hellogѸ˥֥     η     η     ǿ     helhub (The HEL Hub)     ڡ     ɽ    

hellogѸ˥֥ / 2017-07

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

2017-07-31 Mon

#3017. industry 2Ĥθֻȡפȡֶ١ (1) [semantic_change][polysemy][etymology][latin][french][industrial_revolution]

¿μ industry Ȥ1ϡֻȡȡפǤ롥heavy industry ʽŹȡˡthe steel industry Ŵݶȡˤǡơ2Ȥơֶ١פ롥a man of great industry ʶٲȡˤȤɽ䡤Poverty is a stranger to industry. ֲԤɤդ˳ʤפȤ⤢롥2ĤθϡֶϫϫƯפȤǰǷӤĤ줽ȤȤϤ狼뤬餫ΩǤꡤindustry ŵŪ¿ȤȤˤʤ롥ºݡƻʬƤꡤֻȤΡפ industrialֶ٤ʡפ industrious Ǥ롥
츻̤ȡƥ industria ʶ١ˤ˹Ԥ夯 indu- (in) + struere (to build) ȤǤꡤ¤פȡʤĿŪʼʸӤμǽνܤȤ̣礤äϿͤ˵ִѤפӤãԡפäΤǤ롥ñ줬θȤơե󥹸ͳ15ȾαѸäƤơǤ15ޤǤˤϡֶ١פθȯãƤ
16ˤʤȡޤǤθĿŪʿȤȷӤĤƤ꽸Ūʴްդơֻȡפο롥οܳŪѤ褦ˤʤäΤ18ΤȤǤ롥1771ǯ˥ե󥹸 industrie θѤ줿ΤäơѸǤλѤ¥ʤ줿Ȥǯϡ Industrial Revolution ʻȳ̿ˤ̿̾줿ҲΰĬήγϻȤ褽礹롥
бƻˤɤäƤȡ˶ᤤãԤʡѤʡסֶ٤ʡפΰ̣ industrious Ǥ15˸Ƥ롥¤ϡֻȤΡפ̣ industrial Ʊ15ˤϸƤꡤǤϤƻֺϤʤindustrial ʻȤΡˤܳŪѤ褦ˤʤäΤϡ18бե󥹸 industriel αƶƤǤꡤȤ19ʹߤǤ롥
̾ƻ⡤18ˡǤΥ˥󥰥ݥȤȤʤäƤ뤬ϾǤ⿨줿Ȥ Industrial Revolution μҲŪŪʱƶϤäƤ롥ʤIndustrial Revolution ȤѸϡ1840ǯ˽Ф뤬1848ǯ John Stuart Mill (1806--73) ˤäƳ줿ȤäƤ褯줬˳ؼ Arnold Toynbee (1852--83) ˤäƹ줿Ȥаޤġ

Referrer (Inside): [2022-01-01-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-30 Sun

#3016. colonel ֻȯ [spelling][pronunciation][spelling_pronunciation_gap][dissimilation][silent_letter][folk_etymology][l][r]

Φ纴̣ colonel ϡֻ /ˈkəːnəl/ ȯ롥̤ñ kernel ʳ˿ˤƱȯǤ롥l ۻ (silent_letter) ǤФ꤫첻⡤ȯȤбΤʤΤ狼ʤۤɤԵ§Ǥ롥Ϥʤ
ñαѸǤνФ1548ǯΤȤǤꡤΤȤֻ coronell äl ǤϤʤ r ƤΤǤ롥бե󥹸줫μѸǡ coronnel, coronel, couronnel ʤɤ֤ƤΤ褽ΤޤޱѸäƤȤˤʤ롥Υեñ켫Τϥꥢ줫μѤǡꥢǤ colonnello, colonello Τ褦֤ƤĤޤꡤꥢ줫ե󥹸ϤäȤˡǽή l r ؤؤ줿ΤǤ롥ϥޥ󥹽ǤϤ褯۲ (dissimilation) κѤη̤Ǥ (cf. Sp. coronel) l 2ٸ뤳ȤäƤβѲʱѸ˴ؤϡ#72. /r/ /l/ ϴְ㤨!? ([2009-07-09-1])#1597. star stella ([2013-09-10-1])#1614. Ѹ title Фƥե󥹸 titre ǤΤϤʤ ([2013-09-27-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
˸츻̤Хƥ columnam ʱˤ˹Ԥ夭ʼΤʥ꡼ˡפۤɤΰ̣Ѥ褦ˤʤäե󥹸Ѳ coronnel ֻˤĤƤСָ̱츻 (folk_etymology) ˤ corona, couronne "crown" ȴطŤݤ줿ե󥹸Ǥ16Ⱦˤ l ֻᤵ졤colonnel ȤƸߤ˻롥
ѸǤϡֻ˴Ť l ǤϤʤ r ȯθѤ³ֻ˴ؤƤ᤯16Ⱦ˸ֻ򻲾Ȥ l ᤵ뤳Ȥˤʤäե󥹸ˤ l Ʊ˻ȤΤȻפ롥18ȾޤǤϸŤ coronel ¸³Ƥ˾äƤߤ colonel ֻͣȤʤäȯϸŤΤ˿졤ֻѲ椨ˡߤˤޤ³ֻȯΥåפƤޤäȤ櫓
ºݤηаޤϡǽҤ٤ۤñǤϤʤä褦ֻ l ᤵ줿Τ˸ƱȯǤ l ᤵ줿ȳǧϤꡤ/ˌkɔləˈnɛl/ ʤɤȯ19ޤѤƤȤȯ벻ˤĤƤ̻ŪѲߤ졤3ä17ȾФ2Ȥȯ㤬졤19ޤǤˤϤ줬̲ĤĤä
<colonel> = /ˈkəːnəl/ ϡֻȯδطʣˤФơŪԵ§˸ǤޤäƤλ1ĤǤ롥

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-29 Sat

#3015. Ѹؤδؿιޤ (2) [lmode][history_of_linguistics][language_change][sociolinguistics][gender][world_englishes][variety]

#2993. Ѹؤδؿιޤ ([2017-07-07-1]) ǡǯѸθ椬夬äƤƤ뤳Ȥ˿줿ͳ͡Ǥ褦˻פ뤬Kytö et al. (4--5) λŦƤ4˼򷹤褦19αѸ줬ͤͳȤơεǿ줿Τȹ碌ƳǧƤ

(1) 19˼Ψ夬äȤˤꡤ¿¿ͤʥƥȤ˭٤߽Ф줿Ȥ櫓ȸѲδط褯ĴǤ褦ˤʤä
(2) Brown Family Τ褦ʸѸΥѥˤ븦̤Ȥơǯۤɤû֤ˤѲܤޤä顤ѸμҲŪŪʽȡθѲδطõ븦椬ߤ褦ˤʤä
(3) λ˥ι꤬줿äˡ修ʹ⡤ʳؤθʤɡˤƽȤˤʤ뤬󤵤줿ȤƽפǤ롥
(4) 19ϡꥹʳαѸѼ¿ˤȤäƷ롥

ιܤ⡤Ѹͭü˻ȿǤƤ뤳ȤϤޤǤʤʾ˶ǯΥѥءҲءȤäץδƤػŪطʤϢưƤ뤳ȤפǤ롥ȤŪʬǤȤϤˤΤɤ¦̤˴ؿ󤻤䤹ΤؿΤȤŪư˸ưƤΤȤ狼롥

Kytö, Merja, Mats Rydén, and Erik Smitterberg. "Introduction: Exploring Nineteenth-Century English --- Past and Present Perspective." Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change. Ed. Merja Kytö, Mats Rydén, and Erik Smitterberg. Cambridge: CUP, 2006. 1--16.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-28 Fri

#3014. Ѹˤˤ륮ꥷο¸ߴ19 [greek][compound][compounding][combining_form][lexicology][scientific_name][word_formation][lmode][neologism]

ε#3013. 19񤵤줿ŵŪʣ ([2017-07-27-1]) Ǥ⿨줿褦ˡ19Ѹ¤Τˡŵͳ褹ǤϢ (combining_form) ȤƤѤ줿Ǥ롥ŵȤϥƥȥꥷؤԤϱѸˤ̤¿ʱƶڤܤƤΤΡԤ¸ߴѸޤǤϤۤȤɴʤ褦䤯ѸäơľܤθüѤʤ褦ˤʤäƤˤθ⤷Ф餯äΩĤȤʤä (cf. #516. ľܤΥꥷѤ15 ([2010-09-25-1])#114. ѸμѸεȳ ([2009-08-19-1]))
#2385. OED ˤ롤ŵ줪ӥޥ󥹽줫μѸä (2) ([2015-11-07-1]) Υդ#2357. OED ˤ롤ŵ줪ӥޥ󥹽줫μѸäס ([2015-10-10-1]) 󤫤狼Ȥꡤ19˥ꥷǤ¸ߴ̻ŪˤߤȡꥷͳαñΰŪȾ19ʹߤƳǤ롥Beal (26) ΥȤ򻲾Ȥ褦

Whilst Greek had been recognized as a language of learning for centuries, it was not until the nineteenth century that large numbers of neologisms were formed from etymologically Greek words and elements. Indeed, Bailey (1996: 144 [= Bailey, R. W. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1996]) points out that 70 per cent of the Greek words in the 80,000-word core vocabulary of English appeared after 1800.


ȤƤѸ줬¿ߤޤǤ˰̲ΤޤޤƤ롥cyclosis ʺ˦ή, creosote ѡѥ쥪ȡ, eclecticism ﵻˡ, ideograph ɽʸ, phonograph ߲, telephone õˤʤɤ
ʤñ¿ϡ̩ˤХꥷ줫μѸȤ⥮ꥷͳ褹Ǥˤ¤ȤߤʤΤŬڤ#1694. ʳظäˤƥꥷǤ˱ɤͳ ([2013-12-16-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿

Beal, Joan C. English in Modern Times: 1700--1945. Arnold: OUP, 2004.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-27 Thu

#3013. 19񤵤줿ŵŪʣ [compounding][greek][latin][neo-latin][inkhorn_term][lexicology][combining_form][scientific_name][lmode][word_formation][neologism]

Ѹ˭ʸûˤˤĤơ#756. μѸ ([2011-05-23-1]), #1526. Ѹܸθûоɽ ([2013-07-01-1])#2966. Ѹä (2) ([2017-06-10-1])#2977. Ϣ6֤ʤѸä3ع¤Τ --- ͥ󥹴Υƥ줫֤ȥס ([2017-06-21-1]) ʤɤǼ夲Ƥ˭Ǥ뤬椨ˡ˾塤ߤ˼ڤꤹꤹȤȽ֤Ƥ
Ǥͭ̾ʤΤ16ȾΡ֥ (inkhorn_term) Ǥꡤ#576. inkhorn term ȱѸ켭 ([2010-11-24-1]) ʤɤǾҲ𤷤Ƥۤˤ#2147. ѸΥե󥹼ѸȽ ([2015-03-14-1])#2813. Bokenham ν ([2017-01-08-1])#1411. Ѹä "oversea language" ([2013-03-08-1]) Τ褦ˡޤΩʤȤǸȽϷ֤Ƥ
⤦1դä٤ϡѸ¤ˡħȤ⤤뿷ŵŪʣ (neo-classical compounds) ˸줿ȽǤ롥˥ƥ䥮ꥷϢ (combining_form) Ѥ¤줹Τǡneo-Latin compounds neo-Hellenic compounds ȤƤФ롥¤ˡϡ19˲ʳѸʤɤѸ줬̤ɬפȤʤäݤѤ줿ˡǤ (cf. #1694. ʳظäˤƥꥷǤ˱ɤͳ ([2013-12-16-1]))
Beal (22--23) 19οŵŪʣؤȽȡĤƤΡ֥פ褬褯ƤŦƤ롥

   If we look at comments on language in the nineteenth century, we find a range of opinions remarkably similar to those expressed during the 'inkhorn' controversy of the late sixteenth/early seventeenth centuries. On the one hand, there were complaints about the number of new words coined from Latin and Greek. Richard Grant White writes:
   
   
In no way is our language more wronged than by a weak readiness with which many of those who, having neither a hearty love nor a ready mastery of it, or lacking both, fly readily to the Latin tongue or to the Greek for help in naming a new thought or thing, or the partial concealment of an old one . . . By doing so they help to deface the characteristic traits of our mother tongue, and to mar and stunt its kindly growth (1872; 22, cited in Bailey, 1996: 141--2 [= Bailey, R. W. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1996]).

   
   Others objected to the profusion of technical and scientific vocabulary, again mainly from Greek and Latin sources. R. Chenevix Trench wrote (1860: 57--8) that these were 'not, for the most part, except by an abuse of language, words at all, but signs: having been deliberately invented as the nomenclature and, so to speak, the algebraic notation of some special art or science'.


ŵŪʣϡȼξˤơʾʤȤԤˤȤäơȽоݤȤʤäƤȤ狼롥
ĤǤʤ顤ܸˤ֥ץȽ丽ߤΡ֥ʸפ⡤Ѹˤξ嵭ΥȤ褯Ƥ롥ˤĤƤϡ#1630. 졤ʸ졤ץ ([2013-10-13-1])#1999. Chuo Online ε֥ʸΩŪ˻ס ([2014-10-17-1])#2977. Ϣ6֤ʤѸä3ع¤Τ --- ͥ󥹴Υƥ줫֤ȥס ([2017-06-21-1]) Dz⡦ɾƤΤ󤴻Ȥ

Beal, Joan C. English in Modern Times: 1700--1945. Arnold: OUP, 2004.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-26 Wed

#3012. Ѹϥ󥬡ե󥫤ǤϤʤ꡼˥󥰸졩 [lingua_franca][linguistic_imperialism][elf][native_speaker_problem]

Ϣ夲Ƥ뤬8ýֱѸ1塤ܸĤ뤫פɲáºˤܸ׸ˤʤꤦ뤫ǡܸפȤǡˤܡʸˤΥץ쥼󥹤뤿ˡ¿ˤȯʤ٤ȤƤʤƤ롥

ֱѸפ˴ФԤϡѸʳθˤȯˤäȿ˼ȤޤʤФʤʤѸʳθˤäȯФƤäҴˤʤʤФʤʤ¿θüԤФơθդǸ꤫뤳ȤϡܤФ붦ƤӳФޤ̤礭ޤθȯˤϡѸ줢뤤ϱѸüԤˤ륹꡼˥󥰤ФƤʤŤߤ롥(57)


ǸˤֱѸ줢뤤ϱѸüԤˤ륹꡼˥󥰡פȤ˰̣ĹǤ롥󥬡ե (lingua_franca) ȤƤαѸ (elf) ˤϡʤѸ줬üԡˤΡֶϤפ̤ƤȤȤȤƤ롥ݥƥʱѸѤ
֥꡼˥󥰡פȤϡͥƥʱѸѤɽ魯ѸȤ軰Ԥͳ뤳Ȥǡΰտޤ̣פ줿ĤƤޤȤްդ롥ˡϤˤ븡ܤȤʴޤߤ鴶 (cf. native_speaker_problem) Τ褦˱Ѹ򸫤ϡ"English as a Language of Censorship" (= ELC) ʤɤθƾΤƤ褦ˤʤ뤫⤷ʤϱѸϰȤ館ƤȤ櫓ǤϤʤѸ˸¤餺׸ϰ̤ˤǤСɬ󥬡ե󥫤ȤƤ¦̤ ELC Ū¦̤碌ĤΤȻŦƤˤʤ

Referrer (Inside): [2023-02-14-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-25 Tue

#3011. Ǥ٤ƤŤϵǤ [japanese][linguistic_imperialism]

ε#3010. ָο̱ϲܤ̵ۤФʹϤʤס ([2017-07-24-1]) ǡ8ΡֱѸ1塤ܸĤ뤫פꤹýˤĤƿ줿ýǡŵȲĹѤˤ̡֡ȥݥȿ¡ɻθפǺܤƤ롥Ǥ⡤Ѥ¼ĤƱ褦ˡܸ줬ο̱ϲȤ줿Τ˵ʤȤǤ뤫Ƥ (37)

ܤϱѸο̱Ϥˤʤä櫓ǤϤޤ󤫤顤ѸȤʤФǤʤ櫓ǤϤʤ줵줿̱ȤθˤäơۤȤɤ٤ƤΤȤṮ̌ȤΤϡǤ⵩ʤΤǤ顤ۤɹʡʹ̱ϤʤȤޤ첯Ķͤ٤ƤΤȤʬιǡƹޤŤ롥줬ǤȤϡƤСե󥹡ɥġꥢڥ󤰤餤ǤϤʤǤ礦衼åѤǤ⾮ϡϱѸǹԤäƤȤ¿ǥͧͤˡַϱѸ줬ǤƤͤȤ󤿤ϸ⤷ʤɡᤷ补ؤζʽϺλʤ饹ǥǤϺʤѸζʽȤ顤ɼȤϱѸˤʤäޤפäƤܤ䤫줿ߤʡƱѸ첽Ƥ櫓ǤϤʤΤǤ


ȤƽФƤ륹ǥϤޤ褤ۤǡեꥫ䥢ε쿢̱Ϥι񡹤Ǥϡǹζʽ񤬽񤫤ƤȤʤɡۤȤɤʤΤǤ롥
(40) ƱݤǼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥

ϡĤʪǤԽʬǡкѤůؤ⵻Ѥ⡤٤ƸʤФʤʤϡ¤ˤۤɤޤͤ϶ʽ񤬡⹻ǤؤǤܸǽ񤫤Ƥ뤳ȤȻפäƤ뤱ɡʤ˷äޤƤ뤳ȤΤǤѸʳǤϥե󥹸ä̯ʤȤǤ


ܸ̤䡤ȴϢƱѸϤˡޤϤΤ褦ʻ¤ǧƤ

Referrer (Inside): [2023-02-14-1] [2021-09-28-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-24 Mon

#3010. ָο̱ϲܤ̵ۤФʹϤʤ [linguistic_imperialism][japanese][hel_education][language_myth]

8ǡֱѸ1塤ܸĤ뤫פꤹýȤޤƤ롥ýΤʤǡܸ줬˴ӤȤ٤ԤǤ¼Ĥ⤵˶ٲäơܸιԤͫƤ롥θФˡָο̱ϲܤ̵ۤФʹϤʤפȤ뤬ϻ⤽̤ȻפäƤ롥̤γ٤鸫СܤޤǸο̱ϲȤƤˤʬɾƤʤȤ⤤롥餳ܿͤϡŪʸǤѸˤȤ⤿䤹̵ˤʤӤȤǤΤޤϡˤ¥ʤФʤʤ
¼ (28--29) ϡΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥

򸫲󤻤Сƥ꤬ɤϱѸǡʳοͤɤΤϸȤ񤬤¿ȤǤ礦ΰ졻ǯΤˤʹޤޤ줬̱ϲȤ줿ȤܤۤɼФ⡤줬˴Ӥ뤳Ȥ˴ʤȴޤ
ϺǶᤤ褤衤Сܸܿͤ줬ǽǤФ褤ΤǤϤȹͤ褦ˤʤäƤޤηǤޤǵǽƤȤƻäƤΤǤ꡼Ȥ̱⡤Τ褦ܸɤ߽񤭤ƤȤξ뤳ȼΤܤȤλ̿ʤΤǤϤʤȤפޤ


¼ϡΤ褦ܸβͤڻ뤵Ƥ뷹ȽŪ˻ŦǡȤʤäѸ˴ؤ䤹ä᡼ˤĤƤ񤷤Ƥ (32)

鶯ĴƤ⤷­ʤΤϡѸ줽ΤΤ׸ȤʤäǤ櫓ǤϤʤȤǤѸϡޤޤŪŤʤä׸Ȥή̤褦ˤʤäդǤʤǤ⤤ä׸Ȥή̤Ϥȡ׸򸫤ʹ֤º礵ѸοͤˤϤФФĤޤȤ褦ˤʤޤǤơѸ׸줿餷᤿綠ΤΤϲΤΤȤʤäƤޤäƤ롥


ͫ᤭Ф¸ߤΤѸˤȤʬǤ롥Ѹ줬ǤäȤƶϤΤˤʤäΤϡѸߤ뤤ʤü椨ǤʤñˤζǤ롥ΤȤϡΤ˲ٶĴƤ⤷­ʤʲεǷ֤ƤΤǡȤ

#1072. ѸϸȤäˤƤ櫓ǤϤʤ ([2012-04-03-1])
#1082. ʤѸȤʤä (1) ([2012-04-13-1])
#1083. ʤѸȤʤä (2) ([2012-04-14-1])
#1607. Ѹ춵Ū¦̡ ([2013-09-20-1])
#1788. Ķ̱²νиȳ˴Ϳװ ([2014-03-20-1])
#2487. νȤϡμҲŪϤΤȤǤ ([2016-02-17-1])
#2673. ָˤѸνο͡ˤȤäƤͭˤס ([2016-08-21-1])
#2935. ַкѡ줬ڤ뻰Ĥǡס ([2017-05-10-1])

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-23 Sun

#3009. üԿˤȥå252017ǯǡ [statistics][world_languages][demography][japanese]

#397. üԿˤȥå25 ([2010-05-29-1]) 񤤤Ƥ7ǯǯФäEthnologue (20th ed) κǿǤФΤǡSummary by language size ɽ3ˤꡤüԿˤȥå23κǿ󥭥󥰤򼨤

RankLanguagePrimary CountryCountriesSpeakers (20th ed, 2017)Speakers (16th ed, 2009)(13th ed, 1996)
1ChineseChina371,284 million1,2131,123
2SpanishSpain31437329266
3EnglishUnited Kingdom106372328322
4ArabicSaudi Arabia57295221202
5HindiIndia5260182 (242.6 with Urdu)(236 with Urdu)
6BengaliBangladesh4242181189
7PortuguesePortugal13219178170
8RussianRussian Federation19154144288
9JapaneseJapan2128122125
10LahndaPakistan611978.3 
11JavaneseIndonesia384.484.6 
12KoreanKorea777.266.3 
13GermanGermany2776.890.398
14FrenchFrance5376.167.872
15TeluguIndia274.269.8 
16MarathiIndia171.868.1 
17TurkishTurkey871.150.8 
18UrduPakistan669.160.6 
19VietnameseViet Nam368.168.6 
20TamilIndia768.065.7 
21ItalianItaly1363.461.763
22PersianIran3061.9  
23MalayMalaysia1660.839.147


2009ǯ16ǤפǤ2̥ڥ3̱ѸκϤ鷺ǻ¾ΥäΥǡˤС2̤Υڥ줬ѸǰΥˤäƤ뤳Ȥ狼롥3̤αѸϡष4̤Υӥ˵ͤ뤳Ȥˤʤꤽ
³󥭥󥰤ǡ9̤ˤĤƤܸޤǤϡǯǽ̤ѤäƤʤΤΡ10̤äɥĸ줬13̤ޤǽ̤ȤƤΤŪǤ롥ե󥹸ϡष16̤14̤ؼ㴳̤夲Ƥ롥
ᤤ衤9̤ˤĤƤܸ줬˥󥭥󥰤򲼤ƤȤɬǤ롥ܰʳȤƻѤ񤬤ʤȡޤܤο͸η礿װǤ롥٥ȥʥʤɤΤ֤
#274. üԿ ([2010-01-26-1]) Ǽ褦ˡΥȥå׸줬͸¿ôäƤȤ֤ѤäƤʤɤ®Ƥ롥㤨Сɽ15̤ޤǤθüԤιפ40ͤȤʤꡤ͸6᤯롥6ϹϢθѸǤꡤ148򥫥С롥βƬ֤ۤ餫

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-22 Sat

#3008. ּѤȤϻͤˤǤ¤Ǥ [borrowing][neolinguistics][terminology]

ؤμȤǡˤ borrowing ȤϲȤˤĤơä˼Ѹ (loan_word) ǰƬ֤Ĥĥǥå󤷤ƤߤˤƱ褦ʥǥå򤷤Ȥꡤܥ֥Ǥ#44. ּѡפˤߤ ([2009-06-11-1])#2010. Ѥϸʣ狼 ([2014-10-28-1]) ʤɤƤ󤢤餿ƼηäڤƹͤȤƶ줿Τ𤷤
μѤͤȤǵäƤ뤳Ȥϸ̩ˤСּڤײǤϤʤäơּѡפȤɽϤդ路ʤȤȤϤ褯ΤƤǡεǤϡʣ (copying) (imitation)ֺ¤ (re-creation) ̤γǰФơ¤ѸΥåפ褦ȤΥǥådzӽФƶϡ꤯Ȥ߹碌ֻͤˤǤ¤פȤǤ롥ñ˼ڤ櫓Ǥ⡤ԡ櫓Ǥ⡤魯櫓Ǥʤˤǥ򻲹ͤˤǡˤƿ¤줹롤ȤϸѼԤμŪѶŪʸưŤ󤸤롤 (neolinguistics) ϩ˱äѤɽ路Ƥ롥
ѶȤΤϡ٤Ǥ롥줬˶ᤱл¾ΡʣפפȤߤʤ¤ȯС¤פ¤פɽ٤Ѹ䳵ǰŪʤۤʤΤǡֻͤˤǤ¤פȤּѡפŬڤȻפŪĹΤ㴳̤Ǥ롥
ˤͭפʥǥåä

Referrer (Inside): [2020-10-20-1] [2018-06-11-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-21 Fri

#3007. Ϣ7 -ish ŪŸ [notice][suffix][productivity][rensai]

դǡѸϢָܴѸѸˤλͤ -ish ŪŸޤ
ϡܤ뤳ȤξʤΤ줶ˤǤ-ish Τ褦Ωʤ1ĤäƤߤƤ⡤˭ˤͤޤäƤ뤳Ȥ򼨤᤽Ȥޤchaque mot a son histoire "every word has its own history" ([2012-10-21-1]) ʤ̡"every affix has its own history" Ȥ櫓Ǥ
ιͤ򤵤˾ñ̤ؤȱĹС"every phoneme has its own history" Ȥʤޤޤ¤Ǥ羮ñ̤ѲѰۤˤ餵ƤꡤƱˤ̵ñ̤ŪäηϤƤꡤȤƵǽƤȤΤϡä٤ȤǤϤʤǤ礦
ϢܵΤʤǿ줿ܼ (productivity) ˤĤƤŪ˳ȯʵ깭ƤޤΤǡʲδϢ

#935. (1) ([2011-11-18-1])
#936. (2) ([2011-11-19-1])
#937. (3) ([2011-11-20-1])
#938. (4) ([2011-11-21-1])
#940. ¤ ([2011-11-23-1])
#2706. ܼ ([2016-09-23-1])

ϢܵƤϡ#133. ƻĤ -ish γηϩ ([2009-09-07-1]) Ǵά˾Ҳ𤷤ƤΤǡ⤴Ʊξܺ٤ˤˤĤƤϡʲƤޤΤǡŪʴؿΤϤȤ

"The Suffix -ish and Its Derogatory Connotation: An OED Based Historical Study." Journal of the Faculty of Letters: Language, Literature and Culture 108 (2011): 107--32.  *

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-20 Thu

#3006. űѸμ [lexicography][dictionary][oe][doe][bibliography][hel_education][link]

űѸؽ椹ͭѤʼ򤤤ĤҲ𤹤롥

(1) Bosworth, Joseph. A Compendious Anglo-Saxon and English Dictionary. London: J. R. Smith, 1848.
(2) Bosworth, Joseph and Thomas N. Toller. Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: OUP, 1973. 1898. (Online version available at http://lexicon.ff.cuni.cz/texts/oe_bosworthtoller_about.html.)
(3) Hall, John R. C. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Rev. ed. by Herbert T. Merritt. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1996. 1896. (Online version available at http://lexicon.ff.cuni.cz/texts/oe_clarkhall_about.html.)
(4) Healey, Antonette diPaolo, Ashley C. Amos and Angus Cameron, eds. The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A--G. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, U of Toronto, 2008. (see The Dictionary of Old English (DOE) and Dictionary of Old English Corpus (DOEC).)
(5) Sweet, Henry. The Student's Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: CUP, 1976. 1896.

ΤΥȥ뤫ȤꡤܤԻˤϤޤޤǤ롥Ѥ Sweet ˻Ϥޤꡤά Hall 顤Ū Bosworth and Toller Фơǿ Healey et al. ˤŻ DOE ˻롥DOE ơűѸ켭֤褽19λʪǤ뤳Ȥܤͤ롥λˡ͡ʥ٥θűѸ켭񤬡ȼεϡҰռäԻ졤Ǥ줿ΤǤ롥
ν񤭸դɸबΤޤäƤʤűѸμԻǤϡФɤΤ褦ֻΩƤ뤫ǺޤȤʤ롥ѼԤϡƤŬڤֻ򸫽Фʤ뤤ϰ֤δ֤򤿤餤󤷤ˤ뤫Ǥ롥绨ĤˤСŪ Sweet ΩƤ븫Фֻ "critical" ǵϼŪǤꡤǤŪ DOE "diplomatic" ǵҼŪǤ롥δ֤ˡˤ䤫 "critical" Hall ȴˤ䤫 "diplomatic" Bosworth and Toller ֤Ť롥
碌ƸűѸäγؽˤϡʲ2󤲤Ƥ

Barney, Stephen A. Word-Hoard: An Introduction to Old English Vocabulary. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985.
Holthausen, Ferdinand. Altenglisches etymologisches Wōrterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1963.

Holthausen μϡűѸ츻ȤŪðۤϰ̤Ƥ뤬츻äؤܤȤݤˤΩġBarney ϡƱݤǡɤdzڤűѸñꥹȤǤ롥

Referrer (Inside): [2020-06-24-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-19 Wed

#3005. or θ츻 [etymology][conjunction][analogy]

³ or ϽѸ˽Ф롤ճȸŤϤʤ³Ǥ롥űѸǤ oþþe, oþþa ѤƤꡤε *ef þau (if or) û̷ȹͤƤOld Saxon eftho ʸڤˡθűѸ1225ǯ˾ü1200ǯäƬƤΤ r ղä oþer Ǥ롥 r ղäϡouther (OE āþer, ǣġhwæþer "either"), whether (OE hwæþer) (analogy) ˤΤ롥褦ѤϡŹϥɥĸ aber, weder αƶ odo, eedo r ղä줿ϥɥĸ oder ˤ⸫롥
oþer ϴ֤ʤ岽ֻҲû or ؤȯŸϡever e'er ؤμ岽ûȤӤ롥Ǥ16ȾޤǶ other 褯¸ƤȤդפ롥Ѹɽ (either) A or B ϡŤ other A other B other A or B Ȥ졤 or A or B ؤȯŸκǸɽ Shakespeare ǤѽФ뤬θ夹줿
ʤ¾Ρפɽ魯 other ϡ嵭ľܸ츻Ū˴Ϣʤϡ#1162. ⤦1Ĥӵ -ther ([2012-07-02-1])#1107. farther and further ([2012-05-08-1]) ǿ줿褦ˡeither, neither, whether, after, nether, bresbyter, further ʤɤƱͳ褹롥äȤ⡤Ҥ̤ "or" ΰ̣ other r θθ˱ƶ줿餷ȤͤСͭȤϤȤ⡤ŪʴطϤäȤߤʤ롥

Referrer (Inside): [2022-01-21-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-18 Tue

#3004. ѸˤϱѸʪ줫 [historiography][language_myth][linguistic_imperialism][official_language][complaint_tradition]

Ѹˤ1̱²äѸ줬ؤĹƤʪǤȸϾʤʤˤϥ󥰥ɤȤΤʤǤե󥹸ΤȤܤʬθˤʤäΤʹߤ˰쵤ФƤäȤаޤΤСޤ˥ǥ顦ȡ꡼˻פƤ뤫⤷ʤ
Romaine (54--55) ˤСʪˤ3Ĥ礭ȵ⤬롥1ˡѸǤ륤󥰥ɤϡۤ˱ѸȻΤΡ­ˤȤ⤤륢ɡåȥɡ륺Ǻʤ100%αѸ첽̤ƤʤȤ¤롥üԿ͸ϾʤȤϤǤϥȷϽ줬äƤΤ沼ŤȤ٤
2ˡѸ줬ѸȤꤵƤΤϡOuter Circle ϰФǤꡤInner Circle ϰǤϤʤʡ#217. ѸüԤƱߥǥ ([2009-11-30-1])#427. ѸüԤˢ֤ǥ ([2010-06-28-1])ˡΤȤϡѸȤ Inner Circle ϰŵŪˤϱơˤˤƱѸϻ¾θѸǤꡤȤ˸ɬפʤ뤬ꥫǤϡ#1657. ꥫαѸѸ첽ư ([2013-11-09-1]) #256. ƹ Hispanification ([2010-01-08-1]) εǸ̤ꡤŪ˱ѸѸ첽ȤҲ꤬夬äƤ롥ѸäɮƬˤơޤǼäѲƤƤȤΤϡŪǤ롥
3ˡƤϤȤפʱѸˤơɸѸ "insecurity" 䤨ʤȤ󤲤롥פˡѤȸѤ "complaint tradition" "linguistic complaint literature" ʤФ³Ƥ뤳ȤѸ줬ŪˡפȤΤǤСɨαƤʤɤˤơȤƤδפɤ餤ǤȤΤϡǤǤ⤢롥
츫Ȥڤ䤫ʡʪפ΢ˤϡ礤ʤ뱢롥

Romaine, Suzanne. "Introduction." The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 4. Cambridge: CUP, 1998. 1--56.

Referrer (Inside): [2023-02-14-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-17 Mon

#3003. ѸˤѸǻߤޤäƤޤäΤ褦˸ͳ (4) [lmode][historiography][language_change][speed_of_change][phonetics][sound_change][variety][contact]

ε ([2017-07-16-1]) ˰³ɸ4ơѸФؿܤܳŪƤΤϡ#2993. Ѹؤδؿιޤ ([2017-07-07-1]) ǸȤꡤäƤȤäƤǤϤʤˤ⤳λ˴ؿ󤻤ġθԤϤᤤȤǤϡѸˤ̾1Ĥ路 Strang ⡤ʤ̴ؿäƸѸ򵭽ҤStrang ϡληŪʲѲƤʤŦƱ夬ڻ뤵ƤȤʤ⡤ȤäƸ٤ѲʤȤȤˤϤʤʤƤ롥

Some short histories of English give the impression that changes in pronunciation stopped dead in the 18c, a development which would be quite inexplicable for a language in everyday use. It is true that the sweeping systematic changes we can detect in earlier periods are missing, but the amount of change is no less. Rather, its location has changed: in the past two hundred years changes in pronunciation are predominantly due, not, as in the past, to evolution of the system, but to what, in a very broad sense, we may call the interplay of different varieties, and to the complex analogical relationship between different parts of the language. (78--79)


ʲѲθ줬ѤäȤ⤷ǤϡϤɤ˰ưȤСѼ֤ܿȤҲŪΰǤꡤηʣѤȤΰȤ
Strang ˼ǤʤСǤϡˤѲϡΤ褦ΰ̵äΤ䤤餯̵ȤȤϤʤĤƤƱͤˡѼ֤ߺѤηѤϤ˴ͿƤۤʤΤϡĤƤλθϸѸ⥢ˤʣ⸫ˤȤȤǤϤʤѸϡ٤μҲŪʾ뤳ȤǤƤޤ椨ˡʣ´䤹ȤȤ٤⤤˱줬ΩġȤǤĤޤꡤѲθ줬ѤäȤϡǽ餫餢äˤ⤫餺ˤä줬褯褦ˤʤäƤɽΤ⤷ʤ󡤸ѸˤĤƤϡʤ褯뤳ȤϸޤǤʤ

Strang, Barbara M. H. A History of English. London: Methuen, 1970.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-16 Sun

#3002. ѸˤѸǻߤޤäƤޤäΤ褦˸ͳ (3) [lmode][historiography][language_change][speed_of_change]

ɸ˴ؤơ#319. ѸüԿ͸ζɤեǥ ([2010-03-12-1])#339. ѸˤѸǻߤޤäƤޤäΤ褦˸ͳ ([2010-04-01-1])#386. Ѹ˵äƤѲ礭 ([2010-05-18-1])#622. ѸʸˡѲŪʸŪ ([2011-01-09-1])#1430. ѸˤѸǻߤޤäƤޤäΤ褦˸ͳ (2) ([2013-03-27-1]) Ǽ夲Ƥ⤦1ĵκɲä
Ѹ鸽ѸˤƤλ򰷤ä Cambridge Ѹ˥꡼4Լ Romaine ϡϤǤλ򼡤Τ褦ħŤƤ (1)

The final decades of the eighteenth century provide the starting point for this volume --- a time when arguably less was happening to shape the structure of the English language than to shape attitudes towards it in a social climate that became increasingly prescriptive. . . . The most radical changes to English grammar had already taken place over the roughly one thousand years preceding the starting year of this volume.


λˤϡηϤ˱ƶ褦ѲϤۤɵäƤ餺षüԤ٤ˤѲʼȤƵϼŪѤˤ˸ΤȤСŪѲȤϼҲŪѲħŤȤȤǤꡤ˼ҲŪ¦̤åפȤȤˤʤ롥
λäʸˡʬ絬ϤѲȤƸ٤ΤʤȤϡ#622. ѸʸˡѲŪʸŪ ([2011-01-09-1]) ǿ줿̤Romaine (2) ƱݤǼΤ褦Ƥ롥

The immediately preceding period dealt with in Volume III (1476--1776) of this series, the Early Modern Period, has often been described as the formative period in the history of Modern Standard English. By the end of the seventeenth century what we might call the present-day 'core' grammar of Standard English was already firmly established. As pointed out by Denison in his chapter on syntax, relatively few categorical innovations or losses occurred. The syntactic changes during the period covered in this volume have been mainly statistical in nature, with certain construction types becoming more frequent.


󡤡ʸ˶Ѹ˱Ѹˤή줬˻ߤޤä櫓ǤϤʤŪѲϡԤ椷ƳΤΩʤȸ쳰ŪѲϷ㤷Ƥ롥ѸˤŪˡ̻ˡˤȳŪˡʳ̻ˡˤ¤Ǥʾ塤ή줬ߤޤ뤳ȤϷ褷Ƥʤ

Romaine, Suzanne. "Introduction." The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 4. Cambridge: CUP, 1998. 1--56.

Referrer (Inside): [2018-05-23-1] [2017-07-17-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-15 Sat

#3001. ʤűѸϸťΥɸִʤäΤ [old_norse][language_shift][contact]

󥰥ͤȥ󥰤Ȥ襤9եå粦Ϥ褯路ΤΡ󥰥󥰤ϤȤˤʤäڤ Danelaw ȸƤФ졤ʹ߿ˤ錄äξ̱²ξʸűѸȸťΥɸˤ¸礹ȤʤäʴϢϿޤȤơ#818. 󥰥ɤ˻ĤťΥɸ̾ ([2011-07-24-1]) #1937. Ϣ -son ˤΤϸťΥɸͳ ([2014-08-16-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
ѸѻƤߤȡξζ¸Ⱥη̤餫˱Ѹ¸ǤꡤťΥɸˤѸִǤϤʤäΤ˸ťΥɸαƶϤ˸뤬 (cf. #1253. ťΥɸαƶܡ ([2012-10-01-1])) ̤ȤƤθϡѲѸפǤѲťΥɸפǤϤʤäΤǤ롥
ʤդθ (language_shift) ʤäΤñ Danelaw ˤ̱²ο͸Ū˵ȤǤΤ뤤ϡ¾μҲŪװ˵٤ŪͿ뤳Ȥ񤷤1Ĺθ٤פǤ롥Gooden (38--39) ꡤϢʸϤ

In the long run, . . . it was the Old Norse speakers who ceded to the English language. There was still a large proportion of native speakers in Danelaw, and within a few years of King Alfred's death in 899 his son Edward had begun a campaign to restore English rule over the whole country. For most of the tenth century under leaders such as Athelstan --- the first ruler who could justifiably be referred to as the king of all of England --- the Vikings were defeated or kept at bay. Additionally, the fact that Old Norse was an oral rather than written culture would have weakened its chances in the 'battle' with English.


ѤκǸʬ狼褦ˡ󥰥ͤδ֤夷ƤʸʸνŤߡ⤦ġȼʸ¸ߤťΥɸФƱѸ򾡤Ĥ餻װ1ĤǤ롤ȤĥθϡͤƤȻפͤƤߤСۤɻ֤γ֤äƤʤ11ȾФΥΥޥ (norman_conquest) ˤƤ⡤ѸϥΥޥ󡦥ե (norman_french) ֤뤳ȤʤäǤ͸פμҲŪװθʤФʤʤȤϸޤǤʤ#1461. William's writ ([2013-04-27-1]) ǻŦ褦ˡ¦ˤ֤ǤĹ񤭸դäؤΰΥꥹڥȡפäΤǤϤʤʸβ뤫򤫤ꤽˤΤäƤԤϡθǤ񤭸դ̱ͭ²ȸˤϰܤ֤ʤ褦˻פ롥

Gooden, Philip. The Story of English: How the English Language Conquered the World. London: Quercus, 2009.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-14 Fri

#3000. 7񎼷uly?? [calendar][etymology][latin][personal_name][dissimilation][month]

ťǤϽʬǯλϤޤȤᡤߤ2Ƥäơߤ7ϤĤƤ5бϥƥ Quinctilis 5ηˤȾΤƤMarcus Antonius (83?--30 B.C.) κǸλۼԤǤͧͤǤ⤢ä Julius Caesar (100--44 B.C.) λ塤ʲ٤νˤʤǡη̾ Jūlius (mēnsis) ؤѹ줬˸ťե󥹸 jule ťΥޥ󡦥ե󥹸 julie ͳơѸ juil, iulie ֻǼѤ줿ʤJulius *Jovilios û̷ǤꡤJove Jupiter ȸ캬ͭ롥Julius Caesar ϡäơJupiter ηʲȷϤ°Ȥߤʤ줿
űѸˤľܥƥѤ줿7ɽ魯ŪɽȤƤϡlīþa se æfterra (the later līþa) ȸƤФ줿ˤĤƤϡ#2983. 6June̵ ([2017-06-27-1]) ε⻲ȡ
July ɸŪȯ /ʤʊˈlaɪ/ 18ˤ1˶֤ /ˈʤuːli/ ȤȯԤʤƤꡤߤǤƹʹ롥ɸȯϡ餯 June ȤκƱ򤱤뤿۲ (dissimilation) ˤΤȹͤcf. ֤ġפȶ̤뤿Ρ֤ʤʤġס7ˤȤɤˡ
ܸ7̾ΡʸפϡΥեեߥťʴ޷ˤͳ褹Ȥ⡤ͼ˻Τʸź뤳Ȥͳ褹Ȥ롥
̾꡼εȤơ#2910. ̾ͳ ([2017-04-15-1])#2890. 3March ([2017-03-26-1])#2896. 4April ([2017-04-01-1])#2939. 5May ([2017-05-14-1])#2983. 6June̵ ([2017-06-27-1]) 򻲾ȡ

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-13 Thu

#2999. ɸѸ줫꤬äͳ [prescriptive_grammar][negative][double_comparative][syntax][emode][double_negative]

ɸѸεʸˡ (prescriptive_grammar) Ǥϡ (double negative) 򤵤롥#301. ѤȤѸθˡ Top 10 ([2010-02-22-1]) Υ󥭥󥰤ˤǤܤǤꡤѤΰ̤Τ褦ˤߤʤƤ롥ŤѸǤФ꤫¿꤬̤ѤƤ¤ꡤϤθˡ˸ŪʸѤΤˤ뤳ȤʪäƤ褦˻פ뤬ϼΩ줫ϥΰĥǤʡ#549. ¿θѡ ([2010-10-28-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
ɸѸˤϡΤ褦18εʸˡζϤʱƶǴ򤵤˻ꡤߤޤŨ뤵ƤȤΤ̾θθɬΤǤϤʤ褦Ը򻲾ȤĤ Tieken-Boon van Ostade (81) Τ褦˻ŦƤ롥

Many scholars believe that the disappearance of double negation from standard English was due to the influence of the normative grammarians, but Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg . . . have shown that double negation was already on the way out during the EModE period. The same is true for another 'double' construction, the use of double comparatives and superlatives, no longer in general use either when first condemned by the grammarians (González-Díaz 2008)


ڤƤԸäƳΤƤʤ⤷θΤʤΤȤС˼θѤˤʤӵ顦ǾˤѤФλ¤18ʸˡȤǤäι¤ܤФȤäȤˤʤ롥
ˤĤƤϡdouble negative γ򡤤ޤӵˤĤƤϡ#195. Shakespeare ˴ؤ Web resources ([2009-11-08-1]) hellog 򻲾ȡ

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-12 Wed

#2998. 18ޤǰȼ񤭤ֻϰۤʤˤä [spelling][orthography][writing][printing][lmode][johnson]

ε#2997. 1800ǯ򶭤˰ä long <s> ([2017-07-11-1]) κǸ˿줿褦ˡʬ˸Ѹ˶ᤤȴ18ǤʤʬŪ19Ǥˡȼ񤭤ϡʸֻεϤ˴ؤơ2ĤΰۤʤƤȤäƤ褤С2Ĥˡ¸ߤƤʤ⡤ơϸŪʰ̣Ǥοϳ餵̶ǤʵϤȤ櫓ǤϤʤäˡϤ褽ָפǤꡤ񤭤ϡֻפǤ뤫顤ˡϸǻȤʬ٤ŴȤʤäƤΤǤ롥
κۤǤŪ˸ΤϡJohnson μǤֻȡJohnson λŪʤǤֻǤ롥㤨СJohnson ϼǤֻȤϰۤʤꡤʤǤ companiable, enervaiting, Fryday, obviateing, occurences, peny, pouns, stiched, chappel, diner, dos (= does) ֻ񤤤Ƥ (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 42) Τ褦ʾ¾κȤˤĤƤƱͤ˸뤳Ȥ顤Johnson ֤겼äȤ̷򵯤ƤʤɤȤˤϤʤʤषŪʰȻŪʼ񤭤Ȥǰۤʤֻδबꡤ줬뤵ƤȤȤǤ롥
Τ褦ʾϡβ桹ˤȤäƤ򤷤ˤ⤷ʤֻθͤƤߤмΤȤǤ롥Ѹˤֻζʽ¿Ǥ줿ϻҶ˰줿ƥȤɤ褦ˤ뤿ζʽǤꡤҶֻ񤯤Ȥ붵ʽǤϤʤäƥȤֻϡȼԤˤäƴŪ줿ˡȿǤƤꡤҶϤηŪֻɤ׷ֽ񤯡׷ä˼ƤʤäΤ褦ʻҶ񤭤ǽʤǧʤˤϡʤƥȤɽ蘆Ƥˡ§ä֤뤳ȤϤǤʤȤäñޤä֤ʤȤȤˤϤʤʤʤμ˸򤵤뤳ȤۤȤɤʤ
ơξϡֻؤǤҶΤߤʤ餺ʸɤ߽񤭤ͤˤ̤ƤϤޤäȼ񤭤ΩϡΩΤߤʤ餺ֻɤǽϤȽǽϤΩǤ⤢äΤ

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009.

Referrer (Inside): [2019-12-06-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-11 Tue

#2997. 1800ǯ򶭤˰ä long <s> [spelling][graphemics][grammatology][alphabet][printing][lmode][writing][orthography]

18ΰܤΥƥȤɤǤȡ³ <s> ΰۻ (allograph) Ǥ <<ʃ>> ޤˤ˸뤳Ȥ˵ŤλΤ "long <s>" ȸƤФƤꡤޤǤѤƤޤäΤΡѸˤĹˤ錄äƳƤۻΤäTieken-Boon van Ostade (40) ˰Ƥ롡ECCO ʸˤꡤ<<ʃ>> λȤ򸫤Ƥߤ褦

. . . WHEREIN / THE CHAPTERS are ʃumm'd up in Contents; the Sacred Text inʃerted at large, in Paragraphs, or Verʃes; and each Paragraph, or Verʃe, reduc'd to its proper Heads; the Senʃe given, and largely illuʃtrated, / WITH / Practical Remarks and Obʃervations


Ƥ狼̤ꡤ٤Ƥ <s> <<ʃ>> ǰƤ櫓ǤϤʤŪˤϸƬ <s> <<ʃ>> ǰ졤Ǥ̾ <<s>> ʤޤƬǤʸξˤ <<S>> Ѥ롥ۤˡIdleneʃs Busineʃs Τ褦ˡ<ss> δĶǤ1ʸܤ long <s> Ȥʤ롥
long <s> 䤬Ѥ˵뤳ȤȤʤäˤƤ18˾äƤäȤŦƤ롥

Long <s> disappeared as a printing device towards the end of the eighteenth century, and its presence or absence is today used by antiquarians to date books that lack a publication date as dating from either before or after 1800. (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 40)


դ٤ϡ1800ǯ򶭤 long <s> äΤϰȤΤˤƤǤꡤ (handwriting) ˤƤϡ⤦Ф餯 long <s> Ѥ³ȤȤǤ롥#584. long <s> graphemics ([2010-12-02-1]) ǿ줿褦ˡ񤭤Ǥ1850ǯޤǻȤ³ȼ񤭤ȤǻʬۤۤʤäƤȤ long <s> ˸¤餺¾ΰۻΤֻˤƤϤޤ롥δФǤϡˤ񤭤ˤ衤1Ĥζ̤ˡȹͤΤʤȤ1800ǯޤǤϡΤ褦ʴФϵäȤߤʤ٤Ǥ롥
long <s> ˤĤơ#1152. sneeze θ츻 ([2012-06-22-1])#1732. Shakespeare ֤ (2) ([2014-01-23-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-10 Mon

#2996. Ѹαʸˡȥ쥷ܤζ [prescriptive_grammar][recipe][genre][lmode]

Tieken-Boon van Ostade (138) ˤѸγɤǤơʸˡȥ쥷ܤ˸פʤ򶵤줿

Between 1500 and 1850, the number of such books [= cooking recipes] increased dramatically, which, interestingly, shows a parallel with the steep rise in the publication of English grammars since the 1760s . . . . Their reading public was also similar: people who desired access to the 'polite' middle classes, and who needed tools for this, even cookery books. Another similarity is that writers of cookery books often 'copy from existing collections so that such compilations tend to be "improvements" of earlier cookery books' (Görlach 1992: 750).


ޤξƥȥפȤˡ̤ƽǤ³ƤꡤȤ櫓18ȾäȤޤμפϤ徺ָζή˻٤ƤȤŦƤ롥⡤ʤ»νʽˤȤäơ֤ʤߡפªƤΤǤ롥ˡԤֲפȾΤơ񤫤ΥԥڤΤ褦˹ԤʤäƤȤȤⶦߤǤ餫ȤȳȤȤǤϤʤäΤȤϤ18Ⱦˤϡ㤦­԰٤ǧ褦ˤʤäƤ褦Ǥ롥
򺣤ܤǤϡ뺧Ȥ˽ȤΤʤߤ褦ˤʤäƤƤ褦äܸʸˡμϵƤʤϤ̣ǤۤäȤȤǤ롥18ΥꥹҲϡ "social climbers" ˤȤäΤڤǤϤʤäΤʤȹͤճʶä

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-09 Sun

#2995. Augustan Age θŪݼ [lexicology][emode][inkhorn_term][purism][loan_word][latin][greek]

17Ⱦ18ˤƸääŪ¤롥λ¤ϡ#203. 1500--1900ǯˤѸäá ([2009-11-16-1])#1226. Ѹˤäǯʬۡ ([2012-09-04-1]) ΥդꡤѹˤǤϡ̤1700ǯ夹ݼŪǽ¹ߤοŵAugustan Age) ȾΤƤꡤη˿Ƴ¤ȤȿǤƤȲ᤹뤳ȤǤʴϢơ#2650. 17μǹߤ18ȾФβߤء ([2016-07-29-1])#2782. 18Υե󥹼ѸؤΡȿס ([2016-12-08-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
λθŪݼˤŪطʤ롥1ĤϡΩĻ塤ä16Ⱦ17Ⱦˡƥ䥮ꥷȤäŵ줫̤θäήȤ¤롥֥Ѹ (inkhorn_term) 餵ۤɤΡɡˤĤ褦ʳιħŤ줿Ǥ롥Τ褦̼ѤϡΤʬŪˤɬפäʳءءůؤʤɤ޲줬ƥ줫Ѹؤȵ޷ڤؤˤäơѸ¿θäΤɬפȤûǸäѤ̡᡹ȱѸΡָäɬספ졤³ˤϤʾѤΤʤʤäƤAugustan Age Ū˸üѤäΤϡΩĻΡּѤפˤȤ礭äȻפ롥ûˤ⡤ԡФǤƤޤȤȤ
⤦1ĤŪطʤȤƤϡAugustan Age ϡΡּѤפ򺹤Ƥ⡤ϤݼŪʸѤ˻ۤƤäȤ¤롥㤨СJonathan Swift (1667--1745) Joseph Addison (1672--1719) ɽݼɤҤǤꡤѸòβ경ܻؤ˳ȯʼɮưԤʤäƤ#1947. Swift clipping Ƚ([2014-08-26-1]) #1948. Addison clipping Ƚ ([2014-08-27-1])#2741. ascertaining, refining, fixing ([2016-10-28-1]) ˸褦ˡʷϵϡ򤱡¹ݼäΤǤ롥
Augustan Age ŪʸŪȤƤϾ嵭̤ġǯǤС㳰Ū˿ƳΩǯ⤢ä㤨С1740ǯ夫50ǯˤƤϡΤȤƸäǤĴʻǤϤ뤬1753ǯˤ Chambers' Cyclopaedia ǤƤꡤ¿βʳѸ줬ޤޤƤˡ㳰Ū˸äϤޤäǯȤƵϿƤ (Beal 21) 󤲤Сƥ줪ӥꥷ줫 adarticulation, aeronautics, azalea, ballistics, hydrangea, primula, sphagnum, trifoliate; anthropomorphism, eczema, mnemonic, urology ǯ˵ϿƤ롥

Beal, Joan C. English in Modern Times: 1700--1945. Arnold: OUP, 2004.

Referrer (Inside): [2020-08-17-1] [2020-06-18-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-08 Sat

#2994. ѸϤĤ餤ĤޤǤ [lmode][periodisation][sociolinguistics][history]

ε#2993. Ѹؤδؿιޤ ([2017-07-07-1]) ǡǯθѸ츦ζδˤĤƾҲ𤷤Ѹ (Late Modern English) ȤϡĤ餤ĤޤǤؤΤȤϡѸˤ뤤ϸ˰̤ˤʬ (periodisation) ȤůŪľ뤷ƤꡤŪͿ뤳ȤϤǤʤŪǶǤϡ#2640. Ѹˤλʬ ([2016-07-19-1])#2774. ʬˤĤƵƤߤ ([2016-11-30-1])#2960. ˸ˤʬΰյ ([2017-06-04-1]) ǵΤǻȡˡ
䤳ȴˤСѸ1700--1900ǯλʤ18--19ؤȹͤƤ褤1700ǯ1900ǯȤڤΤ狼䤹ϡʬ򼨤ƤΤȲ᤹٤Ǥ롥˼Ҳˤ˱ä٤ܤСѹˤˤĹ18פȡĹ19פ̣ơȤϲŤ1660ǯ1ェλ1918ǯޤǤδ֤ؤΤªΤ⤷ʤä˼Ҳˤȸˤ̩ܤʴطܤ˼ҲؤΩ줫ϡΡĹѸפβϡŬڤBeal (2)

Of course, it would be foolish to suggest that any such period could be homogeneous or that the boundaries would not be fuzzy. The starting-point of 1700 is particularly arbitrary, especially since . . . the obvious political turning-point which might mark the Early/Later Modern English boundary is the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. This coincides with the view of historians that the 'long' eighteenth century extends roughly from the restoration of the English monarchy (1660) to the fall of Napoleon (1815). On the other hand, the 'long' nineteenth-century in European history is generally acknowledged as beginning with . . . 'the great bourgeois French Revolution' of 1789 . . . and concluding with the end of World War I in 1918 . . . .


򤵤˾Ф2νλ1945ǯˤޤDzơĹѸפͤ뤳ȤǤ뤫⤷ʤΤ褦˸Ƥȡ3˵ڤִ֤ޤŪʸǤѸˤˤäơˤƽפʻǤ뤳ȤϼΤ褦˻פ롥λܳŪʾϤ᤿ΤϡäƤʤΤǤ롥

Beal, Joan C. English in Modern Times: 1700--1945. Arnold: OUP, 2004.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-07 Fri

#2993. Ѹؤδؿιޤ [lmode][history_of_linguistics][sociolinguistics]

20ǯۤɤδ֡ä21äƤ顤ѸˤʬǤϸѸ (Late Modern English; 18--19αѸ) ؤδؿޤäƤƤ롥դˤСѸ³Ǥֶᤤ׻αѸ줬ޤɾƤʤäȤǤθϡ18--19αѸ츦ɽ Charles Jones ͭ̾ʶ "the Cinderellas of English historical linguistic study" üŪɽ蘆Ƥ (Jones, Charles. A History of English Phonology. London: Longman, 1989. p. 279)
Ѹ˴ؤܳŪʸ1990ǯ夫鸽Ϥᡤ2001ǯˤϥǥХؤǤλ˾ƤƤιݳز񤬳ʤɡˤ狼˳趷褷ƤζǯαѸ˸Ĭήϡä˵Τ
Beal (xi--xii) ˤС2ĤͳȤ1Ĥϥߥ˥ࡤ⤦1Ĥ˼ҲؤȥѥؤȯãȽǤ롥ԤˤĤơΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥

Perhaps the most obvious clue is in the millennium itself: the nineteenth century is no longer 'the last century', so that there is the perception that a 'safe' distance now exists between the 'Later Modern' period the the present day.


פˡԤ19ˡפȤªλֺȿ;͵ȤȤˤʤİ˲ΤΤȤʤäȤǧǤ롥2ܤθػŪĬή˴ؤƤϡBeal (xii) ϼΤ褦˻ŦƤ롥

A second explanation for the recent upsurge in interest in this period lies in the change of emphasis within historical linguistics from the purely theoretical to socio-historical and corpus-based approaches to the study of language.


"socio-historical" "historical sociolinguistic" ɽ蘆˼ҲءפȤɽΤŪΤǤꡤޤ夷ĤIJˤˤʤ1Ĥͭ˾ΰǤȤϻοƤ (cf. #2883. HiSoPra* ˻ä (1) ([2017-03-19-1])#2884. HiSoPra* ˻ä (2) ([2017-03-20-1])) ޤѥؤμˡȯãȤƥȤŻҲĤϡѸ˸ԤͳˤޤDZۤƤȤǽˤ̤ȤŪäѸ츦δָ򹭤뤳Ȥ˹׸Ȥʡ#368. ѥϸβǽ򹭤 ([2010-04-30-1]) 򻲾ȡˡѸˤϡȸߴ뤳ȤΤǤֽв񤤤ξפȤƤԤƤ롥
Ѹ˸夬ߤƤѸˡܤǤ롥

Beal, Joan C. English in Modern Times: 1700--1945. Arnold: OUP, 2004.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-06 Thu

#2992. Ѹˤʸȯã [me][infinitive][syntax][tense][passive][split_infinitive]

ѸǤϡʸȯãLos (Los, Bettelou. The Rise of the to-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP, 2005.) 򻲾Ȥ Sawada (28) ˴ʷˤޤȤƤ褦ˡȯãˤϡ(1) Ķޤ to ٤Ȥ¦̤ȡ(2) űѸǤϸʤäο칽¤줿Ȥ¦̤롥(2) ˤĤƤϡ5ο¤Ŧ롥ʲˡѸ줫ʸȤȤ˼

(a) ư֤ to : The clothes need to be washed.
(b) λ have ȼ to : He expected to have finished last Wednesday.
(c) Ωꤵ to : They motioned to her not to come any further.
(d) դгʹʸˤ to : They believed John to be a liar.
(e) ʬΥ (split infinitive): to boldly go where no one has gone before.

Τ褦ʶḽŪ to 칽¤ޤ줿طʤˤϡб that ˤοͿƤ롥ȤϡŪˤ that β̤ȤƼεǽʣʹ¤ to ˼ä줿򤹤٤ִϰ쵤櫓ǤϤʤư֤ʤɤʣʰ̣¤ؤˤ that ʸФ餯ݤ줿Ȥդ٤Ǥ롥

Sawada, Mayumi. "The Development of a New Infinitival Construction in Late Middle English: The Passive Infinitive after Suffer." Studies in Middle and Modern English: Historical Variation. Ed. Akinobu Tani and Jennifer Smith. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 2017. 27--47.

Referrer (Inside): [2024-07-30-1] [2022-12-11-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-05 Wed

#2991. 롼ʸ̾˰̣ä餳 [runic][kotodama][alphabet][writing][kanji][grammatology]

롼ʸˤĤơ#1006. 롼ʸѼ ([2012-01-28-1]) Ϥ runic εȤƤˤơ롼ʸϤФѤȷӤĤ졤Ūʥ᡼äƤȤ館뤳Ȥ¿󥰥ʸǻѤƤͻҤ˴դߤȡΥ᡼ɬäƤʤ⤷ʤ5--6Υ롼ʸǽ񤫤줿󥰥ʸСǰʤɤιʤ˹ޤƤ㤬¿äǤϤƤ "X raised this stone in memory of Y" Τ褦û귿礬񤫤ƤˤʸΤΥꥨ󤬾ʤȤΤ롼ʸѤħǤ롥롼ʸȤѤѤ줿ȤѶŪʾڵϡ¤˳
#1009. 롼ʸʸȴطο츻 ([2012-01-31-1]) Ǥߤ褦˸츻Ūˤ⥪Ūʥϴ뤷#1897. "futhorc" acrostic ([2014-07-07-1]) ǾҲ𤷤ͷӤظˤϡ롼ʸ˽ɤλۤΤ褦ʤΤꤵƤ褦ˤפ롥
ʸˤȤСɽʸǤפ⤫֡ϸ§Ȥ1ʸθбƤΤǡΰ̣ľŪ۵䤹ե٥åȤʤɤɽʸȤۤʤäƤ롥
ե٥åȤϡޥ󡦥ե٥åȤˤ襮ꥷե٥åȤˤ衤ʸñɽ魯ΤߤǤꡤŪʰ̣ȼ櫓ǤϤʤΤ˥ޥ󡦥ե٥åȤγʸˤϡ֥ס֥ӡפʤɤ̾ĤƤ뤬ޤ̵̣Ǥʡ#1831. ե٥åȤλҲʸ̾Ρ ([2014-05-02-1]) 򻲾ȡˡޤꥷե٥åȤǤϳʸ alpha, beta ʤɤ̣ͭȤܤ̾ĤƤ뤬̾ɽ路Ƥñϡޤǥ٥̣ͭäΤǤꡤꥷͤˤȤäƶŪˤ̵̣äʡ#1832. ꥷե٥åȤʸ̾ (1) ([2014-05-03-1])#1833. ꥷե٥åȤʸ̾ (2) ([2014-05-04-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
Ȥ롼ʸˤĤƤϡʸˡ줿륲ޥˤƶỤ̄ͭ̾դƤĤޤꡤƱͤˡʸľܤ˸Ọ̇̄۵ΤǤ롥椨֤Ƥޥ󡦥ե٥åȤ٤ơŪϤô䤹äȤϤäΤǤϤʤCrystal (180) ꡤƥ롼ʸбΰ򼨤Wikipedia Runes ΰɽ⻲ȡˡ

RuneAnglo-SaxonNameMeaning (where known)
ffeohcattle, wealth
uūrbison (aurochs)
þþornthorn
oōsgod/mouth
rrādjourney/riding
ccentorch
g [j]giefugift
wwynjoy
hhæglhail
nniednecessity/trouble
iisice
jgearyear
ȝēohyew
ppeor?
xeolh?sedge
ssigelsun
ttiw/tirTiw (a god)
bbeorcbirch
eeohhorse
mmanman
llaguwater/sea
ngingIng (a hero)
oeeþelland/estate
ddægday
aacoak
ææscash
yyrbow
eaear?earth
g [ɣ]garspear
kcalc?sandal/chalice/chalk
k~(name unknown) 


Crystal, David. The English Language. 2nd ed. London: Penguin, 2002.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-04 Tue

#2990. Black Death [etymology][loan_translation][history][black_death][epidemic]

14ȾФ˥󥰥ɡʤΤߤʤ餺衼åˤ򽱤ä Black Death ʹ; black_deathˤαѸ˾ΰյˤĤƤϡ#119. ѸˤΤϥޥͥߤ!? ([2009-08-24-1])#138. ¤ȱѸδطˤĤƺƹ͡ ([2009-09-12-1])#139. ¤ȱѸδطˤĤƺơ͡ ([2009-09-13-1]) Ƥ
˾尭̾⤤¤ˤĤ줿 Black Death Ȥ̾ϡ¤ϸ¤Ǥ롥رѸ츻ŵ٤ˤȡѸǤν1758ǯȰճ٤ɥĸder schwarze Tod Τʤ (loan_translation) Ȥ롥16ꥹǥ swarta dödhen ǥޡ den sorte död ǤѤƤꡤ줬ɥĸǤʤ줿ΤŪʱ¤ΰ̣ǥ衼åѽ˼Ѥ줿Τ餷14ȾФΥꥹ˾α¤ؤѸȤƤ Black Death ϡ1823ǯ "Mrs Markham" (Mrs Penrose) Ƴ1833ǯˤϰؽǾҤΤ褦˥ɥĸ򻲾ȤƻȤФȤ졤ˤ the pestilence, the plague, great pestilence, great death ʤɤȸƤФƤ
ʤֹפʤΤȤˤĤƤϡµˤΤʤ뤳Ȥͳ褹ȸ뤬ܺ٤ɬ餫ǤϤʤͤޤǤˡGooden (68) ˤϼΤ褦˲⤵Ƥ롥

The term 'Black Death' came into use after the Middle Ages. It was so called either because of the black lumps or because in the Latin phrase atra mors, which means 'terrible death', atra can also carry the sense of 'black'.


Gooden, Philip. The Story of English: How the English Language Conquered the World. London: Quercus, 2009.

Referrer (Inside): [2020-03-16-1] [2017-09-06-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-03 Mon

#2989. Ѹ줬ǤϤʤΤϲ⸽ߤƱ [variety][world_englishes][model_of_englishes][purism][standardisation][hel_education]

Ѹ˺ѤῴϤȱϤcf. #2073. θѼ˺ѤῴϤȱϡ ([2014-12-30-1])ˤݤˤϡѸˤμΩġѸˤˤơѸϾʣ Englishes äΤǤꡤñ English ȯۤޤ줿Τϡʹߤɸಽ (standardisation) ȤҲŪʥץƤΤȤǤ롥ơζʹߤǤ顤ºݤˤϽѼ¸ߤ³षѸ줬˳ȻˤĤѼ郎äƤΰ̣ˤơEnglish ȤϤεǤꡤѸμ֤ϲ⸽ߤ Englishes äΤǤ롥
Ǥϡ21αѸ졤̤αѸˤĤƤϤɤῴϤȱϤȤƯƤȤܤ21ˤơ䤿 English ٤ʤΤEnglishes ٤ʤΤˤäơGooden (230--31) ʸϤ

   After undergoing many changes at the hands of the Angles and Saxons, the Norman French, and a host of other important but lesser influences, English itself has now spread to become the world's first super-language. While this is a process that may be gratifying to native speakers in Britain, North America, Australia and elsewhere, it is also one that raises certain anxieties. The language is no longer 'ours' but everybody's. The centre of gravity has shifted. Until well into the 19th century it was firmly in Britain. Then, as foreseen by the second US president John Adams ('English is destined to be in the next and succeeding centuries [ . . . ] the language of the world'), the centre shifted to America. Now there is no centre, or at least not one that is readily acknowledged as such.
   English is emerging in pidgin forms such as Singlish which may be scarcely recognizable to non-users. Even the abbreviated, technical and idiosyncratic forms of the language employed in, say, air-traffic control or texting may be perceived as a threat to some idea of linguistic purity.
   If these new forms of non-standard English are a threat, then they are merely the latest in a centuries-long line of threats to linguistic integrity. What were the feelings of the successive inhabitants of the British Isles as armies, marauders and settlers arrived in the thousand years that followed the first landing by Julius Caesar? History does not often record them, although we know that, say, the Anglo-Saxons were deeply troubled by the Viking incursions which began in the north towards the end of the eighth century. Among their responses would surely have been a fear of 'foreign' tongues, and a later resistance to having to learn the vocabulary and constructions of outsiders. Yet many new words and structures were absorbed, just as the outsiders, whether Viking or Norman French, assimilated much of the language already used by the occupants of the country they had overrun or settled.
   With hindsight we can see what those who lived through each upheaval could not see, that each fresh wave of arrivals has helped to develop the English language as it is today. Similarly, the language will develop in the future in ways that cannot be foreseen, let alone controlled. It will change both internally, as it were, among native speakers, and externally at the hands of the millions in Asia and elsewhere who are already adopting it for their own use.


ǤϸŪ (linguistic purity; purism) ˤĤƤ⿨Ƥ뤬äʱѸȤΤϡñɽ English ȤΤϡ¸ߤΤ¸ߤȤСŪ˲ؤΤ뤤ϡ¸ߤʤȤСֱѸפȤϽѼνΤˤĤ줿Ū̾ˤ̣ Englishes 뽸̾Τ
ϱѸθߤ̤ˤäơ¤˥ƥ󥰤Ǥ롥#2986. ˤѸѤΥޡ ([2017-06-30-1]) ȹ碌ơǥåѤˡ

Gooden, Philip. The Story of English: How the English Language Conquered the World. London: Quercus, 2009.

Referrer (Inside): [2022-06-23-1]

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-02 Sun

#2988. Wycliffe θ [wycliffe][bible][reformation][me_text][literature]

14Ⱦ Wycliffe ʰˤˤϡѹˤˤΤߤʤ餺ѸˤˤƤפʤǤȤǤ롥ƥ츶ŵ鴰ȤƽΤΤǤꡤϤ뤫ꤷֽספΤΤä
Wycliffe ϡˤα褦Ȥθ夬Wyclif's Treatise, De Officio Pastorali (Chapter 15) ˸롥ѸƥȤιɤŬƤսȻפΤǡCrystal (198) ˷ǺܤƤ빻ƥȤѤ褦

Also the worthy reume of Fraunse, notwithstondinge alle lettingis, hath translated the Bible and the Gospels, with othere trewe sentensis of doctours, out of Lateyn into Freynsch. Why shulden not Engliyschemen do so? As lordis of Englond han the Bible in Freynsch, so it were not aghenus resoun that they hadden the same sentense in Engliysch; for thus Goddis lawe wolde be betere knowun, and more trowid, for onehed of wit, and more acord be bitwixe reumes.
   And herfore freris han taught in Englond the Paternoster in Engliysch tunge, as men seyen in the pley of York, and in many othere cuntreys. Sithen the Paternoster is part of Matheus Gospel, as clerkis knowen, why may not al be turnyd to Engliysch trewely, as is this part? Specialy sithen alle Cristen men, lerid and lewid, that shulen be sauyd, moten algatis sue Crist, and knowe His lore and His lif. But the comyns of Engliyschmen knowen it best in ther modir tunge; and thus it were al oon to lette siche knowing of the Gospel and to lette Engliyschmen to sue Crist and come to heuene.


ҤΤǤ롥٤Υե󥹤ǤʤƤǤϤʤޤ󥰥ɽ̱ˤȤäƤ⡤ѸΤۤ򤷤䤹ǤϤʤβ桹ˤȤäƤϼ¤ͳŤ14Υ󥰥ɤǤϡιͤϰüüä
ˡλˤϡŪʰü⤵뤳Ȥʤ顤⾰ʥƥȤɮΤ˱ѸäƤȤȼΤޤΩȤϤʤäƤʤäƱΥ硼ʸؤѸǽ񤤤櫓켫ΰǤꡤ¸äȤͤ롥ˤ뤬ֱѸǽ񤯡פȤ԰٤ǤʤäȤϡΩĽѸǤ⤽ä³ѸǤꡥϢơ#2861. Cursor Mundi ԤѸǽ񤤤ͳ ([2017-02-25-1])#2612. 14˥ե󥹸ǤϤʤѸǽ񤳤Ȥ櫓 ([2016-06-21-1])#1407. Ѹ3Ĥ ([2013-03-04-1])#2580. Ѹιռʳ ([2016-05-20-1]) ⻲Ȥ줿

Crystal, David. The English Language. 2nd ed. London: Penguin, 2002.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2017-07-01 Sat

#2987. 衼åѤǤΤޤѤѸ [loan_word][borrowing][lexicology]

Ѹˤ̤͡ʸ줫¿ñѤƤλ¤ˤĤơǶǤϡ#2966. Ѹä (2) ([2017-06-10-1]) 礷ˤơѸϸäμڤ¦Ȥ⡤षߤФ¦ȤƤΤۤΩäƤ롥ǯܸˤ̵αñ줬ʸȤήƤ뤷νϤƤ⡤Ѹ줫鲿餫θŪƶäƤʤϤ̵ۤܳʥʸˤĤƤϡ#1999. Chuo Online ε֥ʸΩŪ˻ס ([2014-10-17-1]) 򻲾ȡˡ
ȼɸ줬Ū˳ΩƤ衼åѽǤ顤ѸθŪƶʲϡ衼åѤ¿θǤΤޤѤѸǤ (Crystal 272)

[ Sport ]

baseball, bobsleigh, clinch, comeback, deuce, football, goalie, jockey, offside, photo-finish, semi-final, volley, walkover

[ Tourism, transport etc. ]

antifreeze, camping, hijack, hitch-hike, jeep, joy-ride, motel, parking, picnic, runway, scooter, sightseeing, stewardess, stop (sign), tanker, taxi

[ Politics, commerce ]

big business, boom, briefing, dollar, good-will, marketing, new deal, senator, sterling, top secret

[ Culture, entertainment ]

cowboy, group, happy ending, heavy metal, hi-fi, jam session, jazz, juke-box, Miss World (etc.), musical, night-club, pimp, ping-pong, pop, rock, showbiz, soul, striptease, top twenty, Western, yeah-yeah-yeah

[ People and behaviour ]

AIDS, angry young man, baby-sitter, boy friend, boy scout, callgirl, cool, cover girl, crack (drugs), crazy, dancing, gangster, hash, hold-up, jogging, mob, OK, pin-up, reporter, sex-appeal, sexy, smart, snob, snow, teenager

[ Consumer society ]

air conditioner, all rights reserved, aspirin, bar, best-seller, bulldozer, camera, chewing gum, Coca Cola, cocktail, coke, drive-in, eye-liner, film, hamburger, hoover, jumper, ketchup, kingsize, Kleenex, layout, Levis, LP, make-up, sandwich, science fiction, Scrabble, self-service, smoking, snackbar, supermarket, tape, thriller, up-to-date, WC, weekend

θˤϡ衼åѤΤߤʤ餺ܸǤ⥫ʸȤѤƤΤ¿ΰ̣ǤϡŪʸ (cosmopolitan vocabulary) ܶᤷƤȸ뤫⤷ʤ

Crystal, David. The English Language. 2nd ed. London: Penguin, 2002.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

ǽ: 2026-06-26 03:46

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow