤢ΤǤϤʤ

Schneider, Edgar W. "Models of English in the World." Chapter 3 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 35--57.
Mesthrie, Rajend and Rakesh M. Bhatt. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP, 2008.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-14 Sat

#4492. αѸѼˡ --- Gupta 5 [model_of_englishes][world_englishes][new_englishes][variety][sociolinguistics][bilingualism]

Ѹ (World Englishes) ǥ벽ߤϡ͡ˤʤƤܥ֥ model_of_englishes γƵǾҲ𤷤Ƥ̤Ǥ롥Ūʿޤɽǥ뤬¿ʤǡҲ𤹤 Gupta ˤǥñʥꥹȤǤ롥αѸѼ5פʬषƤ롥Schneider (44) Gupta ǥξҲʬѤ롥

   Gupta (1996) proposed five types of variety settings, based on whether English is embedded in multilingual nations and on how it originated in a given country (with "ancestral" indicating settler transmission, "scholastic" denoting contexts in which formal education was important, and "contact" characterizing more mixed and creolized varieties):
   
    "Monolingual ancestral English" (e.g. United States, Australia, New Zealand).
    "Monolingual contact variety" (e.g. Jamaica)
    "Multilingual scholastic English" (e.g. India, Pakistan)
    "Multilingual contact variety" countries (e.g. Singapore, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea).
    "Multilingual ancestral English" (e.g. South Africa, Canada)


Ϳѥ᡼2Ĥ1ܤ¿ѤΤʤǤαѸѤݤ2ܤϡαѸʻѡˤεüԤΰܽˤΤˤΤ캮ˤΤȤ߹碌ˤŪˤ6פѼ郎̤뤬ºݤˤ "Monolingual scholastic English" ΤϤʤ㤨СܤαѸ춵餬ȯŸܸüԤߤʱѸظؤʤС "Monolingual scholastic English" ʬव뤳ȤˤʤʤꤽˤʤäǤϤ뤬ˡ
绨ĤǤϤ뤬˼ҲŪʴˤ븫̤Τ褤ˡȤ롥

Schneider, Edgar W. "Models of English in the World." Chapter 3 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 35--57.
Gupta, A. F. "Colonisation, Migration, and Functions of English." Englishes around the World. Vol. 1: General Studies, British Isles, North America. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach. Ed. by E. W. Schneider. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1997. 47--58.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-13 Fri

#4491. 1300ǯä󥰥ɤδѸ첽 [anglo-saxon][language_death][celtic][welsh][cornish][linguistic_imperialism]

ϢεǡѸŪˤĤ Trudgill ͤ򻲾ȤƤκǽǡTrudgill (30) ƶŦ򤷤Ƥ롥

Meanwhile, as all the events described above [= the expansion of English] were taking place around the world, back on the island of Britain, where the English language first came into being, Brittonic, the first language ever to be threatened by English, continued to hold its own in the forms of Welsh and Cornish, well over a millennium after contact with Germanic had first begun. Indeed, there were for a long time still parts of the English language's homeland, England, which remained non-English speaking. Some small border areas of England in Herefordshire and Shropshire---Oswestry, for example---remained Welsh-speaking until the middle of the eighteenth century. And Cornish . . . , which had survived the Anglo-Saxon incursions for many centuries, seems to have been lost as a viable native community language only in the late 1700s---although by that time there would have been very few monolingual Cornish speakers for several generations. When it eventually died out, England for the first time finally became a totally English-speaking country: the complete linguistic anglicisation of England had taken 1,300 years.


4ۤɤȤŪû֤ˡѸ줬֥ƥ礫鱩ФơŪŪ뤲ȤͤȤƱѸ줬ɨǤ륤󥰥ɤδѸ첽ãΤˡ5Υ󥰥ͤ褫1300ǯ⤫äȤΤϡȤۤʤơ⤦1ʿԤ롥Ʊ4ۤɤȤŪû֤ˡꥹۤޤȤƤθؤ˻äȤͤȤɨǤ륤󥰥ɤ˾֥ƥΤ줷ȤʤܲΥåȥɾ򸫤¤ꡤ֥ƥ缫Τˤ԰¤ƤȤΤϡȤۤʤ21αѸ첽βǽˡŪ¤ƧޤƤɬפ
ʸǿƤ륱ȷϸ Welsh Cornish ˤĤƤϡ#1718. Wales ˤѸˡ ([2014-01-09-1])#3742. 륺ǯɽ ([2019-07-26-1])#779. Cornish Manx ([2011-06-15-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Trudgill, Peter. "The Spread of English." Chapter 2 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 14--34.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-04-24-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-12 Thu

#4490. ꥹƿ̱2Ƥ3 [history][canada]

ѸˤǤƿ̱ˤǤ⡤1607ǯϡꥹ͡ʤȱѸˤǯȤˤ˹ޤƤ롥Jamestown (Virginia) ؤǤ롥
ºݤˤϡˤ⼺줿̱ϤȤͭ̾ Roanoke Island (North Carolina)ؤλߤä1587ǯSir Walter Raleigh Ψ줿͡Ƥ롥θ1587ǯ Roanoke Ĥ117̾ԤĤƤä󥤥󥰥ɤäĤ1590ǯ˺Ƥ˵äƤȤˤϡԤϤߤʾäƤȤäƲäΤʬäƤʤǤ롥#3866. Lumbee English ([2019-11-27-1]) ǾҲ𤷤Lumbee ²礫ǤΤǤϤʤȤ꺻Ƥ뤬ɤ
ꥹˤƿ̱1Ƥϡäơ1607ǯ Jamestown ȤäƤ褤Ǥϡ2ƤϤĤΤȤǡɤäΤ1620ǯΡ "Pilgrim Fathers" ȸƤФ̤ˤ Plymouth (Massachusetts) ο̱Ȼפ䡤ϼ¤4ƤʤΤȤTrudgill (20) ˤꡤ2Ƥ3ƤͻҤ⤷褦
2Ƥϡ1609ǯ Bermuda Ǥ롥ꥫڤ900⤫ǡJamestown ˸äƤ̵ˤΤäȤθ1612ǯˡ˥Ҥˤ60̱ͤΤ줿1616ǯϥեꥫпȤޤƤ롥
3Ƥϡ1610ǯθʥ Newfoundland Ǥ롥¤ Newfoundland ϤˤĹ餯ѸȤܿä1497ǯ˥ꥹ˾ꥢιҳ Giovanni Caboto ʱѸ̾ John CabotˤϤ˻äƤ롥ޤꥹΤߤʤ餺衼åѤǤíεȤΤƤ⤤1610ǯο̱ϡॺ1ļβ֥ꥹȥξȶˤäƤʤ줿17Ⱦаʹߡꥹ Newfoundland ο̱ϷбĤȤаޤϤΤΡѸѤ˴ؤƸ1610ǯʹߡߤޤڤƤʤȤˤʤ롥

Trudgill, Peter. "The Spread of English." Chapter 2 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 14--34.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-04-22-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-11 Wed

#4489. 1763ǯѸ줬δߤĹȥå򲡤ǯ [history][french][map][canada]

Trudgill (23) 1763ǯѸŪǽפǯȤߤƤ롥1763ǯαѸ˾ΰյȤϲ

Then in 1763 a very significant event occurred: Britain gained control of the Cape Breton Island area of Nova Scotia, which had remained in French hands until then. This meant that for the first time the English language had effected a complete takeover of a very long contiguous stretch of the east coast of the North American continent: There was now an English-language presence all along the coast from Newfoundland in the north, right down to the border between Georgia and (Spanish-controlled) Florida in the south.


ꥹƱѸ줬δߤĹȥå򲡤ǯäΤǤ롥ĹȥåפǧΤˤϡܥ̿ˡϿޤѤȤʤʤŪ ((C)ROOTS/Heibonsha.C.P.C)

Atlantic Coast of North America (1763)

ǯϡˤǤȤμǯ1756--1763ǯ; Seven Years' Warˤ뤷ǯǤ롥ꥹٱ礹ץȡȥꥢե󥹤ʤɤȤδ֤ǡץΥե꡼ɥ2ιشʤɤˤԤˤϱƿ̱Ȥ¦̤⤢ꡤ̥ꥫȥɤˤξ񤬷ͤ
̥ꥫǤ襤ϥեǥ (French and Indian War) ȤƤФ뤬ʩγˤĤơɴʻŵ2ǡ٤β⤬ȤƤ狼䤹

ŪˤСʸ׽ˤĤʤʿϩˤȾ̾˥ꥹ̱ϤϤե󥹿̱Ϥȡ̡ϡˤγˤäƤΤߤ⤦ȤꥹϤȤϥήǾͤƵäžǡˤΥǥ²ޤޤ줿


ɤǤϥե󥹤ȥǥηͥݤä1758ǯ˥ꥹΥԥåȼ꤬ϤʻƳϤȯ˵ڤӡɤϵžꥹ٥åȥꥪå褷Ԥ褻줿ơ1763ǯΥѥ²Ĥˤꡤե󥹤̥ꥫˤڤ򼺤Ȥˤʤäƥꥹϥʥޤ᤿̥ꥫʤδߤΤȤǤϤ뤬ˤλ۸
ˤ⡤ꥹ1713ǯ New Brunswick Ƥꡤ1732ǯ Georgia ο̱Ƥ롥1740--50ǯˤ Nova Scotia ܹ񤫤̱¿1758ǯˤ Prince Edward Island 򤷤Ƥ롥ơǸ˾嵭Τ褦1763ǯ Nova Scotia 򡤤 Cape Breton Island 嵭ΡĹȥåפĤʤä櫓
嵭αʩ̱εȡ̤ȤƤγƸʬۤϡ褽פƤȹͤƤ褤ꥹλ۲ä٥åǤϡʸȤƤϥեŪǤǻѾ츽ߤ˻äƤʤɡ㳰ʤ櫓ǤϤʤ⤦1󤲤С#1733. Canada ˤѸˡ ([2014-01-24-1]) ǿ줿褦ˡ嵭 Nova Scotia ʤɤ줿ե󥹷Ϥο̱͡ꥫ Louisiana ʤɤذܽƤꡤߤǤλ¹ Louisiana Cajun (< Acadian) ȸƤФե󥹸ѼäƤ롥

Trudgill, Peter. "The Spread of English." Chapter 2 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 14--34.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-10 Tue

#4488. Ѹ줬ʬۤ̾Ƥȸߤλ [history][world_englishes][irish_english][japanese][french][spanish][portuguese][pidgin][lesser-know_varieties]

ѸϡΥ󥬡ե (lingua_franca) Ȥʬۤ礵Ƥ롥ѸϤ̣ǤϡϤ뤫ΡΦꡤ֥ƥΥ̱²俷Φ轻̱Ϥ¿̱²θʬۤ̾ʬۤ礵Ƥˤġ
츫ȡ餱Τ餺פθΤ褦˻פ뤫⤷ʤɬ⤽ǤϤʤ¾θȤζԤʬۤ̾ꡤȤԻѤȤʤ礹餢äߤ⤽Τ褦ʻ㤬ߤΤǤ롥ϡαѸʻˡˤΰճʻ򤤤ĤߤƤȤΤ Trudgill "English in Retreat" ꤹ (27--29) Ǥ롥
Ū˸ŤȤϤȡ12--15Υɤλ㤬롥Henry II ϡ1171ǯ˥󥰥Υޥ󷳤ǥɿΰ˱ѸüԤϤ䤬Ƹϲ˻ꡤѸ줬ŤȤϤʤäѸȤƤ˾ܳŪʬ۳˼ԤäȤcf. #1715. Ireland ˤѸˡ ([2014-01-06-1])#2361. ǯɽ ([2015-10-14-1]
ȸ˶Ť19ΤȤˤʤ뤬䤿ˤȤä˽פ --- ۤȤΤƤʤ --- Ѹ̤λ㤬롥ϤʤȾ޸Ǥ롥ηϤȤ̵ͤä1543ǯ˥ڥͤˤȯ졤θ塤˲ƷϤο͡ˤʤߡ19ˤϱѸ١Ρ־޸ԥѸ (Bonin English) ŸƤ19ȾܤϤͭẖ̂ܤؤεʤ᤿̡ܸ줬ͥȤʤꡤߤޤǤ˾޸ԥѸϤۤѤȤʤäƤ롥ܤϡ#2559. ޸αѸ ([2016-04-29-1])#2596. ־޸ȤСפ ([2016-06-05-1])#3353. ޸ִ50ǯ ([2018-07-02-1]) 򻲾Ȥ줿
ߤλǤСʥΥ٥å󤲤롥ե󥹸줬ͥƱˤơѸ줬ΩƤ뤳ȤϤ褯ΤƤcf. #1733. Canada ˤѸˡ ([2014-01-24-1])ˡͤε°ռ꤬ؤäƤꡤαѸפȤɤñʬۤ򹭤櫓ǤϤʤȤ褯Ƥ롥
ޤޤΤƤʤꥫΥֳߤˤ⡤ѸüԽĤǤʤŪҲŪΩƤ͡νޤϤߤƤ롥Υ롼Ĥ19ȾꥸޥʤɤꥫΦϰŸ͡ǡФȤƼҲŪϰ̤㤤ĤȤߤʤƤߤǤ⡤ϢƹθѸǤ륹ڥΤۤҿ⤯ϤǤϱѸѤΥåƥ뤬ĥƤ롥Ϣ뵭Ȥơ#1679. The West Indies αѸ ([2013-12-01-1])#1702. ֳϰؤΰ̱νпϡ ([2013-12-24-1])#1711. ֳϰαѸγȻ ([2014-01-02-1])#1713. ƤαѸBay Islands ([2014-01-04-1])#1714. ƤαѸBluefields Puerto Limon ([2014-01-05-1])#1731. English as a Basal Language ([2014-01-22-1]) 󤲤Ƥ
ۤˤ⡤19ȾФ˥ꥫԼԤȤʤä֥ͤ饸ƨ줿¹֥饸˱ѸüԽĤȤ餷Ƥ뤬ƱθѸǤݥȥ˲Ǥ롥ޤ1890ǯ˼ҲŪ桼ȥԥƥѥ饰˰ܽȥꥢͤλ¹餷Ƥ뤬Ԥδ֤ǤϤθǤ Guaraní ؤθؤʹǤ롥
Ѹϲˤ⸽ߤˤ餱Τ餺פä櫓ǤϤʤ

Trudgill, Peter. "The Spread of English." Chapter 2 of The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Ed. by Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Devyani Sharma. New York: OUP, 2017. 14--34.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-09 Mon

#4487. Shakespeare ֻѤΥѥϸѸȰۤʤ [shakespeare][preposition][emode]

Baugh and Cable (242--43) Shakespeare 濴Ȥ륨ꥶ٥īαѸˤĤơֻ (preposition) ѤΥѥ󤬸ȰۤʤܤƤ롥

Perhaps nothing illustrates so richly the idiomatic changes in a language from one age to another as the uses of prepositions. When Shakespeare says, I'll rent the fairest house in it after threepence a bay, we should say at; in Our fears in Banquo stick deep, we should say about. The single preposition of shows how many changes in common idioms have come about since 1600: One that I brought up of (from) a puppy; he came of (on) an errand to me; 'Tis pity of (about) him; your name. . . . I now not, nor by what wonder you do hit of (upon) mine; And not be seen to wink of (during) all the day; it was well done of (by) you; I wonder of (at) their being here together; I am provided of (with) a torchbearer; I have no mind of (for) feasting forth tonight; I were better to be married of (by) him than of another; and That did but show three of (as) a fool. Many more examples could be added.


³ʬ Baugh and Cable (243) ϡѸθΤߤʤ餺̤αѸˤθˤͭĽפʻŦƤ롥

Although matters of idiom and usage generally claim less attention from students of the language than do sounds and inflections or additions to the vocabulary, no picture of Elizabethan English would be adequate that did not give them a fair measure of recognition.


ʡۤʤαʸɤǤȡΤֻѤΥѥѲѰۤˤ϶ä롥ޤʣƸ椷褦Ȥˤʤʤ餤̻ŪѲȶŪѰۤ˰ʤ褦˱Ǥ롥
ޤѸˤֻ̤μब³ƤȤ¤롥ֻϤФĤǤ뵡ǽȤʬव뤬ݡμŪäƤ#1201. Ѹ줫ѸˤƤֻȯ ([2012-08-10-1])#947. Ѹֻ ([2011-11-30-1]) 򻲾Ȥ줿
ֻεǽˡѲѰۤ򷫤֤Ƥư֤ư򼨤ֻʸѸǤΥǥեȤ byˤ˸¤äƤ⡤#1350. ư֤ưѤ of ([2013-01-06-1])#1351. ư֤ưѤ줿 through at ([2013-01-07-1])#2269. ư֤ưѤ줿 by of ζ ([2015-07-14-1]) Τ褦˵ϤĤʤȤơ#4383. be surprised at ǤϤʤ be surprised by ¤ήԤäƤƤ ([2021-04-27-1]) Ȥ̣ȥԥå⤢롥ơޤȤƤؤ󤪤⤷μºݤͤȤʤʪǤ롥

Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable. A History of the English Language. 6th ed. London: Routledge, 2013.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-08 Sun

#4486. coffee, cafe, caffeine [sobokunagimon][french][vowel][loan_word][turkish][arabic][assimilation][eebo]

֥ҡפ coffee /ˈkɒfi/ ɤ⡤ΰ˴ޤޤ붽ʳޤΡ֥եפ caffeine /ˈkæfiːn/ Ȥʤ롥ǽ첻ʻˤۤʤΤϤʤѤʵ䤬󤻤줿ΤˤʤȻפäĴ٤Ƥߤ
ҡӡʤɤ¤ǹѤʸ1ĤǤ롥ѤȤƤΥҡʸƸΤϡ10ΥΰؽˤƤǤ롥11˥ǰѤϤᡤ13ȾФˤϼؤƤ륤ඵ̤δ֤ǼΤȤư褦ˤʤäκΰ̾äƥӥ qahwa ȸƤФ褦ˤʤä16˥ȥ륳Υץȱ򵡤ˡΰϥȥ륳 kahve Ȥꡤ1554ǯ˥֡˲ʥҡŹ Kahve Khāne 줿
衼åؤΥҡƳϡ16Ⱦ˥ȥ륳ͳƤʤ줿17ˤʤȥͥѥʤɳϤ˹ޤꡤꥹǤ1650ǯ˥åեɤǡ1652ǯ˥ɥǺǽΥҡŹץ󤷤̵ξȤƤѤʸݤȤƤΥҡϥ (coffee house) Ǥ롥
ơȤƤΥҡϤΤ褦ˤƥꥹäƤ櫓ɽ魯̾ˤĤƤϤɤäΤOED ˤȡӥ qahwah ȥ륳 kahveh Ȥä塤ꥢ caffè Фƥ衼åѽ˼Ѥ줿ΤǤϤʤȤ
˥ꥢȤȡ첻ʻa ݤ줿Τե󥹸 caféڥ caféݥȥ caféɥĸ Kaffeeǥޡ졦ǥ kaffe ȤȤˤʤ롥첻ʻˤİ۷Ȥ夷ΤѸ coffee koffieŤɥĸ coffee/koffee kophe/kopheĭ Ǥ롥Ԥ o ˤĤƤϡӥȥ륳 ahw/ahv w/v ĴƱ (assimilation) Τȿ¬롥Barnhart θ츻εҤ򻲾Ȥ褦

coffee n. 1598 chaoua, 1601 coffe, 1603-30 coffa, borrowed from Turkish kahveh, or directly from Arabic qahwah coffee, originally, wine. Two forms of this word (with a and with o) came into most modern languages about 1600: the first is represented by French, Spanish, and Portuguese café, Italian caffè, German Kaffee, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish kaffe. The second form is represented by English coffee, Dutch koffie, Russian kofe. The forms with o may have had earlier au (see the earliest English form chaoua), from Turkish -ahv-- or Arabic -ahw-.


OED ˤȱѸǤν1598ǯ Chaoua Ǥꡤ17ˤ a ĸ롥Ѹ絬ϥѥ EEBO ǸƤ cahave, kauhi ʤɤ鷺ǤϤ뤬Ĥä17ᤤʳ o ĸˤۤڤؤä褦ǤϤ롥17Ⱦˤ coffa 17Ⱦˤ coffee ׷Ȥ夷
ơե󥹸Ǥ café ֥ҡפΤߤʤ餺֥ҡŹեפ̣뤬Υե󥹸ȤƤñ줬Ԥθ1763ǯˡԤθ1802ǯ˱ѸäƤѸ cafe /ˈkæfeɪ/ ̾ϸԤθ˸ꤷƻȤƤꡤܸǤƱͤǤ롥
Ǹ caffeine 1830ǯ˥ե󥹸 caféine ѸäƤa äƤΤϡե󥹸ǤθȤȤˤʤ롥

Barnhart, Robert K. and Sol Steimetz, eds. The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology. Bronxville, NY: The H. W. Wilson, 1988.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-07 Sat

#4485. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ11֥ͥ󥹤Ƚספ򽪤ޤ [asacul][notice][history][link][slide][renaissance][reformation]

轵731ڡ15:30?18:45ˡī㡼󥿡ɶˤֱѸˤȸ츻11֥ͥ󥹤ȽססꤷƤä򤷤ޤ¿˻äޤ䥳Ȥ¿ȯʵ魯ȤǤޤ꤬Ȥޤ
ϡ16αѸ줬Ƥ3ĤΡǺߡפܤޤߡѸΥ󥬡ե󥫤ȤʤäƤꡤҿؤäƤޤ400ǯۤαѸ2ήȤϤ鷺Ȥ⤤ޤ1.5ήۤɤθˤޤǤǯʾδ֡衼å˷פƤƥʤɤ٤С֤Τ褦ʸˤޤǤΥƥ̿ɤʤǡΥҥȤĤ褦˻פޤ16ϡѸˤȤäơޤ˻ߤζ줷ߤλäΤǤ
ιֺ¤Ѥ饤ɤ˸ޤʲ˥饤ɤγƥڡؤΥ󥯤ĥäƤޤΤǡʤɤˤѤ

1. Ѹˤȸ츻11֥ͥ󥹤Ƚס
2. 11󡡥ͥ󥹤Ƚ
3. ܼ
4. 1.
5. 16󥰥ɤ5ĤμҲŪѲ
6. 2. פȤϡ
7. 󥰥ɤνפȤð
8. ѤȽפͻ
9. 3. ͥ󥹤Ȥϡ
10. 󥰥ɤˤ뽡פȥͥ󥹤ζ¸
11. 4. ͥ󥹤ȽפαѸʸؤΥѥ
12. 16αѸ줬Ƥ3ĤǺ
13. 5. ѸǺ (1) - ƥ줫μΩܻؤ
14. űѸؤδؿιޤ
15. 6. ѸǺ (2) - ֻɸಽΤ⤬
16. 츻Ūֻ (etymological spelling)
17. debt ξ (#116)
18. ¾θ츻Ūֻ
19. 츻Ūֻ黿 Holofernes
20. 7. ѸǺ (3) - Τ
21. R. ɥ꡼ A Table Alphabeticall (#1609)
22. Ϣ
23. ޤȤ
24. ʸ
25. 1Loves Labours Lost
26. 211:1-9 ʡ֥Х٥סˤ Authorised Version ȿƱ

12ϥ꡼ǽȤʤޤֻ̱̿ȿפꤷ2021ǯ1023ڡ15:30?18:45˳֤ͽǤ

Referrer (Inside): [2022-03-12-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-06 Fri

#4484. eye rhyme ɸֻ뤫餳Ω [rhyme][orthography][spelling][poetry][spelling_pronunciation][reconstruction]

ѸαʸˤƵӱ (rhyme) ƧȤΤϡ̤˰ȤιθΡ첻ʡܻҲˡʬ̤Ƥ뤳ȤؤޤDzΰפΤȤ򤤤櫓ѼȤ eye rhyme ʻбˤȤΤ롥ϲΰפǤϤʤֻΰפʤΤǤ롥McArthur Ѹ켭ŵ

EYE RHYME. In verse, the correspondence of written vowels and following consonants which may look as though they rhyme, but do not represent identical sounds, as in move/love, speak/break. Eye rhyme may be deliberate, but often results from a changed pronunciation in one of two words which once made a perfect rhyme, or rhyme in a non-standard variety of English, as in these lines by the Scottish general James Graham, Marquis of Montrose (1649): 'I'll tune thy elegies to trumpet sounds, / And write thy epitaph in blood and wounds.' In Scots, both italicized words have the same 'oo' sound.


ΰѤǤϡeye rhyme "deliberate" Ǥ뤳Ȥ⤢롤Ȳ⤵Ƥ뤬Ϥषͤ "deliberate" ˤΤ eye rhyme ȸƤ֤ΤǤϤʤȹͤƤ롥嵭ΥåȥɱѸˤ벻εӱ sounds/wounds eye rhyme ȸƤ֤ΤϡޤɸѸüԤδǤϤȤΤȤǤ롥eye rhyme ¾Ȥơ#210. ֻȯЪΥˤ ([2009-11-23-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿
ơeye rhyme Ωϡӱʬֻϰפ뤬ϰפʤȤȤǤ롥ξ郎ΤĤDz褦ȤƤͤΤߤʤ餺ɤ߼ꡦʹˤȤäƤ⤽μݤǶͭƤʤС⤽ eye rhyme ϼԤȤʤϤĤޤꡤ춦ƱΤΤʤǡΰФθˤĤơֻϰפ뤬ϰפʤפȤȤʤäƤʤФʤʤפˡ餫٤ɽȤˡ춦Ʊ˹ԤϤäƤʤС̣ʤʤȤȤդߤСˡǤޤäƤʤˤϡeye rhyme ϡȤäȤƤͭǤϤʤȤȤˤʤ롥
ˡΩƤ븽ѸδȤƤȡϻפʤ褯ͤФȤΤ褦˻פ롥䤬ͤ줿ΤϡϢȤƤ Crystal Shakespeare ΥꥸʥȯΥȥɤߤʤ顤eye rhyme Shakespeare Υꥸʥȯ뤿ΥҥȤˤʤΤʤʤΤȤ˽вäǤ롥Crystal (xxiii--xxiv) ꡤϢʬѤ

Certainly, as poetry became less an oral performance and more a private reading experience---a development which accompanied the availability of printed books and the rise of literacy in the sixteenth century---we might expect visual rhymes to be increasingly used as a poetic device. But from a linguistic point of view, this was unlikely to happen until a standardized spelling system had developed. When spelling is inconsistent, regionally diverse, and idiosyncratic, as it was in Middle English (with as many as 52 spellings recorded for might, for example, in the OED), a predictable graphaesthetic effect is impossible. And although the process of spelling standardization was well underway in the sixteenth century, it was still a long way from achieving the stability that would be seen a century later. As John Hart put it in his influential Orthographie (1569, folio 2), English spelling shows 'such confusion and disorder, as it may be accounted rather a kind of ciphring'. And Richard Mulcaster, in his Elementarie (1582), affirms that it is 'a very necessarie labor to set the writing certaine, that the reading may be sure'. Word endings, in particular, were variably spelled, notably the presence or absence of a final e (again vs againe), the alteration between apostrophe and e (arm'd vs armed), the use of ie or y (busie vs busy), and variation between double and single consonants (royall vs royal). This is not a climate in which we would expect eye-rhymes to thrive.
   'That the reading may be sure.' Poets, far more alert to the impact of their linguistic choices than the average language user, would hardly be likely to introduce a graphic effect when there was no guarantee that their readers would recognize it. And certainly not to the extent found in the sonnets.


褯ȤƤϡֻȯ (spelling_pronunciation) ⡤ɽŪֻɸಽ餳ǽȤʤäȤΤ롥ˤĤƤϡ#2097. ɽʸƱֻ֡ȯ ([2015-01-23-1]) 򻲾ȡޤŲΤ (eye) rhyme ѤˤĤƤϡ#437. ˤƸŲꤹ뤫 ([2010-07-08-1]) ⻲ȡ

McArthur, Tom, ed. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: OUP, 1992.
Crystal, David. The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: OUP, 2016.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-05 Thu

#4483. Shakespeare θäϤɤΤ餤˭ [sobokunagimon][shakespeare][statistics][lexicology]

Shakespeare θä˭ϤĤȤΤƤ뤬ŪˤĤñѤƤΤθΤˤ衤ȤѤƤΤˤ衤äεϤΤ˷פ뤳Ȥ񤷤ϡ⤽٤ñ̤Ǥָ (word) ŪޤäƤʤǤ롥ܼŪˤĤƤϡܥ֥Ǥָʤ񤷤פεåƤ
Ǥ⡤Ǥ褤ΤΤꤿȤΤ;Ǥ롥Shakespeare θä˭ϤФз峰ȤƸڤ졤ʤȲƤ뵤̣⤢뤬ºݤΤȤԤδ֤ͿŪʿˤ礭㤬롥ŪΤƤΤϡ3١פȤ2١פȸѤԤ⾯ʤʤ褦Ǥ롥Ǥϡ夲 Crystal ˤ The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation (xv) 򻲹ͤˤȤɤʤ
Ʊ񤬸üоݤȤƤΤ (1) 1եꥪ (2) ʳΥεӱ˴ؤǤʤĤޤꡤShakespeare ΥƥΤǤϤʤȤաˡξƱθФοȡ߻Ȥ20,672줬󤬤äƤ롥ˤ1,809θͭ̾졤495γñʥƥʤɡˡ29 "non-sense words"84Υեꥪεӱ줬ޤޤƤ롥ȡפθä18,255Ȥʤ롥̩ˤСΥߥˤʤ̸äƤȻפ뤷ʣ餭ΤʣȤߤʤɤȤƬˤ⤢뤬οϡ2١˶ᤤΤȤƻͤˤʤ롥
ϢơShakespeare ˤޤĤˤĤƤϡ#1763. Shakespeare κʤȸ˴ؤ뻨¿ʾ ([2014-02-23-1]) ⻲ȡ

Crystal, David. The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: OUP, 2016.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-11-18-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-04 Wed

#4482. Shakespeare ȯ [shakespeare][pronunciation][reconstruction][phonetics][phonology][rhyme][pun]

Crystal ˤ The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation ѥѥįƤ롥Shakespeare 400ǯۤνηȤǤꡤǯΤܤäĸλ٤Τ̯ʴ뤫⤷ʤShakespeare Ρ֥ꥸʥȯפȤŪ줿ΤǤʾ塤ĸκƷ (reconstruction) ܼŪ˰ۤʤȤϤʤShakespeare ξˤϡֻ (spelling)ӱ (rhyme)ϸ (pun) ʤɡƷ٤ƤҥȤŪ¿Ȥü𤬤뤳ȤϳΤϼΰ㤤Ȥ̡٤ΰ㤤Ȥäۤ褤ºݡShakespeare ȯκƷˤĤƤ⡤٤ʲȤʤȡǤʤȤ¿褦
μΡ֥ꥸʥȯפμѤݤˡդʤФʤʤȤ롥 The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation ξǤС Shakespeare ȯ򶵤Ƥ뼭ǤϤʤȤȤơϤɤȤCrystal (xi) ⤳ĴƤΤǡϢսѤƤ

The notion of 'Modern English pronunciation' is actually an abstraction, realized by hundreds of different accents around the world, and the same kind of variation existed in earlier states of the language. People often loosely refer to OP as an accent', but this is as misleading as it would be to refer to Modern English pronunciation as 'an accent'. It would be even more misleading to describe OP as 'Shakespeare's accent', as is sometimes done. We know nothing about how Shakespeare himself spoke, though we can conjecture that his accent would have been a mixture of Warwickshire and London. It cannot be be stated too often that OP is a phonology---a sound system---which would have been realized in a variety of accents, all of which were different in certain respects from the variety we find in present-day English.


1ˡƱϡ Shakespeare ȤȯˤĤƶƤΤǤϤʤȤȤǤ롥󼨤ƤΤ Shakespeare ȤȯǤϤʤShakespeare оʪʤɤ˸餻褦ȤƤդȯˤʤΥȥ뤬 "Shakespeare's Pronunciation" ǤϤʤƻѤƾܤ "Shakespearean Pronunciation" ȤʤäƤ뤳ȤդɬפǤ롥
2ˡƱͿƤȯϡ̩ˤСShakespeare оʪʤɤ˸餻褦ȤƤդȯɽ路Ƥ餤ʤǤϲɽ蘆ƤΤȤСShakespeare оʪʤɤ˸餻褦ȤƤդβ (phonology) Ǥ롥ºݤоʪԡˤȯƤȯΤΡĤޤ phonetics ǤϤʤݲηϤǤ phonology ɽ路ƤΤǤ롥󡤤ϼºݤζ񸽲줿ȯˤٶƤϤȤϸΤǡѾ塤㤨ԤȯŪΤˤϽʬѤ­̩ˤСȯΤΤ򶵤Ƥ뼭ǤϤʤȤȤ򲡤ƤȤϽפǤ롥פˡμΤ "The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Phonology" Ȥ٤ΤǤ롥
Shakespeare ˸¤餺Ųݤ˹ԤʤƤ뤳Ȥϡ§ȤƲηϤʤΤȻפظ˼ºݤβƤ뤳ȤϤ褽ȤƤˤ衤ƷоݤȤʤΤϡޤäŪʲηϤǤ롥
(phonetics) Ȳ (phonology) ΰ㤤ˤĤƤϡ#3717. ؤȲϤɤ㤦ΤǤ ([2019-07-01-1]) ӡ#4232. ؤȲϡ֤ι¤ȥ ([2020-11-27-1]) 򻲾ȡ

Crystal, David. The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: OUP, 2016.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-11-18-1] [2021-08-21-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-03 Tue

#4481. Ѹ˾塤2ټѤ줿ΰ֤Ť [lexicography][lexicology][borrowing][loan_word][latin][lexeme]

Ѹ˾塤2ټѤ줿ȤΤ롥ˤƥñʤɤѤ줿塤̤λˤƱ줬餿ƼѤȤΤǤ롥1ܤ2ܤǤϰ̣ʤӾ֤ˤۤʤäƤ뤳Ȥ¿
㤨Сƥ magister ϡűѸᤤʳǼѤ졤㴳Ѹ첽ֻ mægester ѤƤ10ˤ餿 magister ȤƸֻΤޤ޼줿 (cf. #1895. űѸΥƥѸֻȼѤ෿ ([2014-07-05-1]
ѸȽѸ褦ʻ㤬ߤ롥fastidious Ȥƥñ1440ǯˡ½ʡפθǼѤ줿1ˤϡ֤ʡԲʡפθѤƤʸԤϸΡֵ񤷤ʤʡפθϢʤˡޤChaucer artificial, declination, hemisphere ŷʸѸȤƳθθߤŪʸϡ16κƼѻθ˴ŤѸˤĤƤϡBaugh and Cable (222--23) Τ褦äƤ롥

A word when introduced a second time often carries a different meaning, and in estimating the importance of the Latin and other loanwords of the Renaissance, it is just as essential to consider new meanings as new words. Indeed, the fact that a word had been borrowed once before and used in a different sense is of less significance than its reintroduction in a sense that has continued or been productive of new ones. Thus the word fastidious is found once in 1440 with the significance 'proud, scornful,' but this is of less importance than the fact that both More and Elyot use it a century later in its more usual Latin sense of 'distasteful, disgusting.' From this, it was possible for the modern meaning to develop, aided no doubt by the frequent use of the word in Latin with the force of 'easily disgusted, hard to please, over nice.' Chaucer uses the words artificial, declination, and hemisphere in astronomical sense but their present use is due to the sixteenth century; and the word abject, although found earlier in the sense of 'cast off, rejected,' was reintroduced in its present meaning in the Renaissance.


ˤäƤϡ嵭ΥǤϡƱñ줬2ټѤ줿Ȥϡ¸μѸФƱѸ¦ǰ̣ѹäȤۤŬڤǤϤʤȤոϤ֤Ϣ³ȤСִ¸ؤѹפȤʤꡤϢ³ȤС2٤μѡפȤʤ롥Baugh and Cable ǻŦƤ褦ˡ츻ŪˤƱΥƥñˤΤܤȤƤ⡤Ѹˤδϡ¼Ūˤϰۤʤ˰ۤʤѸ줿ȤߤۤŬڤǤ롥
OED Τ褦Ū§˴ŤԻǰƬˤȡfastidious ʤ artificial ʤФơ1ĤθФΩơβ˸1ʵˤȸ2ʿˤʤɤ֤ΤQŪƻüԤζŪʴФ¤ǤȤʤСष fastidious1 fastidious2 Τ褦˸Ф̤ΩƤƤ褤餤ΤΤǤϤʤԤθʤСˤΤʤǵѤƤä硤ѵ (dead sense) ȤѸ (dead word) Ȥ٤Ȥʤ롥ʡΤˤѸù (dead lexical item; dead lexeme) ȸƤ֤٤
ȴϢơ#3830. űѸΥƥѸϸޤ³ݤ ([2019-10-22-1]) ⻲ȡ

Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable. A History of the English Language. 6th ed. London: Routledge, 2013.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-02 Mon

#4480. ƥ˥Ѹθ츻줳 [etymology][khelf_hel_intro_2021][idiom]

ǯٽƬ45530ޤdzŤƤֱѸƳ2021ϤǤ˽λƤޤƱμݤ̿˽°γꡤҥƥĤ󶡤ȤФޤƤϡ˿ȶ¿ɼԤ˥ԡ뤹Ȼפ֥ƥ˥Ѹθ츻ˤĤƤιƥĤǤǡ١ɲäޤΤǡҤ
ꥹ¿ΥݡĤȯϤǤΤᡤ͡ʥݡĤδϢѸϤȤꡤƼ凉ݡĤ˴ŤѶʤɤŪʱѸɽȤưޤƤޤ㤨СThe ball is in your court. ȤСּ˹ư򵯤٤ϡʻǤϤʤˤʤפ̣봷ѶǤϥƥ˥Υץ쥤ͳ褹ΤǤ
ޤHis idea is (way) out in left field. ȤСΰոϰѤäƤפ̣ޤκʥեȡˤΰ֤濴鳰Ƥ뤳Ȥ˴ŤǥǤʤʥꥫѸǤꥹǤѤʤ褦ǤˡݡĤͳ褹Ѹθ䴷ɽϡפΤۤ󤢤ޤ
Τ褦˴ؿäϡرѸ춵١罤۽Źˤ2019ǯ٤ΥХåʥС2019ǯ4椫2020ǯ312ˤ錄ꡤؤ¿ľ᤬ΤäƤݡĤαѸפꤷơ嵭μݤˤ褦̣ϢܤƤޤۤʤ륹ݡļܤܤƤޤƥ˥Ϣ2019ǯ6Ǽ夲Ƥޤͤޤǡ

Referrer (Inside): [2021-09-02-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2021-08-01 Sun

#4479. Ե§ưβľܵ¸Ƥ [frequency][suppletion][verb][inflection][be][preterite]

ŪԵ§򼨤Ϲٸ˽椷Ƥ롥ŵԵ§ưǤ롥§Ū -ed դƲ밵Ū¿ưФơԵ§ưϿʤƤŪ٤ι⤤ưǤ롥Ե§Ե§Ȥ go be β went, was/were ʤɤϡ佼ˡ (suppletion) ˤΤǤꡤŵƤʤǤǤʤϡĶٸǤ뤳ȤطƤ롥դλϰʲεǤ夲Ƥ

֤ʤٸˤԵ§ʤȤ¿ΤǤ ʵ729դֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸ˤƲ
#3859. ʤˤԵ§ʸݤΤǤ ([2019-11-20-1])
#43. ʤ go β went ˤʤ뤫 ([2009-06-10-1])
#1482. ʤ go β went ˤʤ뤫 (2) ([2013-05-18-1])
#3284. be ưü ([2018-04-24-1])

Ǥϡʤ٤ι⤤ưˤԵ§Ѥ򼨤Τ¿Τ (memory) ֤οŪɽ (mental representation) ʤŪǤ롥Smith (1535) βѤ롥

The relationship between high frequency and irregularity has to do with memory in so far as those verbs that are used frequently have strong mental representations such that the irregular past forms are stored autonomously and thus accessed independently of the present stem. Such items are said to have become "entrenched" in storage . . . . On the other hand, a low frequency form does not necessarily have its past form stored autonomously and does not allow for direct access to that past form. Thus, its use in the past involves access to the present stem and rule application . . . .


٤ι⤤ưβϡˤ˻Ѥ뤿ˡΤʤľܥǤФˤޤäƤΤǤ롥go Ȥ߷­ˤ went ˤɤ夯褦Ǥϡ٤Ωʤgo ͳˡľ went ΰФˤɤ夭٤㤤ưǤС߷­ˤơ -ed դȤ§ŬѤη׻⡤ޤΤȤˤʤΤѤ롥ĤޤꡤФ٤˱ľܥȴܥ2ʬƤΤΨŪǤ롥
Ǥϡ-ed դƲ뵬§ưϾ˷׻ȼܥʤΤȤȡɬ⤽ǤϤʤ褦Smith (1535) ǾҲ𤵤Ƥ뤢븦ˤȡƱǤ kneaded needed ︳ԤȯƤäȤŪ٤㤤Ԥ -ed Τۤ٤ι⤤Ԥθ⡤ʿѤƿߥĹȯ줿Ȥϡneeded ΤۤưפǤ뤳ȡ餯ľܤ˵¸Ƥ뤳Ȥ򼨺롥

Smith, K. Aaron. "New Perspectives, Theories and Methods: Frequency and Language Change." Chapter 97 of English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook. 2 vols. Ed. Alexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2012. 1531--46.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-12-02-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow