01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Ѹ줬ˤ̤¿θܿ (contact) ƤȤϡѸˤδŪμǤ롥ܿκפϡˤǾäƤޤäΤ⤢뤬ߤޤǻĤäƤΤ¿פΤʤܤ䤹ΤϼѸäʸˡȯʤɸðʳǤܿΥѥȤ뤳ȤǰƬ֤Ƥ
ѸθܿˤûΤϻζȤSchneider (334) ˤ븷8ʻ¤٤Ƥˤͤˤʤ롥
continental contacts with Latin, even before the settlement of the British Isles (i.e., roughly between the second and fourth centuries AD);
contact with Celts who were the resident population when the Germanic tribes crossed the channel (in the fifth century and thereafter);
the impact of Latin through Christianization (beginning in the late sixth and seventh centuries);
contact with Scandinavian raiders and later settlers (between the seventh and tenth centuries);
the strong exposure to French as the language of political power after 1066;
the massive exposure to written Latin during the Renaissance;
influences from other European languages beginning in the Early Modern English period; and
the impact of colonial contacts and borrowings.
褯ФƤ8ȻפȤƤϤ3ۤդä1ĤϡŪʱѸˤǤ礭夲ʤΤΡѸʹߤĹˤ錄äƷ³ȤܿǤ롥ˤĤƤϡ#4445. ʤѸˤˤϽ줫αƶᾮɾƤΤ ([2021-06-28-1]) 䤽δϢȤ줿
2ܤϡ嵭ǤϥͥθܿȤƥƥʽաˤΤߤƤ뤬ŵꥷʽաˤθƥۤΩʤΤϻ¤ͥʹߡꥷαѸؤΥѥȤ礭#516. ľܤΥꥷѤ15 ([2010-09-25-1]) ӡ#4449. ꥷαѸؤΥѥȡ ([2021-07-02-1]) ȡ
ǸܸüԤȤƤΤҤܤǤ뤳ȤǧĤĤ⡤19ȾʹߡѸ줬ܸȰճǻܿƤ¤θ줿ˤĤƤϡ#126. 7ˤѸؤαƶӡ ([2009-08-31-1])#2165. 20ȾμѸ쥽 ([2015-04-01-1])#3872. Ѹ˼Ѥ줿ܸμǯ ([2019-12-03-1])#4140. Ѹ˼Ѥ줿ܸΡ֤ġפȡ֤ɤΤ餤ס ([2020-08-27-1]) ȡ
Schneider 8ˡ3äǤθ11δ
Schneider, Edgar W. "Perspectives on Language Contact." Chapter 13 of English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives. Ed. Laurel J. Brinton. Cambridge: CUP, 332--59.
Ρhellog~Ѹ˥֥פɼԤγˡκǶαѸ˳ưhelפˤĤƤΤ餻ޤܥ֥¾ˤ⡤͡ʥǥǡֱѸˤδ֤ˡפåȡ˱Ѹˤ̥ϤưƤޤºݤˤϻ1ͤǤϤʤä khelf= Keio History of the English Language Forum = Ѹ˥եˤΥС˶ϤƤ餤ʤ顤Ѹˤ˴ؤȯƤޤܲ͡helμȤߤˤĤơ⤷ޤ
ΡVoicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)
ܥ֥λǤȤʤαѸ˥֥פǤ2021ǯ62ī6˷礫Ƥޤ2ۤɤϡꥹʡ륳Ȥ夬äƤƤޤܥ֥Ϣư¿ΤǡҤİФȻפޤīϡꥹʡ餤#637. ʤ֥ꥫפǤϤʤΡϤƤޤ
Ρnote
ܥ֥ʿԤơ note ǤѸ˴Ϣεޤ˽Ƥޤheldio 1֤ο֤ʴϢդ 2023ǯ226Ǥϡ轵1֤ heldio ˤĤơϢؤΥĥĤĿ֤ƤޤꥹʡΤϤλʪǤ
Ρࡡ
heldio κǿȲΤ餻륤 @chariderryu ϤƤޤˡ֥ȡפˤơؤΥĥäƤޤХեФȡ
ΡYouTube ְʼδѸظإͥ
YouTube ͥϺ1ǯޤޤ轵ʿˡˤθ6˿ưƤޤκǿư105֤ޤؤDz˶ǤҤ
ΡرѸ˿ʹ
khelf ȯԤΡرѸ˿ʹ٤4ޤǥ־ǸƤޤkhelf СγΤȤʤꡤǯ41ϴФޤθ31ȤڡǡѸˤ̥Ϥ٤衤ԽȯԤƤޤ
Ρμͭӥ Mond Ǥβ
Υӥǡޤ˱Ѹʻˡˤ˴ؤ˲ƤޤǶ3Ĥμ˵Ƥޤ
ޤޤʸηϤǡƥΥե٥åȤɸˤʤäͳȤϤɤäȤˤΤǤ礦
who who-whose-whom Τ褦ʳѲΤФ¾εˤ줬ʤΤϲΤʤΤǤ礦ΤϤäꤷΤǤ礦
flammable inflammable ϤʤƱ̣Ĥ褦ˤʤäΤǤ礦ޤ¾ˤ⤳Τ褦ʸϤޤ
Ρܤμɮ
ǿ2˵ޤ
ջҡ δ졡ʸؤȱѸ˸١ҡ2022ǯΥڡ
ԡ Ϻ δˡظɸಽͤ --- ʩоȸˡפλߡ١罤ۡ2022ǯΥڡ
Τ褦ܥ֥ʳˤ͡hel褷ƤޤΤǡɤꤤޤ
ε#5052. none ñʣ ([2023-02-25-1]) ǡnone ˴ؤΰפŪɤκݤɸθ (proverb) None but the brave deserve(s) the fair. ͦʳͤͤפθνнϡ17Ⱦαʸؤε John Dryden (1631--1700) Ǥ롥 Alexander's Feast (1697) ˡɽƤꡤthe brave = ֥쥯粦סthe fair = ֥ƥͤΰͥפȤޤѤƤ롥
Happy, happy, happy pair!
None but the brave
None but the brave
None but the brave deserves the fair!
ĤޤꡤָŵפǤ3ñ -s 뤳Ȥ none ñȤưƤ뤳Ȥ狼롥the brave the fair γơˤĤƻؼоݤĿͤǤ뤳ȤطƤ褦˻פ롥
Dryden ɽѤˤƤϡSpeake θŵCLMET3.0COHA ʤɤǤäȳǧ¤ꡤʣ¿褦Ǥ롥193ۤɵ褦
1813 SOUTHEY Life of Horatio Lord Nelson It is your sex that makes us go forth, and seem to tell us, 'None but the brave deserve the fair';
1829 P. EGAN Boxiana 2nd Ser. II. 354 The tender sex . . . feeling the good old notion that 'none but the brave deserve the fair', were sadly out of temper.
1873 TROLLOPE Phineas Redux II. xiii. All the proverbs were on his side. 'None but the brave deserve the fair,' said his cousin.
Ȥư̡˲Ȥǡޤthe + ƻפδѤ⡤the brave the fair 줾콸̾Ȥª褦ˤʤäȤȤ⤷ʤˤ none ΰɤζ̣ꥨǤ롥
Speake, Jennifer, ed. The Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. 6th ed. Oxford: OUP, 2015.
;̾ (indefinite_pronoun) none ϡï~ʤפ̣뤬ưȤñˤʣˤפ롥None but the brave deserve(s) the fair. ͦʳͤͤפθǤϡư3ñ -s 뤳ȤǤ뤷ǤĤǤ롥Ūˤñ٤ȸ뤳Ȥ¿ºݤˤϤषʣȤư뤳Ȥ¿ (cf. #301. ѤȤѸθˡ Top 10 ([2010-02-22-1]))
none ϸ츻Ūˤ no one ޤäǤ one 뤬ȤƤϥǤ롥ʬ줿 no one ƱǾñ顤none ΰפ˴ؤƱͤ˿Ȼפ䡤ǤʤΤԻĤǤ롥
American Heritage ˤȡnone ʣפ9ߤ졤King James Bible, Shakespeare, Dryden, Burke ʤɤϢʤʸڤƤǤϡɤο˰פ뤫ʸˡŪȤʸŪȤäƤ褵
Visser (I, § 86; pp. 75--76) ˤϡűѸ줫Ѹ˻ޤǤʣפñפγơ㤬¿Ƥ롥ǸŤΤΤ Shakespeare դޤǤǤĤФƤߤ褦
86---None Plural.
Ælfred, Boeth. xxvii §1, þæt þær nane oðre an ne sæton buton þa weorðestan. | c1200 Trin. Coll. Hom. 31, Ne doð hit none swa ofte se þe hodede. | a1300 Curs. M. 11396, bi-yond þam ar wonnand nan. | 1534 St. Th. More (Wks) 1279 F10, none of them go to hell. | 1557 North, Gueuaia's Diall. Pr. 4, None of these two were as yet feftene yeares olde (OED). | 1588 Shakesp., L.L.L. IV, iii, 126, none offend where all alike do dote. | Idem V, ii, 69, none are so surely caught . . ., as wit turn'd fool. . . .
Singular.
Ælfric, Hom. i, 284, i, Ne nan heora an nis na læsse ðonne eall seo þrynnys. | Ælfred, Boeth. 33. 4, Nan mihtigra ðe nis ne nan ðin gelica. | Charter 41, in: O. E. Texts 448, ȝif þæt ȝesele . . . ðæt ðer ðeara nan ne sie ðe londes weorðe sie. | a1122 O. E. Chron. (Laud Ms) an. 1066, He dyde swa mycel to gode . . . swa nefre nan oðre ne dyde toforen him. | a1175 Cott. Hom. 217, ȝif non of him ne spece, non hine ne lufede (OED). | c1250 Gen. & Ex. 223, Ne was ðor non lik adam. | c1450 St. Cuthbert (Surtees) 4981, Nane of þair bodys . . . Was neuir after sene. | c1489 Caxton, Blanchardyn xxxix, 148, Noon was there, . . . that myghte recomforte her. | 1588 A. King, tr. Canisius' Catch., App., To defende the pure mans cause, quhen thair is nan to take it in hadn by him (OED). | 1592 Shakesp., Venus 970, That every present sorrow seemeth chief, But none is best.
none β֡츻̣ʤɤˤĤƤϰʲε⻲ȡ
#1297. does, done 첻 ([2012-11-14-1])
#1904. ƻ no no ϰۤʤ츻 ([2014-07-14-1])
#2723. ֻ on ˤ n æ ([2016-10-10-1])
#2697. few a few ΰ̣κ ([2016-09-14-1])
#3536. one, once, none, nothing 1첻 ([2019-01-01-1])
#4227. ʤɽ魯ˤ n- ǻϤޤΤ¿ΤǤ --- hellog 饸ǡ ([2020-11-22-1])
ޤפˤĤƤ⡤ޤDz٤夲ƤѸŪˤ singular_they ͿƤ롥
#1144. Ѹˤפ ([2012-06-14-1])
#1334. Ѹˤ̾ưοס ([2012-12-21-1])
#1355. 20ꥹѸǽ̾ñפä ([2013-01-11-1])
#1356. 20ꥹѸǤ government οΰס ([2013-01-12-1])
Visser, F. Th. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1963--1973.
̾鶵ƤΤǤ轵215īʹī31̤ζ֡ʳαطиʤڤäʹǵҤΥӥ塼ǺܤƤޤʹꡤ蘆ˡ˥塼衼ॺٶɤεԤαѸؽˡҲ𤵤ƤΤǤΤʤǸ츻ؽѤǤȤܥ֥hellog~Ѹ˥֥פ˸ڤƤƤޤ̤Ǥ꤬Ȥޤ *
ϻŻٶΤΤˤʤäƤޤäƤޤֻ֤˷ıδ춵ΡرѸ˥֥ (http://user.keio.ac.jp/~rhotta/hellog/index.html) Ǹ츻ؤˤĤƤ褯ɤǤޤñθ츻ؤ֤ȡܥ֥䤹ΤΩĤǤ
Ѹؽˤƥܥӥ˸츻ѤǤ뤳ȤϤ褯ΤƤꡤΤ褦ʳؽ¿ǤƤޤƤѸؽԤϤۤ¿Ϥʤ褦˻פޤ
ޤϱѸ켭θ츻į뤳Ȥ齬ŤƤȤᤷޤξǡܥ֥ɤǤȤ褤Ȼפޤ츻äƤ櫓ǤϤޤޤ˿Ƹ츻˸ڤƤޤϢʤɤ̤Ƹ츻꤬ȶʤΤˤʤäƤOKǤȤʤ뵭ȤơʲƤޤ
#3546. Ѹˤ츻ñؤӤʤ顤줬μ ([2019-01-11-1])
#3696. ܥӥΤΡֺǤΩ25θΥѡġס ([2019-06-10-1])
#3698. 츻ؽˡΤ ([2019-06-12-1])
#4360. ñθ츻Ĵ٤ؤӤȤˤϡ ([2021-04-04-1])
#3381. ֺ¡ˤؤֱñθ츻ס ([2018-07-30-1])
#600. Ѹ츻ν ([2010-12-18-1])
ܥ֥λǡǤ Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)⡤̤̾ǤΤǡǤ츻ؤ֤ȡ̤ΤñγؽưפˤʤǤʤΤñΤ줶¦̤餫ˤʤꡤȥФ⤷ƤޤؽˤϤ⤷Ȥ١ҤȤɬפǤ͡ޤ heldio βƥİˤʤꡤ⤷ʤΤͳİƤߤƤäȥϥޤޤ衪
֥ Voicy ƤޤΤǡ츻ռܥӥνΩĤȻפޤ
¾ָ츻ءפΤΤˤʤ붽̣ϡԤȤưʲεɤ
#466. 츻ؤϵݤʳؤ ([2010-08-06-1])
#1791. 츻ؤϵݤʳؤ (2) ([2014-03-23-1])
#727. 츻ؤμΧ ([2011-04-24-1])
#598. Ѹ츻ؤά (1) ([2010-12-16-1])
#599. Ѹ츻ؤά (2) ([2010-12-17-1])
#636. 츻ؤγԤȤƤ OED ([2011-01-23-1])
#1765. ܤǽ¤ƤѸ츻ؤ Klein αѸ츻ŵ ([2014-02-25-1])

2022ǯ٤˽꤬ŤƤƤޤΥߥǺǯ٤ khelf= Keio History of the English Language Forum = Ѹ˥ե˳ưο֤Ȼפޤ Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)ˤơkhelf Ĺޤˤ khelf HP ôڷ3ͤǤääƤޤΤǡ⤪İ#632. ǯ٤ khelf ʷѸ˥եˤγư with ޤˤڤǤ
ǯ٤μפʳưӤƤߤޤ
2022ǯ41khelf θĥå @khelf_keio γߡ
2022ǯ41رѸ˿ʹ1ϴθ
2022ǯ41--68ֱѸ˥ƥ50θkhelf СѸˤ˴ؤ֥ƥġפǺܡ
2022ǯ410رѸ˿ʹٹ泰1θ
2022ǯ711رѸ˿ʹ2θ
2022ǯ718رѸ˿ʹٹ泰2θ
2022ǯ920khelf ߥåơȥȡκ
2022ǯ920--21khelf-conference-2022khelf Ρ֥߹ɡסˤγ
2022ǯ103رѸ˿ʹ3
2023ǯ111رѸ˿ʹ4θ
¾khelf Ť heldio ٥ȤȤơʲܤǤ
2022ǯ922heldio ˤۿ#479. Ѹ˴ؤѤʵ䡡ܥΥåڹδ --- Part 14cf. ʲޤˤ note ֱ֡Ѹ˴ؤѤʵ䡡ܥΥå() ޤȤˤơ夲줿ѤʵƬФʬäǺܤƤޤ
2022ǯ1028heldio ˤۿ#515. Ѹ˴ؤѤʵ䡡ܥΥåڹδˡ2ơ
2022ǯ122heldio ˤۿ#550. Ѹ˴ؤѤʵ䡡ܥΥåڹδˡ3ơcf. #4967. ֱѸ˴ؤѤʵ䡡ܥΥåڹδˡ3ơפϡ佼ˡפβȤʤޤ ([2022-12-02-1]) ˡ夲줿ѤʵƬФʬäǺܤƤޤ
2023ǯ121heldio ˤƥۿ#600. إ˥¼ŵ٤ --- Ѹȥθˡ
ưȯˤʤˤĤ졤khelf ۡڡƤ¤ƤޤȤ櫓ߤ줿ֱѸ˥饦ʡܤǤ khelf ̤helפˤԤ
Ѹˤϡư (verb) Ⱦ (particle) Ȥ߹碌ʤư (phrasal_verb) ¿¸ߤƤ롥Ȥ櫓ѽФŪŪʰ̣ĤΤ¿칽¤¿ͤʷ뤿ᡤФбѸؽξɤȤʤ롥
㤨 run up Ȥ߹碌ɽͤƤߤ褦Ūˤ4ĤΥѥ˶ʬ롥
(1) A girl ran up. ֤뾯äƤ
ran up ΤȤ1Ĥμư롥
(2) The spider ran up the wall. ֤ΥɤФäƤä
ư ran ֻ up the wall Ȥ߹碌Ǥ롥
(3) The soldier ran up a flag. ֤ʼΤϴǤ
ran up Ȥ߹碌ˤ1Ĥ¾ưŪ롥ξ硤 up ̾Ū a flag ΰ֤ϥС֥ǡThe soldier ran a flag up. θǽŪ줬 it Τ褦̾ξˤϡष The soldier ran it up. θΤߤƤ롥
(4) Would you mind running me up the road? ƻϩޤǼ֤˾褻ƤäƤޤ
¾ư run ֻ up the road Ȥ߹碌Ǥ롥
run up Ȥ߹碌Τߤ˸ꤷƤ⡤Τ褦4Ĥηǧ롥¾ư¾ξȤ߹碌ΤθСȤƤ8ĤηꡤʣȤʤ롥
Cowie, A. P. and R Mackin, comps. Oxford Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. Oxford: OUP, 1993.
褽2ָäƤޤ2023ǯ34ڡ15:30--18:45ˡī㡼ɶˤ4ΥֱѸˤѸפ4ʺǽ˹ֺ¡21αѸΤ椯פ֤ޤ Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)ǡֺ¤ͽԤȤʤäƤޤΤǡҤİ#630. Ѹ ENL, ESL, EFL ǥϤ⤦Ť --- 34ī뿷ɶǡֱѸˤѸפΥ뤷ޤǤ
34ιֵϡǤ̤ӥ饤ˤϥ֥åɤιֵȤʤޤ֤ϡꥢ륿֤Τۤ1ָǹֵưİǤޤΤǡԹΤ褤ˡǤλäƤ
ΤޤȤβȤ֤ŤǤϤޤºݤˤϳƲΩƤޤޤǤβ֤Ƥʤˤ⡤ʤ֤ƤޤΤǤ¿ֺ¤ξܺ٤Ȥߤθڡꤪꤤפޤ
ֺ¤γפϡڡΰѤȤʤޤʲ̤Ǥ
21αѸΤ椯
Υߥ˥ޤޤ21ѸȤƤ˴ԤϤǰۤʤαѸ줬ޤ³ƤޤῴϤȱϤȤ˺ѤѸ뤳ʣʾˤĤơѸˤδäޤޤѸҤ뤤ĤΥǥҲ𤷤ʤ World Englishes ȤϤʤ븽ݤʤΤͻαѸΤ椯ꤤޤ
13ޤǤιֺ¤ȴϢϡhellog heldio Ǥ夲Ƥޤ4˸ͽȤʤޤΤǡʲΥХåʥСͤޤǤˤɤʤǯ٤ϡƱī㡼ɶˤƱѸˤ˴ؤ뿷ϤͽǤ
Ρ1Ѹ硡2022ǯ611ˡ
hellog #4775. ֺ¡ֱѸˤѸ --- ѸפΥϤޤޤ ([2022-05-24-1])
heldio #356. Ѹ --- ī뿷ɶǡֱѸˤѸפΥϤޤޤ
heldio #378. īǡѸפ֤ޤ
Ρ2ˤƱѸϳ礷Τ2022ǯ86ˡ
hellog #4813. īֺ¤2ֱѸˤѸ --- ˤƱѸϳ礷ΤפΤ ([2022-07-01-1])
heldio #393. īֺ¤2ֱѸˤѸ --- ˤƱѸϳ礷Τס
Ρ3ƤαѸ2022ǯ101ˡ
hellog #4875. īֺ¤3ֱѸˤѸ --- ƤαѸפΤ ([2022-09-01-1])
heldio #454. īֺ¤3ֱѸˤѸ --- ƤαѸס
˾塤ҤȤ來Ӥ䤫˱Ǥҳ (age_of_discovery) ǤߤȡʤѸˤȤ̩ܤ˴ؤäƤcf. #4423. ֺ¡ֱѸˤȸ츻פ10ҳȳǰѡפޤ ([2021-06-06-1])ˡ
ʲؿҳ٤δ (pp. 109--10) άǯɽǺܤ롥ҳϰϤˤĤƤϤĤιͤ뤬1415ǯΥݥȥ뷳ˤ륻Τ˻Ϥޤꡤ1648ǯΥȥեꥢ˽ȤΤ1ĤθǤ롥άǯɽˤߤ褦ˡˤĹ
| 5 | 饯ϸ饹Ѥޤǹҳ |
| 4Ⱦ | ͥ륳ƥꥹϸޤõ |
| 111 | 롤ۤʻ |
| 1 | ܥ |
| 60--70 | إȥ鳤 |
| 1Ⱦ | ֥ҥåѥפˤ륢ӥҳˤʤ |
| 2 | ȥޡɤθפʤ |
| 166 | ءʥޥ륯ꥦˤλټ˻ |
| 207 | ۹ |
| 4--5 | Υɲʤ |
| 399--412 | 쿸ˡΥɡιԡʩ٤ |
| 7Ⱦ | Ĥʻ礵 |
| 618 | |
| 639 | ֿͤΥץȿ |
| 7Ⱦ | 䲦ޥåθפ |
| 671--95 | ʩεںߡˡ |
| 750 | ХȤ˥åСī롥ǰפ˿ʽ |
| 875 | ѡ˶ |
| 907 | ˴彽 |
| 960 | ǰפδ |
| 969 | եƥī˰ܤ롥ȳ̤ƤΥǰסʸ奨ץȤϹȳͳΥǰפƳ |
| 1096 | 1 (--99) ꥢԤƬ |
| 1127 | |
| 1147 | 2 (--48) |
| 1169 | ץȤ˥桼īΩ |
| 1245--47 | ץΡԡˡĤ̿ˤꥫ饳˻ιԵ魯 |
| 1254 | ֥奭Ĥ̿ˤꥫ饳ޤιԡιԵ |
| 1258 | 뷳ХΡåСī˴뷳ϥꥢץȤ˿Ǥ |
| 1271--95 | ޥ륳ݥΥιԤںߡιԵ |
| 1291 | ΥΥǥեꥫҳ |
| 1293 | ˥ޥѥҥȲΩ뷳˿ |
| 1312 | ΥΥơޥʥꥢ˹ҳ |
| 1349ʥޥޡ | ֥Хȥ24ǯˤ錄륢եꥫιԤ饿˵ |
| 1336 | ɤ˥ʥ벦 |
| 1345 | ޥѥҥȡϳ |
| 1351--54 | ֥ХȥեꥫιԡػΦͷ٤ |
| 1360 | ޥǥΡιԵ٤κΩ |
| 1368 | |
| 1372 | Ȥ |
| 1403 | ڥΥӡۡιԤƥࡼ˱ڤ顦ȥ٥롤ʥꥢ˹ҳ |
| 1405 | ޤҳ1433ǯޤ7ˤ錄 |
| 1415 | ݥȥ뷳Ρ֤ʤեꥫϩõϤޤ |
| 1434 | 롦ͥܥɡ̨ |
| 1453 | ޥˤ륳ƥΡץ빶ά |
| 1455 | ͥĥͥ⥹Ȥեꥫҳ |
| 1475 | ĥǥץȥޥΡءٴ |
| 1479 | ڥݥȥ֤˥륫 |
| 1482 | ݥȥեꥫεߥʷߡݥȥͥܿ |
| 1488 | ǥˤ˾ȯҳ |
| 1492 | ֥1ҳ (--93) |
| 1493 | ֥2ҳ |
| 1494 | ڥݥȥ֤˥ȥǥ㥹 |
| 1498 | ޤΥɹҳ֥3ҳڤã |
| 1500 | ֥롤ɤؤӼ֥饸ɺ |
| 1501 | ꥴץåꥫ52ޤǹҳ |
| 1502 | ֥4ҳƱ߹ҳ |
| 1505 | ȥġǹõķ |
| 1508 | ֥르ĤƱͤʼݤεķ |
| 1509 | ᥤǥǡץȡ顼Ϣ |
| 1510 | ݥȥ롤 |
| 1511 | ݥȥ롤ޥåά |
| 1512 | ݥȥ |
| 1513 | Хܥѥʥ϶Ǥʿδߤã |
| 1519--21 | ƥΥᥭʥƥ |
| 1520 | ޥ϶ȯʿΤǤƥեԥ˻ |
| 1522 | 륫ΰʲ18͡ǽҤȤƥӥ |
| 1527 | ƥۤΥ楫õ |
| 1528--33 | ԥΥ |
| 1529 | 饴åˤΥݥȥ뵢° |
| 1534 | ƥΥʥõ |
| 1535 | ޥΥõ |
| 1537 | Υ।ʥ֥ |
| 1538 | 롦ġΥϢץǥȥ륳ͤ |
| 1541 | ԥΥޥõΥ㡼ʡϸޤǹҳ (1542) |
| 1543 | ͤΥݥȥ͡ |
| 1545 | ܥӥΥݥȥ仳ȯǯᥭǤ仳ȯ |
| 1553 | ӡϩõ |
| 1565 | ͡ϩˤեԥᥭޤǹҳ |
| 1567 | ˥ʿιҳǯȯ |
| 1568 | ۡեǡ륢ǥڥδæ |
| 1570 | ɥ쥤ΥֳڥϤΫå |
| 1571 | 쥬ԡޥ˥Էߡꥹȶ̤γѥȤǥޥ˾ |
| 1575 | եӥå㡼ϩõļ |
| 1577--80 | ɥ쥤ΫåҤʤ |
| 1578 | 륫롼ǥݥȥ뷳å |
| 1584--85 | 륿Υ˥̱ײ |
| 1586--88 | ٥ǥ |
| 1595 | 1õ˥ʿõޥ륱ȯ |
| 1598 | եΡȡͤȤƺǽ |
| 1599 | ͥեͥå쥤ɹҳ |
| 1600 | ꥹ쥤ɲΩκ֥饸˺Ȥꡤեꥫ͢Ϥޤ |
| 1605 | ιҳ˥塼إ֥ǥޤ |
| 1606 | 塤Ȥ˻Ĥ줿ȥ쥹˥塼˥ȥꥢ֤γȯޥ˥˸ |
| 1610 | ϥɥ˥ƹˤʤ |
| 1614 | ǥԥȤιԵٴ |
| 1615 | ͥۡƥȥ롦ιҳ̨ۡȯ |
| 1617 | 2õ |
| 1620 | ᥤե˥塼ɤ |
| 1622 | δ⡤⥵ӥǥι |
| 1623 | ܥʻͤˤ륤ꥹܿͤ͡λʸ奤ꥹͤ쥤ɤιǰפűषɤ˽ |
| 1637 | եꥫΥߥå |
| 1639 | ޥǰסΤԲǽˤʤ롥ޥʿιҳ |
| 1641 | ͥޥåå |
| 1642--43 | ޥȥꥢسԤ餫ˤ |
| 1645 | ͥȡإ |
| 1647 | ܥ細ΡʡƤΥե˥õ |
| 1648 | ߥǥ˥աų̈ʥǥ˥̨ˤã١¸ߤˤϵĤʤäȥեꥢˤ뻰ǯνꡥΩǧ |
ε#5045. deafening silence ּĤ褦ۡס ([2023-02-18-1]) Ǽ夲ɽˤĤơBNCweb ˤʸФƤߤĤƤߤ褦
All that remained on the barren expanse was a deafening silence.
But the countryside! Absolute deafening silence. Not a tractor in sight. No buzzing saw mills, no electric milking machines humming away. Just horses and ploughs and, for want of a better word, peasants.
now there is almost a deafening silence, broken only by the odd apologetic cough as the minutes tick towards 8.30.
In the deafening silence inside the gallery she could hear her heart thumping madly against her ribs.
It was a relief when a couple of minutes later, amidst the deafening silence that had descended on the room, Mrs Aitken poked her head round the door. 'Dinner will be served whenever you're ready.'
Ƶˡ (oxymoron) ζɽ˴ؿʲĤơsilence Ȥ̾ϤۤˤɤΤ褦ʷƻǽ뤳Ȥ¿Τ䤤ͯƤ϶ (collocation) ˴ؤŪतεǡѼкѤäԤ BNCweb Ĵ٤Ƥߤ뤳Ȥˤ롥"_AJ* {silence/N}" ȸ Frequency breakdown εǽѤ50̤ޤǤ٥ФƤߤ
| No. | Lexical items | No. of occurrences |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | long silence | 145 |
| 2 | stunned silence | 53 |
| 3 | complete silence | 44 |
| 4 | total silence | 43 |
| 5 | tense silence | 37 |
| 6 | awkward silence | 31 |
| 7 | brief silence | 28 |
| 8 | short silence | 27 |
| 9 | sudden silence | 23 |
| 10 | absolute silence | 22 |
| 11 | deafening silence | 22 |
| 12 | embarrassed silence | 22 |
| 13 | uncomfortable silence | 22 |
| 14 | shocked silence | 16 |
| 15 | stony silence | 15 |
| 16 | dead silence | 14 |
| 17 | deep silence | 13 |
| 18 | Eerie silence | 13 |
| 19 | heavy silence | 13 |
| 20 | small silence | 12 |
| 21 | thoughtful silence | 12 |
| 22 | uneasy silence | 12 |
| 23 | utter silence | 12 |
| 24 | ensuing silence | 11 |
| 25 | sullen silence | 11 |
| 26 | momentary silence | 10 |
| 27 | fraught silence | 9 |
| 28 | ominous silence | 9 |
| 29 | terrible silence | 9 |
| 30 | brooding silence | 8 |
| 31 | companionable silence | 8 |
| 32 | sponsored silence | 8 |
| 33 | virtual silence | 8 |
| 34 | dignified silence | 7 |
| 35 | horrified silence | 7 |
| 36 | Hushed Silence | 7 |
| 37 | lengthy silence | 7 |
| 38 | long silences | 7 |
| 39 | longer silence | 7 |
| 40 | strained silence | 7 |
| 41 | uncanny silence | 7 |
| 42 | awful silence | 6 |
| 43 | cold silence | 6 |
| 44 | comparative silence | 6 |
| 45 | continuing silence | 6 |
| 46 | embarrassing silence | 6 |
| 47 | gloomy silence | 6 |
| 48 | great silence | 6 |
| 49 | strange silence | 6 |
| 50 | angry silence | 5 |
Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)ˤơ#624. ۡפθء#627. ۡפ̱²ء2ˤ錄ä (silence) ˤĤƸŪ˹ͤƤߤޤ
hellog ȤƤϡεطޤޤȤɤߤɤ
#1911. ([2014-07-21-1])
#1910. ٻߡ ([2014-07-20-1])
#1633. ٤̱ۤ²ء ([2013-10-16-1])
#1644. ٤̱ۤ² (2) ([2013-10-27-1])
#1646. ȯù٤ʸ ([2013-10-29-1])
heldio ΥˡꥹʡͭפʥȤ¿Ϥޤʤ꤬Ȥޤˡ䤫ΥȥХåΤʤ deafening silence ּĤ褦ۡפȤɤʹФΤäѸɽ˿ޤƵˡ (oxymoron) 1ĤǤѸǤϤ褯ΤƤΤ1ĤΤ褦Ǥ
ܤΤʤäΤĴ٤ƤߤޤOED ˤȡdeafening, adj. θ1b˼Τ褦˵Ƥޤ1968ǯ˽Фοɽ (collocation) Τ褦Ǥ
b. deafening silence n. a silence heavy with significance; spec. a conspicuous failure to respond to or comment on a matter.
1968 Sci. News 93 328/3 (heading) Deafening silence; deadly words.
1976 Survey Spring 195 The so-called mass media made public only these voices of support. There was a deafening silence about protests and about critical voices.
1985 Times 28 Aug. 5/1 Conservative and Labour MPs have complained of a 'deafening silence' over the affair.
ʸ䤷̤ȡdeafening silence 㡼ʥꥺѸȤƻϤޤäȤäƤ褵Ǥ
Ϣ۵ silent majority ϽФ1786ǯǤϤŪʸ̮ѤƤޤ
1786 J. Andrews Hist. War with Amer. III. xxxii. 39 Neither the speech nor the motion produced any reply..and the motion [was] rejected by a silent majority of two hundred and fifty-nine.
ǶǤΥȤ湳ĥǥ˿ȤǤsilence ۡˤθȶӤĤƤȤΤ˼ŪǤ͡ơδ deafening silence ȤɽɾȡŪץץޤ
oxymoron ˤĤƤϡheldio #392. "familiar stranger" Ƶˡ (oxymoron)⤼Ҥİ
(pragmatics) δܤȤʤäƤ륰饤 (Paul Grice) ΡֶĴθ (cooperative_principle) ˤĤƤϡhellog Ǥ#1122. Ĵθ ([2012-05-23-1])#1133. Ĵθι ([2012-06-03-1])#1134. ĴθˤȤ ([2012-06-04-1]) ʤɤǾҲ𤷤Ƥ
饤ˤäŪʸȤƷǤ줿ߤǤϸźθҲβä٤ƤˤĤƤϤޤ櫓ǤϤʤȹͤƤ롥ͭΤˤСɥ衼åѸ²濴δ龧줿ŪʸθƤϤޤȹͤΤϡǤϤʤȤȽФƤΤǤ롥
ޥäƤ륪ȥͥ²Υޥ饬 (Malagasy) 椷ʥ (Elinor (Ochs) Keenan) ϡޥ饬üԤˤϡפʾʬʤѶŪ褦Ȥ봷ۤɤʤȤ餫ˤĴθˤ̤γΨ (maxim of quantity) ƤʤȤȤˤʤ롥Senft (55) ̤ơʥΥ饤ȽʹƤߤ褦
ʥϡʸνǡ֥饤ϥƥå (etic) γʻ (grid) Dzä椹ǽ̤Ԥ뤳ȡͤǥΥեԤ餹βäγΨϺȲȤƤǤϤʤҲŪ¤ȤƤפȻŦ (Keenan 1976: 79) ؼԤӸؼԤϡ٤ƤΥƥå (etic) γʻҡĤޤ̱²ؤ (ethnolinguistic) ФŪʸϤӹͤ˴Ťץάͤϡ٤٤ᤫ졤оݤȤΤΡ˸ʸˤܼŪʻ¤ªͤ뱿̿ˤȤոǰפƤ롥椨饤βäγΨǼ褦ʥƥå (etic) γʻҤϸؼԤФƤŪʽʤ
ǡ֥ƥåγʻҡפȤϡҲüԽĤQȤƤʪζڤۤɤΰ̣ʥϤΤ褦˥饤ȽǡǤ⤳ʬθȤɾ⼨Ƥ롥嵭³սǡΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ (Senft 55)
ǤϤ뤬ʥϡ饤ȤߤؤθФƻѲǽǤˡγάϼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤롥
ϡɤ줫1ĤγΨ夲줬ΩΩʤΤѻƽҤ٤뤳ȤǤ롥λѤ⤷ (abuse) ؤưϡҲ¾μҲʬꡤñҲμҲ롼פʬ뤵ޤޤʲͤȻظ餫ˤ뤫⤷ʤ
ʥϥ饤Ƥִѻ礷äΰŪʸ§˴Ϣ궯Ƥȹͤ륨ΥեԤФȯפȤɾ (Keenan 1976: 79)
ʥƶϡƱΰۤʤѼӤݤˤ⤤㤨СѸ뤵Ƥäθ餯ΤޤűѸƤϤޤ櫓ǤϤʤȤȤϢơ#1646. ȯù٤ʸ ([2013-10-29-1])#3208. ݥ饤ȥͥäűѸ ([2018-02-07-1])#4711. ͤϼդʤä ([2022-03-21-1]) ʤɤȡ
Senft, Gunter ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡˡظδä롡ǡ١ҡ2022ǯ
Keenan (Ochs), Elinor. "The Universality of Conversational Postulates." Language in Society 5 (1976): 67--80.
#5040. Ѹǡ֥ɥĤפŪɽˡ19 --- ȯù٤̣臘 ([2023-02-13-1]) Ǥˤ̤ꡤȯù (speech_act) ϸνפʥơޤ1ĤǤ롥ůؤؤȵڤƤǤꡤůؤǤȤѸ줬ŪʲǤϡȤ Senft Ѹˤ碌̣ǡָ١פѤ롥
٤Ȥϲ塼ˤСϡּҲŪ«ϡ (socially binding force) ĤΤȤ졤ŪôäƤȶĴ롥ĹSenft (46--47) Ѥ롥
塼ϡ٤˴ؤ뤳ξϤˤơָ٤μҲŪ« (socially binding force) ̤ܤסҲŪ«θ§ (PRINCIPLE OF SOCIAL BINDING) 꼰뤳ȤˤäιͤͤϤ롥Ϥθ§ֿʹ֤θǤʤʹ֤ȿʹְʳΰռŪʥߥ˥Τ٤Ƥ¾ηϤ⡤ΤǤפȹͤ (Seuren 2009: 140) θ§ϼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤롥
٤ƤܵθŪȯäϡä¦ΡʶϲѤΡ˵̳ (COMMITMENT) ʶϲѤΡʹȯ줿 (APPEAL) ΤȯáϤɽ줿̿ꡤ뤤ϸƤӤHey, you over there! ʡ֤Τסˡˤˤƾ (APPELATION (sic)) ˴ؤƹư§ (INSTITUTION OF A RULE OF BEHAVIOUR) Τ줫μΡҲŪ«δطϽФȤ (FORCE) ġ
٤οͤ˴ؤͭǤҲŪ֤ϡȯáϤϤξ (FORCE FIELD) 롥(Seuren 2009: 140)
塼ˤȤäơθ§ϰθȵ̳Ŀ͡ʤǤȸĿͤºĿ͡«롥ο͡ϡ֡Ǥꡤ٤Ƥܵθ٤ϡˤʡ뤤ϽפǤʤΤǤäƤ⡤äʹδ֤ǤطϽФ (Seuren 2009: 140) ҲŪ«θ§ָŪפǤꡤֿʹ֤θǤʤ (sign) ˤ뤤ʤΥߥ˥ˤȤäƤŪǤħŤ뤳ȤϡSeuren 2009: 158 ⻲ȡˡγؼԤˤȤäơָŪǤϽФΤƻǤꡤžΤΤΤǤʤȡפ̣ (Seuren 2009: 140) 塼ϡ٤˴ϢƤιͤȯŸΤȤĴ롥
٤Ƥθ٤ϡҲŪ«δط뤤ϻ֤ϽФȤ̣ǹٿŪǤĸδŪʵǽϡˤĤƤξΰưȤ̣ (sense) ǤΡ֥ߥ˥פǤϤʤҲŪ«Ĥޤ<!-- for reference -->ȯä뤤ϸ٤ˤäɽ̿˴ؤпʹ֤ΡҲŪ«δطϽФǤ롥μμҲŪ«ʹ֤μҲ1ĤɬܾǤҲδ쵡ˤ濴ŪǤǤ뤳Ȥ餫ˤʤǤ(Seuren 2009: 147)
塼ˤȤäơ٤ϸػˤˤƤޤ˷ڻ뤵Ƥϥߥ˥ƻǤȤͤƻȸ뤳Ȥ¿äΤΡּҲŪ«ϡפȤƤޤȤ줿ȤϤʤäȤϡƼҲλθѤȤäƤ褤
Senft, Gunter ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡˡظδä롡ǡ١ҡ2022ǯ
Seuren, Pieter A. M. Language from Within Vol. I.: Language in Cognition. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
δñѸ in English٤3椬ȯȤʤޤǴ2ǯ³ϢܡˤѸΥܥʵפ24ǡǽȤʤޤ夲ϡǽˤդ路֥ե٥åȺǸʸ Z ΥߥƥפǤм˼äƤФȻפޤ

ƬZ ϤäȤ֤ξʤʸפǤϡZ ѸΥե٥å26ʸǤ٤㤤ʸǤ뤳ȤҤ٤ޤ³Z ޤñƤߤȡפǤϡZ ޤñ줬ƤޤѥäȤʤΤФǤS Z μϰϤˤĤƤޤΡԤοפǤϡ褤 Z ᰥˤ餫ˤޤǽȯϡ֥פ֥åɡפפǤϡʸɤƤ֤˴ؤ뺮ȶˤ졤ѸαƺäڤӤޤ
24³ϢܤϺ Z ĤޤɼԤ줿ˤ⤢ꡤɮԤȤƤڤߤʤɮ뤳ȤǤޤԽԤǫʤŻ˽졤ƥ饹ȥ졼γΩõ她ˤ⸵Ť졤24Ǥޤطγͤ˴פޤ2ǯ֤Τɡ꤬Ȥޤ
֤ΰ̣ᡤVoicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)Ǻǯ1022Ǹ#509. Τ˱ѸϢܤƤޤ⤪İФȤȻפޤ
ϢܡˤѸΥܥʵפϤˤƽλȤʤޤѸˤΤϡ hellog Ǥ⡤¾ΤǤ⡤³Ƥޤ³ꤤޤ
줿 YouTube ְʼδѸظإͥκǿư#101. Ѹ쥳ץåϤΤ --- ѸȱѸȽͤǤѸȽˤᤰä2ͤǵƤޤФİޤYouTube Υȵǽꤴոʤɤ⤪ФȻפޤ
hellog ǤѸȽˤ䡤Ū˸ (linguistic_imperialism) ¿夲ƤޤѸäƤϡߤαѸƸŪϰ̤褯ǧƤɬפ뤳ȤϤʤѸ줬ޤƸŪʸˤʤäƤΤȤˤƤȤοȹͤƤޤѸᤰϱѸˤνפǤꡤޤ˱ѸˤθϢ礭ǤΤȿƤޤ
伫ȡε˴ؤƤޤΤʰոǤƤ櫓ǤϤޤѸŪˤƸŪ¦̤ǧĤġѸ˼Ƥ뤳Ȥⴰ˵䤹뤳ȤǤʤΡĤޤǤʤȹͤƤޤ³ƤȻפޤ
Ѹ˴ؤҤ¿ФƤޤΰϹǤޤ hellog Ϣ뵭ԥååפƤߤޤεΤˤͤޤǡ
#1072. ѸϸȤäˤƤ櫓ǤϤʤ ([2012-04-03-1])
#1073. Ѹ줬¾άƤѥ ([2012-04-04-1])
#1082. ʤѸȤʤä (1) ([2012-04-13-1])
#1083. ʤѸȤʤä (2) ([2012-04-14-1])
#1194. ¼ɤαѸѤȱѸˡ ([2012-08-03-1])
#1606. Ѹ캹̡ѸƸ ([2013-09-19-1])
#1607. Ѹ춵Ū¦̡ ([2013-09-20-1])
#1785. 츢 ([2014-03-17-1])
#1788. Ķ̱²νиȳ˴Ϳװ ([2014-03-20-1])
#1838. ʸ ([2014-05-09-1])
#1919. ѸγȻ˴ؤ4Ĥ crossings ([2014-07-29-1])
#2163. 쥤ǥ ([2015-03-30-1])
#2306. ʰ鹧ˡرѸγǡ٤ȱѸȽ ([2015-08-20-1])
#2429. ե٥åȤȤ ([2015-12-21-1])
#2458. ܸˡرѸ첽϶̱٤첽Τ ([2016-01-19-1])
#2487. νȤϡμҲŪϤΤȤǤ ([2016-02-17-1])
#2549. ȤƤαѸ¦̡ ([2016-04-19-1])
#2673. ָˤѸνο͡ˤȤäƤͭˤס ([2016-08-21-1])
#2935. ַкѡ줬ڤ뻰Ĥǡס ([2017-05-10-1])
#2986. ˤѸѤΥޡ ([2017-06-30-1])
#3004. ѸˤϱѸʪ줫 ([2017-07-18-1])
#3010. ָο̱ϲܤ̵ۤФʹϤʤס ([2017-07-24-1])
#3011. Ǥ٤ƤŤϵǤ ([2017-07-25-1])
#3012. ѸϥեǤϤʤ˥졩 ([2017-07-26-1])
#3277. ֱѸפΥɡ ([2018-04-17-1])
#3278. Ҳˤ뤤ϡֿʽСάפδαѸ˻ʬ ([2018-04-18-1])
#3286. ĹˤˤѸۤæơ3 ([2018-04-26-1])
#3302.ֱѸפΤɤä3ʳΡס ([2018-05-12-1])
#3315. ֥ϥɸס ([2018-05-25-1])
#3470. ξԤϲˤäƤ뤫 ([2018-10-27-1])
#3603. ²ۡ ([2019-03-09-1])
#3767. ܤ̡ ([2019-08-20-1])
#3851. ưʪࡤ ([2019-11-12-1])
#4279. ʤѸȤʤäƤΤǤ --- hellog 饸ǡ ([2021-01-13-1])
#4467. ɱѸϡ줿Ѹפ岽Ѹפ ([2021-07-20-1])
#4536. 쥤ǥκˤ3ĤεŪ ([2021-09-27-1])
#4537. Ѹ줫ΰϤˤ̲ "domain loss" ([2021-09-28-1])
#4545. ֱѸϤˤζ̸ˤʤäΤ --- IIBC Υӥ塼 ([2021-10-06-1])
#4829. 19ꥹ̳ͤפֱѸפء ([2022-07-17-1])
#4830. 19ꥹοʪࡦưʪ̣ ([2022-07-18-1])
Ϣ Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)#145. 3ʳdzĥƤѸ⤪İ
Can you run fast? Τ褦ʵʸϡŵŪˤϡֵפȤȯù (speech_act) ΤѤ롥Can you pass the salt? ϵʸΤƤʤ顤ʸȯݤüԤԤʤäƤȯù٤ϡֵפǤϤʤְפǤ뤳Ȥ̤ Pass the salt. Ȥ̿ʸȯ줿硤ǹԤʤƤ뤳Ȥϥȥ졼Ȥˡ̿פȤȯù٤ǤˤʤΤ褦ˤ Pass the salt. ľȯù١Can you pass the salt? ϴȯù٤б롥
Ѹǡ֥ɥĤפȤ̿ϡʸ̤ˤ Close the door. Ȥ̿ʸˤäƤʤ롥¤ˤϤΤ֤äܤ̿ʸΤޤѤ뤳ȤϵǤ롥ݥ饤ȥͥ (politeness) ؤθ顥ɽ餫ˡ¤餲亩˶Ť뤳Ȥ¿
Steven Levinson Ȥ Senft (39--40) ˡ֥ɥĤפбȯù٤αʸ19Ƥ롥ǿԤ櫓ǤϤʤǤǤ䤷ƤȤǤ롥
I want you to close the door.
I'd be much obliged if you'd close the door.
Can you close the door?
Are you able by any chance to close the door?
Would you close the door?
Won't you close the door?
Would you mind closing the door?
Would you be willing closing the door?
You ought to close the door.
It might help to close the door.
Hadn't you better close the door?
May I ask you to close the door?
Would you mind awfully if I were to ask you to close the door?
I am sorry to have to tell you to please close the door.
Did you forget the door?
Do us a favour with the door, love.
How about a bit less breeze?
Now Johnny, what do big people do when they come in?
Okay, Johnny, what am I going to say next?
ǸΤĤɽ close the door ȤɽȤ鷺ˡClose the door. ȯ (illocutionary force) ȯ褦ȤƤǶ̣ǤϡʹϾʸ̮Ȥǹ٤ʸŪԤʤȤ뤳Ȥˤʤ롥
ȯù٤ˤĤƤϰʲε⻲ȡ
#3632. ɽ魯 Will you . . . ? ν ([2019-04-07-1])
#4707. ꡦͶ Will you . . . ? ϤĤ餢롩 ([2022-03-17-1])
#4714. ȯù٤Ȥϲ ([2022-03-24-1])
Senft, Gunter ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡˡظδä롡ǡ١ҡ2022ǯ
衤2 (double_negative) ޤ¿ϡ18εϼλ stigma դ졤ζϤʱƶޤ³ƤȸƤǯθοŸˤꡤºݤˤϤäᤤʳɸŪˤʤäƤꡤ18εʸˡϤǤ˹ԤϤäƤ촷ˤդͿˤʤȲᤵ褦ˤʤäƤˤĤƤϡ#2999. ɸѸ줫꤬äͳ ([2017-07-13-1]) ǿ줿
¿깽ʸ̣ȤˤʤΤˤʤΤۣȤʤΤǤСߥ˥پ褿ºݤäˤƤʸ̮䱤Χν⤢ꡤۤɸ櫓Ǥʤʤ٤ۣ椵ӽäξפǡġֽաפä顤ɤŵˡΧʸǤ롥Rissanen (125) Ѥ롥
In the development of negative expressions legal texts may have offered an early model that resulted in the avoidance of multiple or universal negation in Late Middle and Early Modern English.
In Late Middle English, multiple negation was still accepted and universal negation was only gradually becoming obsolete, possibly with the loss of ne. In the fifteenth century, the not . . . no construction . . . was still the rule . . . , but in the Helsinki Corpus samples of legal texts this combination does not occur even once, while the combination not . . . any . . . , can be found no less than eight times. In other contexts . . . multiple negation occurs even in the statutes, but the user of any is more common than in the other genres.
. . . .
The same trend can be seen in sixteenth-century texts: the not . . . no type is avoided in the statutes while it is still an accepted minority variant in other text types. This is not surprising, since the tendency towards disambiguation and clarity of expression probably resulted in the avoidance of double negation in legal texts well before the normative grammarians started arguing about two negatives making one affirmative.
ۣ椵ӽ٤ˡΧʸˤƿ侩줿ˡ˰̤Υ쥸ˤĥȤŸϡʬˤꤽǤ롥⤷ָդˡפȤ٤ĬήѸʹߤθոħŤƤΤȤСҲͿƶϻפΤۤ礭ȤȤˤʤꤽ
Rissanen Ʊʸ#1276. hereby, hereof, thereto, therewith, etc. ([2012-10-24-1]) ⻲ȡ
Rissanen, Matti. "Standardisation and the Language of Early Statutes." The Development of Standard English, 1300--1800. Ed. Laura Wright. Cambridge: CUP, 2000. 117--30.
#5036. 3Ĥ --- ظδä롡ǡ٤ ([2023-02-09-1]) ǾҲ𤷤 Gunter Senft ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡظδä롡ǡʳҡ2022ǯˤνϤǤϡ (pragmatics) غŪʬǤ뤳ȤĴƤ (4--5)
ΤȤϡּҲؤ䲿ءפǤʤؤΤ¾ŪʲʬˤȤäơᥪ顦ȥޥ (Jan-Ola Östman) (1988: 28) ȤΡŪʡǽ̤Ƥ뤳ȤŤ˰̣롥Mey (1994: 3268) Ҥ٤Ƥ褦ˡָθϤäѤ̣ʬ˸ꤵȤ櫓ǤϤʤϡĸ̩˶ڤƤ븦ΰȤϡߤ˴طνޤסϡξưʸҲʸ̮ޤ줿ѼԤλ顤θؿ˱͡ʼˡغŪʥץȤȤ̣ͭʻѤˤĤƸ椹Ǥ롥
غˤ桹ϡ1970ǯ夬ؤˤơָŪžפʤ줿10ǯ֤ǤäȤĥ뤳Ȥˤʤ롥άͤγʬγˤȤʤΰͤƤߤȡůءءưʪưءΥեҲءؤʤɤ¾γʬȴϢĤȤȤˤγʬˤŪ֤뤳Ȥ˵Ť
ܽǤϡؤˤܼŪ˳غŪʬǤǤʤҲŪưؤδŪʴؿͭʸʳؤˤ뤫ʤ깭ϰϤ͡ʬӤĤߤ˱ƶ礦ʬŪʳפǤ뤳ȤǤδؿָκϼҲŪưȤƤθεҤǤ (Clift et al. 2009: 509) ȤοäȤܽΥ饤ȥդ1Ĥ롥
6Ĥʬ֤̾Ƥ뤬ºݤΤȤʬܽξΩƤȿǤƤ롥
1ϡů --- ϸѤȤԤºݤ˲̣ΤʸȲäδޤߤ ---
2ϡȿ --- ľؼȥ㡼 ---
3ϡȿʹֹư --- ߥ˥ưʪŪ ---
4ϡȥΥե --- 졤ʸǧΤΥե ---
5ϡȼҲ --- ˤҲŪ߹ ---
6ϡ --- 졤Ҳ顤ͼȶ顤쥤ǥ ---
Ūäȶªɤ⤢뤬 Senft ܻؤμܤäƤޤۤɤ˹
Senft, Gunter ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡˡظδä롡ǡ١ҡ2022ǯ
Ѹˤͭɡ [ŋ] /ŋ/ Ȥ1ĤβǤǧƤ롥[ŋ] ̤β /n/ ΰ۲ȤƤδġѸβηϤˤ [ŋ] /ŋ/ Ⱦüʰ֤ŤͿƤ롥βǡˤΰ֤Ťˤϡ줬ѸˤŪʳdzΩȤȴط롥δϢ뵭ȤưʲƤ
#1508. ѸˤɡβDz ([2013-06-13-1])
#3482. ƬλҲϢñ㲽Ƥˡ ([2018-11-08-1])
#3855. ʤֿסʤˤΥɽ *Shingkoiwa Ȥʤ餺 Shinkoiwa ȤʤΤǤ ([2019-11-16-1])
#4344. -in' -ing ξάǤϤʤ ([2021-03-19-1])
Minkova (138) ˤȡ /ŋ/ ˤ2Ĥð롥1ĤϡβǤ coda ˤʤȡ2Ĥˤϡ˲ä domain-final ˤʤȤǤ롥Ԥϲ١ǡԤϷ֡å١ȹͤƤ褤ԤͭΤˤСñ줴Ȥ˼¸ /ŋ/ /ŋg/ ۤʤΤաȽҤ٤ƤΤƱǤ롥
The distribution of contrastive /ŋ/ prompts some interesting phonological questions. Like PDF /h-/, which can appear only in onsets, /ŋ/ is a 'defectively distributed' phoneme: it can be distinctive only in coda position. The restriction reflects its historical origin since it is only through the loss of the voiced velar stop in the coda that /ŋ/ became contrastive: kin--king, ban--bang, run--rung. Before /k/, as in plank, sink, hunk, [-ŋ] remains a positional allophone followed by the voiceless stop. Thus, we get a three-way opposition in pin [pɪn]--ping [pɪŋ]--pink [pɪŋk], sin, sing, sink, and so on.
Another peculiarity of contrastive /ŋ/ is that it has to be domain-final, that is, the [-g-] is preserved stem-internally, rendering [-ŋ-] allophonic, as in Bangor, bingo, tango, single, hungry, Hungary, all with [-ŋg-]. Note that the preservation of [-g-] does not depend only on syllabification, because in forms derived with -ing or the agentive suffix -er, the [-g-] of the stem is not realised, and the derived form copies the shape of the base form: singing, singer with just [-ŋ-]. In addition to the most frequent -ing and -er, the majority of the native suffixes such as -y, -dom, -hood, -ness, -ish, -less, -ling, also -let (OFr), preserve the shape of the base: slangy, kingdom, thinghood, youngness, strongish, fangless, kingling, ringlet have [-ŋ-]. The addition of a comparative suffix, -er or -est, as in longer, strongest, youngly, however, results in heterosyllabic [ŋ].[g]. The addition of Latinate suffixes generally preserves the [g], as in fungation, diphthongal, but not always, as in ringette, nothingism. Then there is vacillation with some derivatives: prolong and prolonging are always just [-ŋ], prolongation varies between [-ŋ-] and [-ŋg-], and prolongate is always [-ŋg-]. There are some idiosyncrasies: dinghy, hangar allow both pronunciations, and so do English and England. The behaviour of [-ŋ] in clitic groups and phrases is also variable; the variability of [-ŋ] is of continuous theoretical interest. In our diachronic context, the deletion of the [g] and the possibility of phonemic [ŋ] in narrowly defined contexts in late ME and EModE is most notable as an addition to the inventory of contrastive sounds in English.
Ѹʹ [ŋ] ϲDz (phonemicisation) ФˤʬۤŰ줵椨ˡŪʰϺ˻ޤǾ
Minkova, Donka. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2014.
ǯҤ Gunter Senft ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡظδä롡ǡǤޤ

(pragmatics) ιǤܽ YouTube ְʼδѸظإͥ2ۤɰȤƼ夲Ҳ𤷤Ƥޤ85Gunter Senftк͡Ϥظδä롦ǡ١ʳҡ2022ǯˤΤҲ93ֻؼ̾ϰճ˱˭ŸǤ⤴
YouTube ǰ夲֤ɤǤߤפȤݤȯȤ⤢äơʤһƤޤˡԤкܽܤƤޤޤʤߤޤؤդƤޤˡܽɤϤƤޤϤ p. 5 ˡܽˤ3Ĥε줬ȤơबƤޤ̤Ǥ
1. ϼҲŪ߹٤ˤƤäˤѤ롥ϲҲŪʤĤʤǤδطϽФƻǤ롥ΤĤʤطϽФʤϸʸˤä͡Ǥ롥
2. ȯäϤ줬ʤʸ̮ΰǤꡤܼŪ˸ϸŪʤְ̣ȯäθŪǽ˰͵ (Bauman 1992: 147)
üԤϼҲŪ߹٤ˤƸѤ뤵ϡ§˽
ñ졤硤ʸΰ̣ϡμξŪʸ̮롥
äθѤϡüԤΥߥ˥ưߤΥߥ˥ư˻εǽ¸롥
3. ϸ줪ʸͭθѤη֤椹ʬŪǤ롥
Τ褦ʸħƤʬ1970ǯʹߤˤʤäƤطʤˤϡꥫ¤ؤʸˡФȿưäȤҤ٤Ƥޤ (3--4) ̾βˡؤ褤ȤθѤܳŪ˰ʳäƤΤȻƤޤ
Senft, Gunter ˡк ͡Ϥ ҡˡظδä롡ǡ١ҡ2022ǯ
Senft, Gunter. Understanding Pragmatics. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
#5031. -ism εȯã ([2023-02-04-1])#5033. -ism ¿ ([2023-02-06-1]) (suffix) ȤƤ -ism ˾ƤƤ (productivity) ι⤤ȤƾҲ𤷤ƤŪˤϺǶɤΤ褦 -ism 줬ƤƤΤOED 1900ǯʹߤ˽Ф -ism ȴФƤߤΤ724ñ줬ä10ǯߤǰƤߤ롥
Ρ1900ǯ (1900--1909)135ñ졡
antidisestablishmentarianism, Big Brotherism, cultism, expansionism, heterotrophism, hyperthyroidism, maraboutism, meningism, middle-of-the-roadism, muckerism, Mu'tazilism, neopositivism, neuroticism, Old Testamentism, pentamerism, prostatism, spoonerism, structurism, thanatism, thigmotropism, divisionism, imperativism, motorism, pan-Europeanism, piezomagnetism, productivism, pyromagnetism, Sivaism, sociologism, tabloidism, antilogism, chronotropism, gargoylism, interactionism, ladronism, mescalism, multimodalism, Oblomovism, ogreism, pacifism, pan-Buddhism, seismism, tactism, theoreticism, transitivism, chemotactism, favism, Fletcherism, hippomobilism, homoeothermism, homosexualism, intimism, luminarism, macroseism, Marconism, Mendelianism, Mendelism, neo-Confucianism, osmatism, physogastrism, poikilothermism, polychromism, practicism, preferentialism, racism, stand-pattism, supernationalism, syntonism, aniconism, cryptomerism, Deweyism, ecologism, geneticism, katamorphism, manism, mascotism, microbism, monoclinism, nounism, pan-Africanism, pan-Asiaticism, thermochromism, hypothyroidism, luminism, neurotropism, Nietzscheanism, nomism, pan-Asianism, Parnassianism, Prometheanism, Pygmalionism, quattrocentism, vicinism, Victorianism, Addisonism, champagne socialism, ethnocentrism, hereditarianism, millennialism, new realism, nyctinastism, pismirism, post-classicism, reluctantism, immanentism, immoralism, inhumanism, reactionaryism, reincarnationism, suffragettism, syndicalism, Syrism, Christocentrism, deductivism, expressionism, ingotism, neo-realism, pacificism, Pan-Turkism, rotativism, substitutionalism, super-individualism, theriomorphism, vagrantism, xenophobism, cameralism, heurism, innatism, maximalism, neo-Aristotelianism, oculism, Porro prism, protagonism, Uranianism, voltinism
Ρ1910ǯ塧103ñ졡
adrenalism, conservationism, hypoparathyroidism, perspectivism, pithiatism, post-Impressionism, pre-animism, Sillonism, alloerotism, Cubism, factualism, Georgianism, inspirationalism, masculinism, Ottomanism, Rotarianism, autism, clientelism, eunuchoidism, imagism, marginalism, mobilism, mutationism, orthomorphism, selectionism, Synchromism, transvestitism, trichotomism, Acmeism, apotropaism, behaviourism/behaviorism, monophyletism, moronism, neo-imperialism, taurodontism, Theravadism, transvestism, Zapatism, pansexualism, phobism, postmodernism, supermanism, Thespianism, vorticism, zabernism, Balkanism, consumerism, distributism, Hohenzollernism, homoeroticism, lawyerism, new federalism, polyarchism, rurbanism, Simultaneism, bushism, denationalism, homoerotism, moanism, monenergism, multilingualism, neo-nationalism, pan-Turanianism, Pelmanism, presentism, Russellism, Schoenbergism, Boloism, Bolshevism, defeatism, environmentalism, hyperparathyroidism, indigenism, mathematicism, Mondism, Montessorianism, non-interventionism, pan-Indianism, pan-Turanism, philism, anorchidism, Dadaism, defencism/defensism, diffusionism, Fordism, Leninism, neo-Marxism, preventionism, Rasputinism, surdimutism, biomechanism, culturalism, hegemonism, inflationism, Lukanism, multi-partyism, pan-Arabism, panchromatism, paroicism, predictionism, sadomasochism, social imperialism, unanimism
Ρ1920ǯ塧111ñ졡
gangsterism, Kemalism, Menshevism, mid-Victorianism, mosaicism, Moscowism, myrmecophytism, photoperiodism, predatism, retreatism, servomechanism, fascism, futilitarianism, Mennonitism, New Zealandism, pastism, polycratism, Suprematism, abstract expressionism, adaptationalism, ameliorism, anarcho-syndicalism, Couéism, existentialism, finitism, introspectionism, isolationism, Menckenism, metapsychism, nabism, neoprimitivism, Poplarism, Rayonism, romanticalism, Sitwellism, allelism, neo-Communism, Nordicism, parkinsonism, peyotism, porphyrism, robotism, Tubism, constructionism, constructivism, fictionalism, MacDonaldism, Marranoism, Mussolinism, neo-Freudianism, nondeterminism, paragrammatism, peripheralism, Pollyannaism, redemptivism, voyeurism, Babbittism, configurationism, enantiomerism, Hattism, hyperurbanism, Pirandellism, puerilism, reductionism, Sun Yat-senism, Trotskyism, boosterism, conformism, diachronism, holism, liturgism, mechanomorphism, mycetism, squadrism, totalitarianism, unilateralism, Yiddishism, alloeroticism, choralism, contortionism, diatonism, homoism, Machism, minimalism, monolithism, occupationalism, Petrarchanism, pleiotropism, Praedism, providentialism, sexationalism, Stalinism, surrealism, Buchmanism, dispensationalism, Eonism, mesomerism, multilateralism, normativism, stylism, Undinism, welfarism, wholism, bovarism, contextualism, exceptionalism, foodism, market fundamentalism, Marxism-Leninism, productionism, situationism
Ρ1930ǯ塧90ñ졡
corporativism, hyphenism, metakinetism, National Socialism, Nazism, neocapitalism, neo-modalism, operationalism, social fascism, diatonicism, dirty realism, no-Goddism, pentatonism, post-communism, presenteeism, privatism, substantivism, bruxism, conciliarism, connectionism, Narodnikism, neo-Gothicism, polytypism, Rooseveltism, biocentrism, careerism, escapism, magic realism, Marxism, mesomorphism, New Dealism, nice nellyism, socialist realism, elitism, extrinsicism, inhibitionism, monophysism, Morganism, rightism, transvesticism, trilingualism, descriptivism, Edwardianism, Jocism, linearism, male chauvinism, Neo-plasticism, nothing-but-ism, operationism, quadrupedalism, rheomorphism, spatialism, thingism, Zenonism, conspiratorialism, Cubo-Futurism, Goldwynism, microprism, Miltonicism, non-objectivism, non-racialism, polyphyletism, Rexism, shitticism, apoliticism, Blimpism, Bukharinism, Caodaism, logicism, Marxist-Leninism, neocatastrophism, pandiatonicism, pentaprism, cultural Marxism, Francoism, narcism, nemesism, partitionism, photojournalism, pronatalism, pseudoallelism, sanctionism, blondism, Chamberlainism, essentialism, kineticism, neo-traditionalism, precisionism, verificationism, vicariism
Ρ1940ǯ塧58ñ졡
ahistoricism, photoisomerism, post-humanism, semanticism, technologism, megadontism, New Criticism, Pétainism, preservationism, Vansittartism, capitulationism, managerialism, momism, patrimonialism, pseudohypoparathyroidism, chemoautotrophism, do-goodism, globalism, identitarianism, neo-fascism, passéism, pranksterism, againstism, ethnophaulism, multinationalism, critical rationalism, eliminationism, veganism, lettrism, Peronism, reductivism, supremacism, dynamicism, microphonism, Titoism, Afghanistanism, ecumenism, emotivism, ferrimagnetism, Lysenkoism, magmatism, Messalianism, neo-Nazism, one-worldism, prescriptivism, rejectionism, resistentialism, tailism, white supremacism, immobilism, justicialism, Levantinism, marhaenism, Michurinism, Palamism, Panglossism, restrictivism, tectonism
Ρ1950ǯ塧68ñ졡
abstract impressionism, Atlanticism, Gaullism, judgementalism/judgmentalism, majoritarianism, Maoism, Marrism, McCarthyism, multiracialism, Narodnism, ouvrierism, psychoticism, Bevanism, neo-isolationism, photochromism, revanchism, troilism, amensalism, kleptoparasitism, neocolonialism, Nixonism, Nicodemism, obsessionalism, transsexualism, workerism, Butskellism, Islamicism, multi-partism, neo-Stalinism, retributivism, skollyism, tripartism, alternativism, morphism, neo-Gaullism, postcolonialism, Poujadism, ad hocism, Anglocentrism, diffeomorphism, ebullism, Europocentrism, Mendèsism, Nasserism, patternism, polycentrism, superparamagnetism, breatharianism, hipsterism, Khrushchevism, monoglacialism, multiculturalism, neo-expressionism, Parkinsonism, spiralism, transhumanism, Zhdanovism, archaeomagnetism, outsiderism, pentatonicism, televangelism, Antikythera mechanism, disimperialism, ethnonationalism, Fidelism, macrodactylism, nannyism, proceduralism
Ρ1960ǯ塧64ñ졡
Castroism, Goldwaterism, moderationism, multiregionalism, neo-Dadaism, Nkrumahism, nuclearism, supremism, Asiacentrism, audio-lingualism, compressionism, Kennedyism, neo-behaviourism/neo-behaviorism, neo-Keynesianism, non-ism, permissivism, photorealism, mycomysticism, mycoparasitism, prescriptionism, splittism, tokenism, entrism, neo-Pentecostalism, Parsonianism, polyphenism, Rachmanism, aleatorism, allosterism, androcentrism, credentialism, Montaignism, neuterism, triumphalism, dysmorphism, Eurocentrism, generativism, parajournalism, Powellism, renewalism, symphonism, transgenderism, entryism, neo-modernism, Paisleyism, paramilitarism, Popperism, Reaganism, McLuhanism, monetarism, Naderism, Olympism, Pinterism, polysomatism, auteurism, incrementalism, madrigalism, Panglossianism, workaholism, ageism, anarcho-capitalism, consequentialism, gravitropism, yobbism
Ρ1970ǯ塡53ñ졡
migrationism, Naxalism, Orwellism, spontaneism, tropicalism, heightism, logocentrism, multidialectalism, panselectionism, posthumanism, post-minimalism, sizeism, Afrocentrism, heterosexism, new historicism, O'Neillism, phonocentrism, polyglacialism, processualism, supersessionism, Velikovskianism, eliminativism, polystylism, stabilism, monoculturalism, neurotrophism, ockerism, preparationism, Mobutuism, multiculturism, phallocentrism, phallogocentrism, post-structuralism, speciesism, bioregionalism, ecocentrism, Eurocommunism, post-materialism, pre-modernism, social constructionism, Lacanianism, macromutationism, punctuationism, trendyism, lookism, Manhattanism, me-ism, nutritionism, whataboutism, computationalism, machoism, Mitterrandism, reliabilism
Ρ1980ǯ塧29ñ졡
Bushism, ecofeminism, neo-conceptualism, neosemanticism, originalism, popism, ableism, rockism, social constructivism, ecotourism, post-feminism, mimeticism, yuppieism, conspiracism, eco-socialism, shopaholism, post-Fordism, short-termism, cryovolcanism, fattism, long-termism, New Ageism, Euroscepticism/Euroskepticism, Islamofascism, Majorism, Norman Rockwellism, negaholism, phoenixism, techno-shamanism
Ρ1990ǯ塡8ñ졡
Extropianism, voluntourism, Afrofuturism, Blairism, slacktivism, turntablism, hacktivism, Stuckism
Ρ2000ǯ塧5ñ졡
craftivism, lactivism, disaster capitalism, cissexism, clicktivism
ȤƤߤ20ȾԡǡθϸäƤƤ褦ˤߤ롥OED ԻԹǡŤǯΤۤĤƤĤΤ䤷Ƥ֤Ĺ¿οĤФ䤹ȤϤ뤫⤷ʤǿοˤĤƤȤԻƤǽ⤢롥Τ褦θǡ OED ˴Ť -ism ΰɾɬפ
ȤƤ⡤20ȾȤưλ -ism Ӥ줿Ȥ϶̣20ȾʹߤϡǤ˽Ф٤ΤϽФäƤޤ-ism ˿̣ȤʤäȿǤƤȤߤ뤳ȤǤ뤤ϡǯǤ⤫Ǥ -ism ղä褦ˤʤäƤޤäˡOED ԽѤΤƤޤäȤȤ⤷ʤ
-ism ΰϤɤɤߤޤ
줿 YouTube ְʼδѸظإͥκǿǤϡѸˤδܸɽ뤿ΥˤĤơȤ櫓إܥˤĤƸäƤޤֺǶ褯 shichiji ʤɤΥɽϡ¤ϱѸŪǤϤʤǤ17ʬưȤʤäƤޤɤİ
͵Ѥ˴ؤǡϡǯ930ʸģ줿2021ǯ٤ֹ˴ؤĴη̤Ǥܺ٤3ǯ١ֹ˴ؤĴפη̤ˤĤơ (PDF) ꤴǧޤ
ܸɽ뤿ΥλѤˤĤƤϡޤǤ͡ʵꡤܥ֥Ǥ romaji ε¿夲Ƥޤ YouTube ưȤȤ櫓ϢοؤΥĥäƤޤΤǡ碌ƤȤ
#3427. ἰܼإܥΥĤŤоɽ ([2018-09-14-1])
#1892. ֥ΤĤŤס ([2014-07-02-1])
#1879. ܸˤˡ ([2014-06-19-1])
#2550. 붵եɥå褬ȯ줿 ([2016-04-20-1])
#4905. ְΡפ Aichi Aiti ([2022-10-01-1])
#4925. ɽɤȱѸ쥹ڥ ([2022-10-21-1])
#1893. إܥ <sh>, <ch>, <j> ϤɤΤ餤Ѹ ([2014-07-03-1])
#3251. <chi> ϡ֥פ֥פ֥פ֥ҡפ ([2018-03-22-1])
ܸҲˤƥȤե٥åʸηϤƤѤʤ褦ȤƤ֤뤳Ȥϡ줫ѸϤȤθʸȤɤդäƤͤǤʤȤȹͤޤư̤ơܸɽ뤿ΥѤˤĤƲƹͤƤߤƤϤǤ礦
Ρ#5031. -ism εȯã ([2023-02-04-1]) ˰³-ism ȤŪ (suffix) ˤĤơϤ¿ܤޤ
Webster μ3Ǥ˽ A Dictionary of Prefixes, Suffixes, and Combining Forms ˤȡ-ism ˤ礭4Ĥθޤưס־֡סּסħפǤñζȤȤˤߤƤߤޤ礦
-ism n suffix -s [ME -isme, fr. MF & L; MF -isme, partly fr. L -isma (fr. Gk), & partly fr. L -ismus, fr. Gk -ismos] 1 a : act, practice, or process --- esp. in nouns corresponding to verbs in -ize <criticism> <hypnotism> <plagiarism> b : manner of action or behavior characteristic of a (specified) person or thing <animalism> <Micawberism> 2 a : state, condition, or property <barbarianism> <polymorphism> b : abnormal state or condition resulting from excess of a (specified) thing <alcoholism> <morphinism> c : abnormal state or condition characterized by resemblance to a (specified) person or thing <mongolism> 3 a : doctrine, theory, or cult <Buddhism> <Calvinism> <Platonism> <salvationism> <vegetarianism> b : adherence to a system or a class of principles <neutralism> <realism> <socialism> <stoicism> 4 : characteristic or peculiar feature or trait <colloquialism> <Latinism> <poeticism>
Ǥ褯Ѥ -ism ϡǸΡħפθȴϢΤǤ֡ħŪʸոˡפΰ̣ Americanism, Britishism, Canadianism, Irishism, Gallicism, vulgarism, witticism, neologism ʤɤޤ
24λпʹīˡϢܡ֥ƥΥȿκǿȤʤ뵭ʸȯפǺܤޤпʹβʳԽѰεԡĹβ𤵤ˤʸˤˤĤƼޤơ줬Ȥʤޤ¾Ȥˤषǡʸ⤭ĦˤƤޤ֤ǤϸȤȤǤĤƤɤߤФȡ *

θ漼Ǽޤ2ֶڤäޤϢܡ֥ƥΥȿפ20ˤ錄³ƤԤơ֤Ϥʸκȯפȸ碌ȤϸӤǤ⤽ͤƤޤΤ (^^;;ǤϤؤäˤʤޤ
#5022. hellog ʸˤ˴ؤ뵭 ([2023-01-26-1]) ꤷƥޤμȤδϢǤޤȤΤǤƻпʹΡʸȯȤȤˡ⤴Ф¸ޤ
ֻ21⡤ʸϴְ㤤ʤκǶġǤ³ޤ
Ѹ -ism Ȥ (suffix) Ϲ⤤äƤ롥racism, sexism, ageism, lookism ʤɼҲ̤˴ؤ븽Ūǿȶñ¿Ȥ褯 Buddhism, Calvinism, Catholicism, Judaism ʤɤ뤫ȻפСۤȤ Liberalism, Machiavellism, Platonism, Puritanism ʤɤ롥
嵭Τ褦ˡּפΰ̣Τäñ줬¿ǡaphorism, criticism, mechanism, parallelism ʤɤ̾̾⤢ǤϤʤޤ Americanism Britishism ʤɤΡ֡ˡפΰ̣ñ¿cf. #2241. Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles ([2015-06-16-1])ˡơǤǤϤʤΩȤƤ ism ¸ߤcf. #2576. æʸˡȸò ([2016-05-16-1])ˡ
-ism θ츻ϥꥷ -ismos Ǥ롥ꥷư -izein ʱѸ -ize θˤб̾Ǥ롥Ѹʸ̮Ǥϡư -ize б̾Ȥ -ization פ⤫֤츻Ūˤ -ism Τۤͳ̾ȤȤˤʤ롥ʱѸ -ize/-ise ˤĤƤϡεåȡ
ꥷ -ismos ƥ졤եˤ줾 -ismus, -isme ȤƼѤ졤줬ѸˤäƤơѸʹߤ¿Ѥ褦ˤʤäȤ櫓Ѹˡޤꡤ¿ο줬иGörlach (121) -ism ˤĤƼΤ褦˽Ҥ٤Ƥ롥
The 19th century can be seen as a battleground of ideologies and factions; at least, such is the impression created by the frequency of derivatives ending in -ism (often from a personal name, and accompanied by -ist for the adherent, and -istic/-ian for adjectival uses). The year 1831 alone saw the new words animism, dynamism, humorism, industrialism, narcotism, philistinism, servilism, socialism and spiritualism (CED).
λ۾ʬǤʹԤƤ21 -ism ꤨ뤳ȤϤʤ
Görlach, Manfred. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP, 1999.
ѸֻβפɸಽؤδؿϡѸˤĹˤ錄ä³Ū˴ѻƤűѸ "West-Saxon Schriftsprache" ˡκ1Ѹˤ "AB-language" ֻ Ormulum, Laȝamon ʤɤ֤꤬Ŀͥ٥ˡ˴ؿ16ʹߤˤ (orthoepy) ؤδؿޤꡤȼäƸŪֻԤΩ³˸줿18ʹߤˤ Samuel Johnson Noah Webster ơˡγΩ˴ͿƤˤƤοֻפαưȤƤhellog Ǥ spelling_reform ¿εǿƤ̤Ǥ롥
Crystal (288) ˤȡŪˡ (TO = traditional orthography) Ф˾βפϿ¿뤬4ʬȤ
Standardizing approaches, such as New Spelling . . . , uses familiar letters more regularly (typically, by adding new digraphs . . .); no new symbols are invented.
Augmenting approaches, such as Phonotypy . . . add new symbols; diacritics and invented letters have both been used.
Supplanting approaches replace all TO letters by new symbols, as in Shavian . . . .
Regularizing approaches apply existing rules more consistently or focus on restricted areas of the writing system, as in Noah Webster's changes to US English . . . or those approaches which drop silent or redundant letters, such as Cut Spelling . . . .
ϩϩؤν¤ؤ Regularizing, Standardizing, Augmenting, Supplanting ȤʤޤܳŪֻפϤʤŪ˺פĤ Hart Webster ̾뤯餤Ǥ롥ơŪƤϾ˲ʤΤäѸˤˤֻפϤۤΤäΤǤꡤ⤽³ǽ⤤
Crystal, D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. 3rd ed. CUP, 2018.
Voicy ֱѸθ츻ȤˤĤ饸 (heldio)פˤơʸؤȱѸ˸ʳҡˤζԤǤջʵءˤȤ̤2ƤϤޤ#611. ջȤ̤2ơʸؤȱѸ˸٤Ѹ˥ѥˤĤƸޤꤷơѸ˥ѥѲˤĤƤ20ʬۤɤ̤ǤŽ̤Ѹ˥ѥȤʤäƤޤҤİ
̤θȾǤϡߤαѸ˸ǤϥѥѤˤʤäƤƤȤäڤӤޤѥ (corpus linguistics) ȯŸŪäʳˤ롤Ȥߤ뤳ȤǤǤΰǡѥƻˤʤäƤƤ뤫餳ѥȤ˵ŤˤʤäƤƤ褦ˤפޤɤƻ⤽ǤƻϾ˻ȤȤǤ
̤̤ƱѸʻˡˤΥѥ˴ؿäϡhellog #3676. Ѹ쥳ѥλȤ ([2019-05-21-1]) ϤȤ corpus γƵɤߤФȻפޤ
khelfʷѸ˥եȯԤرѸ˿ʹ٤κǿ41ֱ̥Ѹ쥳ѥäȵڤˡפѸ쥳ѥĶȤưɤ
ʸؤȱѸ˸ʳҡˤɤꤤޤ

˸줿 YouTube ְͥʼδѸظإͥκǿϡʥȥ뤬ĹƤߤޤ֤ĤƱѸˤϡֲơפȡߡפʤäֽաפֽפϤɤäƤޤ줿Ǥ20ʬۤɤưȤʤäƤޤɤ
αѸεϡܥ֥ޤ̤ΥǥDz٤֤ⷫ夲ƤΤǡä˿ȥԥåǤϤޤŪʾϢޤơ͡ʳ٤ܤƤޤΤǡǥƤȻפޤ
hellog #1221. ˡ ([2012-08-30-1])
hellog #1438. Sumer is icumen in ([2013-04-04-1])
hellog #2916. Ϣ4֥ꥹѸ autumn ȥꥫѸ fall --- ʣŪͤΤס ([2017-04-21-1])
֥ꥹѸ autumn ȥꥫѸ fall --- ʣŪͤΤʡϢܡָѸѸˤλͤ4
hellog #2925. autumn vs fall, zed vs zee ([2017-04-30-1])
hellog #3448. autumn vs fall --- Johnson Pickering ([2018-10-05-1])
Voicy heldio #69. winter ϡߡפǤʤǯפɽ魯
Voicy heldio #532. إ˥¼ŵ6ǤνǵǰˡֱѸQ&Aץ spring äޤ
Voicy heldio #533. ˡ
⤦1ĴϢƥեˤ뵨˻ˤĤơƲΤȤФΥΥˤեʸˡʥե춵顡ʸˡɡˡ39եε̾θ츻ϤʤˡǤ
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06
Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow