01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
1ۤ˻ϤְʼδѸظإͥ⡤2ΥڡĤġ10ޤ뤳ȤǤޤİԤγ꤬Ȥޤ
κ10ϡޤǤ٤ƤʤɤȤйɤǤ֥פˤĤƤǤػ (history_of_linguistics) ϡդ˴ؿΤ뤹٤ƤοͤˤȤäƼ¤Ϥʤꤪ⤷ʬʤΤǤʬ䤹ΤϴñǤϤޤ
Ͽ̤ơؤΤΰʾ˸ػˤ˿ؿȸߤΤä2ͤ20ȾγسĬήŤ¤ (structural linguistics) ˤĤäƤߤޤ¤˸ؤŨ˲Τ⤷ڰʼδѸظإͥ # 10 İ
¤ؤȤϲˤϤȤƤüŪǤ뼫ʤΤǡåθػˤγ (81--82) ꤿȻפޤ
¤ؤλϡ衼åѤȥꥫǶ1930ǯξ˻Ϥޤä
¾γʬˤƤ⤽Ǥ뤬ؤˤ빽¤Ϥޤ˴Τλ¤Ф뿷̣Ƥ롥¨Τλ¤ηϤǵǽƤܤƸƤä븫Ǥ롥Ʊˤι¤ŪʸϡμҲŪʡʤĤޤꥳߥ˥Ρ˵ǽζĴŪݤȰˤηϤνħȤΤʶ̤ȼΤǤ롥
λԤϤˡԤ19ˡ˸ƤθΩߤϤλο͡դҤȤϤʤä˿͡μФʤĤƤǽȯΤϥեǥʥɥ塼 Ferdinand de Saussure Ǥäɥ塼뤬Ƹؤˤ뿷ۤˤäƤλο͡˶ƶͿȤȡľܤαƶˤʤä͡λۤκˤΤƱŪפȯȤˤäơɥ塼ϺǤϹ¤ؤϻϼԤȸʤƤ롥
¤ؤΥϤȤ⤤ɥ塼δŪϡʲΤ褦ʤΤǤ롥
ηϤǤꡤηϤȤƸ椹٤Ǥ롧ġλ¤ñȤ˼夲ΤǤϤʤΤȤƸ٤Ǥ롥ĺ٤ΰİηϤǤΰ֤ˤäƵꤵȤȤθ٤Ǥ롥
ϤޤṲ̄ҲŪݤǤꡤΤ褦ʤΤȤƸ椹٤Ǥ롧Ọ̇̄Ȥߴطϡߥ˥ˤƷŪʽĤΤǡˤǰƬ֤٤Ǥ롥
ȯŸȸμ¸ƤΰΡϾ֤ȤϡŪ˰̤ۤθݤǤ롥äơˡ鸫ơθߤξ֤᤹ŪʵळȤϵʤ
¾γʬƱͤˡؤˤƤ¤ѤΤ invariants õ桤; redundant ݤȴͿŪ relevant ݤʬΥ褦ȤϡޤǤ롥
¤ؤοԤϤ٤ơҴŪʬϴʥꥹƥåʵ;Ϥʤ褦ʤΡˤФȴᤷƤ롥
åϤ˱䡹³ΤǤդǻߤƤޤ礦
YouTube ưǤҤ٤̤ꡤˤȤäƹ¤ؤȤϡ֥ޥȥå͡פǤī Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio) Ǥֹ¤ؤȤϥޥȥåͤǤפꤷƤ٤äƤޤΤǡФɤ
ߥ륫å Ρ ͺ ظؤή١ߤ˼1974ǯ
326ꥫΥХǥΤΥסΤ butcher ɽƤǤ롥OALD8 ˤ butcher ˤ3Ĥθ롥
1 a person whose job is cutting up and selling meat in a shop/store or killing animals for this purpose
2 butcher's (plural butchers) a shop/store that sells meat
3 a person who kills people in a cruel and violent way
ХǥѤ3ΤΡСֵԻԡפǤcf. ǯΰ쥹顼֥ɡ顦֥å㡼ˡ
butcher ϸΰ̣Ѳ (semantic_change) ŵƤƤ롥#473. ̣ѲŵŪʥѥ ([2010-08-13-1]) #2102. Ѹˤˤ̣γȽ̾ ([2015-01-28-1]) Ǥ⼨̤ꡤϡͺ䥮פǤ롥顤ͺ䥮˸¤餺ȼԡʤפؤ褦˰̲Ȥˡоݤʹ֤ˤޤǵڤӡֵԻԡפȤʤä
촴ʬ buck ͺפƱǤ롥ĸ̤Ť촴ޥ̤ƸűѸǤϡͺפΰ̣Τۤˡͺ䥮פΰ̣ǤѤ줿θ촴ϥեˤꡤǤϤäѤͺ䥮פΰ̣Ѥ줿
ťեνǤϡưĤ bucher, bouchier ʤɤʸڤ졤ȤȤϸ¤ʡͺ䥮פΰ̣äȻפ뤬12ʹߤϰ̲˻ȼԡפΰ̣Ѥ褦ˤʤäΰ̣ʳ13bocher ηDZѸ˼ѤƤ
ѸǤϡ˰̣̲ơֿͤεԻԡפȤʤäν MED bocher n. θ3 "One who slaughters human beings" βˤ뼡ΤΤǤ롥
c1450(c1350) Alex.& D.(Bod 264) 750: But bochours ben þei [your gods] echon, ȝour body to dismembre.
butcher ˤĤƤϡ̣ѲȤϰۤʤ#754. ̤Ƚա ([2011-05-21-1]) #4033. 3Ż <tch> ʬۤˡ ([2020-05-12-1]) ǤƤ롥
(dialectology) ʹСνϰˤĤĴ줾ħƼʬʤΤȻפϻ¤ʤΤǤϤʤޤפˤϰ (regional dialect) ǤϤʤҲ (social dialect) ȤΤ⤢롥ޤ伫ȤΤ褦˸ؤδߤؤϡ˻֤ȤưŪʥѥθ뤳Ȥˤʤ롥ŪˤäƱѸˤؤݤ碌ȹͤʤСʤȤ֡֡ҲȤ3ĤΥѥͿΤ
ˤĤơ#4168. λʬʬϥեǤ ([2020-09-24-1]) ǰѤ Laing and Lass ͤɤߤʤäĹѤ٤äȸä"On Dialectology" (417) ȤƬ1嵭λ𤬤ޤɽƤ롥
There are no such things as dialects. Or rather, "a dialect" does not exist as a discrete entity. Attempts to delimit a dialect by topographical, political or administrative boundaries ignore the obvious fact that within any such boundaries there will be variation for some features, while other variants will cross the borders. Similar oversimplification arises from those purely linguistic definitions that adopt a single feature to characterize a large regional complex, e.g. [f] for <wh-> in present day Northeast Scotland or [e(:)] in "Old Kentish" for what elsewhere in Old English was represented as [y(:)]. Such definitions merely reify taxonomic conventions. A dialect atlas in fact displays a continuum of overlapping distributions in which the "isoglosses" delimiting dialectal features vary from map to map and "the areal transition between one dialect type and another is graded, not discrete" (Benskin 1994: 169--73).
To the non-dialectologist, the term "dialectology" usually suggests static displays of dots on regional maps, indicating the distribution of phonological, morphological, or lexical features. The dialectology considered here will, of course, include such items; but this is just a small part of our subject matter. Space is only one dimension of dialectology. Spatial distribution is normally a function of change over time projected on a geographical landscape. But change over time involves operations within speech communities; this introduces a third dimension --- human interactions and the intricacies of language use. Dialectology therefore operates on three planes: space, time, and social milieu.
˼ҲŪʴߤ뤳Ȥ˴ƤǤԤˤȤäƤϡؤϥääƤ롥̻ѲߤǤưŪؤȤȤǤ롥
Laing, M. and R. Lass. "Early Middle English Dialectology: Problems and Prospects." Handbook of the History of English. Ed. A. van Kemenade and Los B. L. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. 417--51.
Benskin, M. "Descriptions of Dialect and Areal Distributions." Speaking in Our tongues: Medieval Dialectology and Related Disciplines. Ed. M. Laing and K. Williamson. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1994. 169--87.
ʼȤ YouTube 9ƤޤI wish I were a bird. were Ϥ were Ȥ̤Ρ--СڰʼδѸظإͥ #9 ǤϢươ hellog heldio Ǥ⡤ƤޤΤǡ뤵⤷ޤʾСˡ
YouTube ʤθȾˤǤϡƱ were Ǥ2ĤϤäȰ㤦Ȥ夲ޤI wish I were a bird. If I were you . . . ȤΡֲˡפ were ȡ̤ we were young Τ褦ʾΡľˡפξ were Ȥΰ㤤ˤĤƤǤˤĤƤϡܥ֥ǤεåǼ夲ƤޤǥǤʲ2ǰäƤޤ
was were --- 2Ĥͣưheldio: 2021ǯ77
֤ʤˡǤ If I WERE a bird Τ褦 WERE ȤΤǤhellog-radio: 2020ǯ104
褽ϿԤƤȤпԤƤΤǤ YouTube Ƥ˹碌ơ Voicy ȤƤwas were δطˤĤƤޤ礦ꤷäޤ
ˡ were ˤĤƤΤ褦˱ѸŪƤȡषθʹ I wish I was a bird. was ⤷ʤäƤޤѸؽԤ99% was Τ֥ۤ쥮顼פǤϤʤȻפ⤷ޤѸ˸ԤȤƤϡĤ were ǤϤʤ was ˤʤäƤΤȤ˸ޤˡǯʾƿषƤΤǤοβ褤Ǥ were/was ˤڤǤȸ櫓Ǥǯ٥äȤƶʳޤ͡
桤ʹͤޤʲϷɤɤäΤǤϤʤΤǤ
餽ǻ罪λ vs ο
2٤뤳Ȥ3٤ vs 3ܤľ
ͤѤ vs ʤϤѤʤ
ؼԤ vs ư
ĤťλϤޤ vs
ФΤʤȤ˱Ϥʤ vs α
vs 븭 vs 뤤
ܤ褫褫
ԡɤ̿ vs Ȥ
ͤΰ٤ʬΤᤫ
ƨ뤬 vs ƨѤΩ
Ͼ vs ϾĤȤϸ¤ʤ
⤺äȼԤƱĹ餯ƤޤΤǡؤޤ
褯ƤޤäٶˤʤäƤޤޤΤȿФΰ̣θ¿Ǥͤ
ȤΤϡαΤΤϤγˤϿդζ¿ʤäȿѤʤʤʤäƤȡ
ĹǯˤĤ塹Ȥޤޤˡϱ濫äƱѸȤ褦ˤʤѸθ褦ˤʤäΤǤ¤ܸƱʤǤ͡
ܸΡֽ褱Ф٤Ƥ褷פȡֻϤ褱н褷ס㡤Ҥɤ̷ʤȻפäƤȤѸǥԥͭ̾ All is well that ends well. ФơA good beginning makes a good ending. ȤΤ⤢餷Ȥξ
ʤߤ֤餺פȡפ⡤ɡ餫äȤϥʤΤǤľΤǤȤȤʥ辰ǤξȤΤǤѸǤȡAn occasion lost cannot be redeemed. Tomorrow is another day. ȤڥǤ
ѸθǤȤ櫓ĤʤȻפΤOne is never too old to learn. You can't teach an old dog new tricks. ǤԤϿȤʤ
θ̷ˤĤ塹饤饤Ѥ꤫ƤȤƣˮˡؤȤ虜õ롡ƿͤηäȹͤ١ʳҡ2018ǯˤ˽вޤʲpp. 11-12 ꡥ
ơΤ褦˰̣ȿФΤȤ虜˽вȡڤ뤳Ȥιʿͤϡ֤ɤ餫ϥåꤻפȤä˻פΤޤ뤤ϡȤ虜ΤοͤפĤǸäȤ顤ʳŪ̷⤷Ƥ餢ޤ̣ʤȻפ⤷ޤϤȤ虜β뤫來ޤʤΤȤ٤Ǥ礦
ˡϰ츫̷⤷Ƥ褦˻פޤ뤲褦ȤΤȤͤƤϤʳǤϡ䤿ϡֻϤפȸäƳиˤʤФʤޤʳˤʤФΤȤˤϤޤֽ꤬פȸäƵʤФʤʤΤǤȤ虜ϡ줾ξΤ줾ʳˤηäǤ顤ä̷⤷Ƥ櫓ǤϤޤ줾ʳ˱ƽ֤äƤǤäơɤ¤ʤΤǤ
æ˹Ǥ䤬Ҷͤˤʤäִ֤ǤγиˤĤơѤǦǡ֥#3425. ѸеȤ虜 ([2018-09-12-1])Ӱʲ Voicy 饸ֱѸθ դζϤߤǤäƤޤɤȤ
319ڡ15:30--18:45ˡī㡼ɶˤɸΤäƤޤ2ǯȾۤ12ϤֱѸˤȸ츻ץ֤ƤޤΥȤȤֳԤǤϤޤ13Ǥ˥λȤʤޤʥΤˤĤƤϡ#4702. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פΥȡֱѸäˡפΤ ([2022-03-12-1]) ˡ13ֳԤ³̡饤Υϥ֥åɷǹԤʤޤ碌¿ˤäޤ꤬Ȥޤ
ȤȤϸʤ⡤ºݤˤϿ⾯ʤ餺äޤΤǡΩƤȤʤäƤȻפޤȤ櫓ѸܸθûˤӤʤɤϡǤϴñ˿뤳ȤϤäƤܤϼ夲ƤޤǤΤǡεڤܤ뤳ȤǤޤ
ιֺ¤Ѥ饤ɤ˸ޤʲϥ饤ɤγƥڡؤΥǤ
1. Ѹˤȸ츻13ֱѸä ? ȱѸˤȸ츻
2. ֱѸä ? ȱѸˤȸ츻
3. ܼ
4. 1. Ϥ ? Ѹûˤγ
5. 12ΡֱѸˤȸ츻ץ
6. 2. ѸäεϤȼ˭٤
7. 츻
8. 3. Ѹû
9. 4. ²
10. 5. Ѹûˤξܺ
11. 6. αѸäˤߤˤΰ仺
12. 7. Ѹο
13. 8. Ѹο̾
14. 9. ѸûˤͤóȽθ
15. ֥פ̼
16. ̼Ѥؤȿ
17. 졤ץ졤ʸоȸ
18. 10.
19. ʸ
Ĺˤ錄äƥˤäˤϴդޤ꤬Ȥޤ
ϿȤ4ˤ錄ֱѸˤѸ --- Ѹפ֤ͽǤϾ611ڡˤȤʤޤϤǤ˽ФƤޤΤǴؿΤϤȤȤꤤޤ
ϥݥŪʵǿ̣ʤƤߤޤǤ̣Ѳ (semantic_change) δʤΤǡǤ夲뼡Ǥ
2ۤMondȤ䥵ȤˤơѸˤ˴ϢΤ˲ȤȤԤʤäƤޤǶμȤơζ̣䤤Ƥޤ
ʤˤȤդˤ
äȤۤɶ
³Ƥ롥ʡ
Ȥ2Ĥΰ̣ޤԤΰ̣ǼѤƤݤǤѸ¾θˤ⼺ĤḤ̂ñϤΤǤ礦
ϡޤ˸źθŪʰ̣ѲΥѥ˴ؤǤո (intensifier) ϡȤ줹ȶդ긺äƤΤʤΤǡ˶դɽ魯ɽ˵ΤǤʶոΥϡȤΤǤŵ1ĤŪʴפǤݤޤˤ줷Ȥۥ顼ѸϡɤƤĴˤʤ䤹ΤǤ͡ϡʤ10äۤɹͤʬȻפޤδ10³顤äȻޤ͡
嵭μơʴDzޤ
ȤƤȶǤ⤷Ŧ꤬Ȥޤ֤פ2Ĥΰ̣ȤΤϡ줾ߤ餫Ǥ͡㤨С֤ܤĤפȤСֶפΰ̣Ȥ狼ޤ֤͡פȤС³줿פΰ̣Ȥ狼ޤ2Ĥΰ̣ä̤ʤСֶפϴμࡦ˴ؤ̣ǡ³줿פʪ١̤˴ؤ̣ȤȤˤʤޤŪˤԤԤƤΤǡ̤ؤΰ̣ѲȸäƤƤ褤Ȼפޤ
Ρּ̤ؤΰ̣ѲפȤΤϡʤŪʤ褦ǤȤ櫓ֶסˤס֤ҤɤפȤäŪʴγФɽ魯ƻ졦ϡФдμΤΤ⡤δ٤οӤܤ졤̤Ȥñʤ붯Ĵɽˤʤ겼ȤȤ褯ѥΤ褦Ǥ
ܸΡֶͥסˤס֤ҤɤפΤ褦㤫ʬ̤ꡤʸ̤Ūʼΰ̣Dz᤹ȡष̷⤹褦ɽ⤢ޤ͡Ǥ̤ΰ̣ˤʤ겼äƤȤȤȻפޤ
Ѹ줫㤬Ǥޤterrible/terribly θ촴 terror ֶݡפƱǤΡֶפΰ̣ǻȤ뤳ȤϾʤǤ (ex. a terrible weapon ֶ) ष٤η㤷ȤζĴȤ in a terrible hurry ˵ޤǡפΤ褦˻ȤȤΤۤ¿Ǥ̤ؤΰ̣Ѳ⤦1ĤǤ͡
ۤˤ amazingly, awfully, desperately, dreadfully, horribly, marvellously, sorelyʤɴ˵ϡĴˤʤ겼㤬¿褦Ǥ
äȤꡤθǤϡμŪʰ̣ϴˤʤäƤޤۤȤɤξ硤Ūʰ̣ǶĴȤѤ˻äΤȻפޤ
θǤ⡤¹ŪʸݤȤΤϡؤǤ꤬͡Ȥޤ
ϢơѸ˴ؤǤϤޤɮԤˤε
ԤϳؤӤδܤȻפޤ褯褯䤦ۤŪǤ⤦1֤ǿǯ٤ϤޤޤȤ櫓Τʤǡ䤦ˡפƤ
ո˴ؤƤϡʲε intensifier ⤴Ȥ
#992. ոȡָ³ˡ§ס ([2012-01-14-1])
#1220. Ѹˤ붯γ ([2012-08-29-1])
#1219. ոϤʤब˭٤ ([2012-08-28-1])
#2190. μޤäո ([2015-04-26-1])
#4236. intensifier ʬ ([2020-12-01-1])
ʼȤ YouTube 8ƤޤѸͤʼդ---Ǥ⡤ܿͤ鸫ȤʤʡڰʼδѸظإͥ #8 Ǥ³ΤȤʤޤ
պ֤ʤעջ֡٤Ȥޤעջ֤䤦 Will you . . . ? ˤĤƢWill you . . . ? ǫΤ褦˥äǤޤޤ˻̤ȤǤΤǡϤȴƵڤˤİ
ưǡȯù (speech_act) 濴ȤʤäƤޤȯù٤ȤϲʤΤǤ礦
Ūʸ (pragmatics) Ω줫餤СäʹΥߥ˥οȤδϢߤȯäפۤɤǤǤϤ褯ʬޤ͡
̤ˤϡȯù٤ˤ3ढȤƤޤ1ĤϡäˤȯäΤ (locutionary acṭǤΡȯù١) 2Ĥϡäΰտޡ뤤ä꤬ȯäˤäƹԤʤäƤ뤳 (illocutionary actȯ١) 3Ĥϡä꤬ȯä̤ʹ˵ڤܤ (perlocutionary actȯ١) Ǥ
ĤѸ켭ŵ "speech act (theory)" Ĵ٤ƤߤޤŪ狼䤹ûä2Ѥޤ礦
speech act theory A theory associated with the work of the British philosopher J. L. Austen, in his 1962 book How to do things with words, which distinguishes between three facets of a speech act: the locutionary act, which has to do with the simple act of a speaker saying something; the illocutionary act, which has to do with the intention behind a speaker's saying something; and the perlocutionary act, which has to do with the actual effect produced by a speaker saying something. The illocutionary force of a speech act is the effect which a speech act is intended to have by the speaker. (Trudgill 125)
speech act A term derived from the work of the philosopher J. L. Austin (1911--60), and now used widely in linguistics, to refer to a theory which analyses the role of utterances in relation to the behaviour of speaker and hearer in interpersonal communication. It is not an 'act of speech' (in the sense of parole), but a communicative activity (a locutionary act), defined with reference to the intentions of speakers while speaking (the illocutionary force of their utterances) and the effects they achieve on listeners (the perlocutionary effect of their utterances). Several categories of speech act have been proposed, viz. directives (speakers try to get their listeners to do something, e.g. begging, commanding, requesting), commissives (speakers commit themselves to a future course of action, e.g. promising, guaranteeing), expressives (speakers express their feelings, e.g. apologizing, welcoming, sympathizing), declarations (the speaker's utterance brings about a new external situation, e.g. christening, marrying, resigning) and representatives (speakers convey their belief about the truth of a proposition, e.g. asserting, hypothesizing). The verbs which are used to indicate the speech act intended by the speaker are sometimes known as performative verbs. The criteria which have to be satisfied in order for a speech act to be a successful are known as felicity conditions. (Crystal 446)
Ϣܥ֥ʲε⤴Ȥ
#2665. ȯù٤Ŭ ([2016-08-13-1])
#2674. Ūʸ3Ĥħ ([2016-08-22-1])
#2831. performative hypothesis ([2017-01-26-1])
#1646. ȯù٤ʸ ([2013-10-29-1])
Trudgill, Peter. A Glossary of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Crystal, David, ed. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. 295--96.
36 14:40--16:10 ˡZoom Ť춵饨2022ΥݥֱѸˤѸ춵פˤƤäƤޤطˤϥݥνޤǤؤäˤʤޤä줿ͤˤ⡤ؤŤʤո䤴ޤ꤬Ȥޤ
䤬äܤϡ֡첻ܡפαѸ춵ƸƤʶǯθưƧޤơˡפǤ伫Ȥ첻 (gvs) ˤĤƥꥸʥοߤ櫓ǤϤޤäʤޤdzػˤ֤äǤͽơפɤ
ΩĤ⤷ޤΤǡȯɽѤ饤ɻޤ100ǯʾˤ錄äƱѸ˸Ԥ̥λƤ첻ܡפιԤ˻פϤƤФȡʲϥ饤ɤγƥڡؤΥǤ
1. 첻ܡפαѸ춵ƸƤʶǯθưƧޤơ
2. ܼ
3. 1. Ϥ
4. GVS 첻շǼ
5. 2. GVS θ˳
6. 3. GVS 5W1H
7. Ūñ
8. 4. GVS Ρ㳰
9. 4Ĥ
10. /ɛː/ > /eː/ > /iː/ 2ʳξ夲
11. GVS Ѳη
12. ʹߤΥեѸˤ
13. GVS ̵첻û첻Ȥ̵
14. ڥˤߤ첻Ĺû
15. ڥˤߤ첻Ĺû㳰
16. 5. GVS β
17. GVS δŰ٤ˤäưۤʤ
18. ơ첻ѲʬŪˤϴϢäƤΤΡΩѲǤ
19. GVS ʹɽ
20. űѸѸޤǤĹˤ錄͡첻Ѳΰ
21. 6.
22. ʸ
23. Ѥʵ (1)nature mature 1ʸ㤤Ǥʤȯʤ˰ۤʤΤǤ
24. Ѥʵ (2)֤ʤ friend ϤֻǤȯʤΤǤ
ʤߤˡ Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 Ǥʻ⤷ʤ첻ܤˤĤƤ٤äФʤΤǾҲ𤷤ƤȻפޤ첻ܤΰϤ̥Ϥ̣äƤߤƤ
첻ܡԡˡ2022ǯ38
첻ܡʸԡˡ2022ǯ39
̾˴ؤ츦 toponymy ̾ءˤγƵǼ夲Ƥ̾Ͽ̾ȹ碌Ƹͭ̾ʤϸŪˤðۤʿcf. #4249. ͭ̾ʳءˤȤħ ([2020-12-14-1])#4538. ͭ̾ϰ̡ ([2021-09-29-1])ˡ
Ѹ̾Ϥȼθΰ뤬θΰյϻפΤۤͽ̤ۤѸˤˤ礭ʥѥȤͿ롥ѸˤΰˤȤɤޤ櫓ǤʤEkwall (xxix-xxxiv) ꡤ̾ΰյ6Ŧ褦
1. Place-names embody important material for the history of England. 㤨СɤΥǥʥϤ̾ϡǥʥϿ̱Ϥ˴ؤפʾͿƤ롥
2. Place names have something to tell us about Anglo-Saxon religion and belief before the conversion to Christianity. 㤨СWedenesbury Ȥ̾ Wōden ĤˤĤƤʤˤʪäƤ롥
3. Some place-names indicate familiarity with old heroic sagas in various parts of England. 㤨Сإ٥ա٤ˤʤ Grendels mere ȡ
4. Place-names give important information on antiquities. 㤨СStratford Ȥ̾ϥޥ֥ƥƻ stræt ɽ魯
5. Place-names give information on early institutions, social conditions, and the like. 㤨СKingston Ȥ̾ϡϤǤäȤ롥
6. Place-names are of great value for linguistic study.
(a) They frequently contain personal names, and are therefore a source of first-rate importance for our knowledge of the Anglo-Saxon personal nomenclature. 㤨СGodalming Ȥ̾ظˤ Godhelm Ȥ̾ꤵ롥
(b) Place-names contain many old words not otherwise recorded. They show that Old Englsih preserved several words found in other Germanic languages, but not found in Old English literature. 㤨СDoiley Ȥ̾ϡűѸǤϰŪʸڤƤʤ diger "thick" ¸ߤ롥
(c) Place-names often afford far earlier references for words than those found in literature. 㤨Сdimple Ȥ OED ˤ1400ǯ˽ФȤ뤬֤ϡפ̣̾ǤȤƤ1205ǯ˸롥
(d) the value of place-names for the history of English sounds. 㤨СStratford Stretford 첻ΰ㤤ˤꡤϤϤ̤롥
Ѹ̾ΩΰƤꡤʤʤߤˤȤ뤬ʾΤ褦˱ѸˤˤȤäƤפʬǤ뤳Ȥʬ
Ekwall, Bror Oscar Eilert. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names. 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1960. 1st ed. 1936.
ʼȤ YouTube 7ƤޤΤαѸˤϼպɽʤä--áդʤääƤȡڰʼδѸظإͥ #7 Ǥ
ɤűѸǤϡּպפȤȯù (speech_act) ʤä뤤Ϥ餷ΤäȤƤΩäҲǤϤʤäȤǤ#3208. ݥ饤ȥͥäűѸ ([2018-02-07-1]) Ǥߤ褦ˡαѸҲˤȤƤʸδҲˤϤʤäȤȤϡޤǤ𤵤ƤޤΤ⤦1ĤȤơպ (apology) ȤȤǤ
ŵϡѸ˸ʬŪ˸ʤƤ Kohnen κǿʸǤKohnen (169) ¾ԸˤСպȯù٤ϸűѸˤϤߤ줺ѸˤʤäƽȤƤޤպϡؤκιȤꥹȶŪʸ̮˵¯ƵҲءˤήؤȳȤꡤŪʼҲŪǽ˻äȤήǤѸޤǤˤϡպ mea culpa, I am ryght sory, me repenteth Τ褦ʸɽȷӤĤ褦ˤʤäƤޤ
YouTube ˤȤʤޤѸܤμպΤϡʤۤʤޤ͡ϡ嵭̤ѸˤպŪʸ̮üȯƤȤؤäƤ褦˻פޤۤȤǤ碌ʤ˰夵Ȥ̤ڤǤ櫓ǤäƤˤɤɤǥͯƤޤȯޤؤΤʤȼ´Ƥޤ
YouTube Ǥϻ֤Թ塤˥åȤƤʬ⤢ޤΤǡ䤦ĤǺī Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)Ʊͤ夲ޤ⤼Ҥİ
Kohnen, Thomas. "Speech Acts in the History of English: Gaps and Paths of Evolution." Chapter 9 of English Historical Linguistics: Historical English in Contact. Ed. Bettelou Los, Chris Cummins, Lisa Gotthard, Alpo Honkapohja, and Benjamin Molineaux. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2022. 165--79.
ѸֻȯЪΥ (spelling_pronunciation_gap) 夲Ϥȥ꤬ʤºݤ˥ʤܥ֥ǤƤäȵˤʤäƤ̤꤬롥ɸ <o> /u:/ Ȥʤ륱Ǥ롥ˤĤƤϲ٤Ƥ伫Ȥ⤪˴ؿΤȤȤƲˤǼˤäƤʤǡޤطȤϤᡤĴˤĤʤȻפ
Ǥȶ do, to, who, whose դȻפäƤޤۤɿȶǤ롥does, done ˤĤƤϡ#1297. does, done 첻 ([2012-11-14-1]) Ǽ夲Το do ˤĤƤϹͤƤʤäwho ˤĤƤϡ#3630. ʤ who ϤֻǤȯʤΤ ([2019-04-05-1]) Ǽ夲ɤѤڤʤ֤Ȥ two Ƥ褤ˤĤƤϡ#184. two /w/ ȯʤΤϤʤ ([2009-10-28-1])#1324. two /w/ Ϥ ([2012-12-11-1]) Ǽ夲
move, remove, removal; prove, approve, approval, improve ʤɤ <-ove> ֤Ǥ롥#1882. move prove ˤĤƸ줿첻Ȥαƶ ([2014-06-22-1]) Ǽ夲Ǥ <o> /u:/ δطˤĤơ伫Ȥ褯ʬäƤʤ
ơlose ȤԲĻĤ㤬롥OED ˤȡΤ褦˲⤬롥ߤαƶˤꡤֻ̾ȯбطäȤǤ롥
The regular modern English pronunciation representing Old English losian would be /ləʊz/; the standard English pronunciation /luːz/ seems to be due to association with LOOSE v., which in some contexts (e.g. to loose hold) closely approaches this verb in meaning. Many dialects have the phonetic form normally descending from the Old English verb. The Scottish form loss is probably evolved from the past tense and past participle lost.
¾ˤϡȾХ shoe, canoe; tomb, womb դϢȤƵƤ
ơͭ̾Ȥơꥹ̳ Sir Alec Frederick Douglas-Home Home the Stone of Scone Scone ˸ۤ Brome, Scrome ⤢ (Carney 353)
嵭ν <o> /u:/ θ뤬δطʤ˻äŪаޤϡ餯̤ʤФʤʤ礷ǤʤФ꤫ĤҤȤĤǤ롥
Carney, Edward. A Survey of English Spelling. Abingdon: Routledge, 1994.
ε#4708. ѸŪǥη --- Strang, Quirk et al, Kachru ([2022-03-18-1]) Ǹ褦 Quirk et al. Kachru ˤͭ̾3ĤƱߥǥȤȤơStrang ˤ3ʬǥ뤬äȤStrang Ϲ¤ؤ˴ŤѸˤ̾1ĤǤꡤⲿ٤ɤǤѸʬ˴ؤ뵭ҤβսϤۤɥޡƤʤä褦ǡˤȤäƤʤʤȯä
Quirk et al. Τ ENL, ESL, EFL ϡStrang ζʬǤ A, B, C-speakers б롥ޤϡʬѤ (Strang 17--18)
At the present time, for instance, English is spoken by perhaps 350 to 400m people who have it as their mother tongue. These people are scattered over the earth, in far-ranging communities of divergent status, history, cultural traditions and local affinities. I shall call them A-speakers, because they are the principal kind we think of in trying to choose a variety of English as a basis for description. The principal communities of A-speakers are those of the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. There are many millions more for whom English may not be quite the mother tongue, but who learnt it in early childhood, and who lived in communities in which English has a special status (whether or not as an official national language) as a, or the, language for advanced academic work and for participation in the affairs of men at the international, and possibly even the national level. These are the B-speakers, found extensively in Asia (especially India) and Africa (especially the former colonial territories). Then there are those throughout the world for whom English is a foreign language, its study required, often as the first foreign language, as part of their country's educational curriculum, though the language has no official, or even traditional, standing in that country. These are the C-speakers.
ޤǤ Quirk et al. ٤Ƥ⡤ۤȤƱҤȤäƤ褤Strang (18--19) ³ˤơA-speakers Τߤʤ餺 B-speakers ζƱΤ⡤ơΡɸѸפȯŸƤƤΤǤQuirk et al. Ϥ˿Ƥʤˡ
. . . we know that American English is different from British English and within the two, US English from Canadian, Boston from Brooklyn, Southern, Mid-Western or West Coast, or Edinburgh from Liverpool, Leeds or Newcastle. These examples introduce us to an important principle in the classification of varieties. In fact, in all the communities containing A- and B-speakers a special variety of English has developed, used for all public purposes, Standard English. By and large, with rather trivial exceptions, this kind of English is the same wherever English is used, except in one area of its organisation --- the accent, or mode of pronunciation. Different accents characterise the spoken standards of say, England, Scotland and the USA. In England special status is accorded to an accent characterised by its having no local roots, namely RP. Communities with only C-speakers are characterised by having no fully developed indigenous Standard so that they model themselves largely on the Standard (including accent) of one of the major English-speaking communities.
Strang ϡENL ESL 줾ɸѼȯŸȤˤƤޤȤᤢQuirk et al. Ϥδ롼ơQuirk et al. 롼δ Kachru ƤӼ夲Strang ήؤȲȤΤ褦
Strang, Barbara M. H. A History of English. London: Methuen, 1970.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman, 1972.
Kachru, B. B. "Standards, Codification and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle." English in the World. Ed. R. Quirk and H. G. Widdowson. Cambridge: CUP, 1985. 11--30.
Ѹ (world_englishes) Υǥ벽 (model_of_englishes) ˤϡͥȾĶ롥äȤ褯ȤƤϡQuirk et al. ˤ ENL (English as a Native Language), ESL (English as a Second Language), EFL (English as a Foreign Language) 3ʬǥȤäƤ褤ʡ#173. ENL, ESL, EFL üԿ ([2009-10-17-1]) ȡˡ
ơKachru ʲäȽŪ "Three Circles" ΥǥȤ褯ΤƤ롥Quirk et al. ΤΤȤäƱߤǤϤ뤬줾 Inner Circle, Outer Circle, Expanding Circle ȸƤѤΤǤ롥ƥ뤬ϤФƤɤΤ褦Ωˤ뤫Ȥ顤줾 norm-providing, norm-developing, norm-dependent Ȥߤʤ˿äʡ#217. ѸüԤƱߥǥ ([2009-11-30-1])#222. ѸüԤƱߥǥ (2) ([2009-12-05-1]) ȡˡ
κǽѸǥϡޤäʬ䤹˻äΰǡ#4472. ENL, ESL, EFL Ȥʬ ([2021-07-25-1]) Ǥߤ褦ˡФȽˤ⤵餵Ƥǯ Quirk et al. Kachru ΤޤŪʥǥ˰ꤺưŪʥǥ뤬ƤƤƤ롥ˤĤƤϡ#4497. ݥȥ˥ѸѼ˴ؤ Schneider Dynamic Model ([2021-08-19-1]) Ȥ줿
ơŪʥǥϡ˽Ҥ٤褦 Quirk et al. Ƥ Kachru ȽŪȿȤаޤΤ褦ˤʤäΤǧƤPercillier (6) ˤȡػˤȤƤ Quirk et al. ʳ Strang Ƥä褦Τʤä
One such earlier model is the ENL-ESL-EFL model. The abbreviations used in the name of this model refer to the categories English as a Native Language, English as a Second Language, and English as Foreign Language (sic) respectively. These labels were coined by Quirk et al. (1972: 3--4) and describe three types of English based on the function of the language in a given country or territory. The idea of this categorisation goes back to Strang (1970: 17--18), who uses the labels A-speakers, B-speakers, and C-speakers. In this context, Strang also argues that A- and B-speakers develop their own local norms, whereas C-speakers rely on the standard of one of the major English-speaking communities (1970: 18--19). In their relabelling of Strang's suggestion, Quirk et al. (1972) do not mention this latter point, which has led to a general interpretation of the ENL-ESL-EFL model as implying ENL norms.
A further model, the Three Circles model (Kachru 1985), also referred to as the Kachruvian Circles, draws a similar distinction into Inner, Outer, and Expanding Circles of English (henceforth, InnerC, OuterC, and ExpandingC), the difference being that the distribution of varieties of English around the world is described without implying that non-native forms are in any way deficient in comparison to native forms. Further, Kachru (1985: 16--17) describes the InnerC as norm-providing, the OuterC as norm-developing, and the ExpandingC as norm-dependent, the latter meaning that without norms of its own, the ExpandingC follows norms from the InnerC. In excluding the OuterC from the norm-dependent category, Kachru picks up on the point made by Strang (1970: 18--19) which was excluded by Quirk et al. (1972). This represents a break from the approach implicit in the ENL-ESL-EFL model, in which only the InnerC could be seen as a "norm maker", and the OuterC/ExpandingC as "norm breakers" (Kachru 1985: 17).
ȡػŪˤϰʲΤ褦ʴطäȤȤˤʤ롥Ϥʤʤ̣ĹǤ롥
+-----> Quirk et al. (1972) -----+
| |
| v
Strang (1970) -----+-------------------------------->-----> Kachru (1985)
18:00 YouTube 6ƤޤWould you...?ʤɤδŪʰλϱѸͭ--ȺǶαѸħڰʼδѸظإͥ #6 Ǥ꤬ѸΥݥ饤ȥͥѸˤؤȥʥߥåڤؤäƤޤΤǡŪʳФ⤤äΤǤϤʤȡ
ʼˡرѸλˡäʸˡʸå١˼Ҥӡ2021ǯǤϡѸλˡκˤϡΩס֤Ĥʤספ3줬ȼĥƤޤʡ#4526. ʼˡرѸλˡäʸˡʸå١ ([2021-09-17-1]) ȡˡ
1ĤθȤơѸǤϡ˲ꡦͶݤˡΥץ饤Хˤʤ٤Ƨ߹ޤʤ褦ˡưѤʸηǥݥ饤ȤɽȤޤưǤ夲줿 Would you . . . ? ŵǤ¾ˤ Will you . . . ?, Could you . . . ?, Can you . . . ? ʤɤޤWon't you . . . ? ʤɤС⤢ޤ줾ǫ٤ϰۤʤޤȥ͡ʸ̮ˤäƤϡषȤʤ⤢Τǡ¤ϤʤʤȤˤȤ⤢ޤطʤˤŪʹͤϡľ᤹̿ΤǤϤʤΰոǽϤ䤦ʸκۤȤäƤȤȤǤ˥Ρ뼫ͳѤͤƤ롤ΩºŤƤƤ롤Ȥ˱ѸήΥݥ饤ȥͥΤȤȤǤ
ѸŪˤߤȡΤ褦ʱѸŪʥݥ饤ȥͥɽɤŤ餢äΤˤ뤳ȤϡɬñǤϤޤʹߤΰճȿɽǤǽ⤢ΤǤ
Will you . . . ? оݤʤäƤߤޤ餷ʸϸűѸ줫äƤޤѸǤۥȤߤޤOED will, v.1 θ8bȴ褷ޤ礦
b. Expressing a request in the second person, in the interrogative or in a subordinate clause after a verb such as beg.
Such a request is usually courteous, but when given emphasis, it is impatient.
This construction implies a first person response: 'I beg that you will excuse this' implies 'I will excuse it'.
. . . .
lOE St. Margaret (Corpus Cambr.) (1994) 166 Wilt þu me get geheran and to minum gode þe gebiddan?
?a1300 Fox & Wolf l. 186 in G. H. McKnight Middle Eng. Humorous Tales (1913) 33 Þou hauest ben ofte min I-fere, Woltou nou mi srift I-here?
c1390 Pistel of Swete Susan (Vernon) l. 135 Wolt þou, ladi, for loue, on vre lay lerne?
1485 Malory's Morte Darthur (Caxton) i. vi. sig. aiiiiv Sir said Ector vnto Arthur woll ye be my good & gracious lord when ye are kyng.
. . . .
MED willen v.(1)θ18aΤȤˤ⡤Ĥ㤬Ƥޤ
Τ褦˸ƤȡꡦͶ Will you . . . ? ϸűѸѸΤ褦ʸŤ餢äȹͤ줽Ǥ㤬ƱΰꡦͶȯù٤ɽ路ƤɤϡĤҤȤʸ̮äƿŤ˳Τɬפޤΰջ֤䤦ʸǤϤʤüԤˤꡦͶȯù٤ɽ魯ʸǤ뤳Ȥʸ̮ǧꤹɬפΤǤơ䤫ꡦͶϸŪ˥ǡʤƤΤǡǤϤʤ¾Ǹ뤳Ȥϡȥ͡ʤɤǤʤʸ١θˤäƤϡʤʤʤȤʤΤǤ
Τ褦˿ŤʻʤСŪʰꡦͶ Will you . . . ? ϡμ盧Ѹʤ뤤Ϥ̤äƸűѸˤ˵줽ǤܳŪѤФΤϤäȸΤȤǤȤǽĤޤˤĤƤϡǤˡ#3632. ɽ魯 Will you . . . ? ν ([2019-04-07-1])#3637. ɽ魯 Will you . . . ? ν (2) ([2019-04-12-1]) ǤƤޤΤǡ⻲Ȥ
űѸޤޥ졤̥ޥ졤ƥƥʤɤˤˤѻƤ rhotacism ϡ첻֤ [s] [z] ʤɤ [r] Ѳ벻ѲǤ롥IJ (sonorisation) üȤߤ뤳ȤǤ뤷 "lenition" 1ȤߤʤȤǤcf. #4684. æ ([2022-02-22-1])ˡBybee (32) ΤȤ˸ڤƤ롥
Another form of sonorization is rhotacism, a change by which an [s] or [z] becomes an [r]. Such a change occurred in Latin as exemplified by the alternation corpus, corpora 'body, nom./acc.sg. and pl.', opus, opera 'work, nom./acc.sg. and pl.' and In Germanic where Old English infinitive cēosan 'to choose' has a past participle coren, and wæs alternates with wǣre/wǣren 'were'. This change involves voicing and loss of fricative closure; it takes place intervocalically.
ѸˤˤƤ⡤ޤѸθäͤǤ⡤űѸƥǤ rhotacism θ̤ǧƤȤϽפǤ롥Ѥˤ was/were ˤȤɤޤ餺us/our, lose/lorn, raise/rear, ƵŪˤ is/are δط⡤rhotacism λŶȤǤ롥
ƥѸ줫ϡѤˤߤ opus/opera, corpus/corpora ñʣΤۤcorpus/corporal, Venus/venereal, virus/viral Τ褦̾졦ƻδطˤ rhotacism θ̤ߤƤȤ롥
rhotacism ˿ˤϡεʤɤȡ
#36. rhotacism ([2009-06-03-1])
#393. Venus ˾θ ([2010-05-25-1])
#3192. ̡쥲ޥ췲δ֤ˤߤ벻֡μפʺ ([2018-01-22-1])
#3812. was were δط ([2019-10-04-1])
Bybee, Joan. Language Change. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.
οǯ٤⡤1ǯ³ƤNHK饸ֺ¡δñѸ in EnglishפǤϢܡֱѸΥܥʵפ³뤳ȤˤʤޤɼԤɤȴդƤޤ꤬ȤޤܥʵŪʴʤ٤狼䤹⤹ȤΤϢܤμݤǤ³ɤΤۤɡꤤޤ
ȯ䤵줿4ƥȤˡϢܤ13Ǻܤޤǯ٤˸Ƥΰȯܤϡ֤ʤ one, two ϤֻǤȯʤΡפȤֻȯЪΥ˴ؤǤǤ˸졤ɤߴƤñǤΤԻĤʤɴʤȻפޤ̤Ǥ one ǡ֥סtwo ǡ֥ȥפʤɤȤϤҤä֤äƤɤʤϤǤʤľˡ֥͡פ֥ȥפʤɤȤʤʤΤǤ礦ˤϡäȶäŪͳäΤǤ

one, two ˸¤餺Ѹˤȯֻ߹äƤʤñ줬ޤȤޤ¤ΤȤŪñǤФۤɥϥʥ¿ΤǡؼԤˤȤäƤä˥ĤΤǤ§ΤǤϤʤʤԵ§櫓Ǥ顥
ϢܵǤϤǤ¤ǫޤƱˤĤܥ֥䲻ǥǤ夲ȤޤΤǡ碌ƻȤƤФȻפޤϢåɤǥˤĤƤϡʲľܤİ
18:00˰ʼȤ YouTube 5Ƥޤ饹 vs. ǥХ顦ΥϤɤΤ褦ˤǤ롩ڰʼδѸظإͥ #5 ꤹ롤8ʬ٤δˤ٤Ǥæ˭٤Ǥ
ϡưǤȤʤäƤ륹åȥɱѸˤĤƻŪθäȻפޤϥåȥɤΥ饹ؤαؤƤȤޤʤǤϤʤǤˤʹʤåȥɱѸ (Scottish English or Scots) ˸ǤޤꥹǤ⡤Ȥ櫓饹¤αѸ (Glaswegian) ϥȤĤȤΤϹΤƤɾǡºݤʤʤʪǤ
֡פ֡¤פȰǤäƤ⡤Τʤǡ־פֲפޤǤꥨΤǤ㤨СƱåȥɱѸȤäƤ⡤ʼ˥åȥɤμԥǥХΡμͤѤɸॹåȥɱѸפϡ䤿Ūɸ।ꥹѸȤƤȯȤϰ褷ƤΤΡǤʹ䤹ݤޤǥХȯϡɡʤƥꥹΡˤμԤǤɥȤŪϢȤռ졤ְҿȯפȤߤʤƤޤդˤСƥƤΥåȥ¤äпȼԤ餹ȡäȯʹ褦Ǥ
ǥХ餫ХǤŴƻǤ1֤ۤɤΥƤʤ饹¤ϡʤꥳƥƤȤƤޤ饹¤üԤϡǥХȯȤƵΥ뤳ȤǡʬʥɤջӤʤ˿ΥåȥɿͤʤΤȤǥƥƥɽФƤȤޤϢơåȥɿͤǤ⥨ȻָϥǥХؤؿʳؤϸָϥ饹ؤؿʳؤȤʹȤޤ
оݤ֥饹¤פȶʤäƤ⡤ϤꤽΤʤǾ岼ޤϼؤδĶˤΤǡ٥ƥ٤ޤ줿饹¤İ¿äȻפޤʬʤǿС"foreigner talk" Τ褦¿ƼϤƤ٤äƤȤȤ⤢ޤںߤƤեåȤǡʥꥹʪǤ˥줿ꡤ뤬줿ꤹȡͤƤ櫓Ǥʸ̤ꥳƥƤΥ饹¤ˤϡޤä夲ǤͤƱΤäƤΤΩʹƤȡꥹΤʤäʤС⤽ѸȤǧǤʤäȻפޤեåȥᥤȤϸʣˡ饹¤ʹꥹäƤȻפǤΤǤϤޤäǤǤޤǤ
Υ饹¤˥ץå⤤ޤϸָǤФۤɤǤʤΤǤ礦ʽСפͤƤˤȤäƤϡɾ㤤饹¤꤬ˤʤΤǤϤʤȤ¤褦ǤϢơ#2029. ܤ̤ץåˡ ([2014-11-16-1])#2030. ꥹ̤ץåˡ ([2014-11-17-1]) ⤴Ȥ
̤ץåȤΤϤäƤϤʤʤȤϻפޤ¤ˤ¿θ춦ƱΤˤʺȤ¸ߤޤϼҲؤΰǤ伫ȤѸˤδϢ˥ץƤޤ
1ǯ9ۤɤδ֡ܥ֥μݤǤֱѸˤ˴ؤĹ³פǥ˺ܤߤ³Ƥޤ
ޤ2020ǯ6232021ǯ27ޤǤϡǤϤޤhellog 饸 (hellog-radio)פꤷơ110ʬ٤βƥĤ62ܡܥȤΤʤȼ˥åץɤƤޤʤߤ˽ϡ#4075. ʤʸȾʸΤǤ --- hellog 饸ǡ ([2020-06-23-1]) ȤǤʤ¾hellog-radio ε⻲ȡˡ
θ塤2021ǯ62ꡤƥۿѤΥץåȥեȤ Voicy ˳ưξܤֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)ꤹͥˤƥƥۿ³Ƥޤʸ塤˻ޤ10ʬ٤αѸˤۿƤޤʷ286ܡˡ
ӤƱѸ˴ؤѤʵ濴ȤƤˤäƤޤ嵭Τ褦椫ץåȥեѹȤ⤢ꡤƥĤκ߽褬2ʬƤޤäƤޤǤϳѤ両ؤʤΤǡΤξץåȥեफΥƥĤǤڡޤ֥ǾΥ˥塼ˤ⤢ޤֲƥİ (heldio & hellog-radio)åƤߤƤǿΤΤ˥ƥĤƤޤ
ΰڡϺʤ٤ˤ˹ƤȻפäƤޤʤɤϾѲƤꡤȤ櫓ˤ⤤ޤΤǡǿƥĤˤĤƤֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)Ǥǧ
ơǯ12ˡ#4633. 2021ǯˤ褯İ줿ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸פ ([2022-01-02-1]) ǺΥƤߤޤ줫3ۤɷФäƤޤäƿޤΤǡ褯İƤ50ƥĤȻפޤ֤ΤȤˤǤⵤڤˤİ
ʤߤ˥ȥåפϺǯ917ƱνΰʼȤ̤Ǥ¤ϤμϿΤȤˡƥĤ̤褤Ǥ YouTube ưˤɤǤ礦͡ʤɤȤȤ꤬ꡤ226 YouTube ְʼδѸظإͥߤƤޤäȤǤ
2ǯȾۤˡī㡼ɶˤơֱѸˤȸ츻פꤹ륷ֺ¤Ϥޤ12ιֺ¤ϡޤޤƺǯ1023ڡˤäƽλޤ
ơΤӾ嵭ΥǤȤʤñȯֺ¡ֱѸäˡפ֤뤳Ȥˤʤޤ轵319ڡ15:30--18:45˳ͽǤɶǤ̤Τۤ饤Ȥ߹碌dz֤ޤΤǡ֤¤줺˻äޤؿΤꤴͽǤȤϤΩ1Ĥιֺ¤Ǥݤϰʲ̤Ȥʤޤ
ѸθäεϤؤޤ츻δߤƤब¤˭٤ǤѸθäϡˤ˭Ǥ뤳ȤϡѸ줬ɤäƤˡȤ櫓¿θȸήƤˤ̩ܤ˴طƤޤֺܹ¤ǤϡܸθûˤȤоȤʤ顤Ѹθûˤޤ2019ǯ2021ǯˤ12ˤ錄äƳ֤ƤֱѸˤȸ츻פȤƤɤ
ʤ12ΥγƲˤĤƤܥ֥Ǥ夲ƤޤʲȤ
#3731. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ1֥ɥ衼åĸθζפޤ ([2019-07-15-1])
#3757. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ2֥Ȥפޤ ([2019-08-10-1])
#3792. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ3֥ο̱ϡפޤ ([2019-09-14-1])
#3832. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ4֥ޥ̱²ưפޤ ([2019-10-24-1])
#3845. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ5֥ꥹȶפޤ ([2019-11-06-1])
#3988. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ6֥οפޤ ([2020-03-28-1])
#4180. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ7֥ΥޥȥΥޥīפޤ ([2020-10-06-1])
#4266. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ8֥ϲȥޥʥ륿פޤ ([2020-12-31-1])
#4347. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ9ɴǯȹ¡פޤ ([2021-03-22-1])
#4423. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ10ҳȳǰѡפޤ ([2021-06-06-1])
#4485. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ11֥ͥȽספޤ ([2021-08-07-1])
#4568. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ12ֻ̱̿ȿפޤ --- ˤƥλ ([2021-10-29-1])
ɤꤤޤ
Ѹ <ae> ȤڥϵǤ롥2ʸȤ߹碌1ʸȤ (ligature) Ǥ <æ> ˻äƤϡȯСˤޤޤɤ̾ϤܤˤʤΰǤ encyclopædia mediæval ʤɤΥڥ̤ˤߤ줿ߤǤϹǤϤʤ2ʸʬ encyclopaedia mediaeval ֤褦ˤʤꡤꥫǤϤ⤽ <ae> Ѥ <e> ǺѤޤ encyclopedia medieval ΥڥŪǤ롥
űѸ衤<æ> <ae> Υڥ֤ƤűѸǤ <æ> ϥե٥åȤʸǤꡤ̤Ѥ줿Ȥ12--13ˤϿषб첻ñ <a> ֤褦ˤʤäcf. #3998. ʤ apple a ̤Ρ֥פǤϤʤ֥פ˶ᤤȯʤΤǤ ([2020-04-07-1])ˡ
Ȥꥷƥ줫Ѹ줬̤ή16ˡθŵ˴ޤޤƤ ai ae ѸˤƤ <æ> ʸǼޤ뤳ȤˤʤꡤХХ̤嵭Τ褦˶ḽˤƹ <æ> 2ʸ <ae> ֤ʤ뤳Ȥˤʤꡤ <e> ˴ά뤳Ȥ¿ʤꡤߤ˻롥ߤǤ <ae> <æ> ܤʤڥ̤ƤƤ (Upward and Davidson 179--80)
<ae> ΥڥݻƤΤϡۤܤ٤ƥꥷ <ai> ޤѸ졤뤤Ϥ줬ƥͳ <ae> ѲΤͳ褹ȤäƤ褤ѸǤϸŤϸ§Ȥ <ae> /eː/ бطä첻 (gvs) ФơǤ <ae> /iː/ бطŪǤ롥Carney (283) ꡤĤñ
in Greek words --- aegis, aeon, aesthetic, anaemia, anaesthetist, archaeology, encyclopaedia, leukaemia, paean, etc.;
in classical names --- Aegean, Aeneas, Aesop, Athenaeum, Caesar, Judaea, Bacchae, Mycenae, Thermopylae;
the Latin feminine plural in scientific terms --- alumnae, aortae, lacunae,, lamellae, ulnae, etc.
Ȥ<ae> <r> ³˴ؤƤȼλ𤬤ꡤ <aer> /ɛə(r)/ ΩƤ롥aeration, aerial, aerobic, aerodrome, aeronaut, aerosol, anaerobic ʤɤǤ롥ۤܤ٤Ƥꥷͳ褷μѸ졦¤ȤϢ (combining_form) aero- ޤǤ (Carney 282) 츻Ūˤ̣Ūˤ air /ɛə(r)/ ȴϢ뤿ᡤ ߤȯӤĤ줿ȤưפǤ롥ʤߤˡԵפ̣ airplane ˤĤơꥹѸǤ aeroplane θֻ
ʤܵϡMond˴줿 aerobics ʤɤƬ aero- ֥פȯΤϤʤǤ礦Ȥ䤤ʲĤƼɮؤβɤ
Carney, Edward. A Survey of English Spelling. Abingdon: Routledge, 1994.
Upward, Christopher and George Davidson. The History of English Spelling. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
ʼȤ YouTube 4ƤޤpleaseλȤϥߥ˥μҲءڰʼδѸظإͥ #4 ꤹ뤪٤ǤҲ (sociolinguistics) ȤʬˤĤƳѤƤߤޤ
ҲؤϰȻ䤬ؿͭʬǤ⤽Ѹ˸ŪˡμҲŪʸŪطʤθΤŪǤȼҲδطͻҲؤȤܼŪ褤ΤǤ20ȾҲؤŪϤƤȡѸ˸⤽̤ߡʲǽƤޤȤ櫓μҲŪѰۤ¸ߤȤ "variationist" ʸѤϡҲؤ߽Ф줿ΤǡαѸ˸ǤŪ˺ѤƤޤ
Ҳؤμ夲¿ˤ錄ޤ#2545. Wardhaugh μҲسܼ ([2016-04-15-1]) ʤɤѤȡСϰϤιʬȻפޤɸಽϰҲ쥸եԥ졤쥪졤2ѡ¿ѡɥåǡѲԥᥦդβ⡤ץȥס֡նɽ٤ꡤƾΡݥ饤ȥͥȯù١Ĵθ캹̡츢ײʤɡɤϤȻߤޤޤѸˤǤ⡤γơǰƬˤƸ椹뤳ȤǽǤ
YouTube ǤϡߥȥޥμҲؤ˿ޤߥʼҲؤǤϡ㤨ŵŪ2ͤδ֤߹ (interaction) ܤ褦ʥץޤˤ᤹ܶ뤳Ȥ¿ǤޥʼҲؤǤϡ2ͤˤȤɤޤ餺춦ƱΤȤ礭ñ̤ǸȼҲδطȤ館褦Ȥޤ⡤ξԤ³ȤͤƤޤ
ҲؤΥߥȥޥˤĤƤϡʲε⻲ȤƤ
#1380. micro-sociolinguistics macro-sociolinguistics ([2013-02-05-1])
#1623. ͥ¿Ծ --- ޥȥߥμҲء ([2013-10-06-1])
#2005. üԺߤθѲؤηپ ([2014-10-23-1])
#3204. ˼Ҳؤ˸ιή ([2018-02-03-1])
Ҳؤ˴ؿäϡҡ#1480. ʱѸ˼Ҳسν ([2013-05-16-1]) ꤤ줫γ˼äƤߤƤ
Ѹ줬ƻܿƤȤδط̤ƱѸθûˤȤϡѸˤΥɤ1ĤǤ롥ܥ֥Ǥ#1526. Ѹܸθûоɽ ([2013-07-01-1])#2615. Ѹä ([2016-06-24-1])#2966. Ѹä (2) ([2017-06-10-1])#3381. ֺ¡ˤؤֱñθ츻ס ([2018-07-30-1])#4130. Ѹä¿Ͳȳˤв "The OED in two minutes" ([2020-08-17-1]) ʤɤǷ֤Ҳ𤷤Ƥ
Ȥ褽ϢưϤΤΩߤȤơѸ줬ƻܿƤȤδط̤ƱѸΥڥˤȤǤ롥ơλߤɬ⥹ɤǤϤʤѸˤΤʤǤΰϾäȤäƤ褤
ѸΥڥˤȸܿ ˤĤ Horobin (113) Τ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥
English spelling is a concoction of written forms drawn from a variety of languages through processes of inheritance and borrowing. At every period in its history, the English lexicon contains words inherited from earlier stages, as well as new words introduced from foreign languages. But this distinction should not be applied too straightforwardly, since inherited words have frequently been subjected to changes in their spelling over time. Similarly, while words drawn from foreign language may preserve their native spellings intact, they frequently undergo changes in order to accommodate to native English spelling patterns.
ûˤȥڥˤϡФϢư뤬§ȤΩˤǤ롤ȤªϤȤƤȻפHorobin ƱͤΤʤǡѸˤγƻ头Ȥ˥ڥ˱ƶڤܤ졦ˤĤƼΤ褦ʸޤƤ롥ͤΥȥȴФǤޤȤƤߤ褦
˲ȤӾӰˤإ衼åѻ硡ؤư١ʴȥ˥ˤɤǤ롥Ȥߺդƽ˥ܤɤΤ¿ܽ衼åѤܼʬ䤹äƤ롥
ԤϡʸȤƤΥ衼åѡפȤªƤꡤ1012ȾˤΩΥ衼åѤιǤϡ֥ꥷ㡦ޤΡס֥ꥹȶס֥ޥν¯ס֥Ȥ̴ۡפ4Ǥȼĥ (212--13)
ѸˤȤδؤǤϡȤ櫓֥ޥν¯פΩ֤˶̣襤Ƥ롥ʸȤƤΥ衼åѤΤʤDz̤Ƥ֥ޥפϲˤĤơӾ (40--42) Ѥ
ǡ¯䵻ݤˤĤơޥ֥ͤ衼åѡפΤˤĤƤͤƤߤޤ礦衼åѤο͡Ⱦꥹȶ˲褦ˤʤΤϡ۶ȤϤλʪǤǽ̱ΤޤǤοĤΤ俴Ѥ櫓ǤϤޤ۶Ū¯Ĥȡǧ붵ɤȤĹĹ褤ĤФ礤θ⤺ä³ΤǤ
ޥͤϡҤ¿Ƥޤϡꥹȶ˲Ƥ⡤ĤϵοäƤꡤɽ̤ΥåääΤǤͿɤʪɤϡ۶Сġ鼫ʪ˽ɤؤεͤޥꥢ¾ͤؤοɤ֤ΤǤˤڤСʤɤ˲ϤˡƤ줿ΤǤޤꥹȶʤɤ⡤۶κλ֤ΤǤȤХꥹˤꥹޥϡ¤ϥޤΡԤۡפκ֤Ǥ
ꥹȶޥͤν¯Ǥʤˤ뤷ΤϡʡʥꥹȤζˤڤ¿٤ǤϸˡᵬפȤκʤˤޤȤƵꤵ뤳Ȥˤʤޤʪؤδ꤫ꤤ䡤ǽ»ʤ褦ʹ٤ȳޤ
ϡä뤳ȤΤʤޥޤΤ褦˶ƬޤϲˤޤꡤȤˤɤ褦ʷʮФޤάְ͡üפפϤŵǤ¿̱¯Ȥơդޤ̱á¿Ȥʤä¼Ҳ˻ĤäƤޤ
ۤˡľܥꥹȶڤΤǤϤʤޥͳǤ⤢ޤ²²²Τߤ佬¯ϡȤ˵²ҲμҲΥ١ˤʤäƤäǽפǤޥͤʶˡȤƤ٤䡤åڤδ֤Ǥ襤եǡʸҡ²ε̳콲ˤϡȾаʹߤˤĤޤطʤˤ른åڤ̾ǰε²ΤޤĹΨ˰̼ͳ˻Ҥꡤޤޤ£Ϳݸ뤫ˡ緯Τ臘ȤֽפϡŪ罾طȤƻȤޤ
褦ˡ֥ꥷ㡦ޤΡפȤʤǡ֥ޥν¯פ⡤θ塤ˤ衼åѤηȤʤäƤä櫓Ǥ
ʤϤȤ뵻Ѥ̺⡦ϡΤĤʤɤμŪμϤ⤿餷ޤƤʾˡָפפʴͿǤޤζ̸ƥ˥ޥ줬äơ衼åѤγƹ줬ǤäƤΤǤ顥
ѤκǸʬ˸꤬ФƤ롥Ѹ֥衼åѤγƹפ1ĤǤꡤޤѸʹߡޥŪǤȥƥŪǤκ㤷äƤȤˤʤäΤǤ롥
Ӿ Ӱ졡إ衼åѻ硡ؤư١ȽŹҴȥ˥ӡ2021ǯ
ʼȤ YouTube 3ƤޤϰԤǤˤƼ㤭ǯϸ˴ؿäΤɬĶȥȡϸؤΥͥˤʤΤֱѸؤؤʰԡˡ
Τ٤Υɤϡְ̣פȻפäƤޤ䥳ߥ˥ϡ̣礦ȤΤϤǤȤؤˤƤϰ̣θ줭ΤǤȯʸϼʹܤ˸ΤĴ٤褦ޤȤ̣ϤɤˤªɤʤΤǡ椷ȤƤˡʤˤʤäƤޤΤǤ
ؤˤҤȤȡϤ̣ΰϾ˼夫äȤʬޤˤȤäܼŪǤְ̣פεʤʤä顤ؤ⤪ޤΤϤǤǤΤǡĴǤϤ졤Ϥ̣ε³Ƥޤ#1686. Ụ̄άˡ ([2013-12-08-1]) ɤǤΤǤĴʤ⡤Ф̣¦μĥϡΤ¸ߤ³ޤ
βη̤ȤäƤ褤ΤǤ礦ƬȤäƤ褤ΤǤ礦Ĥ1970ǯ夯餤顤ǤϤʤ̣ܵȤȸƤޤǧΰ̣ (cognitive_linguistics) (pragmatics) Ȥäפΰ̣ (semantics) Ǥợ椬Ƥޤ
ְ̣פϱѸ semantics ȸޤʣ -s ˤĤƤޤϾפΤǤ19衤Ĵʤ͡ʡְ̣sפޤƤ櫓ǤṬ̌ξ˿̣ääѤƤȤǤȯŸȤϡṬ̌ȿ̣¤ӤˤʤäȯŸƤ褦˻פΤǤʸ̤ʣΡְ̣sפǤ
ự椬ؤˡʤ褯äƤ櫓Ǥμ̣ȤƤϡ͡ʡְ̣sפʻ¸Ƥ뤳Ȥˤ⤷ʤȻפäįƤޤ
Ѹ3ñθ -th -s ؤȿܤƤäѲϡѸˤǤ褯椵Ƥ롥ܥ֥Ǥ#2141. 3ñ -th -s Ѳγס ([2015-03-08-1])#1857. 3ñ -th -s Ѳθưϡ ([2014-05-28-1])#1856. ưľˡ߷ -eth 17Ⱦˤ -s ȯƤ ([2014-05-27-1])#1855. ꥫѸ˿ʤǤ3ñ -th -s ([2014-05-26-1]) ʤɤǼ夲Ƥ
ꥶ٥1 (1533--1603) λ -th -s ؤοܤΤޤäʤˤꡤȤξʻѤƤ뤬ΤʻȤʬδबä櫓ǤϤʤϡǤäդǤ -s ̤Ѥ졤ʸʽաˤǤ -th ޤȤʳˤϤäǤϡŪʥ쥸Ȥ⤤뻶ʸʽաˤǤϤɤäΤȤȡʣLass (163) ˰ѤƤ롤ꥶ٥1 Boethius The Consolation of Philosophy 1Ƥߤ褦 (Book 0, Prose IX)
He that seekith riches by shunning penury, nothing carith for powre, he chosith rather to be meane & base, and withdrawes him from many naturall delytes. . . But that waye, he hath not ynogh, who leues to haue, & greues in woe, whom neerenes ouerthrowes & obscurenes hydes. He that only desyres to be able, he throwes away riches, despisith pleasures, nought esteems honour nor glory that powre wantith.
Lass (163) ˤȡƱΥץĴȤ-th -s Ϥ褽 1:2 äȤǤ -s äƤ褦ޤܤΤޤäʤäȸäƤ褤
Lass, Roger. "Phonology and Morphology." The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 3. Cambridge: CUP, 1999. 56--186.
34θˤơ2021ǯ٤´ʥ饤ˤŤޤ1ǤԤǤ4ǯϤkhelf ˽°γ2ǯ3ǯ¾ʤȤʤޤ
ǯ٤13´Ф졤ΰϡ#4665. 2021ǯ٤Ф줿´ʸܡ ([2022-02-03-1]) ǵޤΤǤǷ֤ޤƱѸˡѸؤϰϤιǧ뤳ȤǤޤǯ٤⡤Ķƿ͵Υơޤ⤢СȿǤŪʥơޤ⤢ޤǤ⤳ǯ´ܤįʤĤҤȤĤ´פФƤߤȡޤʷ⸫Ƥ褦˻פޤ
㤨СǯˡȤŻһѤ븦椬ȤʤäƤޤ켫ΤͽۤǤ뤳ȤȻפޤȤ櫓2ǯ֤ϳʲҤ㤴;ʤ줿ˡη֤ä褦˻פޤƼΥѥ OED ʤɤμѤϤޤޤ¿ʤäƤޤͥåȾβưѤ븦桤־DZѸüԤʤɤ˥Ȥ»ܤ륱Ƥޤ
⤦1ĤηȤơ͡ʱѸѼȤ櫓Ѹ (world_englishes) ؤδؿ餫˹ޤäƤޤϱѸѼ˴ؤ븦ȤбƺΤ¿ޤ˥ʥѸ䥪ȥꥢѸ줬ƤȤäդ˼פ ENL ѼåȤȤ꤬¿äȻפޤäˤǯǡפǤʤ ENL ѼESL Ѽԥ졤쥪ޤ͡ʱѸѼؤδؿޤäƤޤǯ֤ѲȤϡ˶ޤäƤƤޤ
ǸˡκƲDZŦäΤǤҲŪʻθ椬ΩäƤƤΤǤϤʤȤȤǤϡĬήȤȤ⤢ޤĥߤʸħʥХˤȿǤƤ⤷ޤǤΤǡȤޤǯ٤Τ褦ʻ´¿äȤΤϻ¤Ȼפޤ
ơǺǯ٤θʥ߳ưϰޤǤ˿ǯ٤ˤƤ͡ʴ褬ưФƤޤ㤨Ф45ˤϡ1ǯƱͤˡֱѸƳפǤ夲ͽǤcf. #4417. ֱѸƳ2021פλޤ ([2021-05-31-1])ˡ4ꡤޤꤤޤ
ͤޤǤˡޤǤ´ʸܤˤĤƤεåˤޤȤޤϢ sotsuron 뤤 khelf СơҲˤ⻲ͤˤʤޤ1ǯΡ#4330. դΥ߹ɤˤ´Ťޤ ([2021-03-05-1]) ɤ
Ρ#4689. YouTube ǡְʼδѸظإͥפߤޤ ([2022-02-27-1])#4690. ͤȤΤʤäֱѸؤȤϲס ([2022-02-28-1]) ǤȤʤäѸءؤȤϲȤ䤤ˤĤơƹͤƤߤ
ε֤ΩŪʿȤСֱѸؤȤϱήθؤǤסˤȡֱѸȤоݤȤؤǤסʰˤ2βäϤɤ餬ȤȤ⡤2ĤθȤȤγǧʤΤȻפºݡ弫ȤѸسΤʤǡ2ĤαѸؤ뤳ȤˤĤƵƤ (1--2)
礭ʬơֱѸءפ2ĤʬؤƤ롥2ĤϽŤʤäƤʬ⤢뤬礭Υ̤ʬȸäƤ褤ʬ⤢롥
1ĤϡֱѸȤθפȤ̣Ǥ롥ĤޤꡤѸǸСthe study of English language ȤȤǡǶαѸͤȡthe study of English languages ʣˤƤ褤⤷ʤܽΥϤˡȤȤϥ̱²ŪʸŪطʤä̱²ȤƤαѸθȤ̣礤⤢롥άͱѸȤ줽ΤΤõ椹Ǥ롥ΩͤȤʤ顤ѸȤطʤǤˤܤ뤳ȤˤäȤǤ롥μ¡ʬαѸؤϡֱѸˡפȤ̤ĤȤˤʤꡤαѸʸҤȤĤ֤ʬϤ뤳ȤפʺȤȤʤ롥ʬαѸؤѸǤ philology ȸƤФ椨Ǥ롥
⤦1ĤΡֱѸءפΰ̣ȤϡֱƷϤθءפȤ̣Ǥ롥ֱƷϡפȤΤϡĤޤֱƤǵƤǤפȤ̣Ǥ롥ĤƤΡֹءסߤǤϡܸءפˤꡤʩءסȸءפƱͤˡ줾˵ꡤݤˤ㤤롥ήɤΤ褦ʤΤȹͤƤ⤽ְäƤϤʤ줾ήɤθؤϤ줾θоݤ˵Τǡ֡ǡȤѤءפȸäƤ褤ǤϤʤλˤ㤤롥ǤϡӤ뤳ȤϤʤޤϡֱƤƤˤءפƤȤ褤Ǥ1ܤαѸؤФơαѸؤϱѸǤ linguistics ɤǤ롥ΰ̣ˤƤϡѸؤϸؤȤۤƱȹͤƤ褤
ºݡֱѸءפȤʬ̣̾ȤϡȤʸ̮ۤʤС˱ưۤʤäƤ褦˻פ롥ξβ碌ƹֱѸءפȻؼ뤳ȤϡʾʤȤˤȤäƤϡˤ褯뤳ȤǤ⤢롥
ʼإХ륳ߥ˥ΤαѸس١ؽDz2015ǯ
227˳ߤְʼδѸظإͥ2ƤޤɸѸפꥹΡä顤ܿ͡ڤäΤˡѸؤؤԡǤ
ĤѸءѸˤ˴ؿääֱѸʣȤϲ䡩פǤäȤϤޤꡤƱ -s Ĥʤư3ñä˰ܤꡤ3ñǤ -s ΤĤʤꥹ뤾Ȥ˵ڤӤޤˡ٤ϥꥫˤޤӲФǸˤϹͱѸꡤȤ櫓 Ebonics ãޤ10ʬ֤αѸؤΤڤǤС
ȴϢܥ֥εʲ˾Ҳ𤷤Ƥޤ礷ɤߤɤ
#946. ̾ʣˤγס ([2011-11-29-1])
#2112. ʤ3ñ -s ĤΤ ([2015-02-07-1])
#2310. 3ñΥ ([2015-08-24-1])
#2566. 3ñ -s Ȥϲס ([2016-05-06-1])
#4255. ʤ̾ʣư3ñƱ s ʤΤǤ ([2020-12-20-1])
#591. ꥫѸ줬ͤǤͳ ([2010-12-09-1])
#3653. Ebonics ([2019-04-28-1])
#2672. ꥹѸȯˡꥫѸʸˡ˼ҲŪʲ֤ͤ ([2016-08-20-1])
(typology) ϡ̸ŪˤߤŪʬǤ롥оݤȤʬ¿ˤ錄뤬Ʊʬ路 Whaley (28) 3ĤŦƤ롥
The starting point for all typology is the presupposition that there are recurrent structural patterns across languages that are not random or accidental. These patterns can be described in statements called language universals.
Once one grants this simple assumption, myriad questions arise. . . . [T]ypologists explore both absolute properties of language and probabilistic properties. In addition, they are concerned with the connections between two or more properties.
A second key question about universals is "How are they determined?" . . . . For now, it is sufficient to say that this question has become central to typology in the past few decades, and its answer has profound implications, particularly for universals that are based on statistical probability.
The final basic question that concerns modern typology is "How are universals explained?" A protracted debate over issues of explanation has been occurring since the 1950s. The most acrimonious elements of the debate have concerned the relationship between diachrony and synchrony (i.e., to what degree does an explanation require reference to past stages of a language?) and the need to go outside the language system itself in forming satisfying explanations . . . .
˵Ƥ3Ĥδؿϡ줾ħ˴ؤ What, How, Why 䤤ȤȤ館Ƥ褤
˸ؤΩ줫ϡȤ櫓3Ĥ Why ꤬̻֤ؤäƤǽפǤ롥ȸѲδطˤĤơWhaley (25--26) ʹ
Another characteristic trait of modern typology that is represented well in Greenberg's work is a focus on the ways that language changes through time . . . . Greenberg's interest in diachrony was in many ways a throwback to the earlier days of typology in which historical-comparative linguistics predominated. The uniqueness of Greenberg's work, however, was in his use of language change as an explanation for language universals. The basic insight is the following: Because the form that a language takes at any given point in time results from alterations that have occurred to a previous stage of the language, one should expect to find some explanations for (or exceptions to) universals by examining the processes of language change. In other words, many currently existing properties of a language can be accounted for in terms of past properties of the language.
ȤŪˤ϶ŪʻȤäƤʬˡ̻ŪȤʤȡʤʤʵˤʤäƤ
Whaley, Lindsay J. Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1997.
2 (double_negative) ˤĤƤϡߤ YouTube ְʼδѸظإͥνȤʤäֱѸءפäƤʤˡ--ऺֱѸפֳءפ֤櫓ǤϤޤǤ⾯˼夲
ŪˤСI don't have any money. 뤤 I have no money. ΰ̣ǡI don't have no money. ȸäƤϤʤȤ§ͳϡƱ꼭2ġʰʾˤˤ⤫餺Τΰ̣ȤƤ1ȤΤŪ̷⤷Ƥ뤫ȤȤˤʤ롥
ܥ֥ double_negative ˴ؤ뵭ˤƤ⡤ޤƱ˻䤬 Voicy ΡֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸äְʼ YouTube ϡäǤҤ٤Ƥ褦ˡ2ŪˤϢʤ³Ƥ칽¤Ǥ롥
ѸǤ⡤ɸѸ⳰˽ФС2¿ϤǤ㤬äƤ롥㤨 Siemund (619) ѤƤ2Ĥۤɵ褦
Yes, and no people didn't trouble about gas stoves then. (Southeast of England)
We didn't have no use for it noways. (Appalachian English)
ޤŪˤѸѸǤϤ̤츽ݤäѸ줫ȤơSiemund (620) Ƥ1ĵ롥
I thinke ye weare never yet in no grownd of mine, and I never say no man naye.
θϤƤ⡤2Ϥʤ̤ΤȤΤ褦Siemund (620) 206θĴԸȤΤ170θǤλ㤬ǧ줿Ȥ𤷤Ƥ롥ɸѸΤ褦2꤬Τϡ鷺11ΤߤäȤŪˤϡɸѸ쥿פʤΤ
ǤϡʤɸѸϤۤɤޤǤ˴ʤ2ΤºݡϽפʱѸ˾Ǥꡤ͡˵Ƥаޤ롥2꤬褦ˤʤäŪطʤȤƤϡ#2999. ɸѸ줫꤬äͳ ([2017-07-13-1])#4275. 2ŪǺᤷǽεʸˡ Greenwood ([2021-01-09-1]) Ȥ줿
Siemund, Peter. "Regional Varieties of English: Non-Standard Grammatical Features." Chapter 28 of The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar. Ed. Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie and Gergana Popova. Oxford: OUP, 2020. 604--29.
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06
Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow