hellogѸ˥֥               ǿ     helhub (The HEL Hub) 2013-02     ڡ     ɽ    

hellogѸ˥֥ / 2013-02-11

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2013-02-11 Mon

#1386. Ѹʹߤ˳ΩƤɸֻηϤħ [spelling][grammatology][orthography][etymological_respelling][standardisation][loan_word][latin][greek]

#1332. ѸȶѸֻηϤܼŪʺ ([2012-12-19-1]) άҤ褦ˡѸֻηϤ礭ħϡ logographic ȤȤǤֻɽ魯ȤܻؤƤꡤˤɽ¿쾯ʤ쵾ˤƤ롥ħȤϴˤ䤫ʷȸƤ֤٤Τ⤷ʤŪΤʵҤǤ롥Brengelman (346) ϡħʤ극ʤ򡤤ŪΤɽƤ롥

The specific characteristics of the theory of English spelling which finally emerged were the following: Each morpheme ought to have a consistent, preferably etymological spelling. Each morpheme ought to be spelled phonemically according to its most fully stressed and fully articulated pronunciation (thus n in autumn and damn, d in advance and adventure), and the etymology ought to be indicated in conventional ways (by ch, ps, ph, etc. in Greek words; by writing complexion---not complection---because the word comes from Latin complexus).


פˡǥ٥ǤϼȤƸ츻򻲾ȤưӤɽܻؤǥ٥Ǥ (1) ƤȯбȤˤȡ(2) 츻餫ˤ뤿δ˽Ȥˡ˱äɽܻؤȤȤǤ롥ḽֻηϤħ褯Ȥ館ǤϤʤ
̣ȤˡˤǤ褯ȿǤƤΤϡĹƷ줷ѸǤ롥դˤСѸ˥ƥ䥮ꥷ줫μѸ줬äȤطʤä餳ħȯƤȤȤ⤷ʤ˴ϢơBrengelman 2ĤεҤɤǤߤ褦

Of all the improvements on English spelling made by the seventeenth-century orthographers, none was more important than their decision to spell the English words of Latin origin in a consistent way. Schoolmasters explained the process as showing the historical derivation of the words, but it did more than this: it showed their morphology. It is this development which makes possible a curious fact about English spelling: the longer and more bookish a word is, the easier it is to spell. No rules would lead a foreigner to spellings such as build or one, but he should easily spell verification or multiplicity. (350)


[E]nglish spelling began to be increasingly ideographic as early as the fourteenth century, and by the sixteenth, when the majority of readers and writers knew Latin, understanding was actually enhanced by Latinate spellings . . . . (351)


Ū˥ƥϱѸ¿¿ͤʱƶͿƤޤ1ġѸֻɸಽβˤƤ礭ʱƶͿƤȤȤ狼

Brengelman, F. H. "Orthoepists, Printers, and the Rationalization of English Spelling." JEGP 79 (1980): 332--54.

[ | ѥڡ ]

2026 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2025 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2024 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2023 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2022 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2021 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2020 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2019 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2018 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2017 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2016 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2015 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2014 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2013 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2011 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2010 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2009 : 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

ǽ: 2026-06-26 03:46

Powered by WinChalow1.0rc4 based on chalow