01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
ѸΥڥȤСƤȯȤЪΥ (spelling_pronunciation_gap) ꤬濴Ȥʤ롥1Ĥʸ¿βбƤդ1Ĥβ¿ʸбƤޤۻ (silent_letter) ¸ߤʤɡ˻礫ʤܥ֥Ǥ spelling ¿εǼ夲Ƥ
ȯȥڥб§ϡ켫Ρɵ椷Ƥͤ롥ѸˤȤΩ줫鶯ĴƤΤϡб§˾Ȥ餺ڥΤļҲŪ¦̤ˤܤƤ餤ȤȤñΥڥ뤤ϸʤɤȤ硤ȤƤΤɸŪǵŪˡ (orthography) ¸ߤǤ롥䤿褯ΤäƤ褦ˡˡϷ褷ƹŪǤ§ŪǤʤΤγˤϼҲŪˡפȤΤդ롥
ǤϡïΤդͿƤΤõȤȡѸˡ夲ƤˡˤƤ˼ҲŪʰҿͿƤΤηаޤҤȤɬפƤ롥busy <u> /ɪ/ ȯ뤳ȡdoubt <b> ̵Ȥʤ뤳ȡcolour color ˤߤ륹ڥαƺʤɤϡб§ǤƱˡ䤽ʾˡʤΤ褦ʥڥƤΤȤ˼ҲŪʤΤǤ롥
ѸΥڥˤĤơCook (178) ⤽μҲŪ¦̤˸ڤƤ롥
Group loyalty manifests itself in several ways in the English writing system. At one level it becomes a matter of patriotism: your national identity is shown by whether you spell in a Canadian, a British or an American fashion. While people accept that speakers have different accents; they are far less tolerant about variations in spelling. A paper of mine was returned with the comment 'American spelling for an American journal': no one has ever required me to use an American accent for an American conference. As Jaffe (2000: 502) puts it, 'Orthography selects, displays and naturalises linguistic difference, which is in turn used to legitimise and naturalise cultural and political identity'.
At another level spelling can be a mark of regional or social group membership. The actual pronunciation of the group can be mimicked through unusual sound correspondences, as in dialect spelling such as 'Down Vizes way zom yoars agoo, When smuggal'n wur nuthen new . . .'. Or an arbitrary group standard can be adopted unrelated to pronunciation, for instance British 'colour' versus American 'color'. Particular conventions act as a way of excluding outsiders, say the chat-room convention of abbreviations such as 'LOL' ('laughing out loud'). Jargon makes insiders feel they belong and outsiders feel uncomfortable, whether the groups consist of teenagers, street gangs, football fans or syntacticians.
ѸѤʵȤ֤Ρ֡ȤñϤʤߡߤΤ褦̯֤ΤǤפФˤϡƤ˭˼ҲŪطʤǤ롥Ե§ʤΤޤްŵ褦פǺѤޤˤϤޤˤäʤŪɷ٤ͥˤǤ롥
Cook, Vivian. The English Writing System. London: Hodder Education, 2004.
Jaffe, Alexandra. "Non-Standard Orthography and Non-Standard Speech." Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (2000): 497--513.
2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
ǽ: 2026-07-01 06:06
Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow